The past 10 to 15 years have witnessed major advances in our understanding of polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism involving prostaglandin (PG)--especially PGE2--synthesis, activity and degradation in neoplasia, especially colorectal neoplasia. Little is known, however, about the role of PG transport in these processes. The flow of PGs in and out of colorectal cells involves highly coordinated activities of PG transporters that become highly dysregulated in colorectal neoplasia. Recent work by various investigators supports key components of this flow for novel molecular-targeted approaches to prevent or treat colorectal neoplasia.
The DuBois lab first reported that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is overexpressed in colorectal adenomas and cancer (1), which led to seminal trials of COX-2 inhibitors in familial adenomatous polyposis (2) and sporadic colorectal adenomas (3). This research group and others showed that COX-2-derived PGE2 promotes tumorigenesis by affecting angiogenesis, cell adhesion, invasion, proliferation and apoptosis (4-9). These effects of COX-2/PGE2 are implemented by PGE2 binding to and activating certain EP receptors and thus activating important pathways including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPAR-δ), Ras, PI3K, and beta-catenin signaling. More recent work from this and other groups has shown that 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), which degrades intracellular PGE2, is suppressed in colorectal neoplasia from pre-adenoma to invasive stages; suppressed growth of human CRC cells in immunodeficient mice and inhibited the development of murine intestinal neoplasia when its expression was restored by transfection; and was upregulated by certain agents including EGFR and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (10-15).
Strong evidence suggests that two cellular transporters of PGE2—the transmembrane influx PG transporter (PGT, carrying into the cytoplasm) and efflux multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4, carrying out to the extracellular milieu)--are deeply implicated in colorectal neoplasia. Although it is the first-identified (in 1995) and best-studied prostaglandin transporter (16, 17), PGT has not previously been studied in any cancer setting. Effective termination of PGE2 may require both PGT, which has a high affinity and specificity for PGE2, and 15-PGDH (18). As for MRP4: In non-cancer model systems, MRP4 knockout or knockdown led to a pronounced reduction in extracellular PGE2, and MRP4 was inhibited by certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (19, 20); also, MRP4 is overexpressed in colorectal and other cancers (21).
In their exciting new report “Regulation of the Prostaglandin Transporter in Colorectal Neoplasia” in this issue (22), Holla and his colleagues in the DuBois lab build on the foregoing and other related discoveries to address our limited understanding of PGE2 transport and inactivation in neoplasia. They found that PGT was downregulated in CRC in the vast majority of their human specimens and cell lines. Although focused on colorectal neoplasia, this study indicated that PGT expression also is dysregulated in stomach, ovary, kidney and lung cancers. PGT downregulation occurred early, or at the level of adenomas in MIN mice. Forced PGT overexpression in vitro in HCA-7 cells reduced extracellular PGE2 levels and increased intracellular levels of 15-keto PGE2, the catabolic product of PGE2; both events occurred in a dose-dependent fashion, which is consistent with PGT transporting PGE2 into cells and suggests that the 15-PGDH enzyme was still available inside these cells for degrading PGE2 into the keto product (11). These investigators also showed evidence of epigenetic regulation of PGT by an HDAC inhibitor and a demethylating agent. These PGT results are the first reported for any cancer setting.
These new results of Holla et al amplify on the known patterns of prostaglandin signaling events in colorectal neoplasia. We now can say that colorectal neoplasia throttles down PGT expression in addition to revving up the expressions of COX-2, mPGES1 and MRP4 and throttling down 15-PGDH (Fig. 1). Data now suggest that cellular efflux of PGE2 in normal cells can occur via two mechanisms--diffusion and MRP transport--whereas PGE2 influx occurs primarily via the PGT. MRP4 appears to increase its efflux role in neoplasia, although diffusion likely continues. This flexibility in efflux suggests that limiting PGE2 influx through reduced PGT may play an important role in upregulating effects of the COX-2 pathway in colorectal neoplasia and in producing increased levels of extracellular PGE2 to bind and activate EP receptors. The suggestive timing of these events involves stepwise progressions from early (adenomas) through late stages of colorectal neoplasia.
Fig. 1.
The flow of colorectal neoplasia passes through the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) transporters. A, the PGE2 influx-dominated flow of normal colorectal cells; the dotted blue circular line represents the general pattern of this flow. B, the PGE2 efflux-dominated flow of neoplastic colorectal cells; the dotted red circular line represents the general pattern of this flow. C, a conceptual approach for preventing or treating colorectal cancer via molecular targeting of the processes shown in panels A and B. The colorectal neoplasia risk factors shown at the upper left in panel C are key early events associated with upregulated COX-2 and neoplasia in the colorectal region. The agent classes shown at the lower right in panel C are supported by PGT and/or 15-PGDH upregulation data. All of the processes suggested in panels A–C are well described toward the end of the text. 15-PGDH, 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase; AA, arachidonic acid; COX-1, cyclooxygenase 1; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; MRP, multidrug resistance-associated protein; mPGES1, microsomal PGE synthase 1; PGT, PG transporter; ППAP-γ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.
The novel findings of Holla et al support the conclusion that PGT may collaborate functionally with 15-PGDH to inactivate PGE2. Fig. 1 provides a model summarizing the elements involved in the PG transport-related flow of PGE2 into and out of normal and neoplastic colorectal cells, and highlights opportunities for using preventive or therapeutic agents to target this flow in neoplasia. The PGE2 influx-dominated flow of normal colorectal cells is associated with a relatively low level of PGE2 (compared with the level in neoplastic cells) originating in the cytoplasm and either undergoing degradation and inactivation by highly expressed 15-PGDH or escaping from the cell via diffusion and MRP4 [MRP1 and -2 also have been implicated in PGE2 efflux in non-cancer experimental systems (23)] (Fig. 1A). The resultant extracellular PGE2 then flows by means of highly expressed PGT back into the cytoplasm, where it can be inactivated by 15-PGDH. This cycle keeps the level of PGE2 below that generally associated with dysregulated neoplastic cells. The PGE2 efflux-dominated flow of neoplastic colorectal cells is associated with a relatively high level of PGE2 (produced by upregulated COX-2 and mPGES1) in the cytoplasm that flows out of the cell via diffusion and upregulated MRP4 (Fig. 1B). This process is relatively unimpeded because 15-PGDH becomes downregulated in these cells. The PGT also is downregulated, and so extracellular PGE2 is relatively free to bind with and activate EP receptors (especially EP-2 and -4), which are deeply involved in colorectal neoplasia. Findings of Holla et al and others show an intriguing potential for epigenetic or other regulation of PGT and 15-PGDH in various cancer systems (11, 14, 15, 22, 24-26) and raise the possibility that certain agents, especially EGFR (11, 14) and HDAC (22) inhibitors, may prevent or treat colorectal neoplasia via targeting PGT and/or 15-PGDH to reverse the PGE2 efflux-dominated flow of colorectal neoplasia (Fig. 1C). It is conceivable that agents that upregulate PGT may be synergistic with agents that upregulate 15-PGDH in increasing the influx and catabolism (by 15-PGDH) of PGE2 and thus in producing desirable effects on, for example, proliferation, apoptosis and angiogenesis. Prior work has shown that 15-PGDH functions as a tumor-suppressor gene (10-12). The new findings of Holla et al in this issue now nominate PGT as a tumor-suppressor gene, a hypothesis that is very likely to be tested in the near future.
It is clinically important to identify promising non-COX-2 targets within the polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolic signaling pathway (8, 27, 28) because COX-2-selective NSAIDs increased adverse cardiovascular events in long-term prevention trials also showing significant suppression of colorectal neoplasia (3, 29). As indicated in Fig. 1, promising such targets include mPGES1, EP-2 and -4, 15-PGDH, MRP4 and PGT (8-14, 22, 28). Future studies should examine whether the beneficial effects of epigenetic regulation in colorectal neoplasia (27, 30, 31) involve the PG transport-related mechanisms hypothesized above in this article. Mechanistic studies of PGT downregulation in neoplasia may identify additional new and promising prevention and therapy targets. We look forward to future studies that will assess the functional role of PGT in neoplasia, testing whether restoration of PGT expression suppresses tumorigenesis, and elucidating the interactions between PGT and 15-PGDH in antagonizing the activity of the COX-2 oncogenic pathway.
References
- 1.Eberhart CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, et al. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1183–8. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90246-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steinbach G, Lynch PM, Phillips RK, et al. The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1946–52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006293422603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bertagnolli MM, Eagle CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:873–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tsujii M, DuBois RN. Alterations in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell. 1995;83:493–501. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90127-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tsujii M, Kawano S, Tsuji S, et al. Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by colon cancer cells. Cell. 1998;93:705–16. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81433-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang D, Wang H, Shi Q, et al. Prostglandin E(2) promotes colorectal adenoma growth via transactivation of the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:285–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang D, Wang H, Guo Y, et al. Crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta and VEGF stimulates cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:19069–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607948103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang D, DuBois RN. Prostaglandins and cancer. Gut. 2006;55:115–22. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.047100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dannenberg AJ, Subbaramaiah K. Targeting cyclooxygeanse-2 in human neoplasia : rationale and promise. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:431–6. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00310-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yan M, Rerko RM, Platzer P, et al. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase, a COX-2 oncogene antagonist, is a TGF-β-induced suppressor of a human gastrointestinal cancers. PNAS. 2004;101:17468–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406142101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Backlund MG, Mann JR, Holla VR, et al. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is down-regulated in colorectal cancer. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3217–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411221200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Myung S-J, Rerko RM, Yan M, et al. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase in an in vivo suppressor of colon tumorigenesis. PNAS. 2006;103:12098–102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603235103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Otani T, Yamaguchi K, Scherl E, et al. Levels of NAD+-dependent 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase are reduced in inflammatory bowel disease: evidence for involvement of TNF-α. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G361–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00348.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mann JR, Backlund MG, Buchanan FG, et al. Repression of prostaglandin dehydrogenase by epidermal growth factor and snail increases prostaglandin E2 and promotes cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6649–56. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tong M, Ding Y, Tai HH. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and transforming growth factor-β induce 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase expression in human lung adenomacarcinoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;72:701–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kanai N, Lu R, Satriano JA, et al. Identification and characterization of a prostaglandin transporter. Science. 1995;268:866–9. doi: 10.1126/science.7754369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schuster VL. Prostaglandin transport. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2002;68-69:633–47. doi: 10.1016/s0090-6980(02)00061-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nomura T, Ru L, Pucci ML, et al. The two-step model of prostaglandin signal termination: in vitro reconstitution with the prostaglandin transporter and prostaglandin 15 dehydrogenase. Mol Pharmacol. 2004;65:973–8. doi: 10.1124/mol.65.4.973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reid G, Wielinga P, Zelcer N, et al. The human multidrug resistance protein MRP4 functions as a prostaglandin efflux transporter and is inhibited by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. PNAS. 2003;100:9244–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1033060100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lin ZP, Zhu Y-L, Johnson DR, et al. Disruption of cAMP and prostaglandin E2 transport by multidrug resistance protein 4 deficiency alters cAMP-mediated signaling and nociceptive response. Molec Pharmacol. 2008;73:243–51. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.039594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maubon N, Vee ML, Fossati L, et al. Analysis of drug transporter expression in human intestinal Caco-2 cells by real-time PCR. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007;21:659–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Holla VR, Backlund MG, Yang P, Newman RA, DuBois RN. Regulation of the prostaglandin transporter in colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Prev Res. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-07-0009. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.De Waart DR, Paulusma CC, Kunne C, et al. Multidrug resistance associated protein 2 mediates transport of prostaglandin E2. Liver Int. 2006;26:362–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wolf I, O’Kelly J, Rubinek T, et al. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is a tumor suppressor of human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7818–23. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang L, Amann JM, Kikuchi T, et al. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling elevates 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenease in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5587–93. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hazra S, Batra RK, Tai HH, et al. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone decrease prostaglandin E2 in non-small-cell lung cancer cells by up-regulating 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;71:1715–20. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.033357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hsi LC, Xi X, Lotan R, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid induces apoptosis via induction of 15-lipoxygeanse-1 in colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8778–81. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Markowitz SD. Aspirin and colon cancer--Targeting Prevention? N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2195–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe078044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Solomon SD, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, et al. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1071–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Suzuki H, Watkins DN, Jair KW, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes allows constitutive WNT signaling in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:417–22. doi: 10.1038/ng1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yoo CB, Chuang JC, Byun H-M, et al. Long-term epigenetic therapy with oral zebularine prevents intestinal tumors in mice. Cancer Prev Res. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-07-0008. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



