Abstract
An analysis of 11 cases of congenital stenosis of the cervical spine seen over the past three years is reported. The authors' experiences at an urban community hospital, as well as a large Veterans Administration Hospital, lead them to conclude that this disorder is a neurologically significant anomaly which is probably more common than published reports would imply. It can be clinically and radiographically distinguished from “pure” cervical spondylosis, to which it is related, and its treatment should be appropriately modified. It appears to have a predilection for young adult black males, and cervical myelopathy is the predominant clinical feature. Varying degrees of trauma, a disease endemic to the inner city, plays a major role in precipitating the neurological catastrophes associated with this potentially correctable disorder. Proper management of this entity demands a heightened awareness of its existence as well as a high standard of neurological and roentgenographic diagnosis, and operative performance. A flexible operative strategy which takes into account the specific biomechanical factors involved in this disorder as well as the patient's individual physiological and social status is imperative. Surgery offers a good opportunity for improving neurological function.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddec9/ddec9a48d1e36ecd60e84f16a8ef67ef6b3dd515" alt="257"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6e9/5d6e9dac418c8e2c214f57d84ab1d6d8c59bdf29" alt="258"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/778d9/778d917a0347a60f074dd8718274124f8f7731d1" alt="259"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b1c4/0b1c4ff0d33fb454e8c2413a97bce87a1f6d9216" alt="260"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13c6f/13c6f9e0e2a404bc5c55cdfae4ea8edd1f556d84" alt="261"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7717/d7717c88edac2046cb87f539909ece3cc2520866" alt="262"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103ad/103ad925d970bc92880cd26b083c5b4f32db0e8e" alt="263"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f502/1f502835874c342b0732bdd066da11d8d2e9182c" alt="264"
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BRAIN R. Spondylosis, the known and the unknown. Lancet. 1954 Apr 3;266(6814):687–693. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(54)92104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BRAIN W. R., NORTHFIELD D., WILKINSON M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1952 Jun;75(2):187–225. doi: 10.1093/brain/75.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BURROWS E. H. The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. Clin Radiol. 1963 Jan;14:77–86. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(63)80015-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crandall P. H., Batzdorf U. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1966 Jul;25(1):57–66. doi: 10.3171/jns.1966.25.1.0057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galera R., Tovi D. Anterior disc excision with interbody fusion in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and rizopathy. J Neurosurg. 1968 Apr;28(4):305–310. doi: 10.3171/jns.1968.28.4.0305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregorius F. K., Estrin T., Crandall P. H. Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. A long-term follow-up study. Arch Neurol. 1976 Sep;33(9):618–625. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1976.00500090024005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guidetti B., Fortuna A. Long-term results of surgical treatment of myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis. J Neurosurg. 1969 Jun;30(6):714–721. doi: 10.3171/jns.1969.30.6.0714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HINCK V. C., GORDY P. D., STORINO H. E. DEVELOPMENTAL STENOSIS OF THE CERVICAL SPINAL CANAL. RADIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS. Neurology. 1964 Sep;14:864–868. doi: 10.1212/wnl.14.9.864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris P. Cervical spine stenosis. Paraplegia. 1977 Aug;15(2):125–132. doi: 10.1038/sc.1977.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinck V. C., Sachdev N. S. Developmental stenosis of the cervical spinal canal. Brain. 1966 Mar;89(1):27–36. doi: 10.1093/brain/89.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessler J. T. Congenital narrowing of the cervical spinal canal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975 Dec;38(12):1218–1224. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.38.12.1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosary I. Z., Braham J., Shacked I., Shacked R. Microsurgery in anterior approach to cervical discs. Surg Neurol. 1976 Nov;6(5):275–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lurati M., Mertens H. G. Die Bedeutung der anlagebedingten Enge des Cervicalkanals für die cervicale Myelopathie. Statistische Vergleichsuntersuchungen. Z Neurol. 1971 Apr 28;199(1):46–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moiel R. H., Raso E., Waltz T. A. Central cord syndrome resulting from congenital narrowness of the cervical spinal canal. J Trauma. 1970 Jun;10(6):502–510. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197006000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95(1):87–100. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PAYNE E. E., SPILLANE J. D. The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1957 Dec;80(4):571–596. doi: 10.1093/brain/80.4.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips D. G. Surgical treatment of myelopathy with cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1973 Oct;36(5):879–884. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.36.5.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Symon L., Lavender P. The surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurology. 1967 Feb;17(2):117–127. doi: 10.1212/wnl.17.2.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson H. A., LeMay M. L., Ferris E. J. Roentgenographic correlations in cervical spondylosis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1969 Feb;105(2):370–374. doi: 10.2214/ajr.105.2.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]