Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 1994 Mar 5;308(6929):652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6929.652a

Compliance in screening programmes. High compliance essential in cervical screening programme...

D Jenkins, S Gallivan, C Sherlaw-Johnson
PMCID: PMC2539732  PMID: 8148720

Full text

PDF

Page 652

652

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson G. H., Benedet J. L., Le Riche J. C., Matisic J. P., Thompson J. E. Invasive cancer of the cervix in British Columbia: a review of the demography and screening histories of 437 cases seen from 1985-1988. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;80(1):1–4. doi: 10.3109/01443619209029905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jones M. H., Jenkins D., Cuzick J., Wolfendale M. R., Jones J. J., Balogun-Lynch C., Usherwood M. M., Singer A. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance. Lancet. 1992 Jun 13;339(8807):1440–1443. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92031-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Robertson J. H., Woodend B. E., Crozier E. H., Hutchinson J. Risk of cervical cancer associated with mild dyskaryosis. BMJ. 1988 Jul 2;297(6640):18–21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6640.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Torgerson D. J., Donaldson C. An economic view of high compliance as a screening objective. BMJ. 1994 Jan 8;308(6921):117–119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES