Abstract
Fetal intrauterine growth restriction has been associated with adult disease in both human epidemiologic studies and in animal models. In some cases, intrauterine deprivation programs the fetus to develop increased appetite and obesity, hypertension and diabetes as an adult. Although the mechanisms responsible for fetal programming remain poorly understood, both anatomic and functional (cell signaling) changes have been described in affected individuals. In some animal models, aspects of fetal programming can be reversed postnatally, however at the present time the best strategy for avoiding the adult consequences of fetal growth restriction is prevention.
Fetal intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) occurs in humans as a consequence of poor maternal nutrition, placental insufficiency and diminished fetal oxygenation, or exposure to teratogens, among other causes. In animals, and in some cases in humans, IUGR from these causes has been associated with the development of adult diseases; this phenomenon is called “fetal programming”. The association of maladaptive programming with adult disease has been termed the “Barker hypothesis”. In general, the Barker hypothesis1 contends that the malnourished fetus is programmed to exhibit a “thrifty phenotype” with increased food intake and fat deposition and possibly decreased energy output. Faced with ample available calories, such individuals develop obesity and other manifestations of the metabolic syndrome as adults due to alterations in homeostatic regulatory mechanisms.2–4
The issue of fetal programming is not merely of intellectual interest. Currently, 65% of adults in the United States are overweight and almost one in three are obese (BMI>30 kg/m2), representing a modern health crisis.5 Obesity and its related diseases are the leading cause of death in Western society, with associated risks of hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and breast, prostate and colon cancer. Evidence indicates a striking 25 to 63% of adult diabetes, hypertension and coronary heart disease can be attributed to the effects of low birthweight with accelerated newborn-to-adolescent weight gain.2 therefore gestational programming of low birth weight/ IUGR has contributed importantly to the population shift towards obesity. In Western societies, the incidence of low birth weight infants has increased since the mid-twentieth century. Low birth weight infants are now being born to women with chronic diseases who would previously have had limited survival and reproductive capacity, while assisted reproductive technologies and increasing numbers of multiple gestations have resulted in both preterm and low birth weight offspring. When combined with improved neonatal survival and exposure to Western diet, this results in an increased number of programmed offspring predisposed to adult obesity. These obese mothers may ultimately give birth to macrosomic newborns, perpetuating obesity in the population.
Evidence for fetal programming
Several lines of evidence suggest that human IUGR is associated with adult obesity. Epidemiological studies of individuals born during the Dutch “hunger winter” of 1944–45 revealed that maternal starvation was associated with a reduced infant birth weight and an increased incidence of obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension and coronary artery disease in adulthood.6–10 Work by Barker and colleagues on a cohort of men and women born in Herfordshire, England between 1911 and 1930,11 revealed that low weight at birth and 1 year of age are associated with an increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease and stroke. Additional supporting evidence came from a study of Swedish males army conscripts in which increased diastolic blood pressure was associated with low birth weight.12
A large number of manipulations have been used to induce offspring IUGR in animal models, including maternal calorie13 and protein14 restriction, fetal hypoxia from uterine artery ligation15 and passive maternal smoking,16 and maternal alcohol administration17 and hyperthermia.18 The association of IUGR with adult disease has been demonstrated in many animal species (for review see 19). In our laboratory, we have developed a rat model of IUGR caused by 50% maternal food restriction (MFR) during the second half of pregnancy. Newborn pups from MFR mothers have lower body weights with decreased plasma leptin levels. IUGR offspring nursed by ad libitum fed dams demonstrate rapid catch-up growth at 3 weeks and continued accelerated growth, resulting in increased weight, percent body fat, and plasma leptin levels as adults. These animals have been utilized in our studies described below.
Mechanisms of Fetal Programming
IUGR leads to alterations in numerous fetal organs. Obesity is potentiated by alterations in appetite regulation, and by increased adipogenesis. Hypertension is made more likely by alterations in renal and blood vessel development, while diabetes is associated with alterations in cellular insulin signalling and decreased beta cell function. These programmed alterations in function, together, induce the full metabolic syndrome in the adult. Although the specifics of fetal programming are likely to differ depending on the cause of the IUGR, this issue has not been well studied, and the discussion below does not attempt to differentiate the various maternal manipulations leading to offspring IUGR.
Obesity
That MFR induces IUGR and subsequent offspring obesity in association with an increased appetite is well documented.20–23 Leptin, a primary satiety factor, normally reduces food intake, it has been shown to be one of the factors influenced by fetal programming. In growth restricted fetuses, cord blood leptin levels are decreased24,25 and preterm or low birth weight human, rat, or calf newborns have reduced plasma leptin levels.26–28 These findings are not surprising, given the reduced fat stores in IUGR offspring. At 2 months of age, however, subcutaneous fat leptin mRNA is negatively correlated with birth weight.29 As adults, leptin and insulin levels are related to birth weight, independent of adult obesity.24 In normal sheep30–33 and rodents,34–39 leptin reduces voluntary food intake. Adult IUGR offspring , however, exhibit resistance to the anorexogenic effects of leptin,40 suggesting altered control of appetite as a source of IUGR-associated obesity.
The hypothalamus is an important site for central control of appetite. Hypothalamic leptin resistance may be due to alterations in leptin transporter,41–44 hypothalamic leptin receptor (ObRb),41,45 and/or leptin signaling, 46–48 though it is not known which of these mechanism accounts for gestational programming of leptin resistance and obesity. In our studies, MFR-induced IUGR results in offspring with increased ObRb expression and disruption of intracellular leptin signaling. In summary, IUGR offspring exhibit reduced newborn leptin levels, though increased leptin levels as adults, and a decreased anorexic response to leptin, possibly due to abnormalities in intracellular signaling.
In addition to adult leptin resistance, recent studies provide convincing evidence that leptin promotes the development of hypothalamic neuronal projections, consistent with a role in brain development. Neuronal projections from the arcuate nucleus (ARC) are formed in mice primarily during the second week of postnatal life49 (developmentally similar to human third trimester of pregnancy). In leptin deficient (ob/ob) mice, these projection pathways regulating appetite are permanently disrupted, demonstrating axonal densities one third to one fourth that of controls.50 In the rodent, the crucial developmental window coincides with a natural postnatal surge in leptin. IUGR in mice is associated with an abnormal leptin surge,51 and postnatal leptin replacement rescues ARC axonal development.50 These findings suggest that, in addition to signaling alterations, IUGR may be associated with permanent anatomic changes in the appetite centers of the brain.
IUGR may also affect the development of adipocytes. Development of obesity is associated with increased adipocyte differentiation, adipocyte hypertrophy and/or upregulation of lipogenic genes. PPARγ2, an adipogenic transcription factor, promotes both adipocyte differentiation and lipid storage.52,53 In our rat model, IUGR offspring showed significantly increased expression (mRNA and protein) of PPARγ both as newborns and as adults. Further, the expression of adipogenic transcription factors regulating PPARγ was also upregulated in both groups. Therefore, in addition to central disregulation of appetite, IUGR individuals may demonstrate abnormal activation of adipocytes, contributing to the development of obesity.
Hypertension
Reduced numbers of nephrons are associated with elevations in arterial blood pressure and changes in postnatal renal function. A reduction of nephron number of as little as 11% in sheep54 and 13% in the rat55 can result in adult hypertension. In the human, there was a strong correlation between low nephron number and hypertension among individuals involved in fatal accidents.56 Studies indicate that intrauterine growth restriction correlates with decreased nephron numbers.57–61 Work in our laboratory demonstrates a 19% reduction in glomerular number in male rat IUGR offspring at three weeks of age, with the development of adult hypertension.62 Many factors are likely to be involved in determining nephron endowment, including all of those responsible for the complex process of nephrogenesis. In our rat model, fetal kidneys demonstrated altered expression of genes in pathways regulating events of nephrogenesis, including UBB and mesenchymal to epithelial transformation (unpublished data). All of this suggests that permanent changes in renal anatomy result from IUGR, with an increased propensity to adult hypertension. Investigation of renal growth in utero suggests that 26–34 weeks of gestation in humans could be the period during which altered renal development may lead to hypertension.58
The vascular endothelium is another target for programming. Several studies have shown that endothelial-dependant and -independent vasodilation is impaired and flow-mediated dilation is decreased in low-birthweight individuals at 3 months of age, in later childhood and in early adult life.63–65 In rats that were undernourished during the first 18 days of gestation, increased blood pressure at 60 days after birth was noted, and the maximal vasoconstriction response to phenylephrine and norepinephrine was reduced in isolated femoral arteries,66 although other maternal nutrient restricted diets67,68 showed no effect on vasoconstrictor responses.
A major determinant of blood pressure is arterial compliance, which is a function of the extracellular matrix (ECM).69 The ECM, made of collagen, elastin and smooth muscle,69 can be altered by diet even in the adult state. Adult rats fed a high salt diet over a course of 8 weeks showed structural changes in the aorta with an increase in wall thickness, a decrease in collagen and an increase in elastin/collagen ratio.70 Studies in our laboratory demonstrate marked changes in the ECM composition of vessel wall as a result of MFR.71
In summary, IUGR is associated with hypertension, particularly in male offspring. Programmed offspring exhibit changes in renal structure, as well as in vascular structure and function that precede and are probably contributory to the development of hypertension. The relative importance of these changes remains to be determined.
Diabetes
Low newborn weight has been associated with an increased risk for type 2 diabetes in human epidemiologic studies72 and with abnormal insulin secretion and glucose intolerance in rats and sheep.73,74 Several factors may contribute to this phenomenon. First, the IUGR offspring may have a reduced ability to secrete insulin due to reduced numbers of pancreatic islets. Adult humans born IUGR have impaired insulin responses to glucose.7 In rats, adult IUGR offspring have a lower beta cell mass and pancreatic insulin content, as well as a reduced insulin response to glucose.75 A reduction in the capacity to excrete insulin may be associated in IUGR individuals with an increase in insulin requirement. When the insulin requirement exceeds the capacity of the pancreas, diabetes results.
One reason for an increased insulin requirement in IUGR offsring is increased gluconeogenesis. Hepatic gluconeogenesis is increased in adult IUGR rats,15 and this increase precedes the development of hyperglycemia and is relatively resistant to the effects of insulin compared to controls. Expression of PPARγ coactivator-1, a regulator of mRNA expression of glucose-6-phosphatase and other gluconeogenesis enzymes, is increased in the livers of IUGR rat offspring,76 suggesting that the alteration in hepatic glucose production may be the result of changes in intracellular signaling.
The development of glucose intolerance in IUGR individuals may also be associated with other alterations in insulin signaling. For example, glucose entry into skeletal muscle occurs via the glucose transporter GLUT4; the process is stimulated by insulin. In the rat, fetal skeletal muscle GLUT4 expression is decreased, but the amount of GLUT4 present on the plasma membrane is increased, with diminished intracellular stores, suggesting a compensatory adaptation to low glucose availability.13 In the adult IUGR rat, skeletal muscle GLUT4 continues to be increased on the plasma membrane but there is diminished translocation of additional GLUT4 to the plasma membrane in response to insulin. Adult IUGR human subjects with insulin resistance also demonstrated a failure to upregulate muscle GLUT4 after insulin stimulation.77 As skeletal muscle is a primary site for insulin-induced glucose utilization, this unresponsiveness may be associated with glucose intolerance.
In summary, IUGR is associated with both anatomic changes in the pancreatic islets and with changes in intracellular insulin signaling pathways. The end result of these alterations is to decrease the individual’s capacity to secrete insulin, while increasing the demand for insulin leading to an increased liklihood of frank glucose intolerance.
Manipulation of Fetal Programming
The many deleterious effects of a programmed “thrifty phenotype” in a setting of postnatal calorie abundance lead to the question as to whether fetal programming can be reversed or ameliorated. Although no treatments are currently available, there are several promising lines of inquiry.
Immediate postnatal nutrition can affect long-term health in IUGR offspring. Although adults born during the Dutch hunger winter developed hypertension and diabetes as adults, those exposed in utero to starvation in the siege of Leningrad were not diabetic or hypertensive at a rate greater than controls.78 One explanation for this is that the siege of Leningrad was of greater duration, and those starved in utero were also likely to have been starved as newborns. Similarly, in our lab79 and others,13 rats born IUGR who continued to be nutritionally deprived during lactation did not become obese as adults. However, in our studies these postnatally deprived rats did exhibit elevated serum total and LDL cholesterol, and insulin insufficiency.79
Treatment of rats with peripheral leptin either to the dam during pregnancy and to the pup during lactation80 or to the pup alone during early lactation 81 resulted in adults who were neither obese nor diabetic. These observations suggest that supplementation of leptin to assure a normal plasma leptin surge at rat postnatal day 10–12, may facilitate the development of arcuate axonal projections.82,83 In contrast to rats, there is no evidence of a human postnatal leptin surge.84 Consequently, it is speculative as to whether leptin administration would be effective in human IUGR.
The interventions above are empiric, and unlikely to be completely effective due to the wide range of effects of IUGR on adult health. Truly reversing the effects of maladaptive fetal programming will likely require an ability to reprogram the changes in gene expression, probably by epigenetic changes to the chromatin.
Epigenetics
There is growing evidence that maternal nutritional status can alter the state of the fetal genome and imprint gene expression. Epigenetic alterations (stable alterations of gene expression through covalent modifications of DNA and core histones) in early embryos may be carried forward to subsequent developmental stages.85 Two mechanisms mediating epigenetic effects are DNA methylation and histone modification (acetylation and methylation).86 Either of these mechanisms can alter gene expression gene expression (is “gene expression” duplicated intentionally?).86 Epignentic changes in IUGR individuals have been demonstrated in relevant genes including those involved in hepatic insulin signaling,87 and beta cell development.88 Interestingly, folic acid, a methyl donor, has been shown to reverse at least some epigenetic changes associated with IUGR in a rat model, although the folic acid dose used (1mg/kg) far exceeds that used in human clinical practice.89
Epigenetic changes may also explain the transgenerational effect of the thrifty phenotype. In support of this hypothesis, offspring of IUGR rat dams demonstrated altered insulin signaling and glucose metabolism, even when gestated by control rats.90. Offspring of IUGR dams also had persistence of altered methylation of the promoters for PPARα and glucocorticoid receptor despite begin gestated by dams being fed a regular diet.91
Conclusion
Growth restriction in utero is associated with the development of obesity, hypertension and diabetes in animal models and in humans when ample calories are provided postnatally, as occurs in most Western societies. The resultant adult obesity has become a significant health risk. The current understanding is that intrauterine deprivation programs the individual for a deprived environment, and that such programming is maladaptive in a non-deprived environment. Programming causes both anatomic changes, such as a decrease in the number of glomeruli, and functional changes, such as a decrease in GLUT4 induction after insulin treatment. The sum of these changes is an increase in appetite and in adipocyte activity, leading to obesity, a decrease in glomeruli and in vascular compliance, contributing to hypertension, and a reduction in beta cells and insulin signaling, contributing to diabetes. Data suggests that at least some of these programmed effects are subject to postnatal alteration, although there are currently no accepted human manipulations. At present, the best treatment is prevention. Avoiding severe IUGR is therefore of importance not only in improving fetal and neonatal outcomes, but in improving adult health both for the index individual and for their children.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Hales CN, Barker DJ. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia. 1992;35:595–601. doi: 10.1007/BF00400248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barker DJ, Eriksson JG, Forsen T, et al. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:1235–1239. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Forsen T, Osmond C, Eriksson JG, et al. Growth of girls who later develop coronary heart disease. Heart. 2004;90:20–24. doi: 10.1136/heart.90.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eriksson JG, Forsen T, Tuomilehto J, et al. Early adiposity rebound in childhood and risk of Type 2 diabetes in adult life. Diabetologia. 2003;46:190–194. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-1012-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723–1727. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de R, Sr, Painter RC, Roseboom TJ, et al. Glucose tolerance at age 58 and the decline of glucose tolerance in comparison with age 50 in people prenatally exposed to the Dutch famine. Diabetologia. 2006;49:637–643. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0136-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.de R, Sr, Painter RC, Phillips DI, et al. Impaired insulin secretion after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1897–1901. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Painter RC, de R, Sr, Bossuyt PM, et al. Blood pressure response to psychological stressors in adults after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. J Hypertens. 2006;24:1771–1778. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000242401.45591.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stein AD, Zybert PA, van der Pal-de Bruin, et al. Exposure to famine during gestation, size at birth, and blood pressure at age 59 y: evidence from the Dutch Famine. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:759–765. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9065-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Painter RC, de R, Sr, Bossuyt PM, et al. Early onset of coronary artery disease after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:322–327. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barker DJ, Osmond C, Golding J, et al. Growth in utero, blood pressure in childhood and adult life, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 1989;298:564–567. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gennser G, Rymark P, Isberg PE. Low birth weight and risk of high blood pressure in adulthood. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296:1498–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6635.1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thamotharan M, Shin BC, Suddirikku DT, et al. GLUT4 expression and subcellular localization in the intrauterine growth-restricted adult rat female offspring. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005;288:E935–E947. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00342.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jansson N, Pettersson J, Haafiz A, et al. Down-regulation of placental transport of amino acids precedes the development of intrauterine growth restriction in rats fed a low protein diet. J Physiol. 2006;576:935–946. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vuguin P, Raab E, Liu B, et al. Hepatic insulin resistance precedes the development of diabetes in a model of intrauterine growth retardation. Diabetes. 2004;53:2617–2622. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.10.2617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bassi JA, Rosso P, Moessinger AC, et al. Fetal growth retardation due to maternal tobacco smoke exposure in the rat. Pediatr Res. 1984;18:127–130. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198402000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen L, Nyomba BL. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on glucose tolerance in the rat offspring. Metab. 2003;52:454–462. doi: 10.1053/meta.2003.50073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barry JS, Davidsen ML, Limesand SW, et al. Developmental changes in ovine myocardial glucose transporters and insulin signaling following hyperthermia-induced intrauterine fetal growth restriction. Exp Biol Med (Maywood ) 2006;231:566–575. doi: 10.1177/153537020623100511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McMillen IC, Robinson JS. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev. 2005;85:571–633. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00053.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jones AP, Friedman MI. Obesity and adipocyte abnormalities in offspring of rats undernourished during pregnancy. Science. 1982;215:1518–1519. doi: 10.1126/science.7063860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jones AP, Simson EL, Friedman MI. Gestational undernutrition and the development of obesity in rats. J Nutr. 1984;114:1484–1492. doi: 10.1093/jn/114.8.1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Anguita RM, Sigulem DM, Sawaya AL. Intrauterine food restriction is associated with obesity in young rats. J Nutr. 1993;123:1421–1428. doi: 10.1093/jn/123.8.1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vickers MH, Breier BH, Cutfield WS, et al. Fetal origins of hyperphagia, obesity, and hypertension and postnatal amplification by hypercaloric nutrition. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000;279:E83–E87. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2000.279.1.E83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Geary M, Pringle PJ, Persaud M, et al. Leptin concentrations in maternal serum and cord blood: relationship to maternal anthropometry and fetal growth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:1054–1060. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hoggard N, Haggarty P, Thomas L, et al. Leptin expression in placental and fetal tissues: does leptin have a functional role? Biochem Soc Trans. 2001;29:57–63. doi: 10.1042/0300-5127:0290057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blum JW, Zbinden Y, Hammon HM, et al. Plasma leptin status in young calves: effects of pre-term birth, age, glucocorticoid status, suckling, and feeding with an automatic feeder or by bucket. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2005;28:119–133. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2004.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kotani Y, Yokota I, Kitamura S, et al. Plasma adiponectin levels in newborns are higher than those in adults and positively correlated with birth weight. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2004;61:418–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McMillen IC, Muhlhausler BS, Duffield JA, et al. Prenatal programming of postnatal obesity: fetal nutrition and the regulation of leptin synthesis and secretion before birth. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:405–412. doi: 10.1079/pns2004370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eckert JE, Gatford KL, Luxford BG, et al. Leptin expression in offspring is programmed by nutrition in pregnancy. J Endocrinol. 2000;165:R1–R6. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.165r001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Blache D, Celi P, Blackberrv MA, et al. Decrease in voluntary feed intake and pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion after intracerebroventricular infusion of recombinant bovine leptin in mature male sheep. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2000;12:373–381. doi: 10.1071/rd00102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morrison CD, Daniel JA, Holmberg BJ, et al. Central infusion of leptin into well-fed and undernourished ewe lambs: effects on feed intake and serum concentrations of growth hormone and luteinizing hormone. J Endocrinol. 2001;168:317–324. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1680317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Clarke IJ, Henry B, Iqbal J, et al. Leptin and the regulation of food intake and the neuroendocrine axis in sheep. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2001;28:106–107. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2001.03410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Henry BA, Goding JW, Alexander WS, et al. Central administration of leptin to ovariectomized ewes inhibits food intake without affecting the secretion of hormones from the pituitary gland: evidence for a dissociation of effects on appetite and neuroendocrine function. Endocrinol. 1999;140:1175–1182. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.3.6604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Air EL, Benoit SC, Clegg DJ, et al. Insulin and leptin combine additively to reduce food intake and body weight in rats. Endocrinol. 2002;143:2449–2452. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.6.8948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thorsell A, Caberlotto L, Rimondini R, et al. Leptin suppression of hypothalamic NPY expression and feeding, but not amygdala NPY expression and experimental anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002;71:425–430. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00678-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dhillon H, Kalra SP, Kalra PS. Dose-dependent effects of central leptin gene therapy on genes that regulate body weight and appetite in the hypothalamus. Mol Ther. 2001;4:139–145. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2001.0427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shiraishi T, Oomura Y, Sasaki K, et al. Effects of leptin and orexin-A on food intake and feeding related hypothalamic neurons. Physiol Behav. 2000;71:251–261. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00341-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Muzzin P, Cusin I, Charnay Y, et al. Single intracerebroventricular bolus injection of a recombinant adenovirus expressing leptin results in reduction of food intake and body weight in both lean and obese Zucker fa/fa rats. Regul Pept. 2000;92:57–64. doi: 10.1016/s0167-0115(00)00150-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fox AS, Olster DH. Effects of intracerebroventricular leptin administration on feeding and sexual behaviors in lean and obese female Zucker rats. Horm Behav. 2000;37:377–387. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Desai M, Gayle D, Han G, et al. Programmed hyperphagia due to reduced anorexigenic mechanisms in intrauterine growth-restricted offspring. Reprod Sci. 2007;14:329–337. doi: 10.1177/1933719107303983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jequier E. Leptin signaling, adiposity, and energy balance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;967:379–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Caro JF, Kolaczynski JW, Nyce MR, et al. Decreased cerebrospinal-fluid/serum leptin ratio in obesity: a possible mechanism for leptin resistance. Lancet. 1996;348:159–161. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03173-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schwartz MW, Peskind E, Raskind M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leptin levels: relationship to plasma levels and to adiposity in humans. Nat Med. 1996;2:589–593. doi: 10.1038/nm0596-589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Burguera B, Couce ME, Curran GL, et al. Obesity is associated with a decreased leptin transport across the blood-brain barrier in rats. Diabetes. 2000;49:1219–1223. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.7.1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Clement K, Vaisse C, Lahlou N, et al. A mutation in the human leptin receptor gene causes obesity and pituitary dysfunction. Nature. 1998;392:398–401. doi: 10.1038/32911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bjorbaek C, Buchholz RM, Davis SM, et al. Divergent roles of SHP-2 in ERK activation by leptin receptors. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:4747–4755. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007439200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bjorbak C, Lavery HJ, Bates SH, et al. SOCS3 mediates feedback inhibition of the leptin receptor via Tyr985. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:40649–40657. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007577200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vaisse C, Halaas JL, Horvath CM, et al. Leptin activation of Stat3 in the hypothalamus of wild-type and ob/ob mice but not db/db mice. Nat Genet. 1996;14:95–97. doi: 10.1038/ng0996-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bouret SG, Draper SJ, Simerly RB. Formation of projection pathways from the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus to hypothalamic regions implicated in the neural control of feeding behavior in mice. J Neurosci. 2004;24:2797–2805. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5369-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bouret SG, Draper SJ, Simerly RB. Trophic action of leptin on hypothalamic neurons that regulate feeding. Science. 2004;304:108–110. doi: 10.1126/science.1095004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yura S, Itoh H, Sagawa N, et al. Role of premature leptin surge in obesity resulting from intrauterine undernutrition. Cell Metab. 2005;1:371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Spiegelman BM, Choy L, Hotamisligil GS, et al. Regulation of adipocyte gene expression in differentiation and syndromes of obesity/diabetes. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:6823–6826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Spiegelman BM, Flier JS. Adipogenesis and obesity: rounding out the big picture. Cell. 1996;87:377–389. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gilbert JS, Lang AL, Grant AR, et al. Maternal nutrient restriction in sheep: hypertension and decreased nephron number in offspring at 9 months of age. J Physiol. 2005;565:137–147. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.084202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Langley-Evans SC, Welham SJ, Jackson AA. Fetal exposure to a maternal low protein diet impairs nephrogenesis and promotes hypertension in the rat. Life Sci. 1999;64:965–974. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Brenner BM, Mackenzie HS. Nephron mass as a risk factor for progression of renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 1997;63:S124–S127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Manalich R, Reyes L, Herrera M, et al. Relationship between weight at birth and the number and size of renal glomeruli in humans: a histomorphometric study. Kidney Int. 2000;58:770–773. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Konje JC, Bell SC, Morton JJ, et al. Human fetal kidney morphometry during gestation and the relationship between weight, kidney morphometry and plasma active renin concentration at birth. Clin Sci (Lond) 1996;91:169–175. doi: 10.1042/cs0910169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schreuder MF, Nyengaard JR, Remmers F, et al. Postnatal food restriction in the rat as a model for a low nephron endowment. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;291:F1104–F1107. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00158.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Brenner BM, Chertow GM. Congenital oligonephropathy: an inborn cause of adult hypertension and progressive renal injury? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1993;2:691–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lisle SJ, Lewis RM, Petry CJ, et al. Effect of maternal iron restriction during pregnancy on renal morphology in the adult rat offspring. Br J Nutr. 2003;90:33–39. doi: 10.1079/bjn2003881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mansano RZ, Desai M, Garg A, et al. Paradoxic increase in glomerular number of offspring exposed to maternal hypernatremia. Am J Obstet Gyn. 2007;195:S33. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Goh KL, Shore AC, Quinn M, et al. Impaired microvascular vasodilatory function in 3-month-old infants of low birth weight. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1102–1107. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Goodfellow J, Bellamy MF, Gorman ST, et al. Endothelial function is impaired in fit young adults of low birth weight. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;40:600–606. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(98)00197-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Martin H, Hu J, Gennser G, et al. Impaired endothelial function and increased carotid stiffness in 9-year-old children with low birthweight. Circul. 2000;102:2739–2744. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.22.2739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ozaki T, Nishina H, Hanson MA, et al. Dietary restriction in pregnant rats causes gender-related hypertension and vascular dysfunction in offspring. J Physiol. 2001;530:141–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0141m.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Holemans K, Gerber R, Meurrens K, et al. Maternal food restriction in the second half of pregnancy affects vascular function but not blood pressure of rat female offspring. Br J Nutr. 1999;81:73–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Brawley L, Itoh S, Torrens C, et al. Dietary protein restriction in pregnancy induces hypertension and vascular defects in rat male offspring. Pediatr Res. 2003;54:83–90. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000065731.00639.02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shadwick RE. Mechanical design in arteries. J Exp Biol. 1999;202:3305–3313. doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Et-Taouil K, Schiavi P, Levy BI, et al. Sodium intake, large artery stiffness, and proteoglycans in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. 2001;38:1172–1176. doi: 10.1161/hy1101.96740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Khorram O, Momeni M, Desai M, et al. Nutrient restriction in utero induces remodeling of the vascular extracellular matrix in rat offspring. Reprod Sci. 2007;14:73–80. doi: 10.1177/1933719106298215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hales CN, Barker DJ, Clark PM, et al. Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64. BMJ. 1991;303:1019–1022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Limesand SW, Rozance PJ, Zerbe GO, et al. Attenuated insulin release and storage in fetal sheep pancreatic islets with intrauterine growth restriction. Endocrinol. 2006;147:1488–1497. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hales CN, Ozanne SE. For debate: Fetal and early postnatal growth restriction lead to diabetes, the metabolic syndrome and renal failure. Diabetologia. 2003;46:1013–1019. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1131-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Simmons RA, Templeton LJ, Gertz SJ. Intrauterine growth retardation leads to the development of type 2 diabetes in the rat. Diabetes. 2001;50:2279–2286. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.10.2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lane RH, MacLennan NK, Hsu JL, et al. Increased hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1 gene expression in a rat model of intrauterine growth retardation and subsequent insulin resistance. Endocrinol. 2002;143:2486–2490. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.7.8898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jaquet D, Vidal H, Hankard R, et al. Impaired regulation of glucose transporter 4 gene expression in insulin resistance associated with in utero undernutrition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3266–3271. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.7.7677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Stanner SA, Bulmer K, Andres C, et al. Does malnutrition in utero determine diabetes and coronary heart disease in adulthood? Results from the Leningrad siege study, a cross sectional study. BMJ. 1997;315:1342–1348. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Desai M, Gayle D, Babu J, et al. The timing of nutrient restriction during rat pregnancy/lactation alters metabolic syndrome phenotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:555–557. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stocker CJ, Wargent E, O'Dowd J, et al. Prevention of diet-induced obesity and impaired glucose tolerance in rats following administration of leptin to their mothers. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;292:R1810–R1818. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00676.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Vickers MH, Gluckman PD, Coveny AH, et al. Neonatal leptin treatment reverses developmental programming. Endocrinol. 2005;146:4211–4216. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ahima RS, Prabakaran D, Flier JS. Postnatal leptin surge and regulation of circadian rhythm of leptin by feeding. Implications for energy homeostasis and neuroendocrine function. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1020–1027. doi: 10.1172/JCI1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Herrera E, Lasuncion MA, Huerta L, et al. Plasma leptin levels in rat mother and offspring during pregnancy and lactation. Biol Neonate. 2000;78:315–320. doi: 10.1159/000014286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Akcurin S, Velipasaoglu S, Akcurin G, et al. Leptin profile in neonatal gonadotropin surge and relationship between leptin and body mass index in early infancy. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005;18:189–195. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2005.18.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Early nutrition, epigenetic changes at transposons and imprinted genes, and enhanced susceptibility to adult chronic diseases. Nutrition. 2004;20:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2003.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33 Suppl:245–254. doi: 10.1038/ng1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fu Q, McKnight RA, Yu X, et al. Growth retardation alters the epigenetic characteristics of hepatic dual specificity phosphatase 5. FASEB J. 2006;20:2127–2129. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6179fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Park J, Suponitsky-Kroyter I, Niu H, et al. Epigenetic silencing of Pdx-1 in growth retarded (IUGR) rats. Pediatr Res. (in press) [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lillycrop KA, Phillips ES, Jackson AA, et al. Dietary protein restriction of pregnant rats induces and folic acid supplementation prevents epigenetic modification of hepatic gene expression in the offspring. J Nutr. 2005;135:1382–1386. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Thamotharan M, Garg M, Oak S, et al. Transgenerational Inheritance of the Insulin Resistant Phenotype in Embryo-Transferred Intra-Uterine Growth Restricted Adult Female Rat Offspring. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00462.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Burdge GC, Slater-Jefferies J, Torrens C, et al. Dietary protein restriction of pregnant rats in the F0 generation induces altered methylation of hepatic gene promoters in the adult male offspring in the F1 and F2 generations. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:435–439. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507352392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]