Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1968 Dec;96(6):1912–1914. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.6.1912-1914.1968

Effect of Lysogeny on Serum Sensitivity

Louis H Muschel 1,2, Lissa A Ahl 1,2, L S Baron 1,2
PMCID: PMC252525  PMID: 4881698

Abstract

When Escherichia coli K-12 was infected with λ phage and mutants of λ characterized by the production of temperature-sensitive repressors, the lysogenic bacteria were significantly more resistant to normal serum than the uninfected organisms. Infection of E. coli K-12 with a lambdoid phage, φ80, whose prophage attachment site is different from that of λ, did not result in a detectable change in serum resistance. Similarly, infection with certain Pseudomonas and Shigella phages caused no detectable differences in serum resistance. Finally, the well-known conversion of the Salmonella anatum serotype to S. newington by E15 phage indicated that, despite the relatively greater roughness of S. anatum, S. newington was more sensitive to normal serum than S. anatum. Thus, the effects of lysogeny on the sensitivity of bacteria to the bactericidal action of serum mediated by the complement system may be quite variable.

Full text

PDF
1912

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. MUSCHEL L. H. Bactericidal activity of normal serum against bacterial cultures. II. Activity against Eschericha coli strains. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1960 Mar;103:632–636. doi: 10.3181/00379727-103-25619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. MUSCHEL L. H., CHAMBERLIN R. H., OSAWA E. Bactericidal activity of normal serum against bacterial cultures. I. Activity against Salmonella typhi strains. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1958 Feb;97(2):376–382. doi: 10.3181/00379727-97-23748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MUSCHEL L. H., TREFFERS H. P. Quantitative studies on the bactericidal actions of serum and complement. I. A rapid photometric growth assay for bactericidal activity. J Immunol. 1956 Jan;76(1):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Muschel L. H., Gustafson L. Antibiotic, detergent, and complement sensitivity of Salmonella typhi after ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid treatment. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jun;95(6):2010–2013. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.6.2010-2013.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muschel L. H., Schmoker K. Activity of mitomycin C, other antibiotics, and serum against lysogenic bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1966 Oct;92(4):967–971. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.4.967-971.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ROBBINS P. W., UCHIDA T. Determinants of specificity in Salmonella: changes in antigenic structure mediated by bacteriophage. Fed Proc. 1962 Jul-Aug;21:702–710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rowley D. Sensitivity of rough gram-negative bacteria to the bactericidal action of serum. J Bacteriol. 1968 May;95(5):1647–1650. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.5.1647-1650.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. TREFFERS H. P. The linear representation of dosage-response curves in microbial-antibiotic assays. J Bacteriol. 1956 Jul;72(1):108–114. doi: 10.1128/jb.72.1.108-114.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES