Skip to main content
HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association logoLink to HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
. 2008;10(2):138–143. doi: 10.1080/13651820801938909

Alcohol-metabolizing enzyme gene polymorphisms and alcohol chronic pancreatitis among Polish individuals

Halina Cichoż-Lach 1,, Krzysztof Celiński 1, Maria Słomka 1
PMCID: PMC2504395  PMID: 18773092

Abstract

Background and aims. Chronic pancreatitis develops in 5–10% of alcohol addicts. In developed societies, alcohol is the cause of chronic pancreatitis in at least 70–80% of cases. The genetic polymorphism of enzymes involved in alcohol metabolism is relevant in the etiopathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis. The aim of the study was to find the ADH, ALDH2 and CYP2E1 alleles and genotypes in the Polish population that are likely to be responsible for higher susceptibility to chronic alcohol pancreatitis. Material and methods. We determined the allele and genotype of ADH2, ADH3, ALDH2 and CYP2E1 in 141 subjects: 44 with alcohol chronic pancreatitis (ACP), 43 healthy alcoholics and 54 healthy non-drinkers as the controls. Genotyping was performed using PCR-RELP methods on white cell DNA. Results. ADH2*1, ADH3*1 alleles and ADH2*1/*1, ADH3*1/*1 genotypes were statistically more frequent among the patients with ACP than among the controls. The ADH3*2/*2 genotype was more frequent among “healthy alcoholics” and in the controls than among those with ACP. In the studied group, only the ALDH2*1 allele was detected, all patients were ALDH2*1/*1 homozygotic. Differences in the CYP2E1 allele and genotype distribution in the examined groups were not significant. Conclusion. In the Polish population examined, ADH3*1 and ADH2*1 alleles may be risk factors for the development of alcoholism. The ADH3*2/*2 genotype may confer protection against ACP. CYP2E1 gene polymorphism is not related to alcoholism and ACP. The Polish population examined is ALDH2*1/*1 homozygotic.

Keywords: ADH gene polymorphism, alcohol chronic pancreatitis, ALDH gene polymorphism, CYP2E1 gene polymorphism

Introduction

The abuse of alcohol leads to injury to many organs: the liver, pancreas, gastric mucous membrane and cerebral tissue, and results in the loss of behavior control. In Poland, people treated for alcohol dependency account for about 3% of the population 1. Chronic pancreatitis develops in 5–10% of alcohol addicts 2, and in developed societies alcohol is the cause of chronic pancreatitis in at least 70–80% of cases 3,4. Genetic factors are important in the susceptibility to pancreatic injury, severity and evolution of inflammatory processes leading to chronic inflammation or fibrosis. Discovery of the gain of function mutations of pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (SPINK 1) or other potential defects in genes that regulate pancreatic secretory function, or modulate inflammatory response to pancreatic injury (TNF, IL-1, IL-10 genes), has changed the current concept concerning the pathogenesis of pancreatitis. Some few studies indicate that mutations of the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1), cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) and SPINK may also be risk factors for the developing alcohol chronic pancreatitis (ACP) 5,6,7.

It is known that genetic polymorphism of the enzymes involved in alcohol metabolism has a relevant role in the etiopathogenesis of alcohol liver disease. Several genes encoding ethanol metabolizing enzymes have been proposed and studied in recent years, among them alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), cytochrome P-4502E1- CYP2E1, glutathione S-transferase M1-GSTM1, GSTT1, with controversial or inconclusive results in people of different races with ACP. It is assumed that this is associated with genetically determined differences in alcohol metabolism. Polymorphic genes ADH1B and ADH1C code different forms of β and γ subunits of different features each. The ADH1B gene occurs in the form of three alleles, ADH2*1, ADH2*2 and ADH2*3 responsible for β1, β2 and β3 subunit coding 8,9. The ADH2*1 and ADH2*2 alleles occur among Caucasians and Asians, ADH2*3 in 25% of the Afro-American population 10, i.e. relatively more often than among the white American, European and Chinese populations 11. The β1 subunit is barely active in the metabolism of alcohol, while β2 is highly active in this respect.

The ADH3 gene gives two alleles, ADH3*1 and ADH3*2, which code respective subunits γ1 of higher activity and γ2 of lower activity towards ethanol 8,9.

The ALDH2 izoenzyme is the main form of aldehyde dehydrogenase responsible for acetate aldehyde oxidation. The ALDH2 gene has two alleles, ALDH2*1 and ALDH2*2, the latter predominant and typical of Asians and North American Indians and does not occur in Caucasians 12.

Between 10% and 15% of ethanol consumed is metabolized by MEOS 2. The activity of this system increases as a consequence of long-term ethanol abuse. Alcohol metabolism in individuals who drink regularly causes 5–10 times higher stimulation of MEOS than in individuals who do not drink absolutely or drink sporadically. ADH alcohol oxidation takes place mainly at lower alcohol concentrations in blood, while the peak action of MEOS is observed at high concentrations 8. The most important enzyme of this metabolic pathway is cytochrome P-450 CYP2E1. The CYP2E1 gene exhibits polymorphism in the 5‘ flanking region of human cytochrome CYP2E1. The CYP2E1 gene forms two alleles – c1 and c2 13. The CYP2E1 genetic polymorphism varies significantly among different ethnic groups 14.

The aim of the study was to find the ADH2, ADH3, ALDH2 and CYP2E1 alleles and genotypes in the Polish population that are likely to be responsible for the higher susceptibility to ACP. We studied the frequency of alleles for the ADH2, ADH3, ALDH2 and CYP2E1 genotype in the Polish population when comparing patients with ACP, patients addicted but without pancreas damage or non-drinkers.

Material and methods

Subjects

The study comprised 141 subjects (30 F and 111 M; average age 45.2±9.4 years). The patient group with chronic alcohol abuse included 44 with ACP and 43 alcoholics with no damage to gastrointestinal organs, the pancreas in particular, considered as healthy alcoholics. Fifty-four healthy volunteers, total abstainers, formed a control group.

The chronic alcohol abusers group included patients consuming on average over 80 g of pure ethanol a day over at least 2 years, average 160.9±43.9 g daily. Alcohol history was obtained during a face-to face interview.

All the drinkers examined had a positive CAGE screening test 15 and the patients of the alcoholics group met the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for alcoholism 16. They were recruited from the Department of Gastroenterology and from the Department of Therapy of Addiction to Alcohol.

The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was based on the generally accepted criteria: medical history, physical examination, abdominal X-ray picture, ultrasound, CT of the abdominal cavity, ERCP and pancreatic exocrine function tests 17. Twenty-seven patients had ERCP confirming the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. In the remaining 27 patients, abdominal X-ray, ultrasound and CT confirmed the diagnosis sufficiently. Calcifications in the area of the pancreas were shown in abdominal X-ray. Ultrasound and CT demonstrated atrophy or diffuse calcification of the pancreas, irregularity and dilated extension of the main pancreatic duct. The alcoholic etiology was defined on the basis of the history.

The alcoholics group underwent examinations to exclude alimentary pathology, particularly of the liver and pancreas. Results of the examinations indicated no organ damage.

The control group comprised healthy volunteers whose histories revealed no consumption of alcohol. Diagnostic tests were performed to exclude any digestive pathology.

All the patients in this study were recruited from the same city and were homogeneity ethnic of the Caucasian race group. The study was approved by a local ethics committee and all subjects gave informed consent for examinations.

Genomic DNA and oligonucleotide

Genomic DNA was isolated from 15 mL of peripheral blood 18.

Genotyping of ADH2 gene polymorphism

For detection of polymorphism in the ADH2 gene, the polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique was used on white cell DNA. The primers for amplification were the following: ADH2 247, ADH2 303 and ADH2 290, ADH2 424 and ADH2 352. The amplified product was digested with MaeIII enzyme (Roche Applied Science) and with AluI enzyme (MBI Fermantas) and subjected to electrophoresis in 12% polyacrylamide gel stained with silver nitrate 19.

Genotyping of ADH3 gene polymorphism

Detection of polymorphisms in the ADH3 gene was performed using polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The primers for amplification were: ADH3 321 and ADH3 351. The amplified product was digested with the SspI enzyme (MBI Fermantas) subjected to electrophoresis in 3% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide 19.

Genotyping of ALDH2 gene polymorphism

Polymorphisms in the ALDH2 gene were detected using the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. The primers for amplification were ALDH2 YC1 and ALDH2 YC2. The amplified product was digested with EcoRI enzyme (MBI Fermantas) and subjected to electrophoresis in 12% polyacrylamide gel stained with silver nitrate 20.

Genotyping of CYP2E1 gene polymorphism

Detection of polymorphisms in the 5′-flanking region of the P4502E1 gene was performed using polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The primers for amplification were: CYP2E J8 and CYP2E J9. The amplified product was digested with PstI or RsaI enzyme (MBI Fermantas) and subjected to electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide 13.

Statistical analysis

The allele and genotype frequencies between the examined groups were compared using the χ2 test of association. In the event of too few data, the results were corrected by Yates. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The calculations were performed using the computer statistical program STATISTICA PL 21.

Results

ADH2*1 allele frequencies were 100% in patients with alcohol chronic pancreatitis and 94.44% in the controls. The tests found no ADH2*3 allele in examined groups. ADH3*1 allele frequency was 68.18% and 40.74%, respectively. Genotype number and allele frequencies of ADH2 and ADH3 in the groups examined are presented in Tables I and II.

Table I. Genotype number and allele frequencies (%) of ADH2 in the groups examined.

Genotype
Allele
Patient group N *1/*1 *1/*2 *2/*2 *1 *2
Chronic alcohol pancreatitis 44 44*NS 0*NS 0 100*NS 0*NS
Healthy alcoholics 43 42 1 0 98.84 1.16
Control 54 48 6 0 94.44 5.56
Total 141 134 7 0 97.52 2.48

*p<0.05 versus control group.

NSNon-significant difference versus healthy alcoholics.

Table II. Genotype number and allele frequencies (%) of ADH3 in the groups examined.

Genotype
Allele
Patient group N *1/*1 *1/*2 *2/*2 *1 *2
Chronic alcohol pancreatitis 44 17* NS 26#NS 1* ** 68.18* NS 31.82* NS
Healthy alcoholics 43 17 17 9 59.30 40.70
Control 54 10 24 20 40.74 59.26
Total 141 44 67 30 54.96 45.04

*p<0.001 versus control.

**p<0.001 versus healthy alcoholics.

NSNon-significant difference versus healthy alcoholics.

#NSNon-significant difference versus healthy alcoholics and versus control.

ADH2*1 and ADH3*1 alleles were statistically more frequent among the patients with ACP in comparison to the controls (p<0.05 and p<0.001, respectively). In the group of patients who abused alcohol, the differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The ADH2*2 allele was not detected in ACP patients.

In the population examined, the ADH2*1/*1 genotype was determined in 134 individuals, and the ADH2*1/*2 genotype was detected in 7 patients. The ADH2*2/*2 genotype was not found at all.

In no patient with ACP was the ADH2*1/*2 genotype presented. All were ADH2*1/*1 homozygotic. The ADH2*1/*1 and ADH3*1/*1 genotypes were statistically more frequent among the patients with alcohol pancreatitis than among the controls (p<0.05 and p<0.001, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant between the ACP group and alcoholics (p>0.05). Comparison of ADH3*2/*2 genotype frequency in the studied groups showed that it was statistically significantly rarer among patients with ACP than among alcoholics and controls.

In the study group, only the ALDH2*1 allele was detected, all patients were ALDH2*1/*1 homozygotic.

In the examined population, all of which abused alcohol, the c2 allele frequency was 0.71% (Table III). In the group of patients with ACP, it was 2.27%. The c2/c2 genotype was not found in any patient. The genotype c1/c1 occurred in 139 patients, and heterozygotes c1/c2 were present in only 2 patients (with ACP). The c1/c2 genotype was not demonstrated in alcoholics. Differences in the allele and genotype distribution in the examined groups were not significant.

Table III. Genotype number and allele frequencies (%) of CYP2E1 in the groups examined.

Genotype
Allele
Patient group N c1/c1 c1/c2 c2/c2 c1 c2
Chronic alcohol pancreatitis 44 42 2 0 97.73 2.27
Healthy alcoholics 43 43 0 0 100 0
Control 54 54 0 0 100 0
Total 141 139 2 0 99.29 0.71

Differences in genotype number and allele frequencies between the groups defined were not significant.

Discussion

Genetic polymorphism of the enzymes involved in alcohol metabolism is relevant in the etiopathogenesis of ACP. It is highly ethnically and race dependent. The ADH2*2 allele is decisively more common among Asians (60% to 80%) than among the white population (0% to 10%) 22. The ADH2*2 allele is 1.3–2 times more frequent among the non-drinkers than among patients who abuse alcohol 23,24,25.

In our study, ADH2*1 alleles occurred statistically significantly more frequently among the ACP patients than among the controls, but the differences between the groups of patients who abused alcohol were not statistically significant. So, they favor developing alcohol consumption but not necessarily developing ACP. On the other hand, ADH2*2 alleles predominated among non-drinkers. The ADH2*2 allele may thus be a protector against alcoholism only. In other studies, however, the role for the ADH2 polymorphism has been found in ACP 26,27.

The role of alcohol-metabolizing enzyme gene polymorphisms is controversial and not clear. There are a few reports in the literature discussing the relationship between ACP and ADH3 genetic polymorphism. Chronic alcohol pancreatitis was more common in ADH3*1 and ADH3*2 homozygotes than heterozygotes. Heterozygotic alleles seem to be protective in the etiology of chronic pancreatitis 28. Our results were different. In the group with ACP the most common was the heterozygotic ADH3*1/*2 genotype; however, 2.3% were homozygotic ADH3*2/*2 genotype. Thus, presence of the ADH1C*2/*2 genotype generally does not favor alcoholism and may protect against ACP. On the other hand, ADH3*1 alleles were markedly concomitant with chronic pancreatitis of alcoholic etiology and healthy alcoholics. Day et al. 8 and Dumas et al. 29 suggested a relationship between the ADH3*1 allele and ACP, although there are studies of Caucasian and Japanese populations in which no relationship was found between ADH3 polymorphism and pancreatitis 27,30,31,32,33.

Frequency of the ALDH2 alleles varies among populations. The ALDH2*2 allele occurs mainly in oriental populations, i.e. Japanese, Chinese, inhabitants of Taiwan and Korea, and protects against developing alcoholism and alcohol liver disease 20,34,35,36,37. Its role in alcohol pancreatitis was not evaluated. Investigations of the Caucasian race have found an almost totally homozygotic character of ALDH2*1 9,22,38. Our observation here is similar. No variations in ALDH alleles or genotypes were found. In the studied group, none of the patients examined presented the ALDH2*2 allele. All were homozygotic ALDH2*1/*1, so we could not examine correlations between ALDH2 gene polymorphism and ACP.

The role of genetic polymorphism of CYP2E1 in ACP is poorly defined and remains unclear. In our study, the c2 allele frequency was 2.27% of patients with ACP. In the group of Italian patients with ACP its prevalence was 2.3% 39, as in our study. Such a rare presence of this allele in the above-mentioned group of patients did not allow us to draw explicit conclusions. We did not found relations between this disease and CYP2E1 polymorphism. Similarly, results published by other authors do not support the hypothesis of correlation between the c2 allele and ACP 26,27. Yang et al. 40 and Verlaan et al. 41 studying the Caucasian population did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in the presence of the c2 allele among patients with ACP, idiopathic pancreatitis, healthy alcoholics and controls.

Studies concerning the role of the glutathione S-transferase gene in development of ACP show that the GSTM1 null genotype seems to protect a subset of subjects (women under age of 50 years) from this disease 42.

In conclusion, our analysis and studies presented suggest that the ADH3*1 and ADH2*1 alleles may be risk factors for developing alcoholism. The ADH3*2/*2 genotype may confer protection against ACP. CYP2E1 gene polymorphism is not related to alcoholism and ACP. The Polish population examined is ALDH2*1/*1 homozygotic.

References

  • 1.Akolinski S.Trade, import, costs. Probl Alkohol1990;411:5–6. In Polish. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Czech E, Hartleb M.Genetic polymorphism of alcohol dehydrogenase- pathophysiologic implications. Adv Clin Exp Med2003;12:801–9. In Polish. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dzieniszewski J, Gabryelewicz A. Pancreas; pancreatitis – Polish accomplishments. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003;54:155–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Singh M, Simsek H. Ethanol and the pancreas. Current status. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:1051–62. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90033-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hanck C, Schneider A, Whitcomb DC. Genetic polymorphism in alcoholic pancreatitis. Bet Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;4:613–23. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6918(03)00048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Whitcomb D. Genetic predisposition to alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2003;27:321–6. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200311000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grigorescu M, Grigorescu MD. Genetic factors in pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Liv Dis. 2005;14:53–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Crabb DW, Dipple KM, Thomasson HR. Alcohol sensitivity, alcohol metabolism, risk of alcoholism and the role of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase genotypes. J Lab Clin Med. 1993;122:234–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Day CP, Bashir R, James OF, Bassendine MF, Crabb DW, Thomasson HR, et al. Investigation of the role of polymorphism at the alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase loci in genetic predisposition to alcohol-related end-organ damage. Hepatology. 1991;14:98–801. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840140509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Poupon R, Nalpas B, Coutelle C, Fleury B, Couzigou P, Higueret D. Polymorphism of alcohol dehydrogenase, alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase activities; implication in alcoholic cirrhosis in white patients. Hepatology. 1992;15:1017–22. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840150608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Osier M, Paktis A, Soodyall H, Comas D, Goldman D, Odunsi A, et al. A global perspective on genetic variation at the ADH genes reveals unusual patterns of linkage disequilibrium and diversity. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:84–99. doi: 10.1086/341290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crabb D, Edenberg HJ, Bosron WF, Li TK. Genotypes for aldehyde dehydrogenase deficiency and alcohol sensitivity: the inactive ALDH2 allele is dominant. Clin Invest. 1989;83:314–16. doi: 10.1172/JCI113875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hayashi S, Watanabe J., Kawajiri K. Genetic polymorphism in the 5′-flanking region change transcriptional regulation of the human cytochrome P450IIE1 gene. J Biochem. 1991;110:559–65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Watanabe J, Hayashi SI, Nakachi K, Imai K, Suda Y, Sekine T, et al. PstI and RsaI RELPs in complete linkage disequilibrium at the CYP2E gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:2194–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.23.7194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ewing JA, Bradley KA, Burman ML. Screening for alcoholism using CAGE. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280:1904–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.22.1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grant BF, Hardford TC, Hasin DS, Pickering R. DSM-III-R and the proposed DSM-IV alcohol use disorders, United States 1988. A nosological comparison. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1988;16:215–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dzieniszewski J, Jarosz M, Rakoczy A, and the Pancreas Division of the Polish Gastroenterology Society. Chronic pancreatitis. Recommendation relating to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Gastroenterol Pol2004;11:245–51. In Polish. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Madison L, Hoar LD, Holroyd CD. DNA banking: The effect of storage of blood and isolated DNA on integrity of DNA. Am J Med Genet. 1987;27:379–382. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320270216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Groppi A, Begueret J, Iron A. Improved methods for genotype determination of human alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) at ADH2 and ADH3 loci by using polymerase chain reaction-directed mutagenesis. Clin Chem. 1990;36:1765–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chao YC, Liou SR, Chung YY, Tang HS, Chsu CT, Li TK, et al. Polymorphism of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase genes and alcoholic cirrhosis in Chinese patients. Hepatology. 1994;19:360–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stanisz A. StatSoft Polska; Kraków: 1998. Przyst(pny kurs statystyki w oparciu o program STATISTICA PL. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Goedde HW, Agarwal DP, Fritze G, Meier-Tackmann D, Singh S, Beckmann G, et al. Distribution of ADH2 and ALDH2 genotypes in different populations. Hum Genet. 1992;88:344–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00197271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen CC, Lu RB, Chen YC, Wang MF, Chang YC, Li TK, et al. Interaction between the functional polymorphism of the alcohol metabolism genes in protection against alcoholism. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:795–807. doi: 10.1086/302540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen WJ, Loh EW, Hsu IP, Chen CC, Yu JM, Cheng AT. Alcohol-metabolizing gene and alcoholism among Taiwanese Han men: independent effect of ADH2, ADH3 and ALDH2. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168:762–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.168.6.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nakamura K, Iwahashi K, Matsuo Y, Miyatake R, Ichikawa Y, Suwaki H. Characteristics of Japanese alcoholics with the atypical aldehyde dehydrogenase 2*2.I. A comparison of the genotypes of ALDH2, ADH2, ADH3 and cytochrome P-4502E1 between alcoholics and non-alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996;20:52–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Matsumoto M, Takahashi H, Maruyama K, Higuchi S, Matsushita S, Muramatsu T, et al. Genotypes of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes and the risk for chronic pancreatitis in Japanese alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996;20:289A–92A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maruyama K, Takahashi H, Matsushita S, Nakano M, Harada H, Otsuki M. Genotypes of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes in relation to alcoholic chronic pancreatitis in Japan. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999;23:85S–91S. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1999.tb04541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drenth JPH, Meijer RPP, Peeters WHM, Jansen JBMJ. 06 Pancreatitis. Facts and prospects. A specific alcohol dehydrogenase 3 polymorphism protects against chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2001;1:129–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dumas F, Coutelle C, Gerolami A, Groppi A, Cassaigne A, Couzigou P. Role of alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in alcoholic patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1995;104:A302. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Frenzer A, Butler W, Orton J, Wilson J, Apte M, Pirola R, et al. Polymorphism in alcohol-metabolizing enzymes, glutathione S-transferases and apolipoprotein E and susceptibility to alcohol-induced cirrhosis and chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:177–82. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harber P, Wilson J, Apte M, Korsten M, Pirola R. Individual susceptibility to alcohol pancreatitis: still an enigma. J Lab Clin Med. 1995;125:305–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Klingenberg RD, Jakobs A, Homann N, Benesova M, Ludwig D, Seitz HK.Genotyping of alcohol dehydrogenase 3 in alcoholic pancreatitis, liver cirrhosis and esophageal cancer in Caucasians. Gut 2002;51 Suppl III:A134. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Etemad B, Whitcomb DC. Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification and new genetic development. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:682–707. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.22586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chao YC, Young TH, Tang HS, Hsu CT. Alcoholism and alcoholic organ damage and genetic polymorphisms of alcohol metabolizing enzymes in Chinese patients. Hepatology. 1997;25:112–117. doi: 10.1002/hep.510250121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nakamura Y, Amamoto K, Tamaki S, Okamura T, Tsujita Y, Ueno Y, et al. Genetic variation in aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 and the effect of alcohol consumption on cholesterol levels. Atherosclerosis. 2002;164:171–7. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(02)00059-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee KH, Kwak BY, Kim JH, Yoo SK, Yum SK, Jeong HS. Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P-4502E1 and mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase in a Korean population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997;21:953–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Osaka R, Nanakorn S, Sakata R, Nishiyori A, Shibata A, Nakamura J, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase-2 and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 genotypes and male alcohol use disorders in Khon Kean, north-east Thailand. Psychiatr Clin Neurosci. 2003;57:37–45. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01077.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gilder FJ, Hodgkinson S, Murray RM. ADH and ALDH genotype profiles in Caucasians with alcohol-related problems and controls. Addiction. 1993;8:383–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ceni E, Galli A, Casini A. Genetics, alcohol and cirrhosis. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:1000–3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang BM, O'Reilly DA, Demaine AG, Kingsnorth AN. Study of polymorphism in the CYP2E1 gene in patients with alcoholic pancreatitis. Alcohol. 2001;3:91–7. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(00)00135-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Verlaan M, Te Morsche RHM, Roelofs HMJ, Roelofs HMJ, Laheij RJF, Jansen JBMJ, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in alcohol-metabolizing enzymes and chronic pancreatitis. Alcohol Alcohol. 2004;39:20–4. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Verlaan M, Te Morsche RHM, Roelofs HMJ, Laheij RJF, Jansen JBMJ, Peters WHM, et al. Glutathione S-transferase null genotype affords protection against alcohol induced chronic pancreatitis. Am J Med Genet. 2003;1:34–9. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES