Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein (pX) is implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pathogenesis by an unknown mechanism. Deletions or mutations of genes involved in the p53 pathway are often associated with HBV-mediated HCC, indicating rescue from p53 apoptosis is a likely mechanism in HBV-HCC pathogenesis. Herein, we determined the mechanism by which pX sensitizes hepatocytes to p53-mediated apoptosis. Although it is well established that the Rb/E2F/ARF pathway stabilizes p53, and the DNA damage-activated ATM/ATR kinases activate p53, the mechanism that coordinates these two pathways has not been determined. We demonstrate that the p38MAPK pathway activated by pX serves this role in p53 apoptosis. Specifically, the activated p38MAPK pathway stabilizes p53 via E2F1-mediated ARF expression, and also activates the transcriptional function of p53 by activating ATR. Knockdown of p53, E2F1, ATR, or p38MAPKα abrogates pX-mediated apoptosis, demonstrating that E2F1, ATR, and p38MAPKα are all essential in p53 apoptosis in response to pX. Specifically, in response to pX expression, the p38MAPK pathway activates Cdk4 and Cdk2, leading to phosphorylation of Rb, release of E2F1, and transcription of ARF. The p38MAPK pathway also activates ATR, leading to phosphorylation of p53 on Ser-18 and Ser-23, transcription of pro-apoptotic genes Bax, Fas, and Noxa, and apoptosis. In conclusion, pX sensitizes hepatocytes to p53 apoptosis via activation of the p38MAPK pathway, which couples p53 stabilization and p53 activation, by E2F1 induction and ATR activation, respectively.
p53 protects the integrity of the genome in response to stress signals including hypoxia, metabolic stress, DNA damage, and expression of cellular and viral oncoproteins by inducing growth arrest, senescence, or apoptosis (1–3). p53 stabilization by overexpression of cellular or viral oncoproteins is well established, involving E2F1-mediated ARF expression (3–5). Activated p53 exhibits increased half-life after dissociation from Mdm2 (6). This p53 stabilization step involves Rb phosphorylation, E2F1 release, and induction of Arf gene transcription (7). ARF sequesters Mdm2 from interaction with p53, decreasing p53 degradation thereby enhancing p53 stability (8). In response to stress, p53 becomes heavily phosphorylated (2), inhibiting Mdm2 binding and p53 degradation (6). Transcriptional activation of p53 involves multisite modifications, including phosphorylation and acetylation (2, 9). ATM and ATR kinases phosphorylate Ser-15 and Ser-20 of p53 following DNA damage (10, 11). However, despite the plethora of studies dealing with p53 stabilization and p53 transcriptional activation, how these two pathways become simultaneously activated to affect p53 apoptosis remains to be determined.
Deletions or mutations of p53 (12) as well as disruption of p53 activation mechanisms, such as loss of Rb, Arf, or amplification of genes that inactivate the cellular stress pathways (13) are linked to cancer (14), including Hepatitis B virus (HBV)2-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (15). 50% of HCCs are caused by chronic HBV infection (16). The World Health Organization reports 400 million people are chronically infected with HBV, placing them at a greatly increased risk for HCC development. The 16.5-kDa X protein (pX) encoded by HBV is required for the viral life cycle and is implicated in HCC pathogenesis (17). pX is multifunctional, inducing activation of the mitogenic Ras-Raf-MAPK, JNK, and p38MAPK pathways (18), and transcription of select viral and cellular genes (17). The consequence of these pX activities is deregulation of cellular gene expression resulting in unscheduled cell cycle progression (19, 20), apoptosis (21), and transformation of differentiated hepatocytes (22). Genes transcriptionally induced by pX and linked to deregulated cell growth and apoptosis include the cyclins (23), TNFα/TNFRI, Fas/FasL, and p53-responsive genes (21). Importantly, expression of pX is preferentially maintained in HCC (24), although the mechanism by which pX contributes to HCC development remains to be determined. HBV-mediated HCC often exhibit genetic alterations in the tumor suppressor genes p53, Rb, and Arf (15), indicating that rescue from p53 apoptosis is a likely mechanism of HBV-mediated HCC (25). However, the mechanism by which pX activates p53 has not been determined.
In this study, we investigate the mechanism of p53 activation by pX, employing the well-characterized 4pX-1 cell line (21–23); 4pX-1 cells conditionally express pX via the tet-off system. The significance of this cellular model is that pX expression is very low, resembling expression levels occurring in natural HBV infection (22). In our earlier studies we have shown that pX sensitizes 4pX-1 cells to apoptosis only when challenged by additional sub-apoptotic signals such as growth factor deprivation, by activating the p38MAPK pathway (21). Importantly, we have shown that pX expression induces sustained activation of the p38MAPK pathway within 6 h following serum withdrawal (21). By contrast, in the absence of pX expression, serum withdrawal induces the p38MAPK pathway later, at 24 h. Thus, the effect of pX on the activation of the p38MAPK pathway precedes the effect of serum withdrawal. Moreover, inhibition of the p38MAPK pathway by SB 202190 inhibits pX-mediated apoptosis. Accordingly, our earlier studies (21) have clearly established that the activation of the p38MAPK pathway by pX is necessary for initiation of pX-mediated apoptosis. The role of the p38MAPK pathway in pX-mediated apoptosis remains to be determined.
Herein we demonstrate that the p38MAPK pathway, activated by pX following growth factor withdrawal, induces p53 stabilization by E2F1-mediated ARF expression. The p38MAPK pathway also induces the transcriptional activity of p53 by activating ATR, leading to phosphorylation of Ser-18 and Ser-23 of murine p53. Knockdown of p53, E2F1, ATR, or p38MAPKα abrogates pX-mediated apoptosis, identifying the essential role of the p38MAPK pathway, E2F1, and ATR in p53 apoptosis. We conclude that activation of the p38MAPK pathway by the weakly oncogenic pX couples the stabilization and activation of p53, via ARF induction and ATR activation, respectively, leading to p53-mediated apoptosis.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell Culture—The 4pX-1 cell line, derived from AML12 cells, was propagated as described (22) in medium containing 5 μg/ml tetracycline to turn-off pX expression. Apoptotic conditions are as described (21). Briefly, confluent 4pX-1 cells were treated ± 5 μg/ml tetracycline for 24 h in medium containing 10% fetal calf serum; apoptosis was initiated by switching cultures to 2% fetal calf serum ± 5 μg/ml tetracycline. Concentrations of inhibitors were: SB202190 (CalBiochem), 5 μm; SP600125 (Tocris), 5 μm; PFT-α (BioMoL), 10 μm; caffeine, 8 mm; cycloheximide, 10 μm.
Transient Transfections—Transient transfections of luciferase reporters were performed using FuGENE 6 (21). DNA was added to apoptotic 4pX-1 cultures 8 h prior to serum withdrawal; cells were harvested after 24 h. Assays were performed in triplicate and quantified per μg of protein extract. NFκB-Luc, NFAT-Luc, p53-Luc were purchased from Stratagene. Fas (-1.7 kb)-Luc was kindly provided by Dr. Owens-Schaub.
Construction of Clonal 4pX-1-p53kd, 4pX-1-E2F1kd, 4pX-1-ATRkd, and p38MAPKkd Cell Lines—4pX-1 cells were transfected with pSilencer CMV-Puro (Ambion) containing the p53 sequence forming a short hairpin (26), or the E2F1 and ATR sequences listed below. The p38MAPKα-shRNA vector was purchased from Open Biosystems. Clonal stable cell lines were isolated by puromycin (1.0 μg/ml) selection and screened by Western blot assays employing antibodies for p53, E2F1, ATR and p38MAPKα. Clonal stable cell lines exhibiting the highest level of knockdown were selected for further analyses. Clonal stable cell lines isolated from the same cultures exhibiting absence of knockdown referred to as pseudo-knockdown cell lines (pseudokd), serve as the negative control: E2F1shRNA: 5′-GATCCACGGAGGCTGGATCTGGAGTTCAAGAGACTCCAGATCCAGCCTCCGTTTTTTTGGAAT-3′; ATRshRNA: 5′-GATCCTCTACATCATCTTTGTAAGTTCAAGAGACTTACAAAGATGATGTAGATTT-3′.
Real-time Quantitative PCR—Real-time quantitative PCR was performed as described (23), employing 18 S RNA as internal control. Primers used were: ARF: Fwd, 5′-ATAGCTTCAGCTCAAGCACG-3′ and Rev, 5′-AAGCCACATGCTAGACACG-3′; ASPP2: Fwd, 5′-GGAGATCGAGCAGATGAATAGC-3′ and Rev, 5′-ATCCTGCCGTTCTTCAGC-3′; CHK2: Fwd, 5′-AACCTGAAGAACCTGGTCC-3′ and Rev, 5′-TCGAAGCAATATTCACAGC-3′; pX: Fwd, 5′-TCCCAGCAATGTCAACGACC-3′ and Rev, 5′-CCAATTTATGCCTACAGCCTCC-3′. DNA fragmentation assays were performed as described (21). In vitro Cdk4 kinase assays were performed as described (23).
Western Blot Analyses—Western blot analyses were performed employing whole cell extracts (WCE) isolated from apoptotic cultures (107 cells), grown ±5 μg/ml tetracycline, and harvested in 200 μl of 1× SDS loading buffer. Western blot analyses were performed using Amersham Biosciences ECL reagent. Antibodies used were purchased from: p53 (Vector); phospho-Ser18-p53, phospho-Ser23-p53, and phospho-Ser389-p53, Rb, phospho-Ser800/804-Rb, active caspase3, phospho-ATR, Cdk2, and phospho-Y15-Cdc2 (Cell Signaling); ATM, phospho-Ser1987-ATM (Calbiochem); ATR (Abcam); E2F1 (Activemotif); ARF (Novus).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assays—ChIP was performed as described (27, 28) employing 3 μg of ChIP-validated E2F1 (Activemotif) antibody. Immunoprecipitated DNA was quantified by real-time PCR or following PCR amplification by agarose gel electrophoresis. Sequences of the forward and reverse primers flanking the functional E2F1 binding sites of the Arf, Chk2, and ASPP2 promoters are: ARF: Fwd, 5′-GCGGCGCTGGCTGTCACCGCG-3′ and Rev, 5′-CCTCAGCGGCGGCCTCACCG-3′; ASPP2: Fwd, 5′-ACATCAGGCATGTATGACATT-3′ and Rev, 5′-CTGCTGAACTGGAAACCCCA-3′; Chk2: Fwd, 5′-TAGGTAGCAAGACCCGAGGG-3′ and Rev, 5′-CCTTCCTCCCCGGCAGGACC-3′.
RESULTS
pX expression Induces p53-mediated Apoptosis—The HBV X protein sensitizes the 4pX-1 hepatocyte cell line to apoptosis after growth factor withdrawal by inducing sustained activation of the p38MAPK pathway (21). Specifically, 4pX-1 cultures expressing pX via the Tet-off expression system (22), exhibit sustained activation of the p38MAPK pathway within 6 h following growth factor withdrawal. By contrast, in the absence of pX expression, serum withdrawal induces the p38MAPK pathway later at 24 h. Thus, the effect of pX on the activation of the p38MAPK pathway precedes the effect of serum withdrawal. Moreover, inhibition of the p38MAPK pathway by SB 202190 inhibits pX-mediated apoptosis. Thus, our earlier studies (21) established that the activation of the p38MAPK pathway by pX is necessary for initiation of pX-mediated apoptosis. Moreover, the pX-mediated activation of the p38MAPK pathway induces expression of TNFRI/TNF-α, Fas/FasL, and p53-regulated genes Fas, Bax, and Noxa (21). Expression of pro-apoptotic p53-regulated genes in response to pX suggested the involvement of p53 in pX-mediated apoptosis, in agreement with earlier observations (30). The mechanism by which pX stabilizes and activates pro-apoptotic p53 transcription is unknown.
To obtain initial indications whether pX activates p53 transcription, the p53-responsive luciferase constructs p53-Luc, pBax-Luc (23), and pFas-Luc (31) were transiently transfected in apoptotic 4pX-1 cells. All p53-responsive promoters display induction in response to pX expression (Fig. 1A). Treatment with 10 μm PFT-α, known to specifically inhibit p53 transcriptional activity (29), inhibits induction by pX from the p53-dependent reporter, without significantly inhibiting NFκB- or NFAT-driven luciferase expression, suggesting pX activates p53 (Fig. 1A). To confirm the effect of pX on p53 transcriptional activation and pX-mediated apoptosis, we examined expression of the endogenous p53-regulated genes Bax and p21, in a time course, following incubation of 4pX-1 cells in apoptotic conditions by growth factor withdrawal (Fig. 1B). pX induces expression of both p21 and Bax, as early as 3 h following incubation in apoptotic conditions. Importantly, by 12 h pX mediates a 3-fold increase in the expression of pro-apoptotic Bax in comparison to a 1.6-fold increase in expression of the growth arrest gene p21, suggesting the involvement of p53 in apoptosis, in response to pX expression.
To determine whether p53 activation is involved in pX-dependent apoptosis, radioactive DNA fragmentation assays were performed in apoptotic 4pX-1 cultures, as a function of PFT-α addition (Fig. 1C). PFT-α profoundly inhibits onset of apoptosis in response to pX (Fig. 1C). Likewise, PFT-α inhibits pX-dependent caspase3 activation and apoptosis, assayed by the cell-permeable fluorigenic Z-DEVD-FMK caspase3 substrate (Fig. 1D).
To directly demonstrate involvement of p53 in pX-mediated apoptosis, a 4pX-1 p53 knockdown (kd) cell line was generated, 4pX-1-p53kd, displaying more than 90% silencing of p53. p53-responsive luciferase plasmids transfected in the 4pX-1-p53kd cell line do not exhibit pX-dependent induction. Importantly, this cell line is resistant to apoptosis in response to pX expression (Fig. 1D), assayed by immunofluorescence microscopy, using the cell-permeable fluorigenic Z-DEVD-FMK caspase3 substrate (21). Together, these results (Fig. 1) support that pX activates p53 and induces p53-mediated apoptosis.
p53 Stabilization by pX Requires Activation of the p38MAPK Pathway—Our earlier studies (21) have linked apoptosis by pX to activation of the p38MAPK pathway. Because our results now show that p53 mediates apoptosis in response to pX expression (Fig. 1), we investigated the link between the p38MAPK pathway and p53. A p38MAPKα knockdown cell line (4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd) was constructed, exhibiting ∼80% reduction in the endogenous p38MAPKα (Fig. 2A). Employing the 4pX-1 and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell lines, we investigated whether pX stabilizes p53, and if p53 stability is dependent on activation of the p38MAPK pathway. Confluent, 4pX-1, and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cultures were grown as a function of pX expression, and apoptosis was initiated by serum withdrawal (21). Cycloheximide was added 2 h after onset of apoptosis. p53 protein levels were determined by Western blot analyses and quantified in a time course, following cycloheximide addition (Fig. 2, B and C). In 4pX-1 cells grown in the absence of pX, 50% of p53 remains 30 min after cycloheximide addition, reaching basal levels by 120 min. By contrast, in the presence of pX, 80% of p53 remains at the 30-min interval, decreasing to 60% by 60 min, and reaching the basal level 180 min after cycloheximide addition. The half-life of p53 is estimated to be ∼30 min in apoptotic 4pX-1 cultures without pX, whereas in the presence of pX, the p53 half-life is increased to 75 min, demonstrating that pX stabilizes p53. Interestingly, in 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cells expressing pX, knockdown of the p38MAPKα decreased the half-life of p53 to 45 min, indicating the p38MAPK pathway plays a role in pX-mediated stabilization of p53. Similar conclusions were derived from pulse-chase studies of p53, employing in vivo metabolic labeling with [35S]methionine, in conjunction with treatment using the p38MAPK pathway inhibitor SB202190 (data not shown).
The p38MAPK Pathway Activated by pX Promotes E2F1 Function via Cdk4/Cdk2 Activation—The E2F family of transcription factors is sequestered from function by binding to unphosphorylated Rb. Activated Cdk4 and Cdk2 phosphorylate Rb, releasing E2Fs which mediate transcription of either proliferative S-phase genes, or pro-apoptotic genes such as Arf (7, 32). To obtain initial indications whether pX induces E2F1 activity, the E2F1-responsive APAF-Luc (33) and CyclA-Luc (34) reporters were transiently transfected in apoptotic 4pX-1 cultures. pX expression promoted a 3–4-fold luciferase induction (Fig. 3A), suggesting that pX mediates E2F1 release. Based on these observations, we determined the phosphorylation status of Rb in pX-expressing cells grown in apoptotic conditions. Enhanced Rb phosphorylation was observed in apoptotic 4pX-1 cultures expressing pX, detected by Western blot analyses with the phospho-Rb Ser-800/804 antibody (Fig. 3B). Specifically, in pX-expressing 4pX-1 cells, phosphorylation of Rb increased by 8-fold starting 0 to 12 h after growth factor withdrawal. By contrast, in 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cells expressing pX, only a 1.5-fold increase in Rb phosphorylation is observed (Fig. 3B), supporting that the pX-activated p38MAPK pathway is required for Rb phosphorylation.
Because Rb phosphorylation is mediated by G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinases, we examined by in vitro immunocomplex kinase assays, the level of Cdk4 activation as a function of pX expression (Fig. 3C). Employing extracts isolated from apoptotic 4pX-1 cells, we demonstrate that Cdk4 activation is maintained for 12 h following onset of apoptosis in the presence of pX. Inhibition of the p38MAPK pathway by SB202190 suppresses this pX-dependent Cdk4 activation, whereas inhibition of the JNK pathway by treatment with SP600125 has only a small effect (Fig. 3C). To further confirm these results, we also examined the activation state of Cdk2, and its link to the p38MAPK pathway. A critical step in Cdk2 activation, similar to Cdc2 activation (35), is dephosphorylation of Tyr-15 (36). Employing extracts from the 4pX-1 and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell lines, we monitored by Western blot analyses the phosphorylation state of Tyr-15 of Cdk2 as a function of pX expression (Fig. 3D). In 4pX-1 cells grown in apoptotic conditions for 12 h, pX expression results in Tyr-15 dephosphorylation of Cdk2, indicating pX mediates activation of Cdk2. By contrast, the inhibitory Tyr-15 phosphorylation is maintained in 4pX-1 cells not expressing pX, as well as in pX-expressing cells in which p38MAPKα has been knocked-down (4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cells). We interpret these results to mean that pX cannot activate Cdk2 in the absence of the p38MAPK pathway. We conclude activation of the p38MAPK by pX expression mediates activation of Cdk4 and Cdk2, in turn phosphorylating Rb.
Phosphorylation of Rb results in release of E2F leading to transcription of E2F-responsive genes. Functional E2F1 binding sites have been mapped in the promoters of Arf (7), ASPP2 (37), and Chk2 genes (38). To determine whether pX expression induces the release of E2F1, we examined by ChIP assays the association of endogenous E2F1 with the promoters of Arf (7), ASPP2 (37), and Chk2 genes (38). ChIP assays with the E2F1 antibody were performed employing the 4pX-1 cell line and an E2F-1 4pX-1 knockdown cell line (4pX-1-E2F1kd) displaying nearly 70% depletion of endogenous E2F1 (Fig. 4A), grown in apoptotic conditions as a function of pX expression. E2F1 ChIP assays were analyzed both by quantitative real-time PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products (Fig. 4B). We observe increased association of endogenous E2F1 with the Arf, ASPP2, and Chk2 promoters in the presence of pX in the 4pX-1 cell line, but not in the 4pX-1-E2F1kd cell line (Fig. 4B). In addition, pX-dependent transcriptional induction of the endogenous Arf, ASPP2, and Chk2 genes, 12 h following onset of apoptosis, was observed only in 4pX-1 cells, and not in the 4pX-1-E2F1kd cell line (supplemental Fig. S4B for Fig. 4B). Accordingly, both assays support that pX expression induces expression of endogenous E2F1-regulated genes including the ARF gene.
E2F1-induced ARF expression (7) promotes the dissociation of p53 from Mdm2 and, in turn, the stabilization of p53. Because E2F1 release is mediated by Rb phosphorylation, and the p38MAPK pathway via Cdk2/4 activation (Fig. 3, C and D) phosphorylates Rb (Fig. 3B), we examined the induction of ARF protein in the 4pX-1, 4pX-1-E2F1kd, and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell lines in response to pX expression; cell lysates were prepared in a time course following the onset of apoptosis by serum withdrawal. In 4pX-1 cells expressing pX, ARF expression is observed at time 0 h, and maintained for 24 h following the onset of apoptosis by serum withdrawal (Fig. 4C), in agreement with the pX-dependent activation of Cdk4/Cdk2 and phosphorylation of Rb (Fig. 3, B–D). In the 4pX-1-E2F1kd cell line used as our control, pX expression does not induce ARF (Fig. 4C). Importantly, in the 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell line, ARF induction is also not observed in response to pX expression, clearly demonstrating that activation of the p38MAPK pathway by pX is necessary for E2F1 release and expression of ARF. pX expression increased the p53 protein level only in the 4pX-1 cell line, and not in the 4pX-1-E2F1kd and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell lines, which lack pX-mediated ARF expression (Fig. 4D). Moreover, ARF is important for the observed p53 stabilization, because only in 4pX-1 cells, and not in the 4pX-1-E2F1kd and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cells, p53 co-immunoprecipitates with ARF (supplemental Fig. S4D for Fig. 4D). Together, these results link the stabilization of p53 with the activation of the p38MAPK pathway by pX.
pX Activates ATR via the p38MAPK Pathway Leading to Activation of p53 Transcription—Our previous studies have shown that pX induces Ser-18 phosphorylation of p53 within 1 h following onset of apoptosis (21). Ser-18 phosphorylation participates in p53 stabilization by disrupting interaction with Mdm2 and in promoting p53 nuclear retention (39) and association with CBP (40). Ser-18 phosphorylation of p53 is mediated by ATM/ATR kinases (10, 41).
Accordingly, we investigated whether pX induces activation of ATR and ATM in apoptotic 4pX-1 cultures. Immunoblot analyses employing the phosphospecific ATR and ATM antibodies show pX-dependent activation of ATR in the 0–3-h interval following the onset of apoptosis by serum withdrawal, without detectable ATM activation (Fig. 5A). In agreement with the role of ATR-mediated Ser-18 phosphorylation in p53 stability, a 2–3-fold increase in the p53 level is observed within 1–2 h following onset of pX-dependent apoptosis. Importantly, this increase in p53 stability in the presence of pX, is suppressed to a basal level following addition of the ATM/ATR-specific inhibitor caffeine (Fig. 5A). To confirm these observations we constructed an ATR knockdown 4pX-1 cell line (4pX-1-ATRkd) displaying nearly 70% reduction in the level of the ATR protein (Fig. 5B), and determined the level of p53 as a function of pX expression. In contrast to 4pX-1 cells, which exhibit increased p53 with pX expression, ATR knockdown in the 4pX-1-ATRkd cell line abrogates this increase (Fig. 5C).
In apoptotic 4pX-1 cultures, the early effect of pX is activation of the p38MAPK pathway, regulating expression of the p53 pro-apoptotic genes Bax, Fas, and Noxa, and initiating apoptosis (21). Because our results (Fig. 5A) show that p53 activation by pX requires activation of ATR, we investigated whether the activation of ATR is dependent on the p38MAPK pathway. Employing the 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell line, we examined by Western blot analyses the activation of ATR in response to pX expression (Fig. 6A). In 4pX-1 cells, pX expression mediates a 2-fold induction in ATR activation; by contrast, knockdown of p38MAPKα significantly reduces this pX-mediated activation of ATR (Fig. 6A).
To confirm these results, we employed 4pX-1, 4pX-1-ATRkd, and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell lines and mapped the p53 phosphorylations required for p53 transcriptional activation. These include phosphorylations on Ser-18 and Ser-23 required for nuclear retention (39) and association with CBP (40), as well as ensuing modifications on Ser-389 of murine p53 (42). p53 was immunoprecipitated using lysates isolated from 4pX-1, 4pX-1-ATRkd, and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cells at 2 h following onset of pX-dependent apoptosis. Moreover, to have an internal control for the immunoprecipitation reactions, the actin antibody was added together with the p53 antibody. The p53/actin immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blots using p53 and phospho-p53-specific antibodies. In the 4pX-1 cell line, pX induces p53 stabilization and phosphorylations on Ser-18, Ser-23, and Ser-389. By contrast, p53 protein and Ser-18, Ser-23, and Ser-389 modifications are not detected, either in the ATR or the p38MAPKα knockdown cell lines (Fig. 6B). These results couple activation of the p38MAPK pathway to the activation of ATR by pX, in mediating the stabilization (Fig. 2) and the transcriptional modifications of p53 (Fig. 6B).
To investigate whether activation of the p38MAPK pathway and activation of ATR by pX induce p53 transcription, we examined by real-time PCR expression of endogenous p53-regulated genes Bax, Fas, and Noxa, employing the p53, ATR, and p38MAPKα knockdown cell lines (Fig. 6C). The 4pX-1-ATRkd and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell lines as well as the control 4pX-1 and 4pX-1-p53kd cell lines were grown as a function of pX for 12 h following the onset of apoptosis. In the 4pX-1 cell line, pX induces expression of Bax and Noxa mRNAs by nearly 4-fold and Fas mRNA expression by 7-fold (21). By contrast in the p53, ATR, or p38MAPKα knockdown cell lines, pX mediates only a minimal induction of these mRNAs (Fig. 6C). Inhibition of the p38MAPK pathway by addition of SB 202190 or inhibition of ATR by caffeine abrogated the induction of Fas, Bax, and Noxa in response to pX (supplemental Fig. S6C for Fig. 6C). These results provide conclusive evidence of the essential role of the p38MAPK pathway and the activation of ATR in p53 pro-apoptotic gene transcription induced by pX.
p38MAPKα, E2F1, and ATR Are Essential in p53 Apoptosis Induced by pX—To investigate whether both E2F1 release and ATR activation mediated by p38MAPK activation are essential in p53 apoptosis in response to pX, we employed the 4pX-1 cell line as well as the 4pX-1-p53kd, 4pX-1-E2F1kd, 4pX-1-ATRkd, and 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell lines in apoptosis assays. Apoptosis in response to pX expression was assayed by Western blots monitoring the level of activated, cleaved caspase3, in a time course following onset of apoptosis by growth factor withdrawal (Fig. 7A). In addition, apoptotic assays were performed in pseudo-knockdown 4pX-1 cell lines for p53, E2F1, ATR, and p38MAPKα (Fig. 7, B and C). These pseudo-knockdown cell lines were isolated in parallel with each of the respective knockdown cell lines. This control was performed to exclude effects of puromycin selection and propagation on the observed phenotype of each of the knockdown cell lines. Furthermore in Fig. 7D, we demonstrate that all knockdown cell lines exhibit tetracycline-regulated expression of pX.
In 4pX-1 cells a 3- and 5-fold activation of caspase3 is observed at 12 and 24 h following the onset of apoptosis, respectively. By contrast, pX-dependent caspase3 activation is nearly undetectable in the 4pX-1-p53kd cell line, supporting that p53 mediates apoptosis in response to pX expression. Likewise, the absence of pX-dependent caspase3 activation in the 4pX-1-E2F1kd and 4pX-1-ATRkd cell lines demonstrates the essential role of E2F1 and ATR in stabilizing and activating p53, respectively. Finally, minimal activation of caspase3 is detected in the 4pX-1-p38MAPKαkd cell line. By contrast, all the pseudo-knockdown cell lines exhibit activation of caspase3 in response to pX expression (Fig. 7B). Similar results were obtained by monitoring caspase3 activation by immunofluorescence microscopy, employing the cleaved caspase3 antibody (data not shown).
Because our results show that activation of the p38MAPK pathway by pX is necessary both for the stabilization of p53 (Fig. 2) and the activation of ATR (Fig. 6), we conclude that the p38MAPK pathway couples the stabilization of p53 with the transcriptional activation of p53.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we determined the mechanism by which the weakly oncogenic HBV X protein activates p53, leading to apoptosis. The significance of our study is the determination of the mechanism by which a viral oncoprotein induces both the stabilization and transcriptional activation p53; this mechanism involves the sustained activation of the p38MAPK pathway (21). Stabilization of p53 differs from p53 activation, the latter requiring multisite phosphorylations necessary for nuclear retention, p53 oligomerization, DNA binding, CBP recruitment, and pro-apoptotic gene transcription, leading to p53-mediated apoptosis (42). It is well established that Ser-18 and Ser-23 phosphorylations of murine p53, mediated by ATM/ATR, transcriptionally activate p53 (10, 41, 49). Viral oncoproteins including E1A, SV40 T-antigen, E7 of HPV 16 induce p53-mediated apoptosis by binding to Rb, releasing E2F, and inducing ARF expression, thereby stabilizing p53 (3). Likewise, overexpression of cellular oncogenes including c-myc (50) and H-RasV12 (51), induce p53-mediated apoptosis. Overexpression of oncogenic c-myc promotes p53 apoptosis via ATM-mediated activation of p53 (52). However, how overexpression of these cellular and viral oncogenes mediate transcriptional activation of p53 has not been determined.
In this study we provide evidence that pX expression increases the half-life of p53 by activating the p38MAPK pathway which induces Cdk4/Cdk2 activation, Rb phosphorylation, E2F1 release, and E2F1-mediated ARF expression. This mechanism of pX-mediated p53 stabilization is in agreement with the frequent genetic deletions or mutations of Rb, Arf, and p53 observed in HBV-mediated liver cancer patients (15).
In addition, we show that the viral pX, under conditions of growth factor deprivation, activates ATR via the p38MAPK. Knockdown of the p38MAPKα significantly reduces the activating phosphorylation of ATR as well as the stability and phosphorylations of p53 required for p53 activation. Likewise, knockdown of ATR reduces the stability and phosphorylations required for p53 transcriptional activation, supporting that p38MAPKα acts via ATR, and not by directly phosphorylating p53. Moreover, knockdown of ATR or p38MAPKα abrogates transcription of endogenous p53-regulated genes Bax, Fas, and Noxa in response to pX expression. These results clearly demonstrate that both ATR and p38MAPKα are essential in proapoptotic gene transcription mediated by p53 in response to pX. Knockdown of p53, E2F1, ATR, and p38MAPKα rescues 4pX-1 cells from pX-mediated apoptosis, conclusively demonstrating that the p38MAPK pathway couples the Rb/E2F1/ARF and DNA damage response pathways to p53-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 8).
ATR is the sensor of replication stress. The pX-dependent ATR activation we report agrees with our earlier studies (23), demonstrating that pX expression in 4pX-1 cells promotes robust cell cycle entry, unscheduled entry into the S-phase, and an S-phase pause. This activity of pX resembles the unscheduled S-phase entry of other viral oncoproteins including E1A, T-antigen, E7 of HPV 16, whose expression also induces p53-mediated apoptosis (3). However, in those studies (3), the mechanism of p53 activation was not determined. Accordingly our study provides the first evidence of a weakly oncogenic viral protein, the HBV pX, activating p53 pro-apoptotic gene transcription via ATR activation mediated by the p38MAPK pathway. How the p38MAPK pathway activates ATR remains to be determined. The effect of the p38MAPK pathway may be indirect, acting by inactivating Cdc25 required for Cdc2 activation and progression to mitosis (53). G2/M checkpoint activation results in S-phase pause (54) and stalled replication forks, which in turn signal ATR activation (55). Our recent studies3 have determined that pX expression induces replication stress (DNA re-replication) and ATR activation, further supporting this mechanism (54). Alternatively, ATR activation may occur via direct phosphorylation by the p38MAPK enzyme. Because ATR and its downstream Chk1 are essential in embryonic development (48), the p38MAPK pathway might be an in vivo inducer of ATR/Chk1 activation. In contrast to ATR activation by pX, the activation of ATM by pX is detectable only with doxorubicin co-treatment of apoptotic 4pX-1 cells.4
It has been suggested that E2F1 activation integrates the Rb/ARF pathway to the DNA damage response pathway (38). Functional E2F1 binding sites have been mapped in the promoters of ARF, ASPP2, ATM, and Chk2 genes, using E2F1 overexpression or overexpression of viral E1A or E7 proteins known to deregulate the Rb/E2F pathway (38, 56). In contrast to those studies, our studies monitored the endogenous E2F1 activity induced by pX, and importantly this E2F1 induction was associated with p53-mediated apoptosis. Specifically, E2F1 ChIP assays show that in apoptotic conditions the endogenous E2F1 associates with the Arf, ASPP2, and Chk2 promoters in a pX-dependent manner.
In summary, our studies show that: (i) pX mediates apoptosis via p53; (ii) E2F1 is essential in pX-mediated apoptosis, stabilizing p53, and integrating with the DNA damage pathway; (iii) ATR is essential in pX-mediated apoptosis by transcriptionally activating p53; and (iv) p38MAPKα is essential both in the stabilization of p53 and in the activation of ATR. We conclude that the p38MAPK pathway coordinates Rb/E2F1/ARF and DNA damage response pathways by inducing both p53 stabilization and p53 transcriptional activation, respectively, leading to p53-mediated apoptosis in response to pX.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. S. Mendrysa and Leo Studach for critical review of this manuscript.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant NIDDK 044533 (to O. M. A.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S4B, S4D, and S6C.
Footnotes
The abbreviations used are: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; WCE, whole cell extract; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; kd, knockdown; Rb, retinoblastoma protein.
Rakotomalala, L., Studach, L., Wang, W., and Andrisani, O., unpublished results.
Wang, W., and Andrisani, O., unpublished data.
References
- 1.Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1997) Nature 386 761-763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Giaccia, A. J., and Kastan, M. B. (1998) Genes Dev. 12 2973-2983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lowe, S. W., and Ruley, H. T. (1993) Genes Dev. 7 535-545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Stanchina, E., McCurrach, M. E., Zindy, F., Shieh, S.-Y., Ferbeyer, G., Samuelson, A. V., Prives, C., Roussel, M. F., Sherr, C. J., and Lowe, S. (1998) Genes Dev. 12 2434-2442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ginsberg, D. (2002) FEBS Lett. 529 122-125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387 296-299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bates, S., Phillips, A. C., Clark, P. A., Stott, F., Peters, G., Ludwig, R. L., and Vousden, K. H. (1998) Nature 395 124-125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pomerantz, J., Schreiber-Agus, N., Liegeois, N. J., Silverman, A., Alland, L., Chin, L., Potes, J., Chen, K., Orlow, I., Lee, H. W., Cordon-Cardo, C., and DePinho, R. A. (1998) Cell 92 713-723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tang, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, W., and Gu, W. (2006) Mol. Cell 24 827-839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Canman, C. E., Lim, D. S., Cimprich, K. A., Taya, Y., Tamai, K., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., Kastan, M. B., and Siliciano, J. D. (1998) Science 281 1677-1679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kastan, M. B., and Lim, D. S. (2000) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1 179-186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hainaut, P., Hernandez, T., Robinson, A., Rodriguez-Tome, P., Flores, T., Hollstein, M., Harris, C. C., and Montesano, R. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26 205-213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bulavin, D. V., Demidov, O. N., Saito, S., Kauraniemi, P., Phillips, C., Amundson, S. A., Ambrosino, C., Sauter, G., Nebreda, A. R., Anderson, C. W., Kallioniemi, A., Fornace, A. J., Jr., and Appella, E. (2002) Nat. Genet. 31 210-215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Greenblatt, M. S., Bennett, W. P., Hollstein, M., and Harris, C. C. (1994) Cancer Res. 54 4855-4878 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buendia, M. A. (2000) Semin Cancer Biol. 10 185-200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Parkin, D. M., Bray, F. I., and Devesa, S. S. (2001) Eur. J. Cancer 37 S4-66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Andrisani, O. M., and Barnabas, S. (1999) Int. J. Oncol. 15 373-379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bouchard, M. J., and Schneider, R. J. (2004) J. Virol. 78 12725-12734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Benn, J., and Schneider, R. J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92 11215-11219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee, C., Hong, B., Choi, J. M., Kim, Y., Watanabe, S., Ishimi, Y., Enomoto, T., Tada, S., Kim, Y., and Cho, Y. (2004) Nature 430 913-917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang, W. H., Gregori, G., Hullinger, R. L., and Andrisani, O. M. (2004) Mol. Cell Biol. 24 10352-10365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tarn, C., Bilodeau, M. L., Hullinger, R. L., and Andrisani, O. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274 2327-2336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee, S., Tarn, C., Wang, W. H., Chen, S., Hullinger, R. L., and Andrisani, O. M. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277 8730-8740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Su, Q., Schroder, C. H., Hofmann, W. J., Otto, G., Pichlmayr, R., and Bannasch, P. (1998) Hepatology 27 1109-1120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thorgeirsson, S. S., and Grisham, J. W. (2002) Nat. Genet. 31 339-346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dirac, A. M., and Bernards, R. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278 11731-11734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Benjanirut, C., Paris, M., Wang, W.-H., Hong, S., Kim, K., Hullinger, R. L., and Andrisani, O. M. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281 2969-2981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Paris, M., Wang, W.-H., Shin, M.-H., Franklin, D. S., and Andrisani, O. M. (2006) Mol. Cell Biol. 26 8826-8839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Murphy, P. J., Galigniana, M. D., Morishima, Y., Harrell, J. M., Kwok, R. P., Ljungman, M., and Pratt, W. B. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279 30195-30201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chirillo, P., Pagano, S., Natoli, G., Puri, P. L., Burgio, V. L., Balsano, C., and Levrero, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 8162-8167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cerrato, J. A., Khan, T., Koul, D., Lang, F. F., Conrad, C. A., Yung, W. K., and Liu, T. J. (2004) Int. J. Oncol. 24 409-417 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Moon, N. S., Frolov, M. V., Kwon, E. J., De Stefano, L., Dimova, D. K., Morris, E. J., Taylor-Harding, B., White, K., and Dyson, N. J. (2005) Dev. Cell 9 463-475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pediconi, N., Ianari, A., Costanzo, A., Belloni, L., Gallo, R., Cimino, L., Porcellini, A., Screpanti, I., Balsano, C., Alesse, E., Gulino, A., and Levrero, M. (2003) Nat. Cell Biol. 5 552-558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wells, J., Graveel, C. R., Bartley, S. M., Madore, S. J., and Farnham, P. J. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 3890-3895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hunter, T. (1995) Cell 80 225-236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Morgan, D. O. (1995) Nature 374 131-134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fogal, V., Kartasheva, N. N., Trigiante, G., Llanos, S., Yap, D., Vousden, K. H., and Lu, X. (2005) Cell Death Differ. 12 369-376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hershko, T., Chaussepied, M., Oren, M., and Ginsberg, D. (2005) Cell Death Differ. 12 377-383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang, Y., and Xiong, Y. (2001) Science 292 1910-1915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gu, W., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Cell 90 595-606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Banin, S., Moyal, L., Shieh, S., Taya, Y., Anderson, C. W., Chessa, L., Smorodinsky, N. I., Prives, C., Reiss, Y., Shiloh, Y., and Ziv, Y. (1998) Science 281 1674-1677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Meek, D. W. (1999) Oncogene 18 7666-7675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Deleted in proof
- 44.Deleted in proof
- 45.Deleted in proof
- 46.Deleted in proof
- 47.Deleted in proof
- 48.Brown, E. J., and Baltimore, D. (2000) Genes Dev. 14 397-402 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tibbetts, R. S., Brumbaugh, K. M., Williams, J. M., Sarkaria, J. N., Cliby, W. A., Shieh, S. Y., Taya, Y., Prives, C., and Abraham, R. T. (1999) Genes Dev. 13 152-157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hermeking, H., and Eick, D. (1994) Science 265 2091-2093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Seger, Y. R., Garcia-Cao, M., Piccinin, S., Cunsolo, C. L., Doglioni, C., Blasco, M. A., Hannon, G. J., and Maestro, R. (2002) Cancer Cell 2 401-413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pusapati, R. V., Rounbehler, R. J., Hong, S., Powers, J. T., Yan, M., Kiguchi, K., McArthur, M. J., Wong, P. K., and Johnson, D. C. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 1446-1451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bulavin, D. V., Higashimoto, Y., Popoff, I. J., Gaarde, W. A., Basrur, V., Potapova, O., Appella, E., and Fornace, A. J., Jr. (2001) Nature 411 102-107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tibbetts, R. S., Cortez, D., Brumbaugh, K. M., Scully, R., Livingston, D., Elledge, S. J., and Abraham, R. T. (2000) Genes Dev. 14 2989-3002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu, Q., Guntuku, S., Cui, X. S., Matsuoka, S., Cortez, D., Tamai, K., Luo, G., Carattini-Rivera, S., DeMayo, F., Bradley, A., Donehower, L. A., and Elledge, S. J. (2000) Genes Dev. 14 1448-1459 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rogoff, H. A., Pickering, M. T., Frame, F. M., Debatis, M. E., Sanchez, Y., Jones, S., and Kowalik, T. F. (2004) Mol. Cell Biol. 24 2968-2977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]