Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2006 Sep 29;71(20):7706–7714. doi: 10.1021/jo061199m

Concise Synthesis of Guanidine-Containing Heterocycles Using the Biginelli Reaction

Bradley L Nilsson 1, Larry E Overman 1
PMCID: PMC2535792  NIHMSID: NIHMS61282  PMID: 16995677

Abstract

Two general methods for the synthesis of 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines were developed using the 3-component Biginelli reaction. The first method utilizes pyrazole carboxamidine, a β-ketoester, and an aldehyde in an initial Biginelli reaction. After Boc protection, these products undergo aminolysis and acidic deprotection to generate 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines in a 4-step sequence. The second method utilizes a triazone-protected guanidine, a β-ketoester, and an aldehyde in a Biginelli reaction. Acidic cleavage of the triazone yields 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines in a 2-step sequence. We also describe the further elaboration of several of these products using a tethered Biginelli reaction to give triazaacenaphthalene structures similar to those found in crambescidin and batzelladine alkaloids.

Introduction

Guanidine functional groups are found in numerous biologically active natural products and several drugs and drug candidates.1,2 These guanidine-containing therapeutics include cardiovascular, antihistamine, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antibacterial, antiviral, and antineoplastic drugs.1 The diversity in activity of these compounds likely derives, in part, from the ability of guanidinium cations to recognize receptors by a variety of noncovalent interactions, including hydrogen-bonding, electrostatic, and π-stacking associations.3

Various natural products contain the guanidine functional group embedded in a 6-membered ring, such as the Na+ channel blocker saxitoxin (1), the puffer fish poison tetrodotoxin (2), and the nucleoside base guanine. There are several structurally novel marine alkaloids that contain a guanidine unit within complex polycyclic architectures. These include the crambescidin4 (examples 3-5) and batzelladine4i,5 (6) families, which are related by their triazaacenaphthalene core structures. These guanidine alkaloids, and some of their synthetic derivatives, display promising anticancer4a-h,4k,6 and antiviral activities.4b-d,4h,4j,6c They have also been shown to inhibit important protein-protein interactions,4g,5a-b,7 voltage sensitive Ca2+ channels,4j and Na+, K+, and Ca2+-ATPases.8

The complex architecture of the crambescidins and the batzelladines and their compelling biological activities have sparked intense effort toward their total chemical synthesis.9 Notably, the Snider10 and Murphy11 groups developed biomimetic approaches, the Nagasawa12 group used a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition approach, and the Overman13 group pioneered the use of tethered Biginelli9b,14 reactions for assembly of crambescidin alkaloids. The batzelladines and their analogs have also attracted considerable synthetic attention from the Overman,15 Snider,16 Murphy,17 and Nagasawa18 groups, among others.19

The existing chemistry for the synthesis of complex guanidine natural products of the crambescidin and batzelladine families and their analogs, although highly refined, requires many steps. We have, therefore, directed some effort to the development of new chemistry that will allow access to analogs of these guanidine-containing compounds in just a few steps. The Biginelli reaction20 utilizes urea, an aldehyde, and a β-ketoester in a 3-component condensation giving rise to dihydropyrimidinone products.14 The related condensation of guanidine, an aldehyde, and a β-ketoester to form 6-membered guanidine-containing heterocycles, 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines 10, (eq 1) is much less well developed.14,21 Cho21a and Atwal21b both demonstrated that reactions between the Knoevenagel product of ethyl acetoacetate and 3-nitrobenzaldehyde with guanidine or methylguanidine give Biginelli adducts, albeit in low yields (14-25%). Milcent showed that yields are improved when the R1 substituent of the β-ketoester is phenyl rather than methyl (eq 2).21c In these latter examples, double Biginelli adducts 12 are also observed as byproducts when guanidine is used. Kappe also showed that guanidine can be successfully used in a traditional 3-component Biginelli reaction when the β-ketoester possesses a phenyl substituent (as in the case of ethyl benzoylacetate, R1 = Ph) to give Biginelli adducts in satisfactory yields while avoiding double Biginelli byproducts.21d Finally, multistep Biginelli-aminolysis strategies in which isoureas or isothioureas are used as guanidine precursors to access 2-imino-3,4-dihydropyrimidines is precedented in the literature.22 For example, Atwal demonstrated the aminolysis of Biginelli adducts containing methyl isourea22a fragments, whereas Kappe prepared 2-imino-3,4-dihydropyrimidine salts by aminolysis of resin-bound isothiourea Biginelli adducts.22b

graphic file with name nihms-61282-f0001.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-61282-f0002.jpg

In the course of our efforts to prepare focused libraries of polycyclic guanidines, we discovered that direct 3-component Biginelli reactions with guanidine are useful only with benzoylacetates and aryl aldehydes. Attempted reactions using acetoacetates (R1 = Me) failed to give useful yields of the desired Biginelli adducts. We thus undertook the development of more general Biginelli-based methods for preparing 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines.

Results

Synthesis of 2-Imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines

Aminolysis Strategy

Our initial efforts focused on Biginelli reactions with guanidine surrogates followed by aminolysis of the resulting products (Scheme 1). Atwal-type Biginelli reactions with O-methylisourea 13 and Knoevenagel precursors 11 to give dihydropyrimidines 14 are well established.23 However, aminolysis of these methoxy-1,4-dihydropyrimidines proved to be problematic in our hands. Specifically, it was found that direct aminolysis of methoxydihydropyrimidines 14 was prohibitively sluggish. We hoped that installation of an acyloxy group at N3 to give substrates of type 15 would improve aminolysis rates, similar to effects reported by Atwal.22a However, <10% conversion of Boc-protected methoxydihydropyrimidines 15 to aminolysis products 16 was observed, even after 45 h at 70 °C.

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1

In an attempt to identify Biginelli products in which subsequent aminolysis to generate a guanidine functional group would be more facile, pyrazole carboxamidine hydrochloride (17) was chosen as a coupling partner for Biginelli condensations (Scheme 2). It was reasoned that Biginelli adducts 18 would be efficient substrates for aminolysis based on the common use of 17 as a guanylating agent.24 The initial Biginelli condensation in this sequence when carried out in DMF at 70 °C proceeded in moderate to good yields (58-73%, Table 1). Reaction times of 48 h were required, as the final dehydration step to form the Δ5,6 alkene was slow relative to the comparable step in Biginelli reactions employing urea. Both aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes could be effectively used as reaction substrates. However, three of the representative aldehydes we examined did not give rise to the desired products: 2-furaldehyde and pivaldehyde failed to give isolable Biginelli adducts, whereas p-nitrobenzaldehyde provided marginal yields of Biginelli products as part of intractable mixtures. Biginelli products 18 are depicted in Scheme 2 as the Δ2,3 tautomers, however NMR analysis shows that these heterocycles are mixtures of the Δ2,3 and the Δ1,2 tautomers in variable ratios.

SCHEME 2.

SCHEME 2

TABLE 1.

Synthesis of Biginelli adducts 18 using pyrazole carboxamidine hydrochloride 17

entry R’ R product yield (%)
1 Et Ph 18a 73
2 Et o-vinyl-C6H4 18b 58
3 Bn i-Pr 18c 74
4 Bn n-Pr 18d 65
5 Bn cyclohexyl 18e 63
6 Et m-NO2-C6H4 18f 60

We initially examined direct aminolysis of Biginelli adducts 18 using the conditions described by Atwal22a for related methyl isourea adducts. These Biginelli products were dissolved in THF, cooled to 0 °C and saturated with ammonia by bubbling ammonia gas through the solution for 15 min. The resulting solution was then heated at 70 °C in a sealed tube. Direct aminolysis under these conditions was too slow to be practical. However, introduction of a Boc group significantly improved the rate of aminolysis. Substrates 18a-f were Boc-protected using standard conditions (DMAP, Boc2O) to give compounds 19a-f in good yields (Table 2). These products exist as mixtures of tautomers, with the Boc substituent assumed to be at N3 based on precedent for related functionalizations of 2-methoxy- and 2-[[(4-methoxyphenyl)methyl]thio]-1,4-dihydropyrimidines.22a Substrates 19a-f typically underwent aminolysis at 70 °C within 24 h to give good yields of Boc-protected guanidine products 16a-f (Table 2).25

TABLE 2.

Conversion of pyrazole Biginelli adducts 18 to guanidines 10 by the sequence depicted in Scheme 2

entry R’ R product yield (%) product yield (%) product yield (%)
1 Et Ph 19a 67 16a 77 10a 90
2 Et o-vinyl-C6H4 19b 86 16b 60 10b 65
3 Bn i-Pr 19c 68 16c 63 10c 86
4 Bn n-Pr 19d 99 16d 70 10d 68
5 Bn cyclohexyl 19e 89 16e 86 10e 95
6 Et m-NO2-C6H4 19f 53 16f 75 10f 94

Removal of the Boc group from aminolysis products 16 was facile. Exposing compounds 16a-f to 50% TFA in dichloromethane at room temperature for 1 h gave 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines 10a-f as their trifluoroacetate salts (Table 2). Recrystallization of these salts provided pure products in good to excellent yields.

The pyrazole Biginelli reaction - aminolysis sequence outlined in Scheme 2 provides a reasonably general method for preparing 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines in 4 steps from a β-ketoester, an aldehyde and pyrazole carboxamidine hydrochloride (17). For the substrates examined, overall yields ranged from 19-46%. Of most significance, this strategy can be used with aliphatic as well as aromatic aldehydes and is not limited to the use of benzoylacetates as the β-ketoester component.

Protected-Guanidine Strategy

Although Biginelli reactions with guanidines containing a single alkyl substituent proceed in low to moderate yields,21a-c we postulated that N,N-dialkylguanidines might give improved yields in Biginelli condensations. Initial support for this supposition came from the Biginelli reaction of N,N-diallylguanidine,26 benzaldehyde, and benzyl acetoacetate in sodium bicarbonate-buffered DMF, which gave the Biginelli adduct in 80% yield (70 °C, 11 h). However, preliminary attempts to remove the allyl protecting groups from the resulting product were not encouraging.

Based on this result, other substituted guanidines were surveyed in order to identify a protected guanidine that would both participate in Biginelli condensations and allow subsequent deprotection to be accomplished efficiently. Neither Boc-guanidine27 nor p-tosylguanidine28 were reactive in Biginelli condensations using numerous reaction conditions (acidic, basic, Lewis acidic).14 The reduced basicity of these guanidines compared to N,N-diallylguanidine likely accounts for this lack of reactivity.29 1,3,5-Triaz-4-ones have been employed as masked primary amines.30 We reasoned that the related triazone derivative 20 (Scheme 3) would more closely approximate the basicity and nucleophilicity of N,N-dialkylguanidines during Biginelli condensations to give products that potentially could be converted to simple guanidines under acidic conditions (Scheme 3).

SCHEME 3.

SCHEME 3

The preparation of 3,5-dimethyl-4-oxo-[1,3,5]triazinane-1-carboxamidine (20) is summarized in Scheme 4. Benzylamine was first converted to triazone derivative 25 by standard condensation with N,N’-dimethylurea and aqueous formaldehyde. The benzyl group was subsequently removed by high pressure hydrogenation to give 1,3-dimethyl-[1,3,5]triazinan-2-one (26) in 96% yield. Upon heating triazone 26 and N,N’-bis(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-1H-pyrazole-1-carboxamidine (27) at 70 °C in THF, the di-Boc-protected guanidine precursor 28 was formed in 53% yield (80% based on consumed starting material); extended reaction times or elevated temperatures gave rise to unwanted byproducts. The Boc-protecting groups of product 28 were easily removed by reaction with 50% TFA in dichloromethane at room temperature to give the triazone-protected guanidine 20 in quantitative yield.

SCHEME 4.

SCHEME 4

Triazone-protected guanidine 20 performed well in 3-component Biginelli condensations. Heating an aldehyde (aromatic or aliphatic), β-ketoester, and guanidine 20 at 70 °C for 12 h in sodium bicarbonate-buffered DMF gave good yields (62-86%) of Biginelli adducts 21a-j (Table 3). These Biginelli condensations reached completion more quickly than the corresponding reactions of pyrazole carboxamidine 17. In addition, 2-furaldehyde, pivaldehyde, and p-nitrobenzaldehyde were used successfully in Biginelli reactions with 20.

TABLE 3.

Biginelli reactions with triazone-protected guanidine 20

graphic file with name nihms-61282-t0012.jpg

entry R’ R product yield (%)
1 Et Ph 21a 73
2 Et o-vinyl-C6H4 21b 73
3 Bn i-Pr 21c 86
4 Bn n-Pr 21d 76
5 Bn cyclohexyl 21e 91
6 Et m-NO2-C6H4 21f 71
7 Et 2-furan 21g 67
8 Bn t-Bu 21h 43
9 Et p-NO2-C6H4 21i 86
10 Et 2,4-di-MeO-C6H4 21j 62

We turned to examine conditions for removal of the triazone group from compounds 21a-j in order to reveal the unprotected guanidine functional group. Unfortunately, the triazone ring of these guanidines was not unraveled under the mildly acidic conditions previously used for cleaving triazone derivatives of alkyl amines.30b For example, exposure of these products to 2-6 N HCl in EtOH at room temperature resulted in no deprotection after 16 h; various other acids gave similar results. Heating adducts 21a-j in 6 N HCl in EtOH to 60 °C gave incomplete deprotection in the same time period. Finally, it was discovered that heating these substrates in 6 N aqueous HCl at 60 °C for 24 h in a sealed tube (to prevent loss of HCl) gave complete deprotection in most cases (Table 4). Not surprisingly, these relatively harsh acidic conditions were problematic with some substrates; compounds 21g, 21h, and 21j underwent extensive decomposition under these conditions.

TABLE 4.

Deprotection of triazone-protected Biginelli adducts

graphic file with name nihms-61282-t0013.jpg

entry R’ R product yield (%)
1 Et Ph 10a 84
2 Et o-vinyl-C6H4 10b 69
3 Bn i-Pr 10c 84
4 Bn n-Pr 10d 76
5 Bn cyclohexyl 10e 83
6 Et m-NO2-C6H4 10f 84
7 Et 2-Furan 10g -
8 Bn t-Bu 10h -
9 Et p-NO2-C6H4 10i 79
10 Et 2,4-di-MeO-C6H4 10j -

This triazone-protected guanidine Biginelli strategy provides 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines in only 2 steps with good overall yields (53-76%). However, this sequence is limited to substrates that survive the strongly acidic conditions required to remove the triazone-protecting group from the Biginelli product.

Transformation of 2-Imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidinones Derived From Masked Dialdehydes to Hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalenes

With two methods for the preparation of 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines in hand, we applied these procedures in the synthesis of hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalene structures, envisioning the use of a masked dialdehyde 29 (Scheme 5) in an initial Biginelli reaction to give 2-iminodihydropyrimidine products 30. The protected-aldehyde functional group would then be unmasked to generate pyrrolopyrimidinium hemiaminals of type 31. These cyclic hemiaminals would finally be used in tethered Biginelli reactions9b with a second β-ketoester to give hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalenes

SCHEME 5.

SCHEME 5

A variety of Boc-protected 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines 30a-e were synthesized from masked dialdehydes 29a,b31 using the pyrazole variant of our Biginelli-aminolysis strategy (Scheme 6). The initial Biginelli adducts 33a-e were synthesized in yields ranging from 61-73%. These Biginelli condensations were successful with the mono dimethyl acetal-protected dialdehydes 29a,b and β-ketoesters having various groups at R1 (ethyl and allyl esters) and R2 (methyl, phenyl, p-nitrophenyl). Boc-protection and subsequent aminolysis of these Biginelli products proceeded in good yields to give products 30a-e.

SCHEME 6.

SCHEME 6

The Boc-protected 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines products were converted to hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalenes as summarized in Scheme 7. Treatment of compounds 30a-e with trifluoroacetic acid at room temperature resulted in cleavage of the Boc and dimethylacetal groups and ring closure to give tetrahydropyrrolopyrimidinium salts of type 31. The solvent and excess TFA were removed from these products under reduced pressure; these crude intermediates were then redissolved in trifluoroethanol containing an excess of a second β-ketoester. These solutions were then heated in the presence of morpholinium acetate as a promoter and sodium sulfate as a desiccant to give hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalene tethered-Biginelli products 32.

SCHEME 7.

SCHEME 7

This 5-step sequence was employed to prepare six hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalenes (32a-f, Table 5). The overall yields for these syntheses ranged from 11-42%. For the hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalene products (n = 1), the yields for the tethered Biginelli reactions ranged from 51-90%. However, little diastereoselectivity was observed, a result that stands in contrast to the tethered Biginelli reactions reported previously from our laboratories.9b,13,15 The syn relative configuration was slightly favored (3:1, verified by 1H NMR NOE correlations) for several of these products (32a,c, and e). Other hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalene adducts were isolated as 1:1 mixtures of epimers. In all cases, the syn and anti epimers were cleanly separated using standard flash chromatography techniques.

TABLE 5.

Triazaacenaphthalene and related structures

graphic file with name nihms-61282-t0014.jpg

entry R1 R2 R3 R4 n product yield (%) dr (syn:anti)
1 Et Me Me Me 1 32a 70 3:1
2 Et Ph allyl Me 1 32b 68 1:1.3
3 Et Ph Et C6F5 1 32c 86 3.2:1
4 Et p-NO2-C6H4 allyl Me 1 32d 90 1:1.3
5 Et p-NO2-C6H4 Bn Me 1 32e 54 3.2:1
6 Et p-NO2-C6H4 allyl (CH2)4OBn 1 32f 51 1:1
7 allyl Me Et p-NO2-Ph 2 32g 27 1:0

In addition to the preparation of triazaacenaphthalene structures, one derivative that incorporates a fused piperidine ring, hexahydro-1H-1,9,9b-diazaphenalene 32g, was also synthesized. The inclusion of the 6-membered piperidine ring resulted in a lower yield for the tethered Biginelli reaction (27%). However, this reaction proceeded with high diastereoselection to produce exclusively the syn product.

Discussion

Biginelli strategies utilizing pyrazole carboxamidine 17 or triazone-protected guanidine 20 enable the concise and general synthesis of 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines. Only a few members of this class of heterocycles had previously been prepared using Biginelli reactions, which suffered from low yields or lack of generality in one or more of the reactants.21,22 There are advantages and limitations to each method developed during the present study. The Biginelli reaction with pyrazole carboxamidine 17, followed by aminolysis utilizes relatively mild conditions throughout. However, the initial Biginelli step involves a slow dehydration that requires prolonged heating to drive to completion. In addition, efficient aminolysis is dependent upon the introduction of a Boc substituent. This protection step and the subsequent deprotection reaction add several steps to the route. Despite these limitations, this method is preferable for substrates having sensitive functionality, as most of the chemistry is relatively mild. In contrast, the synthesis of 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines from triazone guanidine 20 requires only 2 steps: the Biginelli reaction, which is complete within 12 h, and the final deprotection step. This Biginelli reaction is more general in scope than that employing pyrazole carboxamidine 17 as every aldehyde surveyed provided the desired adduct. The major limitation of this second strategy is the harsh deprotection step (strong acid, heat), which is incompatible with some functionality. Taken together, these two strategies provide ready access to a wide range of 2-imino-5-carboxy-3,4-dihydropyrimidines. Both strategies provide these products as racemates.32

We have applied the pyrazole carboxamidine 17 Biginelli-aminolysis sequence to masked dialdehydes to ultimately generate tetrahydropyrrolopyrimidinium intermediates 31, which were transformed by tethered Biginelli reactions to a variety of hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalenes 32. This chemistry provides access to the core structures of the crambescidin and the batzelladine alkaloids in a succinct 5-step sequence from readily available starting materials.

The standard Knoevenagel conditions used in this study for the tethered Biginelli condensation (1 equiv of morpholinium acetate, trifluoroethanol) were previously shown to favor syn stereoselection with similar substrates.15a Thus, tethered Biginelli reactions of hexahydropyrrolopyrimidinium substrates 33 (Figure 2) proceeded with up to 9:1 stereoselectivity under essentially identical conditions.15 These studies showed that the stereochemical outcome of this reaction can be rather solvent and temperature dependent, with lower temperatures and more polar solvents improving stereoselectivity.15a We were, therefore, somewhat surprised by the low selectivities observed for tethered Biginelli reactions of tetrahydropyrrolopyridinium substrates 31. The incorporation of a second double bond in substrates of type 31 compared to those of type 33 (Figure 2) leads to some flattening of the bicyclic ring system. This change may account for the erosion in stereoselectivity.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The chemistry reported herein can likely be used to synthesize several heterocyclic architectures in addition to hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalenes. One example was demonstrated, the short construction of hexahydro-1H-1,9,9b-triazaphenalene 32g. This example demonstrates the utility of this chemistry for preparing decidedly non-natural analogs of the crambescidin and the batzelladine alkaloids. In addition to alternative sizes for the central fused ring and the substituents R1-R4, a variety of other analogs undoubtedly can be synthesized from core structures of type 32.

Conclusion

Natural products that contain guanidine units within 6-membered heterocyclic rings possess diverse biological activities. The short synthesis of 2-imino-5-carboxy-1,4-dihydropyrimidines and hexahydrotriazaacenaphthalenes reported herein will likely find use for the synthesis of focused libraries of guanidine alkaloid-like structures. We are applying and extending the strategies described herein to the preparation of such libraries in order to more completely probe the biology of these fascinating guanidine-containing heterocycles.

Experimental Section33

6-Methyl-4-phenyl-2-pyrazol-1-yl-1,4-dihydropyrimidine-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (18a). Representative procedure for synthesis of Biginelli products 18

Benzaldehyde (1.14 mL, 11.3 mmol), ethyl acetoacetate (1.45 mL, 11.3 mmol), pyrazole carboxamidine hydrochloride 17 (1.86 g, 12.5 mmol), NaHCO3 (3.8 g, 45 mmol) were heated in DMF (16.5 mL) at 70 °C for 48 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solution was diluted with water (50 mL) and washed with Et2O (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, 20% Et2O in hexanes → 40% Et2O in hexanes) to give compound 18a as a pale yellow oil (2.65 g, 73% yield, a 1.6:1 mixture of tautomers): 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) major tautomer δ 9.56 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.46 (d, J = 3 Hz, 1 H), 7.86 (s, 1 H), 7.37-7.31 (m, 4 H), 7.28-7.23 (m, 1 H), 6.58-6.57 (m, 1 H), 5.59 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.08-4.03 (m, 2 H), 2.42 (s, 3 H), 1.14 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; minor tautomer δ 9.88 (s, 1 H), 8.34 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.37-7.31 (m, 4 H), 7.28-7.23 (m, 1 H), 6.54-6.53 (m, 1 H), 5.65 (s, 1 H), 4.08-4.03 (m, 2 H), 2.47 (s, 3 H), 1.13 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) all peaks from both tautomers δ 165.9, 165.8, 156.6, 146.9, 146.2, 145.5, 144.5, 143.1, 141.5, 141.3, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 128.0, 127.6, 127.0, 126.8, 126.5, 109.1, 108.6, 103.8, 99.8, 59.3, 59.3, 58.0, 52.7, 23.0, 17.6, 14.1, 14.0 ppm; IR (thin film) 3381, 3335, 2983, 2931, 1743, 1716, 1702, 1628, 1532, 1485, 1395, 1370, 1263, 1240, 1200, 1171, 1151, 1091, 1307 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 311.1513 (311.1508 calcd for C17H19N4O2+ [MH]+).

4-Methyl-6-phenyl-2-pyrazol-1-yl-6H-pyrimidine-1,5-dicarboxylic acid 1-tert-butyl ester 5-ethyl ester (19a). Representative procedure for synthesis of Boc-protected Biginelli adducts 19

Compound 18a (262 mg, 0.84 mmol) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (Boc2O, 285 mg, 1.01 mmol) were dissolved in MeCN (3.0 mL) under an N2 atomosphere. DMAP (10 mg, 78 μmol) was added and the solution was maintained at room temperature for 12 h. The solvent was removed en vacuo and the residue was recrystallized from EtOH to give 19a as a colorless solid (230 mg, 67%, mp 144-145 °C): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10 (s, 1 H), 7.71 (s, 1 H), 7.47 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.32-7.29 (m, 2 H), 7.27 (m, 1 H), 6.45 (s, 1 H), 6.39 (s, 1 H), 4.31-4.22 (m, 2 H), 2.61 (s, 3 H), 1.35 (s, 9 H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165. 7, 153.5, 151.6, 143.3, 143.1, 138. 5, 129.5, 128.5, 128.1, 126.9, 113.6, 108.6, 83.7, 60.7, 55.0, 27.6, 21.2, 14.3 ppm; IR (thin film) 2983, 2935, 1732, 1707, 1702, 1623, 1564, 1461, 1397, 1370, 1300, 1267, 1231, 1143, 1090, 1038, 963, 908 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 433.1867 (433.1852 calcd for C22H26N4O4Na+ [MNa]+). Anal. Calcd for C22H26N4O4: C, 64.37; H, 6.38; N, 13.65; Found: C, 64.24; H, 6.45; N, 13.65.

2-Amino-4-methyl-6-phenyl-6H-pyrimidine-1,5-dicarboxylic acid 1-tert-butyl ester 5-ethyl ester (16a). Representative procedure for synthesis of aminolysis products 16

A solution of compound 19a (219 mg, 0.53 mmol), ammonium chloride (14 mg, 0.27 mmol) and THF (2 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and ammonia gas was bubbled through for 30 min. The resulting solution was heated in a sealed tube at 70 °C for 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was removed en vacuo and the residue was purified by recrystallization (EtOH) to give 16a as a colorless solid (147 mg, 77% yield, mp 169-170 °C): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.71 (bs, 1 H), 7.40-7.38 (m, 2 H), 7.35-7.29 (m, 3 H), 6.25 (s, 1 H), 4.17 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.37 (s, 3 H), 1.55 (s, 9 H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.5, 156.0, 153.3, 151.8, 142.3, 128.6, 128.0, 127.0, 104.4, 84.7, 59.8, 55.7, 28.1, 22.2, 14.5 ppm; IR (thin film) 3370, 3011, 2986, 1717, 1697, 1651, 1607, 1519, 1370, 1342, 1337, 1297, 1236, 1148, 1115, 1063 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 360.1929 (360.1923 calcd for C19H26N3O +4 [MH]+). Anal. Calcd for C19H25N3O4: C, 63.49; H, 7.01; N, 11.69; Found: C, 63.08; H, 7.12; N, 11.85.

5-Ethoxycarbonyl-6-methyl-4-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-1H-pyrimidin-2-ylidene-ammonium trifluoroacetate (10a). Representative procedure for synthesis of heterocyclic guanidines 10

Method A

Compound 16a (674 mg, 1.88 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2.5 mL) under nitrogen. TFA (2.5 mL) was added and the resulting solution was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The solvent and excess TFA were removed under reduced pressure and the resulting residue was purified by trituration with Et2O to give trifluoroacetate salt 10a as a colorless solid (629 mg, 90%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3:CD3OD (1:1)) δ 7.34-7.31 (m, 2 H), 7.28-7.26 (m, 3 H), 5.43 (s, 1 H), 4.10-4.04 (m, 2 H), 2.42 (s, 3 H), 1.14 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3:CD3OD (1:1)) δ 164.9, 151.0, 143.4, 141.6, 128.8, 128.4, 126.4, 103.6, 60.5, 53.3, 17.2, 13.6 ppm; IR (thin film) 3247, 3065, 2984, 2875, 1690, 1637, 1556, 1496, 1457, 1386, 1370, 1329, 1273, 1241, 1090, 910 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 260.1400 (260.1399 calcd for C14H19N3O2+ [MH]). Anal. Calcd for C16H18N3O6F3: C, 51.48; H, 4.86; N, 11.26; Found: C, 51.59; H, 4.87; N, 11.19.

Method B

Compound 21a (189 mg, 0.51 mmol) was dissolved in 6 N HCl (10 mL) and heated to 60 °C in a sealed tube for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction solution was then extracted with CH2Cl2 (8 × 10 mL). The organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, 10% MeOH in CH2Cl2) to give the HCl salt of 10a as a colorless solid (126 mg, 84%).

5-Benzyl-1,3-dimethyl-[1,3,5]triazinan-2-one (25)

Benzylamine (5 mL, 45.8 mmol), formaldehyde (37% w/w solution, 7.5 mL, 91.6 mmol), and N,N’-dimethylurea (4.03 g, 45.8 mmol) were charged to a reaction flask equipped with a reflux condenser and heated to 100 °C under an argon atmosphere for 16 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction was quenched by the addition of H2O (25 mL) and CH2Cl2 (50 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with brine (1 × 25 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, Et2O → 10% MeOH in Et2O) to give 25 as a colorless solid (7.46 g, 74% yield): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.25-7.16 (m, 5 H), 4.00 (s, 4 H), 3.80 (s, 2 H), 2.74 (s, 6 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.9, 137.5, 129.0, 128.5, 127.6, 67.7, 55.3, 32.4 ppm; IR (thin film) 3452, 2924, 2869, 1629, 1514, 1453, 1417, 1404, 1297, 1151, 1024 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 242.1276 (242.1269 calcd for C12H17N3ONa+[MNa]+).

1,3-Dimethyl-[1,3,5]triazinan-2-one (26)

5-Benzyl-1,3-dimethyl-[1,3,5]triazinan-2-one 25 (1.0 g, 4.56 mmol) was dissolved in EtOH (25 mL). To this solution was added Pd/C (10%) (140 mg) and the resulting mixture was heated to 65 °C under an H2 atmosphere (750 psi) for 18 h. After cooling to room temperature, the suspension was then filtered through Celite and the eluent was concentrated by rotary evaporation to give 26 as a colorless solid (567 mg, 96% yield): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.99 (s, 4 H), 2.68 (s, 6 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.8, 63.1, 31.5 ppm; IR (thin film) 3420, 3283, 2939, 2871, 1624, 1523, 1418, 1405, 1301, 1029, 906 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 152.0801 (152.0800 calcd for C5H11N3ONa+[MNa]+).

Tert-Butyloxycarbonylimino-[(3,5-dimethyl-4-oxo-[1,3,5]triazinan-1-yl)-methyl]-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester (28)

N,N’-Bis(t-butoxycarbonyl)-1H-pyrazole-1-carboxamidine 27 (7.46 g, 24.1 mmol) and 1,3-dimethyl-[1,3,5]triazinan-2-one 26 (3.73 g, 28.9 mmol) were dissolved in dry THF (10 mL) under argon in a flame-dried flask. This solution was heated at 70 °C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was removed en vacuo and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, 4% MeOH in CH2Cl2) to give 28 as a colorless solid (4.63 g, 53% yield): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.00 (bs, 1 H), 4.67 (s, 4 H), 2.89 (s, 6 H), 1.46 (s, 18 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) δ 157.1, 153.7, 81.6, 62.1, 33.0, 28.1 ppm; IR (thin film) 3179, 2981, 2934, 1750, 1636, 1607, 1517, 1392, 1288, 1254, 1226, 1131, 1124 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 394.2064 (394.2066 calcd for C16H29N5O5Na+ [MNa]+).

3,5-Dimethyl-4-oxo-[1,3,5]triazinane-1-carboxamidine trifluoroacetate salt (20)

Compound 28 (4.93 g, 13.3 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (18.6 mL) under argon and TFA (18.6 mL) was added. The resulting solution was maintained at room temperature for 1 h, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting residue was crystallized from Et2O to give 20 as a colorless solid (3.8 g, 100% yield, mp 179-181 °C): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 4.73 (s, 4 H), 2.88 (s, 6 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) δ 161.3, 158.4, 63.3, 33.1 ppm; IR (thin film) 3336, 2931, 2882, 2476, 1602, 1527, 1423, 1406, 1313, 1120, 1035, 975 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 172.1204 (172.1198 calcd for C6H14N5O+ [MH]+). Anal. Calcd for C8H14F3N5O3: C, 33.69; H, 5.00; N, 24.55; Found: C, 33.83; H, 5.00; N, 24.43.

2-(3,5-Dimethyl-4-oxo-[1,3,5]triazinan-1-yl)-6-methyl-4-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyrimidine-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (21a). Representative procedure for synthesis of Biginelli products 21

Compound 20 (293 mg, 1.71 mmol), ethyl acetoacetate (0.2 mL, 1.56 mmol), benzaldehyde (0.16 mL, 1.56 mmol) and NaHCO3 (575 mg, 6.85 mmol) were added to DMF (2.5 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere. This mixture was heated at 70 °C for 22 h. The reaction was cooled to room temperature and poured over crushed ice (25 g). The resulting suspension was extracted with Et2O (1 × 75 mL) and CH2Cl2 (3 × 25 mL) and the organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The resulting residue was recrystallized from Et2O to give 21a as a colorless solid (425 mg, 73% yield, mp 198-200 °C): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30-7.21 (m, 5 H), 5.39 (s, 1 H), 4.79-4.72 (m, 4 H), 4.06-4.02 (m, 2 H), 2.77 (s, 6 H), 2.39 (s, 3 H), 1.19 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.3, 158.7, 156.2, 153.0, 145.2, 128.5, 127.6, 126.5, 102.2, 61.8, 60.0, 54.2, 32.7, 24.0, 14.4 ppm; IR (thin film) 3252, 2981, 2932, 2904, 2886, 2880, 1664, 1629, 1599, 1522, 1503, 1372, 1339, 1303, 1217, 1126, 1061, 1033, 968, 910 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 372.2030 (372.2036 calcd for C19H26N5O3+ [MNa]+). Anal. Calcd for C19H25N5O3: C, 61.44; H, 6.78; N, 18.85; Found: C, 61.22; H, 6.94; N, 18.67.

4-(3,3-Dimethoxypropyl)-6-methyl-2-pyrazol-1-yl-1,4-dihydropyrimidine-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (33a). Representative procedure for synthesis of Biginelli products 33

Compound 17 (1.24 g, 8.32 mmol), ethyl acetoacetate (0.96 mL, 7.57 mmol), and aldehyde 29a (1.0 g, 7.57 mmol) were dissolved in DMF buffered with NaHCO3 (2.54 g, 30.3 mmol) and heated under an N2 atmosphere for 48 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with water (20 mL), and the resulting solution was extracted with Et2O (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, 100% Et2O) to give 33a as a yellow oil (1.58 g, 62% yield, a 1.3:1 mixture of tautomers): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) major tautomer δ 8.11 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1 H), 7.87 (s, 1 H), 7.43 (d, J = 1 Hz, 1 H), 6.25-6.24 (m, 1 H), 4.55 (t, J = 5 Hz, 1 H), 4.23 (t, J = 5 Hz, 1 H), 4.09-4.00 (m, 2 H), 3.12 (s, 6 H), 2.21 (s, 3 H), 1.71-1.65 (m, 1 H), 1.59-1.49 (m, 3 H), 1.13 (q, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; minor tautomer δ 8.20 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1 H), 7.48 (d, J = 1 Hz, 1 H), 7.35 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H) 6.25-6.24 (m, 1 H), 4.48-4.47 (m, 1 H), 4.18 (t, J = 5 Hz, 1 H), 4.09-4.00 (m, 2 H), 3.14 (s, 3 H), 3.12 (s, 3 H), 2.20 (s, 3 H), 1.71-1.65 (m, 1 H), 1.59-1.49 (m, 3 H), 1.14 (q, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) all peaks from both tautomers δ 166.5, 157.2, 147.4, 144.8, 142.6, 141.1, 141.0, 128.4, 127.1, 108.7, 108.5, 104.9, 104.5, 104.4, 101.3, 59.68, 59.7, 54.4, 53.0, 52. 6, 52.5, 52.4, 50.2, 32.0, 31.8, 27.6, 27.2, 23.2, 18.6, 14.3, 14.3 ppm; IR (thin film) 3389, 3320, 2982, 2955, 2937, 1697, 1627, 1531, 1484, 1394, 1377, 1241, 1200, 1126, 1105, 1071, 1038 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 359.1689 (359.1695 calcd for C16H24N4O4Na+ [MNa]+).

6-(3,3-Dimethoxypropyl)-4-methyl-2-pyrazol-1-yl-6H-pyrimidine-1,5-dicarboxylic acid 1-tert-butyl ester 5-ethyl ester (34a). Representative procedure for synthesis of Boc-protected Biginelli products 34

Compound 33a (1.45 g, 4.31 mmol) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (Boc2O, 1.13 g, 5.17 mmol) were dissolved in MeCN (17.0 mL) under an N2 atomosphere. DMAP (53 mg, 0.43 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The solvent was removed en vacuo and the residue was recrystallized from Et2O/hexanes to give 34a as a colorless solid (1.36 g, 73%, mp 114-115 °C): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.15 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.72 (s, 1 H), 6.44 (s, 1 H), 5.19 (dd, J = 10 Hz, 4 Hz, 1 H), 4.39 (t, J = 6 Hz, 1 H), 4.32-4.20 (m, 2 H), 3.30 (s, 3 H), 3.27 (s, 3 H), 2.43 (s, 3 H), 1.94-1.87 (m, 1 H), 1.80-1.73 (m, 1 H), 1.65-1.58 (m, 1 H), 1.54-1.46 (m, 1 H), 1.34 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H), 1.25 (s, 9 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.4, 152.5, 151.4, 143.0, 129.5, 114.9, 108.6, 104.18, 83.3, 60.6, 53.2, 52.9, 52.6, 27.8, 27.7, 27.6, 26.8, 21.2, 14.4 ppm; IR (thin film) 3394, 2982, 2935, 2831, 1774, 1732, 1709, 1650, 1623, 1567, 1460, 1398, 1370, 1301, 1288, 1230, 1142, 1070 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 459.2212 (459.2220 calcd for C21H32N4O6Na+ [MNa]+).

2-Amino-6-(3,3-dimethoxypropyl)-4-methyl-6H-pyrimidine-1,5-dicarboxylic acid 1-tert-butyl ester 5-ethyl ester (30a). Representative procedure for synthesis of products 30

Compound 34a (1.15 g, 2.63 mmol) and ammonium chloride (71 mg, 1.32 mmol) were dissolved in THF (17 mL), cooled to 0 °C and ammonia gas was bubbled through for 30 min. The resulting solution was sealed in a glass tube and stirred at 70 °C for 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was removed en vacuo and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, 40% Et2O in hexanes → 100% Et2O → 10% MeOH in Et2O) to give product 30a as a colorless solid (0.90 g, 88% yield, mp 110-111 °C): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87 (bs, 2 H), 5.21 (s, 1 H), 4.30 (s, 1 H), 4.16 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 3.26 (s, 6 H), 2.21 (s, 3 H), 1.55-1.54 (m, 4 H), 1.52 (s, 9 H), 1.26 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.3, 156.1, 153.0, 151.6, 104.1, 84.0, 59.5, 52. 7, 52.65, 51.9, 28.9, 28.0, 27.9, 21.5, 14.4 ppm; IR (thin film) 3410, 2982, 2936, 1716, 1645, 1597, 1514, 1371, 1343, 1289, 1265, 1241, 1141, 1064 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 408.2104 (408.2111 calcd for C18H31N3O6Na+ [MNa]+). Anal. Calcd for C18H31N3O6: C, 56.09; H, 8.11; N, 10.90; Found: C, 56.39; H, 8.05; N, 10.85.

3-Ethoxycarbonyl-8-methoxycarbonyl-4,7-dimethyl-1,2,2a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-5,6,8b-triazaacenaphthylene (32a). Representative procedure for the synthesis of triazaacenaphthalenes 32

Compound 30a (200 mg, 0.52 mmol) was stirred in 50% TFA:CH2Cl2 (1.4 mL) under an N2 atmosphere for 1 h. The solvent and excess TFA were removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was placed under high vacuum for 8 h. The residue was then dissolved in trifluoroethanol (1 mL) and to this solution was added morpholinium acetate (84 mg, 0.57 mmol), Na2SO4 (81 mg, 0.57 mmol), and methyl acetoacetate (0.16 mL, 1.56 mmol). This mixture was heated at 70 °C for 72 h and then filtered to remove Na2SO4, concentrated, and the residue was purified by chromatography (silica gel, 1% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to 5% MeOH in CH2Cl2) to give compound 32a as a mixture of diastereomers. These epimers were separated by chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc) to give syn-32a (119 mg, 52% yield) and anti-32a (40 mg, 18% yield) as tan trifluoroacetate salt solids. The relative configuration of the angular hydrogens flanking the pyrrolidine nitrogen was verified by NOESY crosspeaks: syn-32a: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.31 (q, J = 5 Hz, 2 H), 4.27-4.20 (m, 1 H), 4.18-4.12 (m, 1 H), 2.65-2.62 (m, 2 H), 2.29 (s, 6 H), 1.94-1.90 (m, 2 H), 1.30 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.3, 165.9, 153.1, 152.3, 149.6, 103.7, 103.4, 60.1, 55.8, 51.1, 33.1, 33.0, 20.3, 20.1, 14.6 ppm; IR (thin film) 3283, 3145, 2983, 2948, 2872, 2840, 1691, 1685, 1617, 1522, 1443, 1372, 1338, 1317, 1290, 1269, 1248, 1203, 1183, 1130, 1104, 1079 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 320.1604 (320.1610 calcd for C16H22N3O4+ [M]+); anti-32a: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.27-4.15 (m, 4 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 2.40-2.38 (m, 2 H), 2.37 (s, 6 H), 1.63-1.60 (m, 2 H), 1.30 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.3, 165.8, 153.1, 152.2, 149.6, 103.7, 103.4, 60.1, 55.8, 51.1, 33.1, 33.0, 20.3, 20.1, 14.6 ppm; IR (thin film) 3190, 3078, 2983, 2908, 2779, 1702, 1697, 1619, 1569, 1541, 1433, 1378, 1320, 1280, 1268, 1238, 1201, 1187, 1166, 1089 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) m/z 320.1616 (320.1610 calcd for C16H22N3O4+ [M]+).

Supplementary Material

si20060724_065

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by NIH (HL-25854) and Pharma Mar. Postdoctoral fellowship support for B.L.N. from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Infection and Immunity is gratefully acknowledged. NMR and mass spectra were obtained at UC Irvine using instrumentation acquired with the assistance of NSF and NIH Shared Instrumentation programs.

References

  • 1.Greenhill JV, Lue P. Prog. Med. Chem. 1993;30:203–326. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6468(08)70378-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2(a).For reviews of guanidine-containing natural products see:Berlinck RGS, Kossuga MH. Natl. Prod. Rep. 2005;22:516–550. doi: 10.1039/b209227c.Berlinck RGS. Natl. Prod. Rep. 2002;19:617–649. doi: 10.1039/a901981b.Faulkner DJ. Natl. Prod. Rep. 1999;16:155–198.Berlinck RGS. Natl. Prod. Rep. 1999;16:339–365.Berlinck RGS. Natl. Prod. Rep. 1996;13:377–409. doi: 10.1039/np9961300377.
  • 3.Arndt H-D, Koert U. Organic Synthesis Highlights IV. 2000:241–250.and references contained therein.
  • 4(a).Kashman Y, Hirsh S, McConnell OJ, Ohtani I, Kusumi T, Kakisawa H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:8925–8926. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ohtani I, Kusumi T, Kakisawa H, Kashman Y, Hirsh S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:8372–8479. [Google Scholar]; (c) Jares-Erijman EA, Sakai R, Rinehart KL. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:5712–5715. [Google Scholar]; (d) Jares-Erijman EA, Ingrum AL, Carney JR, Rinehart KL, Sakai R. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:4805–4808. [Google Scholar]; (e) Rinehart KL, Jares-Erijman EA. U.S. Patent 5,756,734. 1998; (f) Shi J-G, Sun F, Rinehart KL. WO Patent 3,756,734. 1998; (g) Berlinck RGS, Braekman JC, Daloze D, Bruno I, Riccio R, Ferri S, Spampinato S, Speroni E. J. Nat. Prod. 1993;56:1007–1015. doi: 10.1021/np50097a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Palagiano E, De Marino S, Minale L, Riccio R, Zollo F, Iorizzi M, Carré JB, Debitus C, Lucarain L, Provost J. Tetrahedron. 1995;51:3675–3682. [Google Scholar]; (i) Braekman JC, Daloze D, Tavares R, Hajdu E, Van Soest RWM. J. Nat. Prod. 2000;63:193–196. doi: 10.1021/np990403g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Chang LC, Whittaker NF, Bewley CA. J. Nat. Prod. 2003;66:1490–1494. doi: 10.1021/np030256t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Aoki S, Kong D, Matsui K, Kobayashi M. Anticancer Res. 2004;24:2325–2330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5(a).Patil AD, Kumar NV, Kokke WC, Bean MF, Freyer AJ, De Brosse C, Mai S, Truneh A, Faulkner DJ, Carte B, Breen AL, Hertzberg RP, Johnson RK, Westley JW, Potts BCM. J. Org. Chem. 1995;60:1182–1188. [Google Scholar]; (b) Patil AD, Freyer AJ, Taylor PB, Carté B, Zuber G, Johnson RK, Faulkner DJ. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:1814–1819. [Google Scholar]
  • 6(a).Moore CG, Murphy PJ, Williams HL, McGown AT, Smith NK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:251–254. [Google Scholar]; (b) Black GP, Coles SJ, Hizi A, Howard-Jones AG, Hursthouse MB, McGown AT, Loya S, Moore CG, Murphy PJ, Smith NK, Walshe ND. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:3377–3381. [Google Scholar]; (c) Aron ZD, Pietraszkiewicz H, Overman LE, Valeriote F, Cuevas C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:3445–3449. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.04.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7(a).Olszewski A, Sato K, Aron ZD, Cohen F, Harris A, McDougall BR, Robinson WE, Jr., Overman LE, Weiss GA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:14079–14084. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406040101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Olszewski A, Weiss GA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:12178–12179. doi: 10.1021/ja053316l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8(a).Ohizumi Y, Sasaki S, Kusumi T, Ohtani II. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1996;310:95–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(96)00482-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Georgieva A, Hirai M, Hashimoto Y, Nakata T, Ohizumi Y, Nagasawa K. Synthesis. 2003:1427–1432. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.For brief reviews and the synthesis and isolation of crambescidins see:(a) Reference 2b.Aron ZD, Overman LE. Chem. Commun. 2004:253–265. doi: 10.1039/b309910e.Heys L, Moore CG, Murphy PJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000;29:57–67.
  • 10(a).Snider BB, Shi Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:2099–2102. [Google Scholar]; (b) Snider BB, Shi Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:549–557. [Google Scholar]
  • 11(a).Murphy PJ, Williams HL, Hursthouse MB, Abdul Malik KM. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994:119–120. [Google Scholar]; (b) Murphy PJ, Williams HL, Hibbs DE, Hursthouse MB, Abdul Malik KM. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:8315–8332. [Google Scholar]; (c) Moore CG, Murphy PJ, Williams HL, McGown AT, Smith AK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:251–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 12(a).Nagasawa K, Georgieva A, Nakata T. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:187–192. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nagasawa K, Georgieva A, Nakata T, Kita T, Hasimoto Y. Org. Lett. 2002;4:177–180. doi: 10.1021/ol0168263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13(a).Overman LE, Rabinowitz MH. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:3235–3237. [Google Scholar]; (b) Overman LE, Rabinowitz MH, Renhowe PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:2657–2658. [Google Scholar]; (c) Coffey DS, McDonald AI, Overman LE, Stappenbeck F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:6944–6945. [Google Scholar]; (d) Coffey DS, McDonald AI, Overman LE, Rabinowitz MH, Renhowe PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:4893–4903. [Google Scholar]; (e) Coffey DS, Overman LE, Stappenbeck F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:4904–4914. [Google Scholar]; (f) Aron ZF, Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:3380–3390. doi: 10.1021/ja042875+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Rhee YH, Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:15652–15658. doi: 10.1021/ja055464h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.For a comprehensive review of the Biginelli reaction see:Kappe CO, Stadler A. Org. React. 2004;63:1–116.
  • 15(a).Franklin AS, Ly SK, Mackin GH, Overman LE, Shaka AJ. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:1512–1519. doi: 10.1021/jo981971o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cohen F, Overman LE, Sakata SKL. Org. Lett. 1999;1:2169–2172. doi: 10.1021/ol991269u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Cohen F, Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:10782–10783. doi: 10.1021/ja017067m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Cohen F, Collins SK, Overman LE. Org. Lett. 2003;5:4485–4488. doi: 10.1021/ol0357999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Cohen F, Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:2594–2603. doi: 10.1021/ja0574320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Cohen F, Overman LE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:2604–2608. doi: 10.1021/ja057433s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16(a).Snider BB, Chen J, Patil AD, Freyer AJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:6977–6980. [Google Scholar]; (b) Snider BB, Chen J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:5697–5700. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.(a) See reference 11a.Black GP, Murphy PJ, Walshe NDA, Hibbs DE, Hursthouse MB, Abdul Malik KM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:6043–6046.Black GP, Murphy PJ, Walshe NDA. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:9481–9488.Black GP, Murphy PJ, Thornhill AJ, Walshe NDA, Zanetti C. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:6547–6554.
  • 18(a).Nagasawa K, Koshino H, Nakata T. Org. Lett. 2001;3:4155–4158. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ishiwata T, Hino T, Koshino H, Hasimoto Y, Nakata T, Nagasawa K. Org. Lett. 2002;4:2921–2924. doi: 10.1021/ol026303a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19(a).Louwrier S, Ostendorf M, Tuynman A, Hiemstra H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:905–908. [Google Scholar]; (b) Duron SG, Gin DY. Org. Lett. 2001;3:1551–1554. doi: 10.1021/ol015848m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Biginelli P. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1893;23:360. [Google Scholar]
  • 21(a).Cho H, Shima K, Hayashimatsu M, Ohnaka Y, Mizuno A, Takeuchi Y. J. Org. Chem. 1985;50:4227–4230. [Google Scholar]; (b) Atwal KS, Rovnyak GC, Schwartz J, Moreland S, Hedberg A, Gougoutas JZ, Malley MF, Floyd DM. J. Med. Chem. 1990;33:1510–1515. doi: 10.1021/jm00167a035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Milcent R, Malanda J-C, Barbier G. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1997;34:329–336. [Google Scholar]; (d) Vanden Eynde JJ, Hecq N, Kataeva O, Kappe CO. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:1785–1791. [Google Scholar]
  • 22(a).Atwal KS, Rovnyak GC, O’Reilly BC, Schwartz J. J. Org. Chem. 1989;54:5898–5907. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kappe CO. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000;10:49–51. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(99)00572-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O’Reilly BC, Atwal KS. Heterocycles. 1987;26:1185–1188. [Google Scholar]
  • 24(a).Bernatowicz MS, Wu Y, Matsueda GR. J. Org. Chem. 1992;57:2497–2502. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bernatowicz MS, Wu Y, Matsueda GR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:3389–3392. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.We initially included ammonium chloride (0.5 equiv) in the reaction mixture to serve as a proton source. Later, it was found that omitting ammonium chloride had no deleterious effect on the outcome of these aminolysis reactions.
  • 26.Schaefer FC, Wright AC. U.S. Patent 3 734 939. 1973
  • 27.Zapf CW, Creighton CJ, Tomioka M, Goodman M. Org. Lett. 2001;3:1133–1136. doi: 10.1021/ol015576n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qi Y, Gao H, Yang M, Xia C-G, Suo J. Synth. Commun. 2003;33:1073–1079. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.The pKa of N,N’-dimethylguanidinium sulfate is 13.4 and that of carbamate-substituted guanidines ∼7.0; the pKa of N-tosylguanidines should be lower, pKa ∼2.0. See:Taylor PJ, Wait AR. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1986:1765–1770.
  • 30(a).Knapp S, Hale JJ, Bastos M, Gibson FS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:2109–2112. [Google Scholar]; (b) Knapp S, Hale JJ, Bastos M, Molina A, Chen KY. J. Org. Chem. 1992;57:6239–6256. [Google Scholar]; (c) Knight SD, Overman LE, Pairaudeau G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:5776–5788. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.The mono-protected dialdehyde precursors were synthesized as described in: Davis FA, Zhang H, Lee SH. Org. Lett. 2001;3:759–762. doi: 10.1021/ol015520t.Spectral data were consistent with previously published data. For 28a:Griesbaum K, Jung IC, Mertens H. J. Org. Chem. 1990;55:6024–6027.For 28b:Boeckman RK, Jr., Ko SS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982;104:1033–1041.
  • 32.Some progress in orchestrating asymmetric Biginelli reactions has been described, see:Huang Y, Yang F, Zhu C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:16386–16387. doi: 10.1021/ja056092f.
  • 33.General experimental details are described in the Supporting Information.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

si20060724_065

RESOURCES