Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2005 Dec 23;70(26):10792–10802. doi: 10.1021/jo0517848

Squaric Acid-Based Peptidic Inhibitors of Matrix Metalloprotease-1 (MMP-1)

M Burak Onaran 1,, Anthony B Comeau 1,, Christopher T Seto 1,*
PMCID: PMC2527039  NIHMSID: NIHMS63114  PMID: 16356002

Abstract

A series of squaric acid-peptide conjugates were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of MMP-1. The cyclobut-3-enedione core was substituted at the 3-position with several functional groups, such as -N(alkyl)OH, -NHOH and –OH, that are designed to bind to the zinc atom in the active site of the metalloprotease. The 4-position of the cyclobut-3-enedione was derivatized with mono- or dipeptides that are designed to bind in the S1′ and S2′ subsites of the enzyme, and position the metal chelating group appropriately in the active site for binding to zinc. Positional scanning revealed that -N(Me)OH provided the highest level of inhibition among the chelating groups that were tested, and Leu-Tle-NHMe was the preferred amino acid sequence. A combination of these groups yielded an inhibitor with an IC50 value of 95 μM. For one inhibitor, conversion of one of the carbonyl groups on the cyclobut-3-enedione core to a thiocarbonyl group resulted in a 18-fold increase in potency, and yielded a compound with an IC50 value of 15 μM.

Introduction

Matrix Metalloproteases (MMPs)

Matrix metalloproteases are a family of structurally related endopeptidases that degrade and remodel components of the extracellular matrix (ECM).1 These enzymes regulate structure and sustain a balanced composition of the ECM, two processes that are important for maintaining normal physiology in a number of tissues. For example, MMPs play a crucial role in embryonic development, healing and reproduction.

The activity of MMPs is normally regulated at three levels: 1) gene transcription, 2) activation of MMP propeptides, and 3) inhibition of MMPs by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases (TIMPs).2,3 Overexpression of MMPs and deregulation of their activity is associated with a variety pathological conditions including tumor growth and metastasis,4 angiogenesis,5 destruction of joints that causes osteoarthritis6 and rheumatoid arthritis,7 periodontal disease8 and multiple sclerosis.9 Therefore, there is significant interest in developing MMP inhibitors for therapeutic applications.

Biological Applications of Squaric Acids

Squaric acid is a molecule that has significant aromatic character. In one resonance form it has two π electrons and a negative charge on each of the carbonyl oxygen atoms (Figure 1). The conjugate base of squaric acid can serve as an electrostatic mimic of negatively charged groups that are common in biology including carboxylates and phosphate mono- and diesters. As a result, derivatives of squaric acid have been used as a replacement for these groups in a number of medicinal applications.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Resonance structures of squaric acid.

Our research group has used squaric acid derivatives to mimic the phosphate group in phosphotyrosine residues. We prepared a number of 3-hydroxy-4-aryl-cyclobut-3-enediones as non-hydrolyzable isosteres of aryl phosphate esters and found that these compounds are effective inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatases.10 Kim and coworkers have used phosphonocyclobutenedione as a mimic of pyrophosphate and found that it is a selective inhibitor of DNA polymerases from several viruses.11 Sekine has used a diamide of squaric acid to replace a phosphate diester linkage in an oligodeoxynucleotide.12

Derivatives of squaric acid have also been used to mimic carboxylates by a number of investigators. Shinada replaced the γ-carboxylic acid of a glutamate residue within a polyamine toxin with a squaric acid derivative. The resulting compound was a selective agonist of ionotropic glutamate receptors.13 Sun and coworkers used a derivative of squaric acid in their investigations of an NMDA antagonist that regulates the activation of glutamate receptors.14 In this example, squaric acid mimics the natural glutamate agonist of the neuronal receptors. In its application as a guanidinium isotere, Butera used diaminocyclobutenedione as a replacement for the N-cyanoguanidine group in a bladder-selective potassium channel opener that is used as a treatment for urge urinary incontinence.15

Hydroxamic acids are potent inhibitors of zinc metalloproteases. X-ray crystal structures show that hydroxamic acids chelate to the active site zinc atom as shown in structure I (Figure 2).16 In addition, Bruckner and coworkers have demonstrated that vinylogous hydroxamic acids that are derived from squaric acid are good metal chelators (see structure II in Figure 2).17 These two observations prompted us to investigate the potential of vinylogous hydroxamic acids that are based upon squaric acid as inhibitors of MMPs. We have derivatized the vinylogous hydroxamic acids with peptides in order to target them to the active site of the proteases.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Known binding mode of hydroxamic acid I versus proposed binding mode by squaric acid derivative II.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Compounds 4a–4f

We began our studies by making a series of simple derivatives to determine what functional group is preferred at the R1 position of the inhibitors (Scheme 1). Squaric acid 1 was converted to its dimethyl ester 2 by treating it with trimethyl orthoformate. Reaction of compound 2 with a series of hydroxylamines gave vinylogous hydroxamic acids 3ae. Substitution of the remaining methyl ester with several primary amines gave inhibitors 4af.

SCHEME 1a.

SCHEME 1a

aReagents: (a) CH(OCH3)3, MeOH, Δ; (b) HONHR1·HCl, KOH, MeOH; (c) H2NR2, MeOH.

These compounds were screened for activity against MMP-1. Assays were performed in a buffer of 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, 5 mM CaCl2, 20 μM ZnSO4, 0.05% Brij 35 at pH 7.6 using the fluorogenic substrate Dnp-Pro-Cha-Gly-Cys(Me)-His-Ala-Lys(Nma)-NH2. In this substrate, N-methylanthranilic acid (Nma) is a fluorophore and the dinitrophenyl (Dnp) group is a quencher.18,19 The progress of the reactions was monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy with excitation at 340 nm and emission at 460 nm. For inhibitors 4ab, R1 = H while the R2 position was varied between a branched and a straight-chain alkyl group. Between these two compounds, inhibitor 4b, which incorporates a simple n-hexyl chain, had the better activity. We next screened Me, cyclohexyl and benzyl groups at the R1 position, and found that large groups are unfavorable at this site. Compounds 4e and 4f, where R1 is cyclohexyl or benzyl, were poor inhibitors that showed no activity up to 10 mM concentration. Compound 4c, which incorporates a smaller methyl group at the R1 position, was approximately three times more active than compound 4b, where R1 = H. Both inhibitors 4c and 4d had IC50 values of 310 μM.

Monopeptide Inhibitors

We next turned our attention to inhibitors that incorporated a single amino acid in order to determine which amino acid side chain is preferred in the S1′ subsite within the context of these inhibitors. As shown in Scheme 2, inhibitors 6ag were synthesized by reaction of vinylogous hydroxamic acids 3b or 3e with a variety of amino acid methyl esters. We chose amino acids with hydrophobic side chains since data from the literature indicated that such structures are preferred in the S1′ subsite.1

SCHEME 2a.

SCHEME 2a

aReagents: (a) MeOH, KOH. bRacemic Nle was used to prepare 5b and 6c.

Comparison of inhibitors 6a and 6b shows that both methyl and isopropyl groups at the R1 position are small enough to be tolerated by the enzyme (Table 2). In addition, the enzyme appears to be fairly insensitive to the identity of the R3 side chain, since all of the inhibitors in this series gave IC50 values that range from 190 to 380 μM. Among these compounds inhibitor 6a had the best activity with an IC50 value of 190 μM.

TABLE 2.

Inhibition of MMP-1 by Compounds 6a–g

graphic file with name nihms63114f12.jpg
compound R1 R3 = side chain of amino acid IC50 (μM)a
6a Me Ile 190 ± 30
6b -CH(CH3)2 Ile 210 ± 10
6c Me Nleb 280 ± 20
6d Me Leu 320 ± 20
6e Me Phe 330 ± 20
6f Me Trp 380 ± 50
6g Me Met 300 ± 50
a

All experiments were performed in duplicate.

b

Racemic Nle was used to prepare compound 6c.

Dipeptide Inhibitors

To improve the potency of the inhibitors, we extended their structure by incorporating a second amino acid that is designed to bind in the S2′ subsite. X-ray crystallographic studies have shown that peptide-based hydroxamic acid inhibitors bind in the active site of MMPs by occupying the primed subsites.20 The synthesis of the inhibitors in this series is shown in Scheme 3. For these studies, we used the dibutyl ester of squaric acid 7 as the starting point. We found that this compound is more convenient to work with than the corresponding dimethyl ester, since the dibutyl ester has increased solubility in most common organic solvents.

SCHEME 3a.

SCHEME 3a

aReagents: (a) (BuO)3CH, BuOH, reflux; (b) HONHMe·HCl, KOH, MeOH; (c) NH2Me, N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), DMF; (d) 50% TFA, CH2Cl2; (e) NHS, N-Boc-Ile or N-Boc-Leu, EDC, DMF; (f) 50% TFA, CH2Cl2; (g) MeOH. Tle = tert-leucine, Chg = cyclohexylglycine, Phg = phenylglycine.

bSee Table 3 for specific structures.

Squaric acid was treated with tributyl orthoformate to give dibutyl ester 7. Subsequent reaction of 7 with N-methylhydroxylamine yielded compound 8. The dipeptide building blocks were prepared by coupling N-Boc amino acids 9ag with methylamine to give the corresponding N-methyl amides. These were treated with trifluoroacetic acid to give compounds 10ag. Coupling of 10ag with N-Boc-Ile or N-Boc-Leu, followed by Boc deprotection gave dipeptides 11ah. Finally, reaction of the dipeptides with compound 8 in methanol at room temperature provided the desired inhibitors 12ah.

Most of the inhibitors in this series incorporate the side chain of Ile at the R3 position because the data presented in Table 2 indicated that Ile is preferred in the S1′ subsite. The side chains at the R4 position were chosen based upon literature precedent, which suggest that aromatic and hydrophobic amino acids are preferred at the S2′ subsite.1 For inhibitors 12ag, which incorporate an Ile side chain at R3, we did not observe any improvement in activity over the related monopeptide inhibitor 6a. In addition, the activity did not depend strongly on the structure of R4, since we observe a difference in IC50 values of only 2.5-fold among these seven compounds.

Compounds 12a and 12h provide an interesting comparison. Both incorporate at bulky t-butyl group at R4. Compound 12a incorporates the side chain of Ile at R3, and was the least active among 12ag. By contrast, 12h has a Leu side chain at R3 and it is 2–5-fold more active than any of the other mono- or dipeptide-based inhibitors. These data suggest that binding interactions in the S1′ and S2′ subsites are dependent on one another. For the monopeptide inhibitors that leave the S2′ subsite empty (Table 2, compare inhibitors 6a and 6d), Ile is preferred over Leu at S1′. This selectivity is reversed in the dipeptide inhibitors. With Tle in the S2′ subsite, Leu is preferred over Ile at S1′ (compare 12a and 12h).

Squaric Acid Monoamides

We also made a cursory examination of a simple monoamide of squaric acid as a potential MMP-1 inhibitor. Scheme 4 shows the synthesis of compound 14, which is the squaric acid analog of the vinylogous hydroxamic acid inhibitor 12h. Reaction of H-Leu-Tle-NHMe (11h) with dimethyl squarate 2 gave compound 13, which was subsequently hydrolyzed under acidic conditions to give compound 14.

SCHEME 4a.

SCHEME 4a

aReagents: (a) H-Leu-Tle-NHMe, MeOH, reflux; (b) 0.15 N HCl, MeOH, reflux.

When compound 14 was assayed against MMP-1, we observed no inhibition up to a concentration of 200 μM. In retrospect, this result is not surprising since the bite angle between the two oxygen atoms in squaric acid is known to be too large to form a strong five-membered chelate with Zn+2 (right side of Figure 3).21 By comparison, the vinylogous hydroxamic acid inhibitors have the potential to form a six-membered chelate with zinc (left side of Figure 3). This structure has a reduced bite angle and a shorter distance between the two chelating oxygen atoms. Both of these factors favor binding to the metal center.22

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

6-membered vs. 5-membered zinc chelation models.

Thiocarbonyl- Vs. Carbonyl-Containing Inhibitors

Despite the fact that hydroxamic acids are potent inhibitors of metalloproteases, they have met with limited success in the clinic because of unfavorable oral bioavailability, stability in vivo and side effects.23 As a result, investigators have been working to discover alternate zinc-binding motifs as a substitute for hydroxamic acids. One such example has been published by Cohen and coworkers, who reported hydroxypyridinone and pyrone ligands as promising alternatives to hydroxamic acids.24 Among the compounds assayed, the zinc chelators that incorporated a thiocarbonyl group had lower IC50 values when compared to their non-sulfur containing analogues.

To apply this strategy to the squaric/hydroxamic acid hybrids, we first needed to develop a reliable method for incorporating sulfur into the inhibitors. Squaric acid monoester 3b (Scheme 2) did not react with a variety of thionating agents including P2S5/hexamethyldisiloxane and Lawesson’s reagent. By contrast, the squaric acid monoamide 6a reacted with both P2S5 and Lawesson’s reagent to give a product that incorporated a single sulfur atom in place of oxygen, as determined by mass spectrometry. Since Lawesson’s reagent provided the cleaner of the two reactions, this method was used to convert 6a, 12d, 12g and 12h into the corresponding thiocarbonyl compounds (Scheme 5).

SCHEME 5.

SCHEME 5

Thionation of Cyclobutenediones

Determining the Position of Sulfur Incorporation

The inhibitors in Scheme 5 contain three or four different carbonyl groups, any of which could be the site of reaction with Lawesson’s reagent. In order to determine the specific site that sulfur was incorporated into the molecules, we prepared two model compounds to aid us with this analysis (Scheme 6). Dibutyl squarate 7 was treated with two equivalents of NH2-Phe-OMe to give compound 19. When compound 19 was treated with less than one equivalent of Lawesson’s reagent, the reaction yielded compound 20 in which one carbonyl group on the cyclobutenedione core had been replaced by a thiocarbonyl as determined by mass spectrometry. Ester carbonyl groups do not react with Lawesson’s reagent under the reaction conditions that we employed (25 °C). In a similar manner, compound 6e was converted to 21.

SCHEME 6a.

SCHEME 6a

aReagents: (a) L-Phe-OMe·HCl, KOH, MeOH; (b) Lawesson’s reagent, CH2Cl2, 25 °C.

The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 19 (Figure 4) has a resonance at 5.0 PPM that corresponds to the α-protons of the two Phe residues (Ha). When this compound is treated with Lawesson’s reagent to give compound 20, one of the α-protons remains at 5.0 PPM (Hc) while the other is shifted to 6.1 PPM (Hb shown in red). Hb shifts downfield since the neighboring nitrogen atom of this Phe residue is in conjugation with the thiocarbonyl group, which is a better electron acceptor than a standard carbonyl. In a similar manner, compound 6e has a resonance at 5.0 PPM that corresponds the Phe α-proton (Hd). When this compound is converted to the monothiocarbonyl adduct 21, this proton shifts downfield to 6.2 PPM (He shown in red). This observation, along with the fact that compound 3b (Scheme 2) that also incorporates a – N(OH)Me group does not react with Lawesson’s reagent, suggests that the carbonyl group opposite the Phe residue in 6e was the site of reaction with Lawesson’s reagent. Since we observe a similar shift for the α-proton of the amino acid that is attached directly to the cyclobutenedione ring in compounds 6a, 12d, 12g and 12h, we infer that all of these compounds react with Lawesson’s reagent on the opposite side of the ring from the peptide chain (see the Supporting Information for the spectra).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Changes that occur in the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 19 and 6e upon monothionation of the cyclobutenedione core.

Additional evidence for the site of sulfur incorporation comes from the chemical shift of the –OH proton of the vinylogous hydroxamic acid in compounds 6e and 21. This proton appears at 10.7 ppm in compound 6e, since it participates in a strong hydrogen bond with the neighboring carbonyl group on the cyclobutenedione ring. However, the analogous proton in compound 21 appears at 8.5–9.0 ppm. This change in chemical shift is partly due to the fact that the thiocarbonyl group is a weaker hydrogen bond acceptor than the carbonyl group.

Effect of the Thiocarbonyl Group on Inhibition

As shown in Table 4, two of the compounds show improved activity against MMP-1 on conversion to their thiocarbonyl analogs, while the activity of the other two remain unchanged. Compound 15 is 2–3 times more potent than 6a, while the potency of 16 is increased by 18-fold compared to 12d. By contrast, compounds 12g and h have similar IC50 values when compared to their thiocarbonyl analogs 17 and 18. These results suggest that conversion of a carbonyl group on the cyclobutenedione core of the inhibitors to a thiocarbonyl can be an effective method for improving inhibition. However, this improvement is dependent on the specific structure of the inhibitor. One plausible explanation for the observation that the potencies of compounds 12g and h do not change upon thionation is that the improvement in chelation between the cyclobutene core and the active site zinc atom changes the position of the bound inhibitor in the active site. This geometry change could decrease binding interactions between the peptide portion of the inhibitors and the S1′ and S2′ subsites, and offset the improved binding to zinc. By contrast, conversion of compounds 6a and 12d to their thiocarbonyl analogs could lead to improved binding with the zinc atom, and also may reposition the inhibitor in the active site so that it makes more favorable interactions with the distal enzyme subsites.

TABLE 4.

Inhibition of MMP-1 by Thiocarbonyl-Containing Inhibitors

graphic file with name nihms63114f14.jpg
R compound number for X = S IC50 (μM)a compound number for X = O IC50 (μM)
HN-Ile-OMe 15 70 ± 8 6a 190 ± 30
HN-Ile-Phe-NHMe 16 15 ± 1 12d 270 ± 30
HN-Ile-Leu-NHMe 17 170 ± 40 12g 200 ± 20
HN-Leu-Tle-NHMe 18 96 ± 30 12h 95 ± 7
a

All experiments performed in duplicate.

Conclusions

We have investigated the potential of a hybrid between squaric and hydroxamic acids to serve as a metal binding motif for the design of metalloprotease inhibitors. While hydroxamic acids are commonly used as MMP inhibitors, to the best of our knowledge this report represents the first use of a squaric acid derivative as a warhead for the design of inhibitors of metalloproteases. The squaric/hydroxamic acid hybrids are generally not as potent as hydroxamic acid-based inhibitors, many of which have inhibition constants in the nM range. However, since hydroxamic acids have not met with much success in the clinic, these hybrids could serve as an alternate starting point for the design of inhibitors with perhaps improved pharmacological properties. The structure of the peptidic portion of the inhibitors helps target them to the active site of zinc proteases, rather than to other classes of enzymes for which squaric acid derivatives can serve as inhibitors.

Among the alkyl groups that we have examined at the –N(OH)alkyl position of the inhibitors, small substituents such as Me and i-Pr are well accommodated in the active site of MMP-1, while sterically demanding groups such as Bn and cyclohexyl are too large and lead to poor activity. Among the inhibitors that do not contain a sulfur atom, we found that the dipeptide Leu-Tle-NHMe provided the highest level of activity when attached to the cyclobutenedione core.

We also developed a regioselective method for converting one of the carbonyl groups on the core into the corresponding thiocarbonyl compound. This reaction occurs specifically at the position on the opposite side of the cyclobutene ring from the peptide substituent. Thionation of the inhibitors leads to improved activity in some cases, but not in others. Compound 12d gave the largest increase in potency upon thionation. The 18-fold improvement resulted in an inhibitor with an IC50 value of 15 μM against MMP-1.

Experimental Section

Full characterization for compounds 3b, 3c and 3e has been reported in the literature.17

3-(Hydroxyamino)-4-methoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (3a)

3,4-Dimethoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione 1 (200 mg, 1.4 mmol) was added to 10 mL of MeOH and stirred until all of the solids had dissolved. To this mixture was added hydroxylamine hydrochloride (104 mg, 1.5 mmol), the reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C, and KOH (94.3 mg, 1.7 mmol) dissolved in 5 mL of MeOH was added. At this point the reaction contained a white precipitate. The reaction was monitored by TLC and upon disappearance of the starting material the mixture was filtered and the solid that was collected was washed with cold MeOH. The filtrate and washes were combined and solvent was evaporated. The crude material was purified by column chromatography (1:9 MeOH/CH2Cl2) to give compound 3a as a yellow solid (0.093 g, 0.650 mmol, 47%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.37 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 184.9, 181.5, 174.4, 170.1, 60.1; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C5H6NO4 144.0297, found 144.0292.

3-[(Benzyl)hydroxyamino]-4-methoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (3d)

This compound was prepared using N-benzylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.367 g, 2.3 mmol) and 1 (0.30 g, 2.1 mmol) according to the procedure described above for the preparation of compound 3a. Purification of 3d was performed by column chromatography (5:95 MeOH/CH2Cl2) to obtain a white solid (0.318 g, 1.37 mmol, 65%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.39 (m, 5 H), 4.88 (s, 3 H), 4.38 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 185.0, 181.3, 175.0, 169.0, 135.0, 129.0, 128.8, 128.5, 60.3, 57.3; HRMS-ESI (M + Na+) calcd for C12H11NO4Na 256.0586, found 256.0590.

3-(Hydroxyamino)-4-[(2-methylpropyl)amino]-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (4a)

To a solution of compound 3a (0.055 g, 0.383 mmol) dissolved in MeOH (1 mL), isobutylamine (0.062 g, 0.844 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 25 h. The solvent was evaporated and the product was purified by column chromatography (1:9:90 30% aqueous NH4OH/MeOH/CH2Cl2) giving 4a (0.009 g, 0.049 mmol, 13%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 3.39 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 1.85 (m, 1 H), 0.96 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 181.1, 180.3, 168.9, 167.8, 52.8, 31.4, 20.0; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C8H12N2O3 185.0926, found 185.0932.

3-(Hexylamino)-4-(hydroxyamino)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (4b)

Compound 3b (100 mg, 0.70 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (10 mL) and hexylamine (84.9 mg, 0.84 mmol) was added to the solution. The reaction was stirred for 12 h at room temperature, after which time TLC showed that all the starting material was consumed. The solvent was then removed by rotary evaporation. The crude material was purified by column chromatography (1:9:90 30% aqueous NH4OH/MeOH/CH2Cl2) to yield 4b as a yellow oil (17.8 mg, 0.084 mmol, 12%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 3.35 (m, 2 H), 1.50 (m, 2 H), 1.27 (m, 6 H), 0.86 (m, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 184.2, 183.6, 170.2, 169.6, 44.1, 31.7, 31.6, 26.4, 23.0, 14.8; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C10H17N2O3 213.1239, found 213.1250.

3-(Hexylamino)-4-(hydroxymethylamino)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (4c)

To a solution of 3b (0.157 g, 1.0 mmol) in MeOH (1 mL), hexylamine (0.111 g, 1.1 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:9:90 30% aqueous NH4OH/MeOH/CH2Cl2) giving 4c (0.19 g, 0.84 mmol, 84%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.19 (s, 1 H), 7.50 (s, 1 H), 3.59 (m, 5 H), 1.64 (m, 2 H), 1.32 (m, 6 H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.9, 177.5, 166.8, 164.9, 45.0, 41.4, 31.4, 30.9, 26.1, 22.6, 14.0; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C11H18N2O3Na 249.1215, found 249.1220.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(pentylamino)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (4d)

Compound 4d (0.058 g, 0.27 mmol, 37%) was prepared from 3b (0.118 g, 0.75 mmol) and pentylamine (0.65 g, 0.75 mmol) according to the procedure used for preparing 4c. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.16 (s, 1 H), 3.56 (m, 5 H), 1.64 (m, 2 H), 1.33 (m, 4 H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.9, 177.4, 166.7, 165.1, 45.0, 41.4, 30.7, 28.6, 22.3, 14.0; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C10H16N2O3Na 235.1059, found 235.1066.

3-[(Cyclohexyl)hydroxyamino]-4-(hexylamino)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (4e)

Compound 4e (0.0047 g, 0.016 mmol, 13%) was prepared as a white solid from 3c (0.027 g, 0.12 mmol) and hexylamine (0.015 g, 0.144 mmol) according to the procedure used for preparation of 4b. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.34 (br s, 2 H), 3.76 (br s, 1 H), 3.32 (s, 4 H), 3.52 (s, 2 H), 1.88 (m, 2 H), 1.70 (m, 2 H), 1.57 (s, 3 H), 1.27 (m, 10 H), 1.53 (m, 3 H), 0.86 (m, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 181.7, 181.4, 167.3, 166.4, 51.5, 42.7, 33.2, 30.3, 30.2, 25.0, 24.3, 23.5, 21.5, 13.4; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C16H27N2O3 295.2022, found 295.2018.

3-[(Benzyl)hydroxyamino]-4-(hexylamino)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (4f)

Compound 4f (0.232 g, 0.77 mmol, 89%) was prepared as a white solid from 3d (0.200 g, 0.86 mmol) and hexylamine (0.101 g, 1.00 mmol) according to the procedure used for the preparation of 4b. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.36 (m, 5 H), 4.94 (s, 2 H), 3.58 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.60 (dd, J = 13.9, 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 1.34 (m, 6 H), 0.91 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 180.4, 178.6, 168.2, 166.1, 135.6, 129.1 128.7, 128.3 57.5, 44.4, 31.6, 26.1, 22.7, 13.4; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) 303.1709, found 303.1711.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucine methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (6a)

To a solution of 3b (0.219 g, 1.39 mmol) dissolved in MeOH (5 mL), the hydrochloride salt of L-isoleucine methyl ester (5a) (0.229 g, 1.26 mmol) was added. To this stirred solution KOH (0.0713 g, 1.27 mmol) was added, and immediately a white precipitate formed. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 12 h and solvent was evaporated. Purification was performed by column chromatography (1:9:90 30% aqueous NH4OH/MeOH/CH2Cl2) to yield a yellowish flaky solid (0.238 g, 0.88 mmol, 70%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 5.04 (br s, 2 H), 4.81 (d, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.50 (s, 3 H), 2.03 (m, 1 H), 1.54 (m, 1 H), 1.30 (m, 1 H), 0.97 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 180.4, 180.0, 173.0, 167.6, 167.0, 62.4, 52.8, 41.4, 39.4, 25.8, 15.6, 11.6; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C12H19N2O5 271.1294, found 271.1287.

3-[Hydroxy(1-methylethyl)amino]-4-(L-isoleucine methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (6b)

Compound 6b (0.034 g, 0.11 mmol, 26%) was prepared as a colorless solid starting from 3e (0.080 g, 0.432 mmol) and 5a (0.120 g, 0.56 mmol) according to the procedure used for the preparation of 4b. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.28 (br s, 1 H), 4.83 (br s, 1 H), 4.52 (br s, 1 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 2.01 (s, 1 H), 1.49 (m, 1 H), 1.31 (m, 7 H), 0.93 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 179.1, 179.0, 172.0, 166.7, 165.5, 61.8, 55.5, 52.7, 38.7, 25.1, 19.8, 15.5, 11.8; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C14H23N2O5 299.1607, found 299.1602.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(D,L-norleucine methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (6c)

Compound 6c (0.09 g, 0.33 mmol, 45%) was prepared from 3b (0.118 g, 0.75 mmol), D,L-norleucine methyl ester HCl salt (0.136 g, 0.75 mmol) and KOH (0.042 g, 0.75 mmol) according to the procedure used for preparing 6a. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.79 (dt, J = 9.1, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 3.55 (s, 3 H), 1.95 (m, 1 H), 1.82 (m, 1 H), 1.36 (m, 4 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.8, 178.2, 172.0, 165.9, 165.2, 57.0, 52.5, 41.3, 32.5, 27.6, 22.2, 13.8; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C12H19N2O5 271.1294, found 271.1285.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-leucine methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (6d)

Compound 6d was prepared as a white solid (0.023 g, 0.076 mmol, 38%) starting from 3b (0.031 g, 0.20 mmol) and 5c (0.047 g, 0.26 mmol) according to the procedure used to prepare 6a. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.14 (br s, 1 H), 4.87 (br s, 1 H), 3.72 (s, 3 H) 3.55 (s, 3 H), 1.75 (m, 1 H), 0.96 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 184.5, 183.5, 174.1, 170.3, 168.7, 54.8, 53.0, 31.3, 25.9, 23.4, 21.7; HRMS-ESI (M + Na+) calcd for C12H18N2O5Na 293.1113, found 293.1118.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-phenylalanine methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (6e)

Compound 6e (0.135 g, 0.44 mmol, 59%) was prepared from 3b (0.118 g, 0.75 mmol), L-phenylalanine methyl ester HCl salt (0.216 g, 1.0 mmol) and KOH (0.056 g, 1.0 mmol) according to the procedure used for preparing 6a. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.75 (s, 1 H), 7.79 (s, 1 H), 7.25 (m, 5 H), 5.06 (s, 1 H), 3.70 (s, 3 H), 3.35 (s, 3 H), 3.28 (dd, J = 14.0, 3.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.18 (m, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 180.0, 179.2, 171.9, 166.9, 166.0, 137.7, 129.6, 128.8, 127.0, 57.6, 52.8, 41.2, 37.7; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C15H16N2O5Na 327.0957, found 327.0948.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-tryptophan methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (6f)

Compound 6f (0.16 g, 0.47 mmol, 62%) was prepared from 3b (0.118 g, 0.75 mmol), L-tryptophan methyl ester HCl salt (0.255 g, 1.0 mmol) and KOH (0.056 g, 1.0 mmol) according to the procedure used for preparing 6a. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.56 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.07 (m, 3 H), 5.13 (dd, J = 7.7, 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H), 3.43 (m, 5 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.6, 179.0, 172.4, 166.9, 166.2, 137.0, 127.7, 123.7, 121.5, 119.0, 118.2, 111.3, 109.1, 57.7, 52.1, 40.3, 28.7; HRMS-ESI (M + Na+) calcd for C17H17N3O5Na 366.1066, found 366.1075.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-methionine methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (6g)

Compound 6g (0.082 g, 0.28 mmol, 38%) was prepared from 3b (0.118 g, 0.75 mmol), L-methionine methyl ester HCl salt (0.15 g, 0.75 mmol) and KOH (0.042 g, 0.75 mmol) according to the procedure used for preparing 6a. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.93 (dd, J = 12.7, 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.55 (s, 3 H), 2.60 (m, 2 H), 2.27 (m, 1 H), 2.17 (td, J = 14.7, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.10 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.8, 178.3, 171.6, 165.9, 165.3, 56.0, 52.8, 41.4, 31.8, 30.1, 15.4; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C11H16N2O5SNa 311.0678, found 311.0685.

3-Butoxy-4-(hydroxymethylamino)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (8)

To a stirred solution of HONHMe HCl salt (2.631 g, 31.5 mmol) in MeOH (30 ml), KOH (1.767 g, 31.5 mmol) and compound 7 (4.766 g, 21.0 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, the solvent was evaporated, and the crude product was washed with H2O, and then dissolved in EtOAc. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc. The organic extracts were combined, dried over MgSO4, and the solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (3% MeOH/CH2Cl2) to yield compound 8 as a pale yellow solid (3.416 g, 17.2 mmol, 82%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.70 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.52 (s, 3 H), 1.77 (m, 2 H), 1.44 (m, 2 H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 184.0, 180.7, 174.3, 169.1, 74.2, 41.6, 32.3, 18.9, 14.0; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C9H13NO4Na 222.0742, found 222.0740.

L-tert-Leucine methyl amide (10a)

Compound 10a was synthesized starting from N-Boc- protected amino acid 9a. To a stirred solution of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, 0.925 g, 8.04 mmol) in DMF (20 mL) under N2, NH2Me (4.02 mL, 2.0 M in MeOH) was added via syringe and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature. Formation of a white precipitate was observed. Addition of N-Boc-protected amino acid 9a (1.55 g, 6.7 mmol) and cooling the mixture to 0 °C was followed by addition of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC, 1.54 g, 8.04 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0 °C and 2 h at room temperature and then diluted with EtOAc. The solution was washed with H2O, the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic extracts were washed with saturated NaHCO3, H2O, and brine, dried over MgSO4, and the solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (3% MeOH/CH2Cl2), washed with heptane, dried in vacuo and dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL). To this stirred solution, TFA (15 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred for 40 min at room temperature. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned between CH2Cl2 (90 mL) and saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (90 mL). The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extracts were combined and dried over Na2SO4, and the solvents were evaporated. Purification was performed by column chromatography (5:95 MeOH/CH2Cl2) yielding 10a as a colorless oil (0.637 g, 4.42 mmol, 66%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 2.99 (s, 1 H), 2.75 (s, 3 H), 0.98 (s, 9 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.2, 63.9, 34.0, 25.9, 24.9; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C7H16N2ONa 167.1160, found 167.1163.

L-Cyclohexylglycine methyl amide (10b)

Compound 10b was synthesized starting from N-Boc-protected amino acid 9b. To a stirred solution of N-Boc-protected amino acid 9b (1.16 g, 4.52 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL), HOBt (760 mg, 4.97 mmol) was added and then EDC (911 mg, 4.75 mmol) and mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 30 min. Formation of a white precipitate was observed. To this solution NH2Me (2.49 mL, 2.0 M in MeOH) was added via syringe and reaction was allowed to stir overnight. The solution was diluted with CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and washed once with 1M citric acid (30 mL), once with saturated NaHCO3 (30 mL) and then with brine (30 mL). The organic layer was then dried over NaSO4 and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (3% MeOH/CH2Cl2) and the product was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL). To this stirred solution TFA (15 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 40 min. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned between 1:1 CH2Cl2/saturated aqueous NaHCO3. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extracts were combined and dried over Na2SO4, and solvents were evaporated. Purification was performed by flash chromatography (5% MeOH/CH2Cl2) yielding 10b as a white solid (440 mg, 2.80 mmol, 62%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.34 (br s, 1 H), 3.22 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.80 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.27 (m, 14 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.5, 60.5, 41.5, 30.6, 27.0, 26.7, 26.6, 26.5, 26.0; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C9H18N2NaO 193.1317, found 193.1320.

O-Methyl-L-tyrosine methyl amide (10c)

The synthesis and the 1H NMR spectrum for this compound have been reported previously.25 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.9, 158.6, 129.9, 129.3, 113.5, 56.5, 54.2, 40.3, 24.7; HRMS-ESI (M + Na+) calcd for C11H16N2O2Na 231.1109, found 231.1115.

L-Phenylalanine methyl amide (10d)

Compound 10d (105 mg, 0.590 mmol, 52%) was prepared as a white solid from 9d (300 mg, 1.13 mmol), HOBt (190 mg, 1.24 mmol), EDC (228 mg, 1.19 mmol) and NH2Me (624 μL of a 2.0 M solution in MeOH) according to the procedure used to prepare 10b. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3,) δ 7.26 (m, 5 H), 3.60 (dd, J = 9.5, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.28 (dd, J = 13.7, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.82 (d, J = 5 Hz, 3 H), 2.67 (dd, J = 13.7, 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.39 (br s, 2 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.8, 138.0, 129.3, 128.7, 126.8, 56.5, 41.0, 25.8; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C10H14N2NaO 201.1004, found 201.1007.

L-Phenylglycine methyl amide (10e)

Compound 10e (0.836 g, 5.1 mmol, 51%) was prepared from 6e (2.513 g, 10 mmol), NH2Me (6.0 mL of a 2.0 M solution in MeOH), NHS (1.381 g, 12 mmol), EDC (2.3 g, 12 mmol) and TFA (15 mL) according to the procedure used for preparing 10a. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra, and the HRMS for this compound have been reported previously.26

L-Tryptophan methyl amide (10f)

The synthesis and the 1H NMR spectrum for this compound have been reported previously.24 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 174.8, 135.3, 125.9, 121.8, 119.6, 116.9, 116.5, 109.4, 108.3, 54.0, 29.3, 23.3; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C12H15N3ONa 240.1113, found 240.1117.

L-Leucine methyl amide (10g)

Compound 10g (0.548 g, 3.8 mmol, 42%) was prepared from 9g (2.245 g, 9 mmol), NH2Me (5.4 mL of a 2.0 M solution in MeOH), NHS (1.243 g, 10.8 mmol), EDC (2.068 g, 10.8 mmol) and TFA (12 mL) according to the procedure used for preparing 10a. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 3.33 (dd, J = 7.7, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.76 (s, 3 H), 1.68 (qt, J = 12.9, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.54 (ddd, J = 13.8, 7.4, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.39 (m, 1 H), 0.95 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 177.0, 53.2, 44.2, 24.8, 24.5, 22.0, 21.1; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C7H16N2ONa 167.1160, found 167.1166.

L-Isoleucyl-L-tert-leucine methyl amide (11a)

To a stirred solution of NHS (0.138 g, 1.2 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) under N2, 10a (0.144 g, 1.0 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Addition of N-Boc-L-isoleucine (0.288 g, 1.2 mmol) and cooling the mixture to 0 °C was followed by addition of EDC (0.23 g, 1.2 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0 °C and 2 h at room temperature and then diluted with EtOAc. The solution was washed with H2O, the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic extracts were washed with saturated NaHCO3, H2O, and brine, dried over MgSO4, and the solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (3:97 MeOH/CH2Cl2), washed with heptane, dried in vacuo and dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2 mL). To this solution TFA (2 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 40 min. The solvents and TFA were removed, and the residue was partitioned between CH2Cl2 (15 mL) and saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (15 mL). Organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extracts were combined and dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was evaporated. Purification was performed by flash chromatography (5:95 MeOH/CH2Cl2) yielding 11a as a colorless oil (0.162 g, 0.63 mmol, 63%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 5.51 (s, 1 H), 4.19 (s, 1 H), 2.73 (s, 3 H), 1.79 (m, 1 H), 1.48 (m, 1 H), 1.16 (m, 1 H), 0.95 (m, 15 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.5, 171.8, 60.6, 59.4, 38.6, 33.8, 25.7, 24.6, 23.8, 14.8, 10.7; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C13H27N3O2Na 280.2001, found 280.2000.

L-Isoleucyl-L-cyclohexylglycine methyl amide (11b)

N-Boc-L-Isoleucine (140 mg, 0.584 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and the solution was cooled to 0 °C. To this solution HOBt (89.5 mg, 0.584 mmol) and EDC (201 mg, 0.558 mmol) were added and the mixture was stirred for 30 min. To this mixture compound 10b (83.5 mg, 0.531 mmol) was then added and reaction was stirred overnight. The solution was diluted with CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and washed once with 1M citric acid (30 mL), once with saturated NaHCO3 (30 mL) and then with brine (30 mL). The organic layer was dried over NaSO4 and the solvents evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (3% MeOH/CH2Cl2) and then dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL). To this solution TFA (15 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 40 min. The solvents and TFA were evaporated, and the residue was partitioned between a 1:1 mixture of CH2Cl2:saturated aqueous NaHCO3. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extracts were combined and dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was evaporated. Purification was performed by flash chromatography (5% MeOH/CH2Cl2) yielding 11b as a white solid (69 mg, 0.244 mmol, 46%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.94 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.98 (m, 1 H), 4.26 (m, 1 H), 3.28 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.78 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.93 (m, 1 H), 1.75 (m, 7 H), 1.39 (m, 2 H), 1.25 (m, 2 H), 1.13 (m, 4 H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 174.6, 171.9, 59.8, 57.8, 39.7, 38.1, 29.8, 28.8, 26.1, 25.9, 25.8, 25.8, 24.0, 16.1, 11.9 HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C15H29N3NaO2 306.2157, found 306.2150.

L-Isoleucyl-O-methyl-L-tyrosine methyl amide (11c)

Compound 11c (0.265 g, 0.82 mmol, 58%) was prepared as a white solid from 10c (0.295 g, 1.42 mmol), NHS (0.196 g, 1.7 mmol), N-Boc-L-isoleucine (0.408 g, 1.7 mmol), EDC (0.326 g, 1.7 mmol) and TFA (3 mL) according to the procedure used for preparing 11a. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.16 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.55 (dd, J = 8.6, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H), 3.17 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.07 (dd, J = 13.8, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.86 (dd, J = 13.8, 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.69 (s, 3 H), 1.66 (m, 1 H), 1.18 (m, 1 H), 0.99 (m, 1 H), 0.83 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.6, 172.7, 158.7, 129.9, 128.8, 113.5, 59.6, 54.7, 54.2, 38.5, 37.0, 24.9, 23.5, 14.7, 10.6; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C17H27N3O3Na 344.1950, found 344.1942.

L-Isoleucyl-L-phenylalanine methyl amide (11d)

Compound 11d (373 mg, 1.28 mmol, 61%) was prepared as a white solid from 10d (374 mg, 2.1 mmol), HOBt (322 mg, 2.1 mmol), EDC (383 mg, 2.0 mmol) and N-Boc-L-Isoleucine (456 mg, 1.9 mmol) according to the procedure that was used to prepare 11b. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.18 (m, 5 H), 4.78 (dt, J = 8.7, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.98 (dd, J = 13.8, 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.68 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.77 (m, 1 H), 0.99 (m, 1 H), 0.88 (m, 1 H), 0.81 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.75 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.0, 171.9, 137.1, 129.2, 128.4, 126.7, 59.8, 54.0, 38.4, 26.0, 23.4, 15.9, 11.8; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C16H25N3NaO2 314.1844, found 314.1850.

L-Isoleucyl-L-phenylglycine methyl amide (11e)

Compound 11e (0.032 g, 0.115 mmol, 53%) was prepared from 10e (0.036 g, 0.217 mmol), NHS (0.03 g, 0.26 mmol), N-Boc-L-isoleucine (0.062 g, 0.26 mmol), EDC (0.05 g, 0.26 mmol) and TFA (0.35 mL) according to the procedure used for preparing 11a. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.44 (m, 2 H), 7.34 (m, 3 H), 5.42 (s, 1 H), 3.29 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.74 (s, 3 H), 1.77 (m, 1 H), 1.47 (m, 1 H), 1.15 (m, 1 H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.1, 171.4, 137.7, 128.3, 127.9, 127.1, 59.2, 57.0, 38.8, 25.0, 23.9, 14.6, 10.6; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C15H23N3O2Na 300.1688, found 300.1680.

L-Isoleucyl-L-tryptophan methyl amide (11f)

Compound 11f (0.103 g, 0.313 mmol, 55%) was prepared from 10f (0.124 g, 0.573 mmol), NHS (0.079 g, 0.688 mmol), N-Boc-L-isoleucine (0.165 g, 0.688 mmol), EDC (0.132 g, 0.688 mmol) and TFA (1 mL) according to the procedure used to prepare 11a. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.57 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (dd, J = 8.1, 0.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.02 (m, 3 H), 4.59 (t, J = 6.5, 1 H), 3.2 (d, J = 6.5, 1 H), 2.62 (d, J = 1.9, 3 H), 1.60 (m, 1 H), 1.14 (m, 1 H), 0.9 (m, 1 H), 0.75 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 174.3, 172.1, 135.6, 126.2, 122.1, 119.9, 117.2, 116.8, 109.7, 108.3, 58.3, 52.9, 37.2, 26.7, 23.8, 22.3, 13.4, 9.4; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C18H27N4O2 331.2134, found 331.2138.

L-Isoleucyl-L-leucine methyl amide (11g)

Compound 11g (0.219 g, 0.851 mmol, 43%) was prepared from 10g (0.285 g, 1.98 mmol), NHS (0.273 g, 2.375 mmol), N-Boc-L-isoleucine (0.57 g, 2.375 mmol), EDC (0.455 g, 2.375 mmol) and TFA (2.5 mL) according to the procedure used to prepare 11a. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.4 (t, J = 7.5, 1 H), 3.23 (d, J = 5.5, 1 H), 2.73 (s, 3 H), 1.61 (m, 5 H), 1.18 (m, 1 H), 0.94 (m, 12 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.9, 174.2, 59.9, 51.9, 41.2, 39.3, 25.4, 24.9, 24.4, 22.5, 21.1, 15.1, 11.0; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C13H27N3O2Na 280.2001, found 280.2006.

L-Leucyl-L-tert-leucine methyl amide (11h)

Compound 11h (0.054 g, 0.208 mmol, 65%) was prepared from 10h (0.046 g, 0.322 mmol), NHS (0.045 g, 0.386 mmol), N-Boc-L-leucine (0.096 g, 0.386 mmol), EDC (0.074 g, 0.386 mmol) and TFA (0.75 mL) according to the procedure that was used to prepare 11a. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.22 (s, 1 H), 3.46 (t, J = 5.3, 1 H), 2.74 (s, 3 H), 1.76 (m, 1 H), 1.57 (m, 1 H), 1.41 (m, 1 H), 1.01 (m, 9 H), 0.97 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 176.8, 172.1, 60.8, 53.6, 44.5, 34.5, 26.2, 25.1, 24.9, 22.7, 21.2; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C13H27N3O2Na 280.2001, found 280.2010.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 12a–h

To a stirred solution of 8 (1.0 eq) dissolved in MeOH, 11ah (1.0 eq) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The solvent was evaporated and the product was purified by column chromatography (3:97 MeOH/CH2Cl2).

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucyl-L-tert-leucine methyl amide)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (12a)

Compound 12a (0.03 g, 0.077 mmol, 71%) was prepared from 8 (0.022 g, 0.109 mmol) and 11a (0.028 g, 0.109 mmol) according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.58 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.23 (s, 1 H), 3.49 (s, 3 H), 2.73 (s, 3 H), 1.93 (m, 1 H), 1.62 (m, 1 H), 1.23 (m, 1 H), 0.99 (s, 9 H), 0.94 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.5, 178.9, 172.0, 171.8, 166.5, 166.3, 62.4, 61.3, 40.2, 37.7, 34.2, 26.1, 24.9, 24.4, 14.5, 10.0; HRMS-ESI (M + Na+) calcd for C18H30N4O5Na 405.2114, found 405.2126.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucyl-L-cyclohexylglycine methyl amide)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (12b)

Compound 12b (0.0106 g, 0.026 mmol, 11%) was prepared from 8 (0.038 g, 0.24 mmol) and 11b (0.068 g, 0.24 mmol) as a white solid according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.56 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1 H), 4.14 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1 H), 3.49 (s, 3 H), 2.74 (s, 3 H), 1.92 (m, 1 H), 1.67 (m, 7 H), 1.22 (m, 5 H), 0.94 (m, 7 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 183.8, 182.7, 171.7, 171.1, 169.1, 168.1, 61.3, 58.4, 40.7, 39.2, 39.1, 31.1, 30.0, 29.2, 26.9, 26.8, 26.7, 24.4, 15.8, 12.0; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C20H32N4NaO5 431.2270, found 431.2261.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucyl-O-methyl-L-tyrosine methyl amide)-3- cyclobutene-1,2-dione (12c)

Compound 12c (0.054 g, 0.12 mmol, 76%) was prepared from 8 (0.032 g, 0.16 mmol) and 11c (0.051 g, 0.16 mmol) according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.11 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.77 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.60 (dd, J = 9.6, 5.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.41 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.49 (s, 3 H), 3.06 (dd, J = 13.8, 5.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.81 (dd, J = 13.9, 9.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.73 (s, 3 H), 1.87 (m, 1 H), 1.53 (m, 1 H), 1.18 (m, 1 H), 0.90 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.1, 178.5, 172.4, 171.3, 165.9, 165.7, 158.6, 129.8, 128.6, 113.4, 62.0, 54.5, 54.2, 40.0, 37.0, 36.7, 24.9, 24.2, 14.1, 9.5; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C22H30N4O6Na 469.2063, found 469.2078.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucyl-L-phenylalanine methyl amide)-3- cyclobutene-1,2-dione (12d)

Compound 12d (0.224 g, 0.54 mmol, 75%) was prepared from 8 (0.113 g, 0.72 mmol) and 11d (0.210 g, 0.72 mmol) as a white solid according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.21 (m, 5 H), 4.63 (dd, J = 9.6, 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.43 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H) 3.49 (s, 3 H), 3.12 (dd, J = 6.3, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.88 (dd, J = 9.7, 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.71 (s, 3 H), 1.86 (m, 1 H), 1.52 (m, 1 H), 1.16 (m, 1 H), 0.90 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.6, 178.9, 172.7, 171.7, 166.4, 166.2, 137.2, 129.2, 128.4, 126.7, 62.3, 54.9, 40.4, 38.1, 37.3, 25.4, 24.5, 14.5, 9.92; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C21H28N4NaO5 439.1957, found 439.1968.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucyl-L-phenylglycine methyl amide)-3- cyclobutene-1,2-dione (12e)

Compound 12e (0.021 g, 0.053 mmol, 65%) was prepared from 8 (0.016 g, 0.08 mmol) and 11e (0.023 g, 0.083 mmol) according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.42 (m, 2 H), 7.35 (m, 3 H), 5.42 (s, 1 H), 4.6 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1 H), 3.47 (s, 3 H), 2.73 (s, 3 H), 1.96 (m, 1 H), 1.63 (m, 1 H), 1.26 (m, 1 H), 1.0 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.1, 178.5, 171.1, 171.0, 166.1, 165.9, 137.3, 128.4, 128.0, 127.2, 61.8, 57.3, 40.0, 37.7, 25.0, 24.2, 14.1, 9.8; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C20H26N4O5Na 425.1801, found 425.1810.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucyl-L-tryptophan methyl amide)-3-cyclobutene- 1,2-dione (12f)

Compound 12f (0.057 g, 0.125 mmol, 78%) was prepared from 8 (0.032 g, 0.16 mmol) and 11f (0.053 g, 0.16 mmol) according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.57 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.07 (m, 2 H), 6.99 (m, 1 H), 4.66 (dd, J = 8.1, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.47 (s, 3 H), 3.25 (dd, J = 14.6, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.11 (dd, J = 14.5, 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.67 (s, 3 H), 1.86 (m, 1 H), 1.50 (m, 1 H), 1.13 (m, 1 H), 0.88 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.1, 178.5, 172.8, 171.3, 166.0, 165.8, 136.6, 127.3, 123.3, 120.9, 118.4, 117.9, 110.9, 109.3, 62.0, 54.3, 40.0, 37.3, 27.8, 25.0, 24.1, 14.1, 9.7; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C23H29N5O5Na 478.2066, found 478.2060.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-isoleucyl-L-leucine methyl amide)-3-cyclobutene-1,2- dione (12g)

Compound 12g (0.051 g, 0.133 mmol, 82%) was prepared from 8 (0.032 g, 0.16 mmol) and 11g (0.042 g, 0.163 mmol) according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.57 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.41 (dd, J = 9.4, 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.50 (s, 3 H), 2.74 (s, 3 H), 1.96 (m, 1 H), 1.63 (m, 3 H), 1.53 (m, 1 H), 1.22 (m, 1 H), 0.94 (m, 12 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.1, 178.6, 173.5, 171.6, 166.3, 165.9, 61.9, 51.9, 40.6, 40.1, 37.6, 25.0, 24.5, 24.3, 22.0, 20.7, 14.3, 9.9; HRMS-FAB (M + H+) calcd for C18H31N4O5 383.2295, found 383.2304.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-4-(L-leucyl-L-tert-leucine methyl amide)-3-cyclobutene- 1,2-dione (12h)

Compound 12h (0.028 g, 0.074 mmol, 74%) was prepared from 8 (0.02 g, 0.1 mmol) and 11h (0.026 g, 0.1 mmol) according to the general procedure. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 4.76 (br s, 1 H), 4.2 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.38 (s, 3 H), 2.57 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.76 (m, 1 H), 1.62 (m, 1 H), 1.51 (m, 1 H), 0.87 (s, 15 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 179.8, 178.9, 172.7, 171.9, 166.5, 166.3, 61.3, 56.6, 41.1, 40.4, 34.4, 26.1, 25.0, 24.9, 22.5, 20.8; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C18H30N4O5Na 405.2114, found 405.2105.

3-(L-Leucyl-L-tert-leucine methyl amide)-4-methoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (13)

To a stirred solution of 2 (0.021 g, 0.15 mmol) in MeOH, 11h (0.042 g, 0.165 mmol) was added and the mixture was heated at reflux overnight. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (3:97 MeOH/CH2Cl2) giving compound 13 (0.052 g, 0.136 mmol, 95%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.40 (s, 4 H), 4.25 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1 H), 2.74 (s, 3 H), 1.68 (m, 3 H), 0.99 (d, J = 6 Hz, 15 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 188.7, 187.9, 184.2, 183.7, 178.0, 176.9, 173.1, 172.6, 172.0, 171.9, 171.4, 60.8, 60.7, 59.9, 56.8, 56.1, 25.6, 24.6, 24.5, 22.1, 20.0; HRMS-ESI (M + Na+) calcd for C18H29N3O5Na 390.2005, found 390.2010.

3-Hydroxy-4-(L-leucyl-L-tert-leucine methyl amide)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (14)

To a stirred solution of 13 (0.05 g, 0.136 mmol) in MeOH (3 mL), 0.15 N HCl (1 mL) was added and the mixture was heated at reflux overnight. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (3:97 MeOH/CH2Cl2) giving 14 (0.032 g, 0.091 mmol, 67%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.22 (s, 1 H), 3.32 (s, 1 H), 2.74 (s, 3 H), 1.69 (m, 3 H), 0.96 (s, 15 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 196.3, 187.8, 180.7, 172.5, 171.9, 61.3, 55.8, 40.6, 34.5, 26.1, 25.1, 24.8, 22.5, 20.9; HRMS-ESI (M − H+) calcd for C17H26N3O5 352.1872, found 352.1880.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-2-(L-isoleucine methylester)-4-thioxo-2-cyclobuten-1-one (15)

Compound 6a (0.100 g, 0.370 mmol) was dissolved in 2 mL of CH2Cl2 and allowed to stir while Lawesson’s reagent (0.150 g, 0.370 mmol) was added. The reaction was monitored by TLC until all the starting material had been consumed. The solvent was then evaporated and the crude material was purified by column chromatography (5:95 MeOH/CH2Cl2) providing 15 as a yellow solid (0.062 g, 0.23 mmol, 62%). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.02 (br s, 1 H), 8.19 (br s, 1 H), 5.93 (br s, 1 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H), 3.67 (s, 3 H), 2.20 (m, 1 H), 2.07 (m, 1 H), 1.48 (m, 1 H), 1.26 (m, 1 H), 1.00 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 205.4, 201.6, 170.9, 170.8, 170.6, 61.2, 52.9, 39.4, 31.6, 25.3, 15.8, 12.2; ESI-MS (M + H+) calcd for C12H19N2O3S2 271.1294, found 271.1287.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-2-(L-isoleucyl-L-phenylalanine methylamide)-4-thioxo-2- cyclobuten-1-one (16)

Compound 16 (0.093 g, 0.216 mmol, 71%) was prepared as a yellow solid according to the procedure used to prepare 15 starting from 12d (0.127 g, 0.305 mmol) and Lawesson’s reagent (0.123 g, 0.304 mmol). The crude material was purified by column chromatography (3:97 MeOH/CH2Cl2). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) 7.15 (m, 5 H), 5.56 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.90 (s, 3 H), 4.68 (m, 1 H), 3.63 (s, 2 H), 3.10 (m, 1 H), 2.72 (d, J = 0.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.91 (m, 1 H), 1.49 (m, 1 H) 1.17 (m, 1 H) 0.87 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 206.7, 204.0, 172.7, 171.1, 170.7, 170.4, 137.1, 129.3, 128.4, 126.5, 60.8, 54.9, 38.3, 37.6, 30.4, 25.5, 24.4, 14.5, 10.3; ESI-MS (M + Na+) calcd for C21H28N4O4SNa 455.1729, found 455.1738.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-2-(L-isoleucyl-L-leucine methyl amide)-4-thioxo-2- cyclobuten-1-one (17)

Compound 17 was prepared as a yellow solid (0.013 g, 0.032 mmol, 59%) from 12g (0.021 g, 0.055 mmol) and Lawesson’s reagent (0.022 g, 0.055 mmol) according to the procedure used to prepare compound 15. The crude material was purified by column chromatography (1.3:98.7 MeOH/CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 5.67 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.39 (dd, J = 9.5, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.63 (s, 3 H), 2.73 (s, 3 H), 2.00 (m, 1 H), 1.56 (m, 4 H), 1.24 (m, 1 H), 0.96 (m, 12 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ 206.6, 203.9, 173.5, 171.2, 170.9, 170.2, 60.5, 51.9, 40.6, 37.9, 29.9, 24.9, 24.5, 23.9, 22.0, 20.5, 14.2, 10.2; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C18H30N4O4SNa 421.1885, found 421.1880.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-2-(L-leucyl-L-tert-leucine methyl amide)-4-thioxo-2- cyclobuten-1-one (18)

Compound 18 was prepared as a yellow solid (0.014 g, 0.035 mmol, 41%) from 12h (0.033 g, 0.086 mmol) and Lawesson’s reagent (0.035 g, 0.086 mmol) according to the procedure used to prepare compound 15. The crude material was purified by column chromatography (1.3:98.7 MeOH/CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 5.92 (s, 1 H), 4.21 (s, 1 H), 3.62 (s, 3 H), 2.74 (s, 3 H), 1.72 (m, 3 H), 0.98 (m, 15 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ 206.1, 203.5, 171.7, 171.4, 170.7, 170.0, 61.2, 54.8, 40.7, 34.2, 30.2, 25.9, 24.8, 24.5, 22.2, 20.6; LRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C18H30N4O4SNa 421.0, found 421.1.

3,4-Di-(L-phenylalanine methyl ester)-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (19)

To a stirred solution of L-phenylalanine methyl ester HCl salt (0.646 g, 3.0 mmol) in MeOH (10 ml), KOH (0.168 g, 3.0 mmol) and compound 7 (0.256 g, 1.13 mmol) were added. Formation of a white precipitate was observed. The mixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature, the solvent was evaporated, EtOAc was added and the solution was washed with H2O. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was recrystallized from MeOH. The resulting white crystals were washed with cold MeOH and dried in vacuo to give 19 as a white solid (0.363 g, 0.831 mmol, 74%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.91 (br s, 1 H), 7.27 (m, 6 H), 7.14 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 4 H), 5.00 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.70 (s, 6 H), 3.17 (dd, J = 13.5, 4.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.06 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 183.3, 171.6, 167.5, 136.4, 129.8, 128.9, 127.3, 57.2, 55.3, 52.8; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C24H25N2O6 437.1713, found 437.1722.

2,3-Bis(L-phenylalanine methyl ester)-4-thioxo-2-cyclobuten-1-one (20)

To a stirred solution of 19 (0.112 g, 0.257 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (5 ml), Lawesson’s reagent (0.021 g, 0.052 mmol) was added. After TLC analysis indicated that the reaction was complete, the crude product was purified by column chromatography (gradient of 0.25–1.0% MeOH/CH2Cl2) to yield compound 20 as a yellow solid (0.038 g, 0.084 mmol, 40%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.76 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 8.31 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.21 (m, 10 H), 6.12 (dd, J = 15.0, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.01 (dd, J = 12.7, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 3.70 (s, 3 H), 3.18 (m, 4 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 204.0, 180.4, 172.0, 171.4, 170.8, 168.9, 136.0, 129.8, 129.7, 129.0, 128.9, 127.5, 127.4, 58.1, 55.8, 53.1, 52.9; HRMS-ESI (M + H+) calcd for C24H25N2O5S 453.1484, found 453.1490.

3-(Hydroxymethylamino)-2-(L-phenylalanine methyl ester)-4-thioxo-2-cyclobuten-1- one (21)

To a stirred solution of 6e (0.171 g, 0.562 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (5 ml), Lawesson’s reagent (0.227 g, 0.561 mmol) was added. After TLC analysis indicated that the reaction was complete, the solvent was evaporated and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2) to yield compound 21 as a yellow solid (0.104 g, 0.325 mmol, 58%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.87 (br s, 1 H), 8.56 (br s, 1 H), 7.24 (m, 5 H), 6.23 (t, J = 6.0, 1 H), 3.72 (s, 3 H), 3.50 (s, 3 H), 3.21 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 206.5, 203.2, 171.0, 170.7, 170.6, 135.7, 129.9, 129.0, 127.5, 56.3, 53.1, 30.8; HRMS-FAB (M + Na+) calcd for C15H16N2O4SNa 343.0729, found 343.0740.

Procedure for the Assay of MMP-1

MMP-1, prepared from a culture medium of human rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts, was obtained from Calbiochem. The assays were based on the enzymatic hydrolysis of the peptide substrate Dnp-Pro-Cha-Gly-Cys(Me)-His-Ala-Lys(Nma)-NH2,18 using the procedure described by Le Diguarher.19 This is a fluorescence quenching assay in which N-methylanthranilic acid (Nma) is the fluorophore and dinitrophenyl (Dnp) is the quencher.

Pro-MMP-1 was dissolved in assay buffer (200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, 5 mM CaCl2, 20 μM ZnSO4, 0.05% Brij 35, pH 7.6) at a concentration of 1.25 μg/mL. APMA solution (p-aminophenylmercuric acetate, 2 mM in 0.1 N NaOH) was prepared. Proenzyme activation was performed by mixing the proenzyme solution and the APMA solution in a 10:1 ratio. This reaction was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and subsequently transferred to ice and then to a freezer. The substrate was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 2 mM, and then diluted to 0.2 mM with H2O. Inhibitors were dissolved in a 10:90 DMSO/buffer solution. Fluorescence measurements were performed in 96-well plates by incubating assay buffer (76 μl), activated enzyme (4 μl), and the inhibitor solution (or buffer for the blank) (10 μl) at 37 °C for 30 min and then adding the substrate (10 μl) to the wells. The change in fluorescence was measured using excitation and emission wavelengths of 340 nm and 460 nm, respectively. IC50 values were calculated using the commercial graphing package Grafit (Erithacus Software Ltd.). Data was obtained for assays with at least 5 different concentrations, in duplicate, of each inhibitor.

Supplementary Material

1si20051013_01. Supporting Information Available.

1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new compounds; Lineweaver-Burk plot for compound 16 (50 pages). This information is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

TABLE 1.

Inhibition of MMP-1 by Compounds 4a–f

graphic file with name nihms63114f11.jpg
compound R1 R2 IC50 (mM)a
4a H -CH2CH(CH3)2 1.8 ± 0.3
4b H -(CH2)5CH3 1.0 ± 0.2
4c Me -(CH2)5CH3 0.31 ± 0.03
4d Me -(CH2)4CH3 0.31 ± 0.03
4e cyclohexyl -(CH2)5CH3 >10
4f benzyl -(CH2)5CH3 >10
a

All experiments were performed in duplicate.

TABLE 3.

Inhibition of MMP-1 by Dipeptides 12 a–ha

graphic file with name nihms63114f13.jpg
compound R3 =side chain of amino acid R4 =side chain of amino acid IC50 (μM)a
12a Ile Tle 500 ± 100
12b Ile Chg 300 ± 100
12c Ile Tyr(Me) 280 ± 30
12d Ile Phe 270 ± 30
12e Ile Phg 260 ± 25
12f Ile Trp 210 ± 30
12g Ile Leu 200 ± 20
12h Leu Tle 95 ± 7
a

All experiments performed in duplicate.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Jian Xie for helpful discussions. This research was supported by the NIH NIGMS (Grant R01 GM057327).

References

  • 1.Whittaker M, Floyd CD, Brown P, Gearing AJH. Chem Rev. 1999;99:2735–2776. doi: 10.1021/cr0100345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones CB, Sane DC, Herrington DM. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;59:812–823. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00516-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chakraborti S, Mandal M, Das S, Mandal A, Chakraborti T. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003;253:269–285. doi: 10.1023/a:1026028303196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Westermarck J, Kahari VM. FASEB J. 1999;13:781–792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fisher C, Gilbertson-Beadling S, Powers EA, Petzold G, Poorman R, Mitchell MA. Dev Biol. 1994;162:499–510. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Billinghurst RC, Dahlberg L, Ionescu M, Reiner A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Mitchell P, Hambor J, Diekmann O, Tschesche H, Chen J, Van Wart H, Poole AR. J Clin Invest. 1997;7:1534–1545. doi: 10.1172/JCI119316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jackson C, Nguyen M, Arkell J, Sambrook P. Inflamm Res. 2001;50:183–186. doi: 10.1007/s000110050743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee W, Aitken S, Sodek J, McCulloch CA. J Periodont Res. 1995;30:23–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1995.tb01249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liedtke W, Cannella B, Mazzaccaro RJ, Clements JM, Miller KM, Wucherpfennig KW, Gearing AJH, Raine CS. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:35–46. doi: 10.1002/ana.410440110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xie J, Comeau AB, Seto CT. Org Lett. 2004;6:83–86. doi: 10.1021/ol036121w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim CU, Misco PF. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:3961–3962. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sato K, Seio K, Sekine M. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:12715–12724. doi: 10.1021/ja027131f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shinada T, Nakagawa Y, Hayashi K, Corzo G, Nakajima T, Ohfune Y. Amino Acids. 2003;24:293–301. doi: 10.1007/s00726-002-0402-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun L, Chiu D, Kowal D, Simon R, Smeyne M, Zukin RS, Olney J, Baudy R, Lin S. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310:563–570. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.066092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butera JA, Antane MM, Antane SA, Argentieri TM, Freeden C, Graceffa RF, Hirth BH, Jenkins D, Lennox JR, Matelan E, Norton NW, Quagliato D, Sheldon JH, Spinelli W, Warga D, Wojdan A, Woods M. J Med Chem. 2000;43:1187–1202. doi: 10.1021/jm9905099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lovejoy B, Welch AR, Carr S, Luong C, Broka C, Hendricks T, Campbell JA, Walker KAM, Martin R, Van Wart H, Browner MF. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:217–221. doi: 10.1038/6657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lim NC, Morton MD, Jenkins HA, Bruckner C. J Org Chem. 2003;68:9233–9241. doi: 10.1021/jo035175g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bickett DM, Green MD, Berman J, Dezube M, Howe AS, Brown PJ, Roth JT, McGeehan GM. Anal Biochem. 1993;212:58–64. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Le Diguarher T, Chollet AM, Bertrand M, Hennig P, Raimbaud E, Sabatini M, Guilbaud N, Pierre A, Tucker GC, Casara P. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3840–3852. doi: 10.1021/jm0307638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Borkakoti N, Winkler FK, Williams DH, D’Arcy A, Broadhurst MJ, Brown PA, Johnson WH, Murray EJ. Nat Struct Biol. 1994;1:106–110. doi: 10.1038/nsb0294-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Solans X, Aguilo M, Gleizes A, Faus J, Julve M, Verdaguer M. Inorg Chem. 1990;29:775–784. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.An X-ray crystal structure of a hydroxamic acid/zinc complex shows that the bite angle in this complex is 81.1°. Ruf M, Weis K, Brasack I, Vahrenkamp H. Inorg Chim Acta. 1996;250:271–281. For comparison, we used HyperChem 3D to calculate the bite angle in a zinc complex of the squaric acid/hydroxamic acid hybrids, which was calculated to be 117.9°
  • 23.Reich R, Katz Y, Hadar R, Breuer E. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:3925–3929. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Puerta DT, Lewis JA, Cohen SM. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8388–8389. doi: 10.1021/ja0485513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kortylewicz ZP, Galardy RE. J Med Chem. 1990;33:263–273. doi: 10.1021/jm00163a044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reichard GA, Stengone C, Paliwal S, Mergelsberg I, Majmundar S, Wang C, Tiberi R, McPhail AT, Piwinski JJ, Shih NY. Org Lett. 2003;5:4249–4251. doi: 10.1021/ol030104p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1si20051013_01. Supporting Information Available.

1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new compounds; Lineweaver-Burk plot for compound 16 (50 pages). This information is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

RESOURCES