Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2001 Jan;83(1):50–53.

Is transurethral resection of the prostate safe and effective in the over 80-year-old?

R D Brierly 1, A H Mostafid 1, D Kontothanassis 1, P J Thomas 1, M S Fletcher 1, N W Harrison 1
PMCID: PMC2503550  PMID: 11212452

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients over 80 years old. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of all patients over 80 years old undergoing TURP at one institution over a 3.5-year period were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: 31% of patients underwent TURP for symptoms and 68% for urinary retention. The early complication rate was 41%. The late complication rate was 22%. There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery. Of all patients, 80% were satisfied with the outcome of their operation. Of all patients with retention, 80% were able to void with small residual volumes by 6 weeks after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Although TURP in the over 80-year-old male is associated with significant morbidity, it is an effective treatment for urinary symptoms or retention. The majority of patients are able to void afterwards and are satisfied with the outcome of their surgery.

Full text

PDF
50

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Doll H. A., Black N. A., McPherson K. Transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy: factors associated with a successful outcome at 1 year. Br J Urol. 1994 Jun;73(6):669–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Matani Y., Mottrie A. M., Stöckle M., Voges G. E., Fichtner J., Hohenfellner R. Transurethral prostatectomy: a long-term follow-up study of 166 patients over 80 years of age. Eur Urol. 1996;30(4):414–417. doi: 10.1159/000474208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mebust W. K., Holtgrewe H. L., Cockett A. T., Peters P. C. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol. 1989 Feb;141(2):243–247. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40731-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Melchior J., Valk W. L., Foret J. D., Mebust W. K. Transurethral prostatectomy: computerized analysis of 2,223 consecutive cases. J Urol. 1974 Nov;112(5):634–642. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59817-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Neal D. E., Ramsden P. D., Sharples L., Smith A., Powell P. H., Styles R. A., Webb R. J. Outcome of elective prostatectomy. BMJ. 1989 Sep 23;299(6702):762–767. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6702.762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Neal D. E. The National Prostatectomy Audit. Br J Urol. 1997 Apr;79 (Suppl 2):69–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1997.tb16924.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Singh M., Tresidder G. C., Blandy J. P. The evaluation of transurethral resection for benign enlargement of the prostate. Br J Urol. 1973 Feb;45(1):93–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thorpe A. C., Cleary R., Coles J., Vernon S., Reynolds J., Neal D. E. Deaths and complications following prostatectomy in 1400 men in the northern region of England. Northern Regional Prostate Audit Group. Br J Urol. 1994 Nov;74(5):559–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb09184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wyatt M. G., Stower M. J., Smith P. J., Roberts J. B. Prostatectomy in the over 80-year-old. Br J Urol. 1989 Oct;64(4):417–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb06055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES