Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2008 Aug 27;105(35):12643–12644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806877105

Overcoming obstacles to the effective immunotherapy of human cancer

Steven A Rosenberg 1,*
PMCID: PMC2529039  PMID: 18753635

Cancers can grow and spread in humans despite their expression of cancer-associated antigens and the presence, within the tumor, of immune lymphocytes that can recognize those antigens. One of the possible explanations for this paradox is discussed in the article by Bai et al. (1) in this issue of PNAS. They demonstrate that anti-tumor T cells can be tolerized in the tumor microenvironment and thus down-regulate their effector functions. This is but one element in a complex story.

It has been known since the mid-1960s that the cellular arm of the immune response is responsible for the rejection of experimental tumors and organ allografts. The predominant effector element in the cellular immune system is the T lymphocyte, which contains surface molecules called T cell receptors that can recognize antigenic peptides presented on the surface of tumor cells. Thus, attempts to develop effective immunotherapies for cancer have emphasized the stimulation, in vivo, of T cells capable of recognizing and destroying cancer cells that express these antigens (reviewed in ref. 2) These attempts at immunotherapy fall into three main classes. They are (i) nonspecific immune stimulation with the goal that T cells reactive against the cancer will also be increased; (ii) active immunization of the tumor-bearing host designed to increase and activate the numbers of preexisting anti-tumor T cell precursors; and (iii) adoptive cell transfer (or adoptive immunotherapy), which involves the transfer to the tumor-bearing host of activated immune T cells capable of recognizing and destroying cancer cells.

At present, the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy in humans is quite limited. IL-2, a cytokine that stimulates T cells and is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cancer, can mediate cancer regression in ≈15–20% of these patients (3). Cancer vaccines are currently ineffective for the therapy of patients with established cancer except in rare and very sporadic cases (4). In contrast, cell transfer approaches can be very effective and can mediate cancer regression in 50–70% of patients with metastatic melanoma. This latter approach has provided important clues to the requirements for the successful immunotherapy of cancers in general (5, 6).

To mediate anti-tumor effects in vivo, T cells of sufficient avidity for recognition of tumor antigens must be present in sufficient quantities, traffic to the tumor site, extravasate from the circulation, and then mediate effector functions to cause destruction of cancer cells. All of these criteria must be met if a treatment is to be effective.

The presence of even large numbers of T cells capable of recognizing tumors is not sufficient to mediate tumor regression. Tumors can grow normally in T cell receptor transgenic mice, all of whose T cells are capable of recognizing the tumor antigen (7). In humans, studies of active immunization have shown that reactive T cells can be generated against antigens present on the tumor, and yet have no impact at all on tumor growth. In some cases, up to 30% of all circulating CD8+ T cells can be shown to have anti-tumor reactivity in tumors that grow normally (8). The paper by Bai et al. (1) clearly demonstrates that T cells in the tumor microenvironment can be suppressed, whereas similar cells at other sites can exhibit profound effector function. The mechanisms of this local down-regulation are not clear, although many hypotheses have been tested, including the local presence of inhibitory cytokines such as IL-10 (9) or TGF-β (10), the presence of other cell types capable of actively suppressing immune reactions such as T regulatory cells (11) or myeloid-derived suppressor cells (12), or the stimulation of inhibitory cell surface components on infiltrating lymphocytes such as PD-1 (13) and CTLA-4 (14) that result in lymphocyte suppression. Lymphocytes can undergo apoptosis when encountering antigen under unique conditions, including lack of costimulation.

Profound lymphodepletion of the host substantially increases the effectiveness of cell transfer therapy.

Overcoming Obstacles

Adoptive immunotherapy experiments in both mice and humans have identified factors involved in overcoming the local immunosuppression at the growing tumor site. Profound lymphodepletion of the host substantially increases the effectiveness of cell transfer therapy in part by eliminating many of the cellular elements responsible for local suppression such as T regulatory cells, as well as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (15). The absence of these regulatory cells at a time when activated T cells are present in the tumor results in substantial enhancement of anti-tumor activity. Lymphodepletion has the added advantage of eliminating lymphocytes that compete with the transferred cells for homeostatic cytokines such as IL-7 and IL-15 (15). Thus, the homeostatic influence of these cytokines is apparent only on the transferred cells with anti-tumor activity.

An important factor that explains much of the failure of active immunization against cancer is the absence of precursor cells with very high affinity for recognition of tumor antigens. The majority of tumor antigens that have been described are self antigens that are selectively expressed or overexpressed on the tumor (16, 17). Because these determinants have been present during thymic development, negative selection mechanisms in the thymus eliminate those clonotypes with high reactivity against these antigens. Negative selection is essential to ensure that cells with high levels of autoimmune activity are deleted and cannot cause destruction of normal tissues in the adult. Thus, with rare exceptions only low-affinity T cell receptors capable of recognizing these antigens persist in the host. It is these cells that are largely stimulated by cancer vaccines, and the expansion of these low-affinity T cells cannot be stimulated by tumor antigens in the suppressive microenvironment of the tumor. This is a major obstacle to the development of effective cancer vaccines.

Adoptive immunotherapy allows the identification of rare cells with high affinity for tumor antigen that can be selected in vitro and expanded before transfer to the host. The anti-tumor cells can be activated ex vivo and directly administered, thus avoiding the tolerizing factors present at the tumor site. This approach using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has resulted in objective regression rates of 50–70% in patients with metastatic melanoma, including bulky, invasive tumors at multiple sites, including liver, lung, soft tissues, and brain (2). These studies have taught us that the administration to a lymphodepleted host of large numbers of activated high-affinity T cells capable of recognizing tumor antigens can overcome host inhibitory factors and mediate effective cancer immunotherapy in humans.

Prospects

The recent ability to genetically modify lymphocytes has opened possibilities for the in vitro creation of lymphocytes with appropriate therapeutic properties (18, 19). High-affinity T cell receptors can be introduced into a patient's normal lymphocytes and the administration of these cells to the lymphodepleted patient has now been shown to be capable of mediating cancer regression (20). The ability to further modify these lymphocytes, to make them less subject to the suppressive influences present in the tumor micro-environment such as the introduction of genes encoding dominant-negative TGF-β, or inhibitory RNAs to prevent the expression of inhibitory molecules such as CTLA-4 and PD-1, can potentially enhance the activity of the transferred cells.

Studies of cell transfer therapy are leading to an understanding of the factors that limit effective cancer immunotherapy and are suggesting experimental manipulations that can lead to the development of effective immunotherapies for the treatment of patients with cancer.

Footnotes

The author declares no conflict of interest.

See companion article on page 13003.

References

  • 1.Bai A, Higham E, Eisen HN, Wittrup KD, Chen J. Rapid tolerization of virus-activated tumor-specific CD+ T cells in prostate tumors of TRAMP mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:13003–13008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805599105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Yang JC, Morgan RA, Dudley ME. Adoptive cell transfer: A clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:299–308. doi: 10.1038/nrc2355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosenberg SA, et al. Treatment of 283 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell cancer using high-dose bolus interleukin-2. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;271:907–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Restifo NP. Cancer immunotherapy: Moving beyond current vaccines. Nat Med. 2004;10:909–915. doi: 10.1038/nm1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dudley ME, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients following clonal repopulation with anti-tumor lymphocytes. Science. 2002;298:850–854. doi: 10.1126/science.1076514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dudley ME, et al. Adoptive cell transfer therapy following non-myeloablative but lymphodepleting chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2346–2357. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Overwijk WW, et al. Tumor regression and autoimmunity after reversal of a functionally tolerant state of self-reactive CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med. 2003;198:569–580. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rosenberg SA, et al. Tumor progression can occur despite the induction of very high levels of self/tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with melanoma. J Immunol. 2005;175:6169–6176. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.6169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O'Garra A, Barrat FJ, Castro AG, Vicari A, Hawrylowicz C. Strategies for use of IL-10 or its antagonists in human disease. Immunol Rev. 2008;223:114–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00635.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wrzesinski SH, Wan YY, Flavell RA. Transforming growth factor-beta and the immune response: Implications for anticancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5262–5270. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kronenberg M, Rudensky A. Regulation of immunity by self-reactive T cells. Nature. 2005;435:598–604. doi: 10.1038/nature03725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Serafini P, Borrello I, Bronte V. Myeloid suppressor cells in cancer: Recruitment, phenotype, properties, and mechanisms of immune suppression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barber DL, et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature. 2006;439:682–687. doi: 10.1038/nature04444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Korman AJ, Peggs KS, Allison JP. Checkpoint blockade in cancer immunotherapy. Adv Immunol. 2006;90:297–339. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(06)90008-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gattinoni L, Powell DJ, Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: Building on success. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:383–393. doi: 10.1038/nri1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Van Pel A, et al. Genes coding for tumor antigens recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes. Immunol Rev. 1995;145:229–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1995.tb00084.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rosenberg SA. A new era for cancer immunotherapy based on the genes that encode cancer antigens. Immunity. 1999;10:281–287. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Morgan RA, et al. High efficiency TCR gene transfer into primary human lymphocytes affords avid recognition of melanoma tumor antigen glycoprotein 100 and does not alter the recognition of autologous melanoma antigens. J Immunol. 2003;171:3287–3295. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kuball J, Schmitz FW, Voss RH. Cooperation of human tumor-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after redirection of their specificity by a high-affinity p53A2.1-specific TCR. Immunity. 2005;22:117–129. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Morgan RA, et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science. 2006;314:126–129. doi: 10.1126/science.1129003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES