Abstract
It has been proposed that synthesis of β-1,6-glucan, one of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall components, is initiated by a uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose–dependent reaction in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Because this sugar nucleotide is not synthesized in the lumen of the ER, we have examined whether or not UDP–glucose can be transported across the ER membrane. We have detected transport of this sugar nucleotide into the ER in vivo and into ER–containing microsomes in vitro. Experiments with ER-containing microsomes showed that transport of UDP–glucose was temperature dependent and saturable with an apparent Km of 46 μM and a Vmax of 200 pmol/mg protein/3 min. Transport was substrate specific because UDP–N-acetylglucosamine did not enter these vesicles. Demonstration of UDP–glucose transport into the ER lumen in vivo was accomplished by functional expression of Schizosaccharomyces pombe UDP–glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (GT) in S. cerevisiae, which is devoid of this activity. Monoglucosylated protein-linked oligosaccharides were detected in alg6 or alg5 mutant cells, which transfer Man9GlcNAc2 to protein; glucosylation was dependent on the inhibition of glucosidase II or the disruption of the gene encoding this enzyme. Although S. cerevisiae lacks GT, it contains Kre5p, a protein with significant homology and the same size and subcellular location as GT. Deletion mutants, kre5Δ, lack cell wall β-1,6 glucan and grow very slowly. Expression of S. pombe GT in kre5Δ mutants did not complement the slow-growth phenotype, indicating that both proteins have different functions in spite of their similarities.
INTRODUCTION
There are four major polysaccharide constituents in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall: mannan, chitin, and β-1,6- and β-1,3-glucans (Cid et al., 1995). Whereas synthesis of mannan is initiated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 by transfer of Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 to a protein core and continues by the transfer of additional mannose units in the Golgi, both chitin and β-1,3-glucan are synthesized at the plasma membrane (Cid et al., 1995). However, it is not clear where the synthesis of β-1,6-glucan is initiated and/or completed, although the intracellular presence of β-1,6-glucan has been detected by immunogold labeling (Horrisberg and Clerk, 1987). Mutants defective in the biosynthesis of β-1,6-glucan (kre) have been identified based on their resistance to K1 killer toxin. Several KRE gene products implicated in β-1,6-glucan biosynthesis reside along the secretory pathway. Kre5p and Cwh41p are located in the ER, Kre6p and Skn1p are located in the Golgi apparatus, Kre1p appears to be in the plasma membrane (Boone et al. 1990; Meaden et al., 1990; Jiang et al., 1996), and Kre9p is also located in the secretory pathway (Brown and Bussey, 1993). It is not known which of these proteins are directly implicated in β-1,6-glucan synthesis, but some proteins have been shown to influence it indirectly. Cells lacking either ER glucosidase I (Cwh41p) or glucosidase II (GII) were found to display a severe reduction in β-1,6-glucan content (Jiang et al., 1996; Simons et al., 1998). The glucosidases are required for removal of the glucose residues from protein-linked Glc3Man9GlcNAc2, during processing of N-glycans. It was shown that it is the retention of the glucose units on the N-linked oligosaccharides that affects the β-1,6-glucan synthesis in glucosidase mutants. Double mutants that do not add glucose to the lipid-linked oligosaccharide precusor have wild-type levels of β-1,6-glucan (Abeijón and Chen, 1998; Shahinian et al., 1998). Kre5p encodes a luminal ER protein of 150 kDa that is essential for S. cerevisiae viability in certain genetic backgrounds. However, null mutants that are viable have no detectable β-1,6-glucan polymer, show aberrant morphology, are unable to retain cell wall mannoproteins in their cell wall, and have extremely compromised growth (Meaden et al., 1990).
Kre5p shows some amino acid similarity with mammalian, insect, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe uridine diphosphate (UDP)–glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (GT) (Parker et al., 1995; Fernandez et al., 1996). Both proteins are approximately the same size and contain the ER-retrieval signal HDEL for soluble proteins at their C-terminal ends. GT transfers a single glucose unit to glucose-free protein-linked high-mannose-type oligosaccharides specifically on incompletely folded proteins (Sousa et al., 1992; Fernandez et al., 1994). It has been proposed that this enzyme is a key element of the so-called quality control of glycoprotein folding (Helenius et al., 1997 and references therein). Monoglucosylated protein-linked oligosaccharides, arising by partial deglucosylation of the oligosaccharide Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 precusor, were shown to be recognized by ER lectins as membrane-bound calnexin or its soluble homologue calreticulin. Upon further deglucosylation by GII, glycoproteins would be liberated from their lectin anchors. If the released glycoprotein is not yet properly folded, it is then reglucosylated by GT, resulting in binding to the lectins. This deglucosylation–reglucosylation cycle can continue until proper folding is achieved. This interaction with the lectins apparently not only prevents exit of misfolded glycoproteins from the ER but also facilitates correct folding by hindering aggregation.
S. cerevisiae is the only organism described so far to be devoid of GT activity, not only in vitro but also in vivo. It was shown that monoglucosylated protein-linked oligosaccharides are not formed in alg5 or alg6 mutant cells that do not synthesize glucosylated lipid-linked oligosaccharides and transfer nonglucosylated oligosaccharides to protein (Fernandez et al., 1994). Similar results were found upon incubation of alg5gls2 double mutants (GLS2 codes for GII) (Jakob et al., 1998). S. cerevisiae not only lacks GT but also calreticulin, and its calnexin-like protein presents significant structural variations compared with its mammalian and S. pombe counterparts (Parlati et al., 1995). Nevertheless, recent evidence indicates that monoglucosylated oligosaccharides do indeed play a role in facilitating glycoprotein folding in S. cerevisiae (Jakob et al., 1998).
Because of its homology with GT, it has been proposed that Kre5p may be a glucosyltransferase involved in the initiation of β-1,6-glucan synthesis (Shahinian et al., 1998). This possibility requires that UDP–glucose be present in the ER lumen. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether this sugar nucleotide is effectively transported from the cytosol, where it is synthesized, to the ER lumen. The only UDP-glucose–dependent reaction known so far to occur in S. cerevisiae ER is the formation of dolichol-P-glucose, and it apparently occurs on the cytosolic side of the ER membrane (Snider et al., 1980; Hanover and Lennarz, 1982; Spiro and Spiro, 1985; Trombeta et al., 1991; Abeijón and Hirschberg, 1992). We demonstrate UDP–glucose transport in vitro using a preparation enriched in ER vesicles. We also show UDP–glucose transport into the ER in vivo by demonstrating functional expression of S. pombe GT, an ER-luminal enzyme that requires UDP–glucose for activity. We also demonstrate that GT expression does not correct the S. cerevisiae kre5− phenotype.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and Growth Conditions
S. cerevisiae strains were grown in YPD or SD medium supplemented with the required auxotrophies. Solid medium was made by adding 2% agar to liquid medium. Standard procedures were used for genetic crosses, sporulation of diploids, and dissection of tetrads. Strains used for this study are isogenic with YPH274 (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989) except for PRY103 (Runge et al., 1984). Strains HH2 y HH3 are haploids derived by sporulation of YPH274 (Table 1). Yeast and bacterial transformations were done by electroporation as described previously (Abeijón et al., 1996). Escherichia coli DH5α cells were used for plasmid propagation and were grown in LB medium, containing Ampicillin (100 μg/ml) when needed (Maniatis et al., 1982).
Table 1.
Strain | Genotype | Source |
---|---|---|
PRY103 | MATa ade 2-101 ura 3-52 alg 6-1 | P.W. Robbins |
YPH274 | MATa/α ura3-52/ura3-52 lys2-801/lys2-801 lys 2-801 ade2-101/ade2-101his3Δ200/his3-Δ200/trp1-Δ1/trp1-Δ1 leu 2-Δ1/leu 2-Δ1 | P. Hieter |
HH2 | MATa ura3-52 lys2-801 ade2-101 his 3-Δ200 trp1-Δ1 leu2-Δ1 | This study |
HH3 | MATα ura 3-52 lys 2-801 ade 2-101 his 3-Δ200 trp 1-Δ1 leu 2-Δ1 | This study |
OCY1 | YPH274 Δalg5::HIS3/ALG5 | This study |
OCY2 | HH2 Δalg5::HIS3 | This study |
OCY3 | HH2 Δalg5::HIS3 Δgls2::URA3 | This study |
OCY5 | YPH274 Δkre5::HIS3/KRE5 | This study |
OCY6 | HH2 Δkre5::HIS3 | This study |
Disruption of the ALG5 Locus
The OCY1 alg5::HIS3/ALG5 heterozygous strain was constructed via one-step gene replacement (Rothstein, 1983). A wild-type diploid YPH274 was transformed with a 2.8-kilobase (kb) BamHI–HpaI linear fragment from palg5::HIS3 (te Heesen et al., 1994) to histidine prototrophy. Sporulation yielded OCY2 haploid alg5::HIS3 cells. Histidine prototrophs were analyzed for correct homologous recombination by PCR analysis with nucleotides 500–523 (5′-GCACAAAGGACCATAGTCACTGTG) as sense primer and nucleotides 1725–1746 (5′-AGCAAATGCCCTTGAGCGAG) of the ALG5 gene (GenBank accession no. X77573) as antisense primer or a HIS3-specific primer and the same antisense primer.
Disruption of the GLS2 Locus
A PCR fragment that included nucleotides 226–270 (5′-CTCACTACGGCACTTGAGAGCTATAACTCAATGAACATGTTGCTT) and nucleotides 3184–3225 (5′-GTTATTTTTTGAGGGAAAAAAACGAAGTGATATCTTTACATC) of the GLS2 gene (GenBank accession no. Z36098) at the 5′- and 3′-ends of the URA3 gene was generated (Lorenz et al., 1995). OCY2 haploid alg5::HIS3 cells were transformed with the 1255-base pair PCR product by electroporation to obtain the alg5::HIS3 gls2::URA3 double-mutant OCY3 strain. Uracil and histidine prototrophs were analyzed for GLS2 gene disruption using two primers proximal to those used for disruption, nucleotides 208–225 (5′-CCCGGACCACGACATCATTTT) as sense primer and nucleotides 3243–3266 (5′-ACGGATATTTTTACGTTTACTTTG) as antisense primer or one of these and a URA3-specific primer. OCY3 cells were completely devoid of GII activity when assayed with [glucose-14C]Glc1Man9GlcNAc as substrate.
Disruption of the KRE5 Locus
The KRE5/kre5::HIS3 heterozygous strain was constructed via one-step gene replacement (Rothstein, 1993). The wild-type diploid YPH274 was transformed to histidine prototrophy with a PvuII linear fragment derived from pkre5::HIS3 (Meaden et al., 1990). Plasmid pkre5::HIS3 contains a disruption of KRE5 gene in which a 3.0-kb EcoRI–BamHI fragment had been replaced by a 1.8-kb fragment containing the HIS3 gene. Diploid cells were sporulated, and kre5::HIS3 haploid cells were obtained after tetrad dissection. A 2:2 segregation in colony size with two wild-type (His−) and two microcolonies (His+) was observed. Histidine prototrophs were analyzed for correct homologous recombination by PCR analysis using nucleotides 448–469 (5′-TAGGTACGAAAAGCCCGACGAC) as sense primer and either nucleotides 3776- 3800 (5′-CCCAGTATCCTTCTTTCCAATAACC) or nucleotides 1487–1510 (5′-TGCCTCCTTCACCTCACTATCTTC) as antisense primers. Positions correspond to GenBank M33556 sequence. Disruption of the KRE5 locus was further confirmed by the total resistance to K1 killer toxin of the histidine prototrophs.
Expression of S. pombe GT in S. cerevisiae
Mutation of PDEL to HDEL Retrieval Signal.
The entire S. pombe-encoding gene (gpt1+) was cloned in three pieces. The 1338-nucleotide 5′-terminus fragment was obtained by digestion with BamHI and NdeI of the 1475-nucleotide PCR product generated using the entire gpt1+ cDNA in pBluescript (Fernández et al., 1996) as template and primers 5′-GCTGGATCCATGAGATGGGGCTTTTGGTTT (sense) and 5′-CATACCATACCAGTCTGAACGGG (antisense). The sense primer corresponded to nucleotides 751–771 of gpt1+ (GenBank U38417) and in it a BamHI (bases in italics) was created immediately before the ATG codon to allow cloning. The antisense primer corresponded to bases 2192–2216. The central fragment was obtained as a 2500-bp NdeI restriction fragment that comprised nucleotides 2089–4588 of gpt1+. The 506-bp 3′-terminus fragment was obtained by digestion with NdeI and XhoI of the 665-nucleotide PCR product generated with primers 5′-AGCAACGTGAGATATGGGGATAC (sense, corresponding to nucleotides 4445–4467 of gpt1+) and 5′-GCGCTCGAGTATGTTTCAAAGTTCGTCATGAGATGAGTTGTTATC (antisense, corresponding to nucleotides 5065–5094 of gpt1+). In the last primer both a XhoI site (first 6 bases in italics) and a mismatch (GGC to GTA, last three bases in italics) were created. The mismatch converted a P into an H in the ER-retrieval signal, and the XhoI site allowed cloning. The three fragments were ligated to a BamHI and XhoI p426GPD-digested plasmid (Mumberg et al., 1995) in a four-partner ligation to produce p426GPD-gpt1+. The 4344-nucleotide fragment containing the complete gpt1+ sequence with the mutated ER-retrieval signal was obtained by digestion of p426GPD-gpt1+ with BamHI and XhoI and introduced into p416GPD and p425GPD (Mumberg et al., 1995) to yield p416GPD-gpt1+ and p425GPD-gpt1+. The p416GPD and p426GPD are low- and high-copy number plasmids, respectively, and both carry the URA3 marker gene. On the other hand, p425GPD is a high-copy number plasmid that carries the LEU2 marker gene. In the three plasmids, GT expression was under the glyceraldehyde 3-P dehydrogenase promoter.
Plasmid Construction: pKRE5
A 6.6-kb HindIII–SalI fragment containing the KRE5 gene with its own promoter was obtained from the pBluescript-KRE5 (kindly provided by H. Bussey). It was cloned into the HindIII–SalI sites at the multiple cloning site of vector YEp352 (Hill et al., 1986).
RT PCR
RNA was extracted from cells in exponential phase at an OD600 of 0.4–0.6 as described previously (Collart and Oliviero, 1993). The primer used for reverse transcription corresponded to the antisense one used for synthesis of the 665-bp 3′-terminal fragment of gene gpt1+. The same primer and the sense one used for synthesis of the same fragment were used for the PCR reaction.
Materials
[3H]acetic acid, sodium salt (100 Ci/mol), GDP-[3,4-3H]Man (20 Ci/mmol), UDP–N-acetyl[6-3H]-d-GlcNAc (30 Ci/mmol), and [14C]glucose (250 Ci/mol) were from Dupont/New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). [1,2-3H]2-deoxyglucose (45 Ci/mmol), UDP–[6-3H]Gal (60 Ci/mmol), and UDP–[1-3H]glucose (15 Ci/mmol) were from American Radiochemicals (St. Louis, MO). Jack bean α-mannosidase and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidose H (Endo H) were from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). UDP–[14C]Glc (250 Ci/mol) was prepared as described by Wright and Robbins (1965).
Substrates and Standards
[Glucose-14C]Glc1Man9GlcNAc, [glucose-14C]Glc1Man8GlcNAc, [glucose-14C]Glc1Man7GlcNAc, glucose-14C]Glc1Man4GlcNAc, [glucose-14C]Glc1Man5GlcNAc, [14C]ManGlcNAc, [14C]Man9GlcNAc, [14C]Man8GlcNAc, and [14C]Man7GlcNAc were prepared as described previously (Fernández et al., 1994).
Preparation and Characterization of P2 Fraction
The P2 vesicle fraction used in sugar-nucleotide-translocation experiments was prepared as previously described with minor modifications (Abeijón et al., 1989). Briefly, wild-type YPH274 yeast cells were grown in YPD medium to an OD600 of 3, centrifuged, and converted to spheroplasts using 10 mg of Zymolyase 100T (ICN, Richmond, CA) per 20 g of cells. Cells were broken by resuspension in buffer A (10 mM triethylamine-acetate, pH 7.2/0.8 M sorbitol/1 mM EDTA) (1 ml/g of cells) and by drawing the suspension rapidly several times into a small-bore serological pipette. Pepstatin (6 μg/ml) and PMSF (1 mM) were used as protease inhibitors. Cell breakage was not complete with these heavy suspensions, but vesicle integrity was very well preserved. The lysate was centrifuged at 1500 × g for 20 min to give a first pellet P1 and a supernatant. This supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h to obtain P2 vesicle fraction. This P2 pellet was gently resuspended in buffer A at 10–15 mg protein/ml, aliquoted, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Each aliquot was thawed only once to preserve vesicle integrity. The specific activity of NADPH-cytochrome C reductase, an ER marker enzyme, was 0.14 nmol/mg of protein/min, representing a 3.1-fold enrichment over homogenate (63% recovery of total homogenate activity). The assay was done as described by Kubota (1977). The luminal Golgi marker guanosine diphosphatase (GDPase) (Abeijón et al., 1989) was 2.6-fold enriched in the P2 fraction (specific activity: 1.4 mmol of GDP hydrolyzed/mg of protein/min; 48% of total homogenate activity). Vesicle integrity of the P2 fraction was at least 90% as determined my measuring latency of GDPase activity.
Nucleotide-Sugar-Translocation Assay
The theoretical basis and calculations for the translocation assay into vesicles of nucleotide derivatives have been described previously in detail (Pérez and Hirschberg, 1987). Briefly, it consists of 1) determining the total radioactive solutes associated with a vesicle pellet (St) after incubation of vesicles with radioactive substrates and centrifugation and 2) substracting from this value the total radioactive solutes outside the vesicles in the pellet (So, see below). This yields the total radioactive solutes within vesicles (Si). Incubations were done in 1 ml of buffer B (30 mM triethanolamine-acetate [pH 7.2]/0.3 M sucrose/5 mM MgCl2/5 mM MnCl2). The specific activity of the different radioactive substrates was adjusted to 3000 cpm/pmol. Incubations were initiated by the addition of 0.8–1.5 mg of P2 vesicle protein per assay, derived from wild-type (YPH274) cells. At the end of the incubations, 3 ml of ice-cold 0.5 M sucrose were added, and the reaction mixtures were immediately centrifuged for 25 min at 100,000 × g.
Calculations Used to Determine Nucleotide Sugar Translocation
Sm = concentration of solute in the incubation medium [μM]= counts per min/ml of solute in the supernatant/specific activity of solute (expressed as counts per min/nmol). St= total solute in the pellet (expressed in picomoles/mg of protein) = total soluble radioactivity associated with the pellet (expressed as counts per min/mg of protein)/specific activity of solute (expressed as counts per min/pmol). So = solutes outside the vesicles in the pellet (picomoles/mg of protein) = Vo (microliters/mg of protein) × Sm (picomoles/μl). Vt, the total volume in the pellet (both inside and outside the vesicles) available to solutes when 1 mg of vesicle protein was used, was calculated using the total counts per min/mg protein obtained after incubating with 2-deoxy-d-[3H]Glc, a penetrant solute that is evenly distributed both inside and outside the vesicles. A Vt of 2.65 μl/mg protein was measured for the P2 vesicle fraction used in these studies. Vo, the volume external to the vesicles in the pellet, was calculated in the same manner using data obtained from the incubation with [3H]acetate, a solute that cannot enter the vesicles and is, therefore, distributed only in the pellet volume external to vesicles. Vo = (counts per min/mg protein in the pellet)/(counts per min/ml in the supernatant). Vi, the internal volume of the vesicles in the pellet, equals Vt − Vo. Vo was calculated to be 1.45 μl/mg protein and Vi = 1.2 μl/mg protein. [Si] is the concentration of solute inside the vesicles, which equals Si/Vi.
In Vivo Labeling of S. cerevisiae Cells
Labeling of S. cervisiae cells with [14C]glucose was performed as described earlier but 150 μCi of [14C]glucose were used (Fernández et al., 1994). Incubation with the label lasted for 15 min. Where indicated, 5 mM 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) was added during the 15-min preincubation and 15-min incubation. Isolation of Endo H-sensitive oligosaccharides was performed as described previously (Fernández et al., 1994).
Carbohydrate Methods
Strong acid hydrolysis and treatment of oligosaccharides with Jack bean α-mannosidase were as described previously (Fernández et al., 1994). Whatman 1 papers were used for chromatographies. Solvents employed were: A, 1-propanol/nitromethane/water (5:2:4); B, 1-butanol/pyridine/water (4:3:4); and C, 1-butanol/pyridine/water (10:3:3). GII activity was assayed as described previously using [glucose-14C]Glc1Man7–9GlcNAc as substrate (Ugalde et al., 1979). GT was assayed using S. cerevisiae cell microsomes as enzyme source and 8 M urea-denatured thyroglobulin as acceptor as previously described (Fernández et al., 1994).
RESULTS
Transport of UDP–Glucose into S. cerevisiae Microsomal Vesicles
To determine whether UDP–glucose is transported into the lumen of S. cerevisiae ER-derived vesicles, a vesicle-enriched population, which was sealed and of the same membrane orientation as in vivo, was incubated with UDP–[3H]glucose. The suspension was centrifuged, and the radioactive solutes that had accumulated in the vesicle pellet were measured (Table 2). Total radioactive solutes in the pellet (St) were 55.4 pmol/mg protein after a 3-min incubation. Only a small amount of the total solutes in the pellet was outside, in between the vesicles in the pellet (So), and ∼95% of total radioactive solutes were within the vesicles in the pellet (Si). Detailed calculations are described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Table 2 also shows that incubation of vesicles with UDP–[3H]glucose resulted in a 22-fold accumulation of radiolabeled solutes within vesicles as compared with the concentration of radiolabeled solutes remaining in the incubation medium. Transport of UDP–glucose was temperature dependent, and the amount of solutes detected inside the vesicles at 0°C was only 6% of that at 30°C (Table 2). The transport signal was dependent on the integrity of the vesicles, because when a very small amount of detergent (0.05% Triton X-100) was added, no solutes were found inside the vesicles (Table 2). This mild detergent treatment only permeabilizes the vesicles and does not extract membrane proteins; upon centrifugation, the membrane enzyme recovery of GDPase in the pellet was 87–95% of that in untreated samples (our unpublished data).
Table 2.
Substrate | Temp (°C) | [Sm] (μM) | Solute (pmol/mg protein)
|
[Si] (μM) | [Si]/[Sm] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St | So | Si | |||||
UDP-Glc | 30 | 2 | 55.4 | 2.9 | 52.5 | 43.7 | 21.9 |
UDP-Glc | 0 | 2 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 1.35 |
UDP-Glcb | 30 | 2 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UDP-GlcNAc | 30 | 2 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
UDP-Gal | 30 | 2 | 12.4 | 2.9 | 9.5 | 7.9 | 3.9 |
GDP-Man | 30 | 2 | 39.7 | 2.9 | 36.8 | 30.7 | 15.3 |
Glucose | 30 | 4 | 10.7 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 1 |
Radioactive substrates (3000 cpm/pmol) were incubated for 3 min at the indicated temperatures with P2 vesicle fraction (1.5 mg of protein) in 1 ml of buffer B. Translocation was determined by a centrifugation assay as described in detail (34). Sm and [Si] are, respectively, solutes in the medium and within vesicles. St, So, and Si are respectively, total solute and solute outside and inside vesicles. Calculations are described in Materials and Methods. Results are average of triplicate determinations.
Triton X-100, 0.05%, was added to the assay.
The accumulation of UDP–[3H]glucose–derived solutes within the lumen of the vesicles was dependent on protein in a linear manner, between 0.8 and 1.5 mg and on time, up to 6 min (our unpublished data). The transport reaction was saturable with an apparent Km of 4.6 μM and a Vmax of 200 pmol/mg protein/3 min (Figure 1). After the 3-min incubation, 90–95% of the radioactivity in the incubation medium was UDP–glucose. Transport of UDP–glucose into the lumen of the vesicles was specific because another uridine nucleotide sugar such as UDP–N-acetyl-glucosamine was not transported (Table 2). Incubations with UDP–[3H]galactose resulted in 9.5 pmol/mg protein of radioactive solutes accumulating inside the vesicles (Si) and a modest fourfold concentration over the incubation medium (Table 2). The small signal detected for UDP–galactose is in agreement with a previous report for the existence of an UDP–galactose transporter in S. cerevisiae (Roy et al., 1998), although no endogenous acceptors for galactose have been described in this organism to date. No accumulation of radioactive solutes was detected inside the vesicles when they were incubated with [3H]glucose (Table 2). GDP–mannose, a nucleotide sugar that is transported mainly into the lumen of the Golgi apparatus in S. cerevisiae (Abeijón et al., 1989), was transported by this mixed vesicle fraction, resulting in a 15-fold accumulation of solutes within the vesicles over that in the incubation medium (Table 2). The following experiments were designed to demonstrate that UDP–glucose was transported into the ER in vivo.
Expression of S. pombe GT in S. cerevisiae
Cell-free Assay.
Before determining in vivo expression of S. pombe GT as a means to detecting transport of UDP–glucose into the ER lumen, we performed experiments to determine its in vitro expression. The C-terminal end of S. pombe GT was mutated from PDEL to the S. cerevisiae retrieval signal HDEL, and the GT-encoding gene, gpt1+, was then inserted in low- and high-copy number expression vectors (p416GPD and p426GPD, respectively) under the glyceraldehyde 3-P dehydrogenase promoter. S. cerevisiae alg6 cells (PRY103) were then transformed with the expression vectors with or without S. pombe gpt1+ gene. The alg6 mutant was chosen to ensure that any glycoprotein glucosylation observed would be independent from intermediates involving dolichol derivatives. This mutant is defective in the dolichol-P-glucose-dependent glucosyltransferase that transfers the first glucose unit to Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol. The microsomal fractions from cells transformed with the above-mentioned plasmids were incubated with UDP–[14C]glucose in the presence of 8 M urea-denatured thyroglobulin. Total proteins were degraded with an nonspecific protease, and resulting glycopeptides were digested with Endo H. Only microsomes derived from cells transformed with the GT-encoding plasmids yielded the expected products, Glc1Man9GlcNAc, Glc1Man8GlcNAc, and Glc1Man7GlcNAc (Figure 2, A and B). No labeled glycopeptides, where detected when the alg6 cells were transformed with the expression vectors without the S. pombe gpt1+ gene, confirmed the absence of endogenous GT activity in S. cerevisiae. The GT-specific activities found with both the low- and high-copy number plasmids were higher than those present in wild-type S. pombe microsomes (Fernández et al., 1994). The enzyme was present in vesicles as omission of detergents from the incubation mixtures significantly decreased incorporation into denatured thyroglobulin (Figure 2C).
In Vivo Assay.
We wanted to determine whether glucosylation of lumenal N-linked oligosaccharides occurred in vivo, as this would indicate that UDP–glucose was transported into the ER where GT resides. Thus, alg6 cells (PRY103) transformed with plasmids p426GPD or p426GPD-gpt1+ were incubated with [14C]glucose for 15 min in the presence or absence of GII inhibitor DNJ. N-linked oliogosaccharides were liberated as described for experiments depicted in Figure 2, A and B. Similar patterns were obtained in all cases (Figure 3, A–D). They showed the presence of oligosaccharides migrating as Man9GlcNAc, Man8GlcNAc, and Man7GlcNAc standards. No peaks or shoulders migrating as their monoglucosylated derivatives were observed, indicating that only minimal amounts of those structures might be present. It has been described that demannosylation of the oligosaccharide transferred to proteins stops at the Man8GlcNAc stage in S. cerevisiae (Byrd et al., 1982). Nevertheless, we have always observed small amounts of the compound having 7 mannose units. Upon degradation of compounds depicted in Figure 3, A–D, with Jack bean α-mannosidase, all samples yielded mannose and the disaccharide ManGlcNAc (Figure 4, A–C; the pattern obtained from samples of cells transformed by p426GPD incubated without DNJ was similar to that shown in Figure 4C). The presence of ManGlcNAc among the degradation products is indicative of the presence of nonglucosylated oligosaccharides.
Samples from cells transformed with the GT-encoding plasmid produced, in addition to the oligosaccharides shown above, an α-mannosidase–resistant compound that migrated as a Glc1Man4GlcNAc standard (Figure 4, A and B). The amount of the α-mannosidase-resistant core was much higher in the sample from cells incubated with DNJ. Strong acid hydrolysis of the core produced labeled glucose and mannose units (Figure 4D). The relative proportion of glucosylated and nonglucosylated oligosaccharides in Figure 3A was calculated as previously described (Gañán et al., 1991). Briefly, the label in mannose in ManGlcNAc divided by the sum of the label in mannose in the same compound plus that in mannose in Glc1Man4GlcNAc divided by 4 gave the relative proportion of nonglucosylated compounds. No labeled glucosamine appeared in the pattern shown in Figure 4D, thus indicating that those residues were not significantly labeled during the 15-min incubation with [14C]glucose. This facilitated quantitation of mannose label in ManGlcNAc. The relative proportion of glucosylated compounds was found to be ∼7%. The presence of glucosylated oligosaccharides in the ER lumen, therefore, indicated that UDP–glucose was indeed transported into this compartment in vivo.
Oligosaccharide Glucosylation in GII Minus Cells
The unexpected low proportion of glucosylated oligosaccharides found above could have been the result of only a partial inhibition of GII by DNJ. Therefore, both alg5 single- and gls2 alg5 double-mutant cells transformed with p425GPD-gpt1+ were incubated with [14C]glucose for 15 min in the presence or absence of DNJ. The gls2 alg5 double mutant was also transformed with p425GPD as a control. In alg5 cells, as in alg6, Man9GlcNAc2 is transferred to proteins as the alg5 cells are unable to synthesize dolichol-P-glucose (Runge et al., 1984). The above double-mutant cells lack GII in addition to dolichol-P-glucose synthetase. The patterns of Endo H-released compounds were similar, if not identical, to those shown in Figure 3, A–D. Substances migrating between the middle of Man9GlcNAc and Man8GlcNAc standards (i.e., in the position expected for the principal glucosylated compound, Glc1Man8GlcNAc) were subjected to strong acid hydrolysis. As expected, the single mutant yielded labeled glucose residues only when incubated in the presence of DNJ (Figure 5A). The double mutant produced similar amounts of labeled glucose when incubated in the presence or absence of DNJ, thus confirming the lack of GII activity in the strain. The pattern yielded by the double mutant in the absence of DNJ is depicted in Figure 5B. When the gls2 alg5 double mutant was transformed with p425 GPD without insert, only mannose was detected (Figure 5C). The proportion of label in glucose over that in mannose units was 6 and 13% in Figure 5, A (alg5 plus DNJ) and B (gls2 alg5 minus DNJ), respectively, thus indicating that the percentage of glucosylated oligosaccharides observed in experiments shown in Figures 3 and 4 (7%) could, at the most, be ∼15% if complete inhibition of GII by DNJ had been achieved.
The above described results show that detection of glucosylated oligosaccharides was dependent on 1) expression of S. pombe GT and 2) inhibition of GII activity either by the addition of DNJ or by disruption of the enzyme-encoding gene. These results show, therefore, that UDP–glucose transport into the ER of S. cerevisiae occurred, as GII is precisely located in the lumen of this organelle. Moreover, the results presented indicate that a low percentage of N-linked oligosaccharides was glucosylated under nonstressed conditions.
GT Expression on the kre5− Phenotype
Kre5p displays a relatively high homology to S. pombe GT: it resides in the same subcellular compartment and has the same size. To test whether the S. pombe GT could correct the kre5− phenotype, KRE5 was disrupted in a strain whose genetic background allows growth of mutant cells, although at a highly reduced rate. The growth rate of kre5 mutant is identical with that of the same mutant transformed with YEp352 shown in Figure 6; mutant cells were completely resistant to K1 killer toxin as previously shown (Meaden et al., 1990). As expected, transformation of kre5 mutant cells with an expression vector carrying wild-type KRE5 gene (pKRE5) corrected the slow-growth-rate phenotype (Figure 6) and recovered the sensitivity to K1 killer toxin to the level of wild type (our unpublished data). Neither recovery of the normal growth rate nor sensitivity to the toxin was observed upon transformation of kre5 mutant cells with p425GPD-gpt1+ (Figure 9). RT-PCR analysis of RNA extracted from kre5 cells transformed with p425GPD-gpt1+ indicated that gpt1+ was effectively transcribed (Figure 6, inset). Taken together, these results indicate that S. pombe GT and Kre5p have different functions in spite of their similarities.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates that UDP–glucose is transported into the S. cerevisiae ER in vivo and in vitro. Transport was saturable and temperature dependent with kinetic properties similar to those measured for the rat liver ER UDP–glucose transporter (Pérez and Hirschberg, 1986). Mammalian and yeast transporter proteins concentrated the substrate ∼20 fold over the concentration present in the incubation medium, both exhibited apparent Km for UDP–glucose between 4 and 4.6 μM and comparable maximum velocities. No signal was detected for transport of UDP–GlcNac in S. cerevisiae. This was expected because S. cerevisiae lacks the terminal N-acetylglucosamine residues present in Kluyveromyces lactis mannan for which the UDP–GlcNac transporter provides the substrate (Abeijón et al., 1996).
Because no UDP-glucose–dependent reaction has been described to occur in the lumen of the ER in S.cerevisiae, we used the heterologous expression of S. pombe GT as a means to detect in vivo transport of UDP–glucose into the ER. The GT transfers glucose from UDP–glucose to misfolded, but not native, glycoproteins and provides a recognition tag for chaperone systems to assist newly synthesized proteins acquiring their final native conformation (Helenius et al., 1997). UDP–glucose was effectively transported to the ER lumen in vivo as indicated by the detection of monoglucosylated, high-mannose type protein-linked oligosaccharides in S. cerevisiae alg5 or alg6 mutants transformed with S. pombe GT expression vectors. Moreover, this detection was dependent on GII inhibition or on disruption of the gene encoding GII, the ER-located enzyme that is responsible for removal of the glucose unit transferred by GT. Because Man9GlcNAc2 is transferred from dolichol-P-P derivatives to nascent polypeptide chains in alg5 and alg6 mutants, glucose residues detected had to be necessarily added by GT.
The low proportion of glucosylated oligosaccharides detected was surprising in view of 1) the ample supply of UDP–glucose available in the lumen of the ER, and 2) the fact that the in vitro activity detected for the heterologously expressed GT was even higher then that measured in S. pombe microsomes directly. The proportion of glucosylated oligosaccharides did not increase when we induced glycoprotein misfolding by DTT or heat shock; suggesting that a misfolded protein conformation is not a sufficient condition for in vivo GT-dependent glycosylation of oligosaccharides, contrary to what occurs in vitro.
The role of UDP–glucose in S. cerevisiae ER lumen is presently unknown because this yeast lacks GT (Fernández et al., 1994; Jakob et al., 1998). It was reported many years ago that incubation of a crude bakers yeast microsomal fraction with UDP–[14]glucose led to the synthesis of both charged (5% of total) and uncharged (95% of total) lipid derivatives. The first one was found to be dolichol-P-glucose, whereas the latter was tentatively identified as sterylglucoside (Parodi, 1976, 1977). Synthesis of this lipid could, therefore, require UDP–glucose in the ER lumen.
When the transport of UDP–glucose into the lumen of the mammalian ER was demonstrated (Pérez and Hirschberg, 1986), the physiological role of a lumenal pool of UDP-glucose was unknown. It was speculated that the formation of dolichol-P-glucose in the ER could be a lumenal or cytosolic reaction (Pérez and Hirschberg, 1986). Now there is consensus that this reaction occurs on the cytosolic side of the ER membrane (Snider et al., 1980; Hanover and Lennarz, 1982; Spiro and Spiro, 1985; Trombeta et al., 1991). Transient glucosylation of oligosaccharides by GT was discovered in 1983 (Parodi et al., 1983), and subsequently found to be widespread in nature (Trombeta et al., 1989). The physiological role of this transient reglucosylation reaction remained unknown for some time. It is now well established that the monoglucosylated oligosaccharides generated by GT in incompletely folded glycoproteins are recognized by chaperones that assist them in acquiring their mature conformation (reviewed by Helenius et al., 1997). This reaction explains the occurrence of a luminal pool of UDP–glucose in the ER.
There should be another reason for the existence of UDP–glucose transport into the ER of S. cerevisiae because it lacks GT (Fernández et al., 1994; Jakob et al., 1998). One possibility could be that synthesis of cell wall β-1,6- glucan is initiated in the ER lumen by Kre5p, as recently suggested (Shahinian et al., 1998). Results presented here show that although Kre5p displays a certain homology with S. pombe GT, the latter could not revert the kre5− phenotype, thereby demonstrating that both proteins have clearly different roles. This conclusion is in agreement with other recent findings by Shahinian et al., (1998), who constructed a strain that constitutively retains one glucose per N-chain in the same position in which GT would add it. This was achieved by a combination of alg8 deletion, which prevents addition of the second glucose to the dolichol oligosaccharide, and a glsIIΔ mutation, which prevents the removal of this glucose after the N-linked oligosaccharide has been transferred to protein. Because kre5Δ disruptions are lethal in a SEY6210 background, it was reasoned that if Kre5p were simply a GT, kre5Δ alg8Δ gls2Δ cells should be viable because the GT activity is no longer required in this strain that constitutively express glucose-containing oligosaccharides. The triple mutant was not viable despite the constitutive expression of monoglucosylated N-linked chains, showing that the essential function of Kre5p is unrelated to N-chain reglucosylation (Shahinian et al., 1998).
The role of Kre5p in the biosynthesis of β-1,6-glucan remains to be established; no enzymatic activity has yet been assigned to it. We have now demonstrated that an ample supply of UDP–glucose exists in the lumen of the ER of S. cervisiae where it could serve as substrate for putative β-1,6-glucan synthases. Only cloning of the gene(s) encoding the UDP–glucose transporter protein(s) and phenotypic analysis of null mutants will allow unequivocal determination of whether or not UDP–glucose transport is a prerequisite for the biosynthesis of cell wall β-1,6-glucan.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank H. Bussey for pkre5::HIS 3 and pBluescript KRE5 and S. te Heesen for palg5::HIS3. This work has received financial support from the United States Public Health Service (grant GM-44500), from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (grant 75197–553502), from the University of Buenos Aires, and from the National Research Council (Argentina) to A.P. This work was also supported by National Institute of Health grant GM-30365 to C. Hirschberg and a Small Grant Program award from University of Massachusetts Medical Center to C.A.
Abbreviations used:
- DNJ
1-deoxynojirimycin
- Endo H
endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- GII
glucosidase II
- GT
UDP–glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase
- UDP–GlcNac
uridine diphosphate N-acetyl glucosamine
REFERENCES
- Abeijón C, Chen LY. The role of glucosidases I (Cwh41p) in the biosynthesis of all wall β-1,6-glucan is indirect. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;9:2729–2738. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.10.2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abeijón C, Hirschberg CB. Topography of glycosylation reactions in the endoplasmic reticulum. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992;17:32–37. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90424-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abeijón C, Orlean P, Robbins PW, Hirschberg CB. Topography of glycosylation in yeast: characterization of GDP mannose transport and lumenal guanosine diphosphatase activities in Golgi-like vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:6935–6939. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.6935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abeijón C, Robbins PW, Hirschberg CB. Molecular cloning of the Golgi apparatus uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine transporter by phenotypic correction of a yeast mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:5963–5972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boone C, Sommer SS, Hensel A, Bussey H. Yeast KRE genes provide evidence for a pathway of cell wall glucan assembly. J Cell Biol. 1990;110:1833–1843. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.5.1833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown JL, Bussey H. The yeast KRE9 gene encodes an O-glycoprotein involved in the cell surface β-glucan assembly. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:6346–6356. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrd JC, Tarentino AL, Maley F, Atkinson PH, Trimble RB. Glycoprotein synthesis in yeast. Identification of M8GlcNac2 as an essential intermediate in oligosaccharide processing. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:14657–14666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cid VJ, Durán A, Del Rey F, Snyder MP, Nombela C, Sánchez M. Molecular basis of cell integrity and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:345–386. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.3.345-386.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collart MA, Oliviero S. In: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K, editors. Vol. 2 1993. , chapter 13, New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández F, Jannatipour M, Hellman U, Rokeach L, Parodi AJ. A new stress protein: synthesis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe UDP-Glc: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase mRNA is induced under stress conditions but enzyme is not essential for cell viability. EMBO J. 1996;15:705–713. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernández F, Trombetta SE, Hellman U, Parodi AJ. Purification to homogeneity of UDP-Glc: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase from Schizosaccharomyces pombe and apparent absence of the enzyme from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:30701–30706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gañán S, Cazzulo JJ, Parodi AJ. A major proportion of N-glycoproteins is transiently glucosylated in the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochemistry. 1991;30:3098–3104. doi: 10.1021/bi00226a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanover JA, Lennarz W. Transmembrane assembly of N-linked glycoproteins. Studies on the topology of the saccharide-lipid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:2787–2794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hebert DN, Foellmer B, Helenius A. Glucose trimming and reglucosylation determine glycoprotein association with calnexin in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 1995;81:425–433. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90395-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helenius A. How N-linked oligosaccharides affect glycoprotein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 1994;5:253–265. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.3.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helenius A, Trombeta ES, Hebert DN, Simons JF. Calnexin, calreticulin and the folding of glycoprotein. Trends Cell Biol. 1997;7:193–200. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(97)01032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill JE, Myers AM, Koerner TJ, Tzagoloff A. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast. 1986;2:163–167. doi: 10.1002/yea.320020304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horrisberg M, Clerk M-F. Cell wall architecture of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with a truncated carbohydrate outer chain in the mannoprotein. Eur J Cell Biol. 1987;45:65–71. [Google Scholar]
- Jakob CA, Burda P, te Heesen S, Aebi M, Roth J. Genetic tailoring of N-linked oligosaccharides: the role of glucose residues in glycoprotein processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in vivo. Glycobiology. 1998;8:155–164. doi: 10.1093/glycob/8.2.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang B, Sheraton J, Ram AFJ, Dijkgraaf GJP, Kils FM, Bussey H. CWH1 encodes a novel endoplasmic reticulum membrane N-glycoprotein involved in β-1,6-glucan assembly. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:1162–1171. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.4.1162-1171.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kubota S, Yoshida Y, Kumaoka H, Furumichi A. Studies on the microsomal electron-transport system of anaerobically grown yeast. J Biochem. 1977;81:197–205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lorenz MC, Muir R, Lim E, Mc Elver J, Weber SC, Heitman J. Gene disruption with PCR products in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1995;158:113–117. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00144-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Meaden P, Hill K, Wagner J, Slipetz D, Sommer SS, Bussey H. The yeast KRE5 gene encodes a probable endoplasmic reticulum protein required for (1—6)-β-d-glucan synthesis and normal growth. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:3013–3019. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.3013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mumberg D, Muller R, Funk M. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene. 1995;156:119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker CG, Fessler LI, Nelson RE, Fessler JH. Drosophila UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase: sequence and characterization of an enzyme that distinguishes between denatured and native proteins. EMBO J. 1995;14:1294–1303. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07115.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parlati F, Dominguez M, Bergeron JJ, Thomas DY. The calnexin homologue cnx1+ in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is an essential gene which can be complemented by its soluble ER domain. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:244–253. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07309.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parodi AJ. Synthesis of steryl glucoside in bakers yeast. Acta Physiol Lationam. 1976;26:430–433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parodi AJ. Synthesis of glucosyl-dolichol derivatives in Bakers’ yeast and their role in protein glycosylation. Eur J Biochem. 1977;75:171–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parodi AJ, Lederkremer GZ, Mendelzon DH. Transient glucosylation of protein bound Man9GlcNac2, Man8GlcNAc2 and Man7GlcNac2 in any thyroid cells: a possible recognition signal in the processing of glycoproteins. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:8260–8265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez M, Hirschberg CB. Topography of glycosylation reactions in the rough endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:6822–6830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez M, Hirschberg C. Transport of sugar nucleotides into the lumen of vesicles derived from rat liver rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. Methods Enzymol. 1987;138:709–715. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)38061-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothstein RJ. One step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roy SK, Yoko-o T, Ikenaga H, Jigami Y. Functional evidence for UDP-galactose transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the in vivo galactosylation and in vitro transport assay. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:2583–2590. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.5.2583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Runge KW, Huffaker TC, Robbins PW. Two yeast mutations in glucosylation steps of the asparagine glycosylation pathway. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:412–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shahinian S, Dijkgraaf GJP, Sdicu A-M, Thomas DY, Jakob CA, Aebi M, Bussey H. Involvement of protein N-glycosyl chain glucosylation and processing in the biosynthesis of cell wall β-1,6-glucan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998;149:843–856. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast mutant strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989;122:19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simons JF, Ferro-Novick S, Rose MD, Helenius A. Bip/Kar2 serves as a molecular chaperone during carboxypeptidase Y folding in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1995;130:41–49. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snider MD, Sultzman LA, Robbins PW. Transmembrane location of oligosaccharide–lipid synthesis in microsomal vesicles. Cell. 1980;21:385–392. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90475-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sousa M, Ferrero-García M, Parodi AJ. Recognition of the oligosaccharide and protein moieties of glycoproteins by the UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase. Biochemistry. 1992;31:97–105. doi: 10.1021/bi00116a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiro MJ, Spiro RG. Effect of anion specific inhibitors on the utilization of sugar nucleotides for N-linked carbohydrate unit assembly by thyroid endoplasmic reticulum vesicles. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:5808–5815. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- te Heesen S, Lehle L, Weissman A, Aebi M. Isolation of the ALG5 locus encoding the UDP-glucose:dolichol-phosphate glucosyltransferase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem. 1994;224:71–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb19996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trombeta S, Bosch M, Parodi AJ. Glucosylation of glycoprotein by mannanlian, plant, fungal and trypanosomatid protozoa microsomal membranes. Biochemistry. 1989;28:8108–8116. doi: 10.1021/bi00446a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trombeta SE, Gañán S, Parodi AJ. The UDP-Glc: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase is a soluble protein of the endoplasmic reticulum. Glycobiology. 1991;1:155–161. doi: 10.1093/glycob/1.2.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ugalde RA, Staneloni RJ, Leloir LF. Microsomal glucosidases acting on the saccharide moiety of the glucose-containing dolichyl diphosphate oligosaccharide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979;91:1174–1181. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(79)92003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright A, Robbins PW. The enzymatic synthesis of uridine diphosphate [14C]glucose. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965;104:594–595. [Google Scholar]