Skip to main content
Paediatrics & Child Health logoLink to Paediatrics & Child Health
. 2006 Dec;11(10):671–672. doi: 10.1093/pch/11.10.671

Which medications used in paediatric practice have demonstrated natural health product-drug interactions?

Part A: Evidence-based answer and summary

Brad Johnston 1, Sunita Vohra 1,
PMCID: PMC2528601  PMID: 19030251

A recent Canadian survey (1) of 1804 children and youth suggested that 49% had tried one or more complementary and alternative medicine therapies and 41% had used a natural health product (NHP) in the previous year. Similarly, a three-month survey (2) of 142 families in an American paediatric emergency department suggested that 45% of caregivers had given their children an herbal remedy in the previous year.

NHP use may be much higher within certain subgroups of the child and youth population (eg, children with serious and/or chronic conditions, such as cancer, cystic fibrosis, asthma, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and eating disorders) (37). In particular, NHP use may be highest in paediatric populations with chronic disease who suffer relapses or other setbacks (3). Surveys have also shown that rates of NHP use are high (70%) among homeless youth, many of whom suffer from chronic mental and physical health conditions (8). Indeed, because children with serious, chronic or recurrent illnesses are the most likely to be on concurrent prescription medications, they may have the highest risk for clinically relevant NHP-drug interactions.

With expanding use, clinicians and researchers are focusing their attention on the potential for NHPs to interact with prescribed medications and alter their pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetics involves the study of the rate of movement of drugs within biological systems, as affected by absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination from the body. Although the mechanisms of NHP-drug interactions are complex and not fully elucidated, interactions are primarily due to altered biotransformation; in particular, herbs may cause induction (or inhibition) of the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes, rendering the index drug less (or more) active (Figure 1) (9). The CYP isozyme families most commonly involved in human liver metabolism are 1A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E and 3A. Many prescription drugs are metabolized through the CYP system, namely the CYP3A4 isoform (9). For example, St John’s wort and garlic are metabolized through the 3A4 isoform and appear to induce other CYP isozymes (9). A recent overview (10) of pharmacokinetic clinical investigations of NHP-drug interactions found that no such clinical investigations have been conducted in children. The search included major electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and AMED) from inception to August 2004. Studies investigating pharmacokinetic interactions between an NHP and the metabolism of a regulated medication were included. In an attempt to determine the relevance of potential NHP-drug interactions to the paediatric population, commonly used reference texts were used to identify drugs used in paediatric practice (eg, Pediatric Dosage Handbook [11] and The Harriet Lane Handbook: A Manual for Pediatric House Officers, 16th Edition [12]). Forty-four adult trials examining drug interactions with 11 different common herbal preparations and 11 traditional preparations were identified. Significant NHP-drug interactions were demonstrated in 18 studies among five common herbal remedies with 13 drugs prescribed in paediatric practice. In 18 studies, there was a decreased area under the curve (AUC) or concentration maximum (Cmax), and, thus, decreased systemic bioavailability of the probe drug. Significant decreases in the AUC were demonstrated in trials with warfarin (when administered with American ginseng) (13), midazolam (with echinacea) (14), saquinavir (with garlic) (15) and alprazolam (with ginkgo biloba) (16). In addition, St John’s wort significantly decreased the AUC or Cmax when administered with alprazolam (AUC [17,18]), amitriptyline (AUC [19]), cyclosporin A (AUC [20]), digoxin (AUC [21,22]), fexofenadine (AUC and Cmax [23]), indinavir (AUC [24]), midazolam (AUC and Cmax [23]), omeprazole (AUC [25]), oral contraceptive (3-ketodesogestrel) (AUC [26]), simvastatin (AUC [27]), tacrolimus (AUC [28,29]) and warfarin (AUC [30]) (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sequential first-pass elimination of a theoretical drug through metabolism by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 and/or transport by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in enterocytes of the small intestine and then hepatocytes of the liver. The percentage of the initial drug dose that is available before and after passage through the gut wall and liver is presented. Although the drug is 100% absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, its bioavailability is only 15% after oral administration. Reprinted with permission from reference 31

TABLE 1.

Summary of significant paediatric herb-drug interactions

Pharmacokinetic trial Herb Drug used in paediatric practice
Yuan et al, 2004 (13) American ginseng Warfarin
Gorski et al, 2004 (14) Echinacea Midazolam
Piscitelli et al, 2002 (15) Garlic Saquinavir
Markowitz et al, 2003 (16) Ginkgo biloba Alprazolam
Markowitz et al, 2000 (17) St John’s wort Alprazolam
Markowitz et al, 2003 (18) St John’s wort Alprazolam
Johne et al, 2002 (19) St John’s wort Amitriptyline
Bauer et al, 2003 (20) St John’s wort Cyclosporin A
Johne et al, 1999 (21) St John’s wort Digoxin
Mueller et al, 2004 (22) St John’s wort Digoxin
Dresser et al, 2003 (23) St John’s wort Fexofenadine
Piscitelli et al, 2000 (24) St John’s wort Indinavir
Wang et al, 2004 (25) St John’s wort Omeprazole
Pfrunder et al, 2003 (26) St John’s wort Oral contraceptive
Sugimoto et al, 2001 (27) St John’s wort Simvastatin
Mai et al, 2003 (28) St John’s wort Tacrolimus
Hebert et al, 2004 (29) St John’s wort Tacrolimus
Jiang et al, 2004 (30) St John’s wort Warfarin

St John’s wort has been studied most extensively, and the mechanism for NHP-drug interaction is best understood using this example. The strength and consistency of St John’s wort’s effect on reducing drug bioavailability suggests that it often has important effects in reducing systemic exposure of a variety of drugs. Whether patients take a conventional medication for a condition that is unrelated to the illness for which the patient is using a NHP (eg, fexofenadine for allergic rhinitis and St John’s wort for depression) or they use two interacting compounds for the same illness (eg, amitriptyline and St John’s wort), patients should be closely monitored for a lack of clinical response to standard dosing or an unexpected adverse event that could be due to undisclosed use or discontinuation of NHPs (9). St John’s wort, along with garlic, American ginseng, ginkgo and echinacea should be avoided in children and youth taking medications that have demonstrated significant herb-drug interactions. The degree to which decreases in the AUC or Cmax result in clinically relevant drug interactions will depend on the therapeutic index of the specific probe drugs and their minimum effective concentrations.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Goldman RD, Vohra S. Complementary and alternative medicine use by children visiting a pediatric emergency department. Abstracts from the First Annual Complementary and Alternative Health Care and Paediatrics Forum, December 2 to 3, 2004. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;11:e254–56. Abst 5. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lanski SL, Greenwald M, Perkins A, Simon HK. Herbal therapy use in a pediatric emergency department population: Expect the unexpected. Pediatrics. 2003;111:981–5. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.5.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Madsen H, Andersen S, Nielsen RG, Dolmer BS, Host A, Damkier A. Use of complementary/alternative medicine among paediatric patients. Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162:334–41. doi: 10.1007/s00431-003-1180-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trigazis L, Tennankore D, Vohra S, Katzman DK. The use of herbal remedies by adolescents with eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35:223–8. doi: 10.1002/eat.10248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simpson N, Roman K. Complementary medicine use in children: Extent and reasons. A population-based study. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51:914–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Neuhouser ML, Patterson RE, Schwartz SM, Hedderson MM, Bowen DJ, Standish LJ. Use of alternative medicine by children with cancer in Washington state. Prev Med. 2001;33:347–54. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chan E, Rappaport LA, Kemper KJ. Complementary and alternative therapies in childhood attention and hyperactivity problems. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24:4–8. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200302000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Breuner CC, Barry PJ, Kemper KJ. Alternative medicine use by homeless youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:1071–5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.11.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mills E, Wu P, Johnston BC, Gallicano K, Clarke M, Guyatt G. Natural health product-drug interactions: A systematic review of clinical trials. Ther Drug Monit. 2005;27:549–57. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000170880.95267.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Johnston BC, Wu P, Mills EJ. Herb-drug interaction implications for pediatric clinical practice: An overview of pharmacokinetic trials. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:692. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.7.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, Kraus DM, editors. Pediatric Dosage Handbook. 10. Hudson: Lexi-Comp Inc; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gunn VL, Nechyba C. The Harriet Lane Handbook: A Manual for Pediatric House Officers. 16. Philadelphia: Mosby Inc; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yuan CS, Wei G, Dey L, et al. Brief communication: American ginseng reduces warfarin’s effect in healthy patients: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:23–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gorski JC, Huang SM, Pinto A, et al. The effect of echinacea (Echinacea purpurea root) on cytochrome P450 activity in vivo. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Piscitelli SC, Burstein AH, Welden N, Gallicano KD, Falloon J. The effect of garlic supplements on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:234–8. doi: 10.1086/324351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, Lindsay DeVane C, Sipkes L, Chavin KD. Multiple-dose administration of Ginkgo biloba did not affect cytochrome P-450 2D6 or 3A4 activity in normal volunteers. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;23:576–81. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000095340.32154.c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Markowitz JS, DeVane CL, Boulton DW, Carson SW, Nahas Z, Risch SC. Effect of St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) on cytochrome P-450 2D6 and 3A4 activity in healthy volunteers. Life Sci. 2000;66:PL133–9. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00659-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, et al. Effect of St John’s wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA. 2003;290:1500–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johne A, Schmider J, Brockmoller J, et al. Decreased plasma levels of amitriptyline and its metabolites on comedication with an extract from St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;22:46–54. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200202000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bauer S, Stormer E, Johne A, et al. Alterations in cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics and metabolism during treatment with St John’s wort in renal transplant patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55:203–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01759.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Johne A, Brockmoller J, Bauer S, Maurer A, Langheinrich M, Roots I. Pharmacokinetic interaction of digoxin with an herbal extract from St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66:338–45. doi: 10.1053/cp.1999.v66.a101944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mueller SC, Uehleke B, Woehling H, et al. Effect of St John’s wort dose and preparations on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:546–57. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dresser GK, Schwarz UI, Wilkinson GR, Kim RB. Coordinate induction of both cytochrome P4503A and MDR1 by St John’s wort in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73:41–50. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2003.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Piscitelli SC, Burstein AH, Chaitt D, Alfaro RM, Falloon J. Indinavir concentrations and St John’s wort. Lancet. 2000;355:547–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05712-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang LS, Zhou G, Zhu B, et al. St John’s wort induces both cytochrome P450 3A4-catalyzed sulfoxidation and 2C19-dependent hydroxylation of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:191–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pfrunder A, Schiesser M, Gerber S, Haschke M, Bitzer J, Drewe J. Interaction of St John’s wort with low-dose oral contraceptive therapy: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56:683–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.02005.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sugimoto K, Ohmori M, Tsuruoka S, et al. Different effects of St John’s wort on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and pravastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;70:518–24. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.120025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mai I, Stormer E, Bauer S, Kruger H, Budde K, Roots I. Impact of St John’s wort treatment on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:819–22. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hebert MF, Park JM, Chen YL, Akhtar S, Larson AM. Effects of St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:89–94. doi: 10.1177/0091270003261078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jiang X, William KM, Liauw WS, et al. Effect of St John’s wort and ginseng on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:592–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02051.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bailey DG, Dresser GK. Natural products and adverse drug interactions. CMAJ. 2004;170:1531–2. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Paediatrics & Child Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES