Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2001 May;83(3):209–214.

Guidelines for inguinal hernia repair in everyday practice.

J Metzger 1, N Lutz 1, I Laidlaw 1
PMCID: PMC2503569  PMID: 11432143

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Royal College of Surgeons of England published clinical guidelines for the management of groin hernia in adults in July 1993. We compared our indications, techniques, complications and outcome with these guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 440 patients who underwent a groin hernia repair from the 1 July 1994 to 30 July 1995 were studied retrospectively. Special consideration was given to the advantages and acceptance of day-case surgery. Confidential questionnaires were sent to all patients 6-12 months following surgery. RESULTS: The majority of elective primary inguinal hernias (83%) were repaired by the open tension-free Lichtenstein mesh technique. Our selection criteria for day-case surgery included ASA I, age (< 65 years) and social situation; 56% underwent an operation on a day-case basis. Including in-patients discharged within 24 h following operation, this proportion of 'day-cases' increased to 72.5%. Less complications occurred in the day-case group (P = 0.018). However, this difference may be caused by incomplete reporting of complications in the day-case group. There were no significant differences in patients' satisfaction, postoperative attendance for medical advice or time back to work between the day-case and in-patient group. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines need to be reviewed. The Lichtenstein repair offers an excellent and simple technique for hernia repair as a day-case procedure. Our results suggest that the number of hernia repairs performed as a day-case could substantially be increased to more than the recommended 30%. Time off work is mainly influenced by the advice given by GPs and surgeons. Reducing time off work by giving more appropriate recommendations and increasing the number of day-case surgery cases could significantly reduce the costs of health-care.

Full text

PDF
209

Images in this article

212Figure 1
on p.212

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amid P. K., Shulman A. G., Lichtenstein I. L. A critical evaluation of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Int Surg. 1994 Jan-Mar;79(1):76–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amid P. K., Shulman A. G., Lichtenstein I. L. An analytic comparison of laparoscopic hernia repair with open "tension-free" hernioplasty. Int Surg. 1995 Jan-Mar;80(1):9–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amid P. K., Shulman A. G., Lichtenstein I. L. Critical scrutiny of the open "tension-free" hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1993 Mar;165(3):369–371. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80847-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amid P. K., Shulman A. G., Lichtenstein I. L. Die Herniotomie nach Lichtenstein. Chirurg. 1994 Jan;65(1):54–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amid P. K., Shulman A. G., Lichtenstein I. L. Open "tension-free" repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg. 1996 Jun;162(6):447–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amid P. K., Shulman A. G., Lichtenstein I. L. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias under local anesthesia. Ann Surg. 1996 Mar;223(3):249–252. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199603000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bailie R., Barnett M. B., Fraser J. F. The Brain laryngeal mask. A comparative study with the nasal mask in paediatric dental outpatient anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1991 May;46(5):358–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09543.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker D. M., Rider M. A., Fawcett A. N. When to return to work following a routine inguinal hernia repair: are doctors giving the correct advice? J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994 Feb;39(1):31–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks D. C. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg. 1994 Apr;129(4):361–366. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280031004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies N. M., Dunn D. C., Appleton B., Bevington E. Experience with 300 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs with up to 3 years follow-up. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Nov;77(6):409–412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fukutome T. Correct positioning of the epiglottis for application of the Brain laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):818–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gallegos N. C., Dawson J., Jarvis M., Hobsley M. Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg. 1991 Oct;78(10):1171–1173. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800781007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Geraghty J. G., Grace P. A., Quereshi A., Bouchier-Hayes D., Osborne D. H. Simple new technique for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 1994 Jan;81(1):93–93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodwin A. P., Rowe W. L., Ogg T. W. Day case laparoscopy. A comparison of two anaesthetic techniques using the laryngeal mask during spontaneous breathing. Anaesthesia. 1992 Oct;47(10):892–895. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb03158.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kingsnorth A. N., Gray M. R., Nott D. M. Prospective randomized trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1992 Oct;79(10):1068–1070. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800791026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lawrence K., McWhinnie D., Goodwin A., Doll H., Gordon A., Gray A., Britton J., Collin J. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. BMJ. 1995 Oct 14;311(7011):981–985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7011.981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lichtenstein I. L., Shulman A. G. Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg. 1986 Jan-Mar;71(1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lichtenstein I. L., Shulman A. G., Amid P. K. The cause, prevention, and treatment of recurrent groin hernia. Surg Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;73(3):529–544. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)46035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Michaels J. A., Reece-Smith H., Faber R. G. Case-control study of patient satisfaction with day-case and inpatient inguinal hernia repair. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992 Apr;37(2):99–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Payne J. H., Jr, Grininger L. M., Izawa M. T., Podoll E. F., Lindahl P. J., Balfour J. Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg. 1994 Sep;129(9):973–981. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420330087016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Phillips E. H., Arregui M., Carroll B. J., Corbitt J., Crafton W. B., Fallas M. J., Filipi C., Fitzgibbons R. J., Franklin M. J., McKernan B. Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 1995 Jan;9(1):16–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00187878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reid I., Devlin H. B. Testicular atrophy as a consequence of inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 1994 Jan;81(1):91–93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Riber C., Alstrup N., Nymann T., Bogstad J. W., Wille-Jørgensen P., Tønnesen H. Postoperative thromboembolism after day-case herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg. 1996 Mar;83(3):420–421. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Robbins A. W., Rutkow I. M. The mesh-plug hernioplasty. Surg Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;73(3):501–512. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)46033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Robertson G. S., Burton P. R., Haynes I. G. How long do patients convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy? Current principles and practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Jan;75(1):30–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rutkow I. M., Robbins A. W. Mesh plug hernia repair: a follow-up report. Surgery. 1995 May;117(5):597–598. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(05)80263-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shulman A. G., Amid P. K., Lichtenstein I. L. A survey of non-expert surgeons using the open tension-free mesh patch repair for primary inguinal hernias. Int Surg. 1995 Jan-Mar;80(1):35–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shulman A. G., Amid P. K., Lichtenstein I. L. Returning to work after herniorrhaphy. BMJ. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):216–217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stoker D. L., Spiegelhalter D. J., Singh R., Wellwood J. M. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. Lancet. 1994 May 21;343(8908):1243–1245. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92148-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Umeh H. N., Reece-Smith H., Faber R. G., Galland R. B. Impact of a waiting list initiative on a general surgical waiting list. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1 Suppl):4–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilson M. S., Deans G. T., Brough W. A. Prospective trial comparing Lichtenstein with laparoscopic tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):274–277. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES