Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2007 Feb 7;46(5):1517–1519. doi: 10.1021/ic061972w

Photochemical Production of a Highly Reactive Porphyrin-Iron-Oxo Species

Zhengzheng Pan 1,, Rui Zhang 1,§, Leslie W-M Fung 1,, Martin Newcomb 1,
PMCID: PMC2525790  NIHMSID: NIHMS63652  PMID: 17284026

Abstract

Oxidation of 5,10,15,20-tetramesitylporphyrin-iron(III) perchlorate, (TMP)FeIII(ClO4), with ferric perchlorate in acetonitrile gave a metastable species identified as (TMP)FeIV(ClO4)2 that decayed within seconds to the known isomeric species (TMP+•)FeIII(ClO4)2. Irradiation of the metastable species with 355 nm laser light gave a highly reactive transient that reacts with simple organic reductants (alkenes and arylalkanes) 5 orders of magnitude faster than known Compound I analogues, (TMP+•)FeIV(O)(X).

Macrocyclic ligand-complexed transition metal-oxo intermediates are the active species in a variety of biological and laboratory oxidation reactions,1-3 and porphyrin-iron complexes, mimics of heme-containing peroxidase and cytochrome P450 enzymes, are widely studied. Neutral porphyrin-iron(IV)-oxo derivatives are well known, relatively stable species.4-7 More highly oxidized iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin radical cations, often called Compounds I in biological contexts, are the most reactive porphyrin-iron-oxo transients characterized to date.8-12 Iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin radical cations are postulated to be the oxidants in systems that employ porphyrin-iron(III) salts as catalysts and sacrificial oxidants such as m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA) or iodosobenzene.13,14 In biological systems, Compounds I are formed by reactions of peroxidase and catalase enzymes with hydrogen peroxide,12,15 and Compound I species are thought to be oxidants in cytochrome P450 enzymes.16-18

The high reactivity observed in catalytic reactions with iron-porphyrin species is not paralleled in stoichiometric reactions of iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin radical cations, which, for example, oxidize low energy benzylic C-H bonds only sluggishly.19,20 The cysteine thiolate ligand to iron in cytochrome P450 enzymes weakens an iron-oxygen bond and activates a Compound I species, but the Compound I derivative of the cytochrome P450 119 enzyme was found to be a low reactivity species,21 and the Compound I derivative of the heme-thiolate enzyme chloroperoxidase reacts with organic substrates only 2-3 orders of magnitude faster than simple Compound I models.22 Neither Compound I species in enzymes nor their model iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin radical cations will oxidize unactivated C-H bonds in hydrocarbons, where the C-H bond dissociation energies are about 10 kcal/mol greater than the benzylic C-H bond dissociation energy in ethylbenzene,23 but the oxidants in the catalytic processes oxidize hydrocarbons so rapidly that they do not accumulate to detectable levels. One possible explanation presented24,25 for the dichotomy between the low reactivities of iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin radical cations and the fast oxidation reactions of porphyrin-iron catalysts and P450 enzymes is that the actual oxidants in the catalytic systems are high energy isomers of Compounds I, possibly porphyrin-iron(V)-oxo species.26-28

Our group reported photochemical entries to high-valent macrocyclic ligand manganese(IV)-oxo and manganese(V)-oxo derivatives by ligand cleavage reactions using laser flash photolysis (LFP) methods.29 Related photochemical ligand cleavage reactions of high-valent iron azides gave iron(V)- and iron(VI)-nitrido species,30 and photolysis of a corrole-iron(IV) chlorate gave a highly reactive transient tentatively identified as a corrole-iron(V)-oxo species.31 We report here an extension of our studies to a porphyrin-iron complex, and photochemical production of an apparent iron-oxo species that is 5 orders of magnitude more reactive than the corresponding Compound I derivatives.

5,10,15,20-Tetramesitylporphyrin-iron(III) chloride, (TMP)FeIIICl, (1) (Scheme 1) was converted to the known perchlorate salt (TMP)FeIII(ClO4) (2). Reaction of 2 with ferric perchlorate in CH3CN gave a metastable species (3) that converted to the known derivative (TMP+•)FeIII(ClO4)2 (4)32 with a 10-second half-life at 20 °C (k = 0.07 s−1.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Compound 3 was characterized as an iron(IV) species (S = 1) by UV-visible, EPR, and NMR spectroscopies and magnetic susceptibility measurements. It is EPR silent as required for S = 1, and its magnetic susceptibility measured by the Evans' NMR method33 in CH3CN was μeff = 2.85 μB. (calc for S = 1; 2.83 μB). An S = 3/2 iron(III) derivative antiferromagnetically (AF) coupled to a porphyrin radical cation also would be EPR silent, but the 1H NMR spectrum of 3 (Figure 1) confirmed the former structure because the signals have positive δ values. For all aryl protons in 3, the S = 1 species should have positive δ values, and the iron(III) species (S = 3/2) AF coupled with a porphyrin radical cation should have negative δ values.34,35

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) UV-visible spectra; the spectrum of 3 is shown as the solid black lines, and that of 4 is shown as the dashed gray lines. (B) NMR spectra at −40 °C; the spectrum of 3 is the black line and expansion, and the spectrum of 4 is the gray line. See Supporting Information for NMR spectral details.

The UV-vis spectrum of 3 further supports the assigned structure (Figure 1). The Soret band of 3 is sharp, and the Q-band at 530 nm is pronounced, as expected for a neutral porphyrin. The absorbance of 3 between 600 and 750 nm is too weak for a porphyrin radical cation species and, in fact, is weaker than for neutral porphyrin TMP-iron(III) salts (Supporting Information). Isomer 4, containing a porphyrin radical cation, has a UV-visible spectrum that resembles those of Compound I species (TMP+•)FeIV(O)(X) (Supporting Information).

Laser flash photolysis of 3 with 355 nm light in CH3CN solution gave a highly reactive transient (5) that could be monitored by UV-visible spectroscopy. A time-resolved difference spectrum is shown in Figure 2A, where the transient formed photochemically has a positive absorbance and decays with time, and its product has a negative absorbance. Transient 5 has a Soret band absorbance that is red-shifted from that of its product with a λmax of the Soret band in the range of 395-405 nm and λmax of the Q-band at about 530 nm. The UV-visible spectrum of 5 is not similar to that of any known (TMP)-iron derivative.7,32,36

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Time-resolved spectrum for 100 ms following 355 nm irradiation of species 3 in CH3CN at ambient temperature. (B) Representative kinetic traces at 403 nm (gray lines) and fits (dotted lines) from reactions of 5 with ethylbenzene at (from the top) 0.0, 0.25, 1.0 mM concentrations in CH3CN at ambient temperature; observed rate constants are plotted in the inset of the figure. (C) Observed rate constants for reactions of 5 in CH3CN at ambient temperature with diphenylmethane (■), cis-cyclooctene (○), trans-stilbene (△), cis-stilbene (▲), and cyclohexene (□); the lines (the slopes of which are the second-order rate constants) are regression solutions.

Transient 5 is a remarkably reactive species. When produced in CH3CN in the absence of additional organic reductants, 5 decayed with a 10 ms half-life (k = 77 s−1) at ambient temperature. When organic reductants were present, the decay of 5 accelerated linearly with reductant concentration (Figure 2) indicating second-order reactions. From the pseudo-first-order rate constants obtained with various concentrations of reductants (Supporting Information), we obtained the second-order rate constants listed in Table 1. The high reactivity of 5 is apparent by comparison of these rate constants to those for the Compound I derivative (TMP+•)FeIV(O)(ClO4)20 (6) and the 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin-manganese(V)-oxo cation29 (7). Species 7 was the most reactive porphyrin-metal-oxo complex with known rate constants,29 and transient 5 is comparable in reactivity to 7.

Table 1.

Second-order rate constants for reactions of 5 - 7 with organic reductants.a

Substrate 5 6b 7c
diphenylmethane (1.5 ± 0.4) ×105 1.3 1.4 × 105
ethylbenzene (1.2 ± 0.1) × 105 1.6 1.3 × 105
trans-stilbene (1.6 ± 0.1) × 106 3.4
cis-stilbene (2.0 ± 0.2) × 106 90 6.1 × 105
cis-cyclooctene (1.6 ± 0.1) × 106 62
cyclohexene (2.2 ± 0.3) × 106 68
a

Second-order rate constants in units of M−1 s−1 for reactions in CH3CN at 20 ± 2 °C; errors in the rate constants for 5 are at 2σ.

b

6 = (TMP)FeIV (O)(ClO4); kinetics from ref. 20.

c

7 = 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin-manganese(V)-oxo cation; kinetics from ref. 29b.

The nature of transient 5 was suggested by its reaction with an alkene, which indicated that 5 behaved as an oxygen-transfer metal-oxo species as opposed to a radical-generating species. An acetonitrile solution of 2 and 1.2 equivalents of Fe(ClO4)3 at −40 °C gave 3 in 80% yield as determined by UV-visible spectroscopy. Addition of excess cyclooctene to this and irradiation with 350 nm light in a photochemical reactor gave cyclooctene oxide (28% based on 3). Control reactions demonstrated that no epoxide was formed without light, without 2, without Fe(ClO4)2, or when 3 was allowed to decay to 4 before irradiation. In the preparative reaction, salt 2 was the major porphyrin compound present by UV-visible spectral analysis after the reactions. This result and the isosbestic behavior at 390 nm in the LFP experiments (Figure 2A) indicate that 5 reacted to give porphyrin-iron(III) salts directly.

Transient 5 cannot be a simple ligand exchanged derivative of (TMP+•)FeIV(O)(ClO4) (6). It reacts 5 orders of magnitude faster than 6 and the chloride salt analogue,20 and substitution of the axial ligand in 6 by the weak binding solvent CH3CN would give an even less reactive species.37 We speculate that 5 is an isomer of 6, however, possibly one best described as an iron(V)-oxo species.26,27,31 Electronic excited states of porphyrin-metal complexes relax on the picosecond time scale,29b and a porphyrin-iron(V)-oxo species that existed in the millisecond time frame would require a high barrier for internal electron transfer from the porphyrin to the metal.

Transient 5 appears to be a member of a new class of porphyrin-iron-oxo derivatives as deduced by its unique UV-visible spectrum in comparison to known Compound I analogues, the formation of epoxide product in reaction with cyclooctene, and the very high reactivity of 5. Further characterization of this species will lead to a better understanding of its detailed structure, but it is noteworthy that 5 displays reactivity appropriate for the active oxidants in a catalytic processes under turnover conditions and in cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Supplementary Material

1si20070119_04

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by NIH grants GM-48722 and GM-068621.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, NMR spectra, and kinetic traces for reactions of 5. This material is available free via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sheldon RA. Metalloprophyrins In Catalytic Oxidations. Marcel Dekker; New York: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meunier B. Metal-Oxo and Metal-Peroxo Species in Catalytic Oxidations. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meunier B. Chem. Rev. 1992;92:1411–1456. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balch AL, Chan YW, Cheng RJ, La Mar GN, Latos-Grazynski L, Renner MW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984;106:7779–7785. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gold A, Jayaraj, Doppelt P, Weiss R, Chottard G, Bill E, Ding X, Trautwein AX. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:5756–5761. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bell SEJ, Cooke PR, Inchley P, Leanord DR, Lindsay Smith JR, Robbins A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1991;2:549–559. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Groves JT, Gross Z, Stern MK. Inorg. Chem. 1994;33:5065–5072. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Groves JT, Haushalter RC, Nakamura M, Nemo TE, Evans BJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981;103:2884–2886. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balch AL, Latos-Grazynski L, Renner MW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107:2983–2985. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mandon D, Weiss R, Jayaraj K, Gold A, Terner J, Bill E, Trautwein AX. Inorg. Chem. 1992;31:4404–4409. doi: 10.1021/ic951058v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Czarnecki K, Nimri S, Gross Z, Proniewicz LM, Kincaid JR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:2929–2935. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hiner ANP, Raven EL, Thorneley RNF, Garcia-Canovas F, Rodriguez-Lopez JN. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002;91:27–34. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(02)00390-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Groves JT, Watanabe Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:8443–8452. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nam W, Jin SW, Lim MH, Ryu JY, Kim C. Inorg. Chem. 2002;41:3647–3652. doi: 10.1021/ic011145p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dawson JH. Science. 1988;240:433–439. doi: 10.1126/science.3358128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ortiz de Montellano PR. Cytochrome P450 Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry. 3rd ed. Kluwer; New York: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sono M, Roach MP, Coulter ED, Dawson JH. Chem. Rev. 1996;96:2841–2887. doi: 10.1021/cr9500500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Denisov IG, Makris TM, Sligar SG, Schlichting I. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:2253–2277. doi: 10.1021/cr0307143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang R, Chandrasena REP, Martinez E, II, Horner JH, Newcomb M. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1193–1195. doi: 10.1021/ol050296j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pan Z, Zhang R, Newcomb M. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006;100:524–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2005.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Newcomb M, Zhang R, Chandrasena REP, Halgrimson JA, Horner JH, Makris TM, Sligar SG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:4580–4581. doi: 10.1021/ja060048y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang R, Nagraj N, Lansakara-P. DSP, Hager LP, Newcomb M. Org. Lett. 2006;8:2731–2734. doi: 10.1021/ol060762k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Griller D, Kanabus-Kaminska JM, Maccoll A. Theochem. 1988;40:125–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Watanabe Y. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2001;6:846–856. doi: 10.1007/s007750100278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Newcomb M, Chandrasena REP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;338:394–403. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ogliaro F, de Visser SP, Groves JT, Shaik S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:2874–2878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dey A, Ghosh A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:3206–3207. doi: 10.1021/ja012402s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.A synthetic putative iron(V)-oxo porphyrin species was reported, but theoretical calculations suggest the species is not a true iron(V)-oxo species. See Yamaguchi K, Watanabe Y, Morishima I. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992:1721–1723. and ref 27.
  • 29.(a) Newcomb M, Zhang R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:12418–12419. doi: 10.1021/ja0377448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang R, Horner JH, Newcomb M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:6573–6582. doi: 10.1021/ja045042s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang R, Harischandra D, Newcomb M. Chem. Eur. J. 2005;11:5713–5720. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.(a) Wagner WD, Nakamoto K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:1590–1598. [Google Scholar]; (b) Berry JF, Bill E, Bothe E, George SD, Mienert B, Neese F, Wieghardt K. Science. 2006;312:1937–1941. doi: 10.1126/science.1128506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harischandra DN, Zhang R, Newcomb M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:13776–13777. doi: 10.1021/ja0542439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Groves JT, Quinn R, McMurry TJ, Nakamura M, Lang G, Boso B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107:354–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.(a) Evans DF. J. Chem. Soc. 1959:2003–2005. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sur S. J. Magn. Reson. 1989;82:169–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Walker FA. Inorg. Chem. 2003;42:4526–4544. doi: 10.1021/ic026245p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.The representation of 3 and 4 in Scheme 1 with two perchlorate anions bound to iron is for convenience. One bound perchlorate is required for the photochemistry of 3, and compound 4 and related species are known to have bound perchlorate (see ref 32).
  • 36.Mizutani, Hashimoto S, Tatsuno Y, Kitagawa T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:6809–6814. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.(a) Gross Z, Nimri S. Inorg. Chem. 1994;33:1731–1732. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nam W, Won JS, Lim MH, Ryu JY, Kim C. Inorg. Chem. 2002;41:3647–3652. doi: 10.1021/ic011145p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1si20070119_04

RESOURCES