Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1989 Nov;63(11):4676–4681. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.11.4676-4681.1989

Proteolytic digestion of reovirus in the intestinal lumens of neonatal mice.

D K Bodkin 1, M L Nibert 1, B N Fields 1
PMCID: PMC251102  PMID: 2677401

Abstract

Two approaches were used to demonstrate proteolysis of reovirus in the intestine of the neonatal mouse. The first approach utilized peroral inoculation of radiolabeled virus into neonatal mice; the intestinal washings were harvested at 0 to 30 min postinoculation. The virus recovered from the intestinal washings was electrophoresed in polyacrylamide to determine whether proteolytic digestion of viral proteins had occurred. Complete loss of sigma 3 and generation of the mu 1c cleavage product delta demonstrated that digestion occurred within 10 to 30 min after the inoculation, resulting in the rapid generation of intermediate subviral particles (ISVPs). The products formed resembled those seen when the virus is digested in vitro with chymotrypsin. The second approach took advantage of the fact that ISVPs grow in cells treated with NH4Cl, whereas intact virus does not grow under these conditions (L. J. Sturzenbecker, M. Nibert, D. Furlong, and B. N. Fields, J. Virol. 61:2351-2361, 1987). Thus, assaying virus for its ability to grow in NH4Cl-treated cells represents a means of ascertaining whether the samples contain ISVPs. Using this approach, we demonstrated that up to 8 h postinoculation ISVPs predominate in the intestinal tissue and in the intestinal lumen. Between 8 and 15 h postinoculation, there is a loss in the proportion of ISVPs in the tissue so that by 15 h postinoculation ISVPs are no longer detectable in intestinal tissue washed of lumen contents and virus. In contrast, the lumen of the intestine contains some ISVPs at all times postinoculation. Thus, after peroral inoculation, the mammalian reoviruses are converted to proteolytically cleaved virus, suggesting that proteolysis plays an important role in initiation of infection in the gastrointestinal tract.

Full text

PDF
4676

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almeida J. D., Hall T., Banatvala J. E., Totterdell B. M., Chrystie I. L. The effect of trypsin on the growth of rotavirus. J Gen Virol. 1978 Jul;40(1):213–218. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-40-1-213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Appleyard G., Davis G. B. Activation of Sendai virus infectivity by an enzyme in chicken amniotic fluid. J Gen Virol. 1983 Apr;64(Pt 4):813–823. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-64-4-813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbey-Morel C. L., Oeltmann T. N., Edwards K. M., Wright P. F. Role of respiratory tract proteases in infectivity of influenza A virus. J Infect Dis. 1987 Apr;155(4):667–672. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.4.667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bass D. M., Trier J. S., Dambrauskas R., Wolf J. L. Reovirus type I infection of small intestinal epithelium in suckling mice and its effect on M cells. Lab Invest. 1988 Feb;58(2):226–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cross R. K., Fields B. N. Use of an aberrant polypeptide as a marker in three-factor crosses: further evidence for independent reassortment as the mechanism of recombination between temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus type 3. Virology. 1976 Oct 15;74(2):345–362. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(76)90341-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Furlong D. B., Nibert M. L., Fields B. N. Sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles. J Virol. 1988 Jan;62(1):246–256. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.1.246-256.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Joklik W. K. Studies on the effect of chymotrypsin on reovirions. Virology. 1972 Sep;49(3):700–715. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(72)90527-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Minor P. D., Ferguson M., Phillips A., Magrath D. I., Huovilainen A., Hovi T. Conservation in vivo of protease cleavage sites in antigenic sites of poliovirus. J Gen Virol. 1987 Jul;68(Pt 7):1857–1865. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-7-1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ramig R. F., Cross R. K., Fields B. N. Genome RNAs and polypeptides of reovirus serotypes 1, 2, and 3. J Virol. 1977 Jun;22(3):726–733. doi: 10.1128/jvi.22.3.726-733.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roivainen M., Hovi T. Intestinal trypsin can significantly modify antigenic properties of polioviruses: implications for the use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine. J Virol. 1987 Dec;61(12):3749–3753. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.12.3749-3753.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rubin D. H., Eaton M. A., Costello T. Reovirus type 1 is secreted into the bile. J Virol. 1986 Nov;60(2):726–728. doi: 10.1128/jvi.60.2.726-728.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rubin D. H., Fields B. N. Molecular basis of reovirus virulence. Role of the M2 gene. J Exp Med. 1980 Oct 1;152(4):853–868. doi: 10.1084/jem.152.4.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sturzenbecker L. J., Nibert M., Furlong D., Fields B. N. Intracellular digestion of reovirus particles requires a low pH and is an essential step in the viral infectious cycle. J Virol. 1987 Aug;61(8):2351–2361. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.8.2351-2361.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tashiro M., Ciborowski P., Reinacher M., Pulverer G., Klenk H. D., Rott R. Synergistic role of staphylococcal proteases in the induction of influenza virus pathogenicity. Virology. 1987 Apr;157(2):421–430. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90284-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tashiro M., Klenk H. D., Rott R. Inhibitory effect of a protease inhibitor, leupeptin, on the development of influenza pneumonia, mediated by concomitant bacteria. J Gen Virol. 1987 Jul;68(Pt 7):2039–2041. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-7-2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vonderfecht S. L., Miskuff R. L., Wee S. B., Sato S., Tidwell R. R., Geratz J. D., Yolken R. H. Protease inhibitors suppress the in vitro and in vivo replication of rotavirus. J Clin Invest. 1988 Dec;82(6):2011–2016. doi: 10.1172/JCI113821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Webster R. G., Rott R. Influenza virus A pathogenicity: the pivotal role of hemagglutinin. Cell. 1987 Aug 28;50(5):665–666. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90321-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wolf J. L., Kauffman R. S., Finberg R., Dambrauskas R., Fields B. N., Trier J. S. Determinants of reovirus interaction with the intestinal M cells and absorptive cells of murine intestine. Gastroenterology. 1983 Aug;85(2):291–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhirnov O. P., Ovcharenko A. V., Bukrinskaya A. G. Suppression of influenza virus replication in infected mice by protease inhibitors. J Gen Virol. 1984 Jan;65(Pt 1):191–196. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-65-1-191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES