Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2002 Jan;84(1):7–9.

Predictive clinical and laboratory factors in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis.

M S Mohamed 1, T Bates 1
PMCID: PMC2503756  PMID: 11890631

Abstract

Surgeons are frequently called upon to perform temporal artery biopsy in patients suspected of having temporal arteritis. In this study, we have attempted to identify clinical and laboratory features that may predict the results of temporal artery biopsy for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. The medical records of patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy over a 10-year period in one hospital were reviewed. Details of presenting features were recorded and comparisons made between biopsy-positive and biopsy-negative patients. Of 59 patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy, the records of 51 patients were located. Of these, 17 patients had positive biopsy specimens and 33 had negative biopsies. In one patient, no temporal artery was found in the biopsy specimen. In the biopsy-positive patients, 69% had an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of greater than 50 mm/h compared to 31% of biopsy negative patients (P = 0.03). With regard to the other clinical and laboratory parameters that were evaluated, no statistically significant differences were found between biopsy-positive and biopsy-negative patients.

Full text

PDF
7

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison M. C., Gallagher P. J. Temporal artery biopsy and corticosteroid treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984 Jun;43(3):416–417. doi: 10.1136/ard.43.3.416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allsop C. J., Gallagher P. J. Temporal artery biopsy in giant-cell arteritis. A reappraisal. Am J Surg Pathol. 1981 Jun;5(4):317–323. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198106000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chmelewski W. L., McKnight K. M., Agudelo C. A., Wise C. M. Presenting features and outcomes in patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy. A review of 98 patients. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Aug;152(8):1690–1695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellis M. E., Ralston S. The ESR in the diagnosis and management of the polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983 Apr;42(2):168–170. doi: 10.1136/ard.42.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fernandez-Herlihy L. Temporal arteritis: clinical aids to diagnosis. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1797–1801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grosvenor T., Malinovsky V., Gelvin J., Tonekaboni K. Diagnosis and management of temporal arteritis: a review and case report. Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Sep;70(9):771–777. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199309000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall S., Hunder G. G. Is temporal artery biopsy prudent? Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Nov;59(11):793–796. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65593-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall S., Persellin S., Lie J. T., O'Brien P. C., Kurland L. T., Hunder G. G. The therapeutic impact of temporal artery biopsy. Lancet. 1983 Nov 26;2(8361):1217–1220. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91269-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayreh S. S., Podhajsky P. A., Raman R., Zimmerman B. Giant cell arteritis: validity and reliability of various diagnostic criteria. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Mar;123(3):285–296. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70123-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunder G. G., Bloch D. A., Michel B. A., Stevens M. B., Arend W. P., Calabrese L. H., Edworthy S. M., Fauci A. S., Leavitt R. Y., Lie J. T. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug;33(8):1122–1128. doi: 10.1002/art.1780330810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kyle V., Cawston T. E., Hazleman B. L. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein in the assessment of polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis on presentation and during follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Aug;48(8):667–671. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.8.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McFarlane A. C., Brooks P. M. Determinants of disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;27(1):7–14. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/27.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paice E. W. Giant cell arteritis: difficult decisions in diagnosis, investigation and treatment. Postgrad Med J. 1989 Oct;65(768):743–747. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.65.768.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Robb-Nicholson C., Chang R. W., Anderson S., Roberts W. N., Longtine J., Corson J., Larson M., George D., Green J., Bryant G. Diagnostic value of the history and examination in giant cell arteritis: a clinical pathological study of 81 temporal artery biopsies. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1793–1796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodriguez-Valverde V., Sarabia J. M., González-Gay M. A., Figueroa M., Armona J., Blanco R., Fernández-Sueiro J. L., Martínez-Taboada V. M. Risk factors and predictive models of giant cell arteritis in polymyalgia rheumatica. Am J Med. 1997 Apr;102(4):331–336. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00117-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vilaseca J., González A., Cid M. C., Lopez-Vivancos J., Ortega A. Clinical usefulness of temporal artery biopsy. Ann Rheum Dis. 1987 Apr;46(4):282–285. doi: 10.1136/ard.46.4.282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilske K. R., Healey L. A. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. The dilemma of therapy. Postgrad Med. 1985 Jun;77(8):243–248. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1985.11699042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES