Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2000 Jul;82(4):268–271.

Patient outcome alone does not justify the centralisation of vascular services.

S J Cook 1, M D Rocker 1, M R Jarvis 1, M S Whiteley 1
PMCID: PMC2503500  PMID: 10932662

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Provision of Vascular Services document from the Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland argues for the centralisation of vascular services into units served by a minimum of four vascular consultants. The rationale for this is the presumed advantages of improved patient care, better utilisation of resources and a more comprehensive arrangement of consultant vascular cover. Since April 1998, the Royal Surrey County Hospital (RSCH) has had a single-handed vascular consultant with out-of-hours cross-district consultant vascular cover. OBJECTIVES: To use P-POSSUM analysis to determine patient outcome from the RSCH vascular unit, and to compare these with previously published P-POSSUM analysis from a major vascular unit in Leeds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing major vascular surgery or amputation between April and November 1998 were analysed. RESULTS: 86 patients underwent 102 surgical procedures in 92 separate admissions. Data retrieval was 100%. Predicted (E) mortality 16 cases; observed (O) mortality 13 cases; O:E ratio 0.80. Predicted morbidity 26 cases; observed morbidity 19; O:E ratio 0.73. O:E ratio for mortality from Leeds = 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: Patient outcome in a single-handed vascular unit, with cross-district consultant cover, is equivalent to that found in a major vascular unit. Centralisation of vascular services cannot be justified on the basis of differences in patient outcome.

Full text

PDF
268

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Prytherch D. R., Whiteley M. S., Higgins B., Weaver P. C., Prout W. G., Powell S. J. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg. 1998 Sep;85(9):1217–1220. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Whiteley M. S., Prytherch D. R., Higgins B., Weaver P. C., Prout W. G. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg. 1996 Jun;83(6):812–815. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Whiteley M. S., Prytherch D., Higgins B., Weaver P. C., Prout W. G. Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg. 1995 Mar;82(3):425–426. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wijesinghe L. D., Mahmood T., Scott D. J., Berridge D. C., Kent P. J., Kester R. C. Comparison of POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation for predicting death following vascular surgery. Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):209–212. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES