Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2002 May;84(3):203–205.

Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of haematuria--a report of over 1,000 cases.

S N Datta 1, G M Allen 1, R Evans 1, K C Vaughton 1, M G Lucas 1
PMCID: PMC2503839  PMID: 12092877

Abstract

Over a 5-year period, 1007 patients with haematuria were investigated, using a protocol based on ultrasonography as the upper tract imaging modality of choice. Intravenous urography (IVU) was only used in selected individuals, including those patients with bladder cancer suspected on cystoscopy, suspicious or malignant cytology, previous investigation for haematuria, on-going haematuria at the time of their clinic visit, a history of flank pain or hydronephrosis on ultrasonography. Of this series, 840 (83%) had visible haematuria, 158 (15%) had microscopic or chemical haematuria and 9 (0.9%) had unspecified haematuria. A total of 133 bladder transitional cell tumours, 21 renal cell cancers and 2 upper tract transitional cell cancers (TCC) were diagnosed. The sensitivity of ultrasound with respect to bladder cancer was 63% and the specificity 99%. The odds ratio of diagnosing cancer in patients with visible haematuria compared to microscopic or unspecified haematuria was 3.3. No upper tract tumours were missed using this investigational protocol. An ultrasonography-based protocol could miss fewer upper tract TCCs than a standard IVU-based service would miss renal cell cancer. Provided there is no history of flank pain, no malignant cytology, no hydronephrosis and no previously investigated haematuria, IVU could be safely omitted.

Full text

PDF
203

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aslaksen A., Halvorsen O. J., Göthlin J. H. Detection of renal and renal pelvic tumours with urography and ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol. 1990 Jul-Aug;11(1):54–58. doi: 10.1016/0720-048x(90)90103-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Corwin H. L., Silverstein M. D. The diagnosis of neoplasia in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria: a decision analysis. J Urol. 1988 May;139(5):1002–1006. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42747-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glen D. A., Gilbert F. J., Bayliss A. P. Renal carcinomas missed by urography. Br J Urol. 1989 May;63(5):457–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb05934.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewis-Jones H. G., Lamb G. H., Hughes P. L. Can ultrasound replace the intravenous urogram in preliminary investigation of renal tract disease? A prospective study. Br J Radiol. 1989 Nov;62(743):977–980. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-743-977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mariani A. J., Mariani M. C., Macchioni C., Stams U. K., Hariharan A., Moriera A. The significance of adult hematuria: 1,000 hematuria evaluations including a risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Urol. 1989 Feb;141(2):350–355. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40763-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sutton J. M. Evaluation of hematuria in adults. JAMA. 1990 May 9;263(18):2475–2480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES