Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the influence of experience and specialisation on clinical judgement by comparing accuracy in diagnosing anaemia between a consultant general surgeon, a consultant ophthalmologist and their registrars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Conjunctival inspection of 101 patients, subsequent correlation with haemoglobin concentration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of correct and incorrect diagnoses of anaemia. RESULTS: 54 patients were anaemic and 47 were not. Overall accuracy in diagnosing anaemia ranged from 0.61-0.69, sensitivity 0.52-0.65 and specificity 0.62-0.83. Agreements between pairs of examiners were 0.68-0.81, with kappa values of 0.36-0.60 when adjusted for chance agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Neither experience nor specialisation significantly influenced our ability to diagnose anaemia, based on conjunctival inspection. Without critical analysis of clinical signs, we are unaware of their diagnostic limitations.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ghosh S., Mohan M. Screening for anaemia. Lancet. 1978 Apr 15;1(8068):823–823. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)93020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gjørup T., Bugge P. M., Hendriksen C., Jensen A. M. A critical evaluation of the clinical diagnosis of anemia. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Oct;124(4):657–665. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koran L. M. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Oct 2;293(14):695–701. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197510022931405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wurapa F. K., Bulsara M. K., Boatin B. A. Evaluation of conjunctival pallor in the diagnosis of anaemia. J Trop Med Hyg. 1986 Feb;89(1):33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]