Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To evaluate general practitioner participation in a district health authority's purchasing work. DESIGN--Questionnaire study of 131 Hackney general practitioners and 33 senior health service managers; review of the minutes of 28 meetings of the Hackney General Practitioners' Forum and the contract between City and Hackney Health Authority and the St Bartholomew's NHS Trust. SETTING--Hackney General Practitioners' Forum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--General practitioners' and managers' perceptions of how representative and effective the general practitioners' forum is; proportion of new quality targets and service developments contributed by general practitioners; main issues discussed by the forum and impact on district health authority policy. RESULTS--99 (76%) general practitioners and 27 (82%) managers responded. Both groups perceived the forum as representative. 92% (24/26) of the managers thought the forum was effective but only 74% (70/95) of general practitioners did so, largely because some doubted that the forum was listened to 75% (103/138) of quality targets and 55% (16/29) of service developments planned in the 1993-4 contract were contributed by general practitioners. They also lobbied successfully for more resources for urology and community mental health services. CONCLUSIONS--Input into commissioning via a general practitioners' forum can be both representative and effective. General practitioners need to work closely to achieve a consensus and those involved need administrative support. The relation between general practice and public health medicine needs to be strengthened.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bowling A., Jacobson B., Southgate L., Formby J. General practitioners' views on quality specifications for "outpatient referrals and care contracts". BMJ. 1991 Aug 3;303(6797):292–294. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6797.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eve R., Hodgkin P. In praise of non-fundholding practices. BMJ. 1991 Jul 20;303(6795):167–168. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6795.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hannay D. R. Primary care and public health. BMJ. 1993 Aug 28;307(6903):516–517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6903.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks N. R., Baker I. A. General practitioners' opinions of health services available to their patients. BMJ. 1991 Apr 27;302(6783):991–993. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6783.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keeley D. The fundholding debate: should practices reconsider the decision not to fundhold? BMJ. 1993 Mar 13;306(6879):697–698. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6879.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pipkorn U., Berge T. Long-term treatment with budesonide in vasomotor rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol. 1983 Jan-Feb;95(1-2):167–171. doi: 10.3109/00016488309130931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryrfeldt A., Andersson P., Edsbäcker S., Tönnesson M., Davies D., Pauwels R. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of budesonide, a selective glucocorticoid. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1982;122:86–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wisely I. C. General practitioner fundholding: experience in Grampian. BMJ. 1993 Mar 13;306(6879):695–697. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6879.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]