Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2001 Mar;83(2):110–112.

Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer.

D Clarke 1, N Sudhakaran 1, C A Gateley 1
PMCID: PMC2503348  PMID: 11320918

Abstract

All patients presenting with a symptomatic breast lump are assessed by means of triple assessment (clinical examination, radiology in the form of mammography and cytology by means of a fine needle aspiration) performed by the clinician in the rapid access breast clinic at the Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK. In our initial experience, it was found that a significant number of patients were returning to clinic for the results of the triple assessment to find that the cytology was not conclusive and hence needed a core biopsy, thus delaying diagnosis and definitive treatment. Therefore, a prospective study was carried out over a 6-month period, where all patients presenting with a symptomatic lump with a clinical or radiological suspicion of breast cancer had, in addition to the standard triple assessment, an automated core biopsy, thus giving rise to the quadruple assessment of the breast lump. A total of 52 patients with a clinical or radiological suspicion of breast cancer were included over this 6-month period. Of these 52 patients, 31 had a definitive diagnosis of breast cancer on fine needle aspiration (sensitivity 60%) compared with 50 of the 52 patients on core biopsy (sensitivity 96%). When radiology was diagnostic of breast cancer (R 5), the sensitivity of cytology was 61% compared with 97% with core biopsy. However, when radiology was not diagnostic of cancer (R 1-4), the sensitivity of cytology fell to 53% while the sensitivity of core biopsy remained high at 95%. The overall cellularity rate for cytology was 96%, which exceeds the BASO requirement for fine needle aspiration cytology. From these results, we conclude that automated core biopsy has a superior diagnostic power when compared with fine needle aspiration cytology and hence should replace fine needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of symptomatic breast lumps.

Full text

PDF
110

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carty N. J., Ravichandran D., Carter C., Mudan S., Royle G. T., Taylor I. Randomized comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and Biopty-Cut needle biopsy after unsatisfactory initial cytology of discrete breast lesions. Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1313–1314. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cusick J. D., Dotan J., Jaecks R. D., Boyle W. T., Jr The role of Tru-Cut needle biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 May;170(5):407–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dixon J. M., Anderson T. J., Lamb J., Nixon S. J., Forrest A. P. Fine needle aspiration cytology, in relationships to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of a solid breast mass. Br J Surg. 1984 Aug;71(8):593–596. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lamb J., Anderson T. J. Influence of cancer histology on the success of fine needle aspiration of the breast. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Jul;42(7):733–735. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.7.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. O'Malley F., Casey T. T., Winfield A. C., Rodgers W. H., Sawyers J., Page D. L. Clinical correlates of false-negative fine needle aspirations of the breast in a consecutive series of 1,005 patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Apr;176(4):360–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Patel J. J., Gartell P. C., Smallwood J. A., Herbert A., Royle G., Buchanan R., Taylor I. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast masses: an evaluation of its accuracy and reasons for diagnostic failure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 Jul;69(4):156–159. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Poole G. H., Willsher P. C., Pinder S. E., Robertson J. F., Elston C. W., Blamey R. W. Diagnosis of breast cancer with core-biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996 Sep;66(9):592–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sadler G. P., McGee S., Dallimore N. S., Monypenny I. J., Douglas-Jones A. G., Lyons K., Horgan K. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and needle-core biopsy in the diagnosis of lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1315–1317. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zajdela A., Ghossein N. A., Pilleron J. P., Ennuyer A. The value of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer: experience at the Fondation Curie. Cancer. 1975 Feb;35(2):499–506. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197502)35:2<499::aid-cncr2820350231>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES