Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 1994 Mar 5;308(6929):654.

Variation in caesarean section rates. What difference does it make.

M Joffe
PMCID: PMC2539718  PMID: 8148726

Full text

PDF

Page 654

654

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett J. F., Jarvis G. J., Macdonald H. N., Buchan P. C., Tyrrell S. N., Lilford R. J. Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics. Lancet. 1990 Sep 1;336(8714):549–551. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goyert G. L., Bottoms S. F., Treadwell M. C., Nehra P. C. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 16;320(11):706–709. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903163201106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Potamitis T., Fouladi M., Aggarwal R. K., Jones H. S., Fielder A. R. General practitioners' awareness of different techniques of cataract surgery: implications for quality of care. BMJ. 1994 May 21;308(6940):1334–1335. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6940.1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Treffers P. E., Pel M. The rising trend for caesarean birth. BMJ. 1993 Oct 23;307(6911):1017–1018. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6911.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES