Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1994 Apr 30;308(6937):1142–1144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1142

Do interventions that improve immunisation uptake also reduce social inequalities in uptake?

R Reading 1, A Colver 1, S Openshaw 1, S Jarvis 1
PMCID: PMC2540112  PMID: 8173457

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To investigate whether an intervention designed to improve overall immunisation uptake affected social inequalities in uptake. DESIGN--Cross-sectional small area analyses measuring immunisation uptake in cohorts of children before and after intervention. Small areas classified into five groups, from most deprived to most affluent, with Townsend deprivation score of census enumeration districts. SETTING--County of Northumberland. SUBJECTS--All children born in country in four birth cohorts (1981-2, 1985-6, 1987-8, and 1990-1) and still resident at time of analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Overall uptake in each cohort of pertussis, diphtheria, and measles immunisation, difference in uptake between most deprived and most affluent areas, and odds ratio of uptake between deprived and affluent areas. RESULTS--Coverage for pertussis immunisation rose from 53.4% in first cohort to 91.1% in final cohort. Coverage in the most deprived areas was lower than in the most affluent areas by 4.7%, 8.7%, 10.2%, and 7.0% respectively in successive cohorts, corresponding to an increase in odds ratio of uptake between deprived and affluent areas from 1.2 to 1.6 to 1.9 to 2.3. Coverage for diphtheria immunisation rose from 70.0% to 93.8%; differences between deprived and affluent areas changed from 8.6% to 8.3% to 9.0% to 5.5%, corresponding to odds ratios of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 2.6. Coverage for measles immunisation rose from 52.5% to 91.4%; differences between deprived and affluent areas changed from 9.1% to 5.7% to 8.2% to 3.6%, corresponding to odds ratios of 1.4, 1.4, 1.7, and 1.5. CONCLUSION--Despite substantial increase in immunisation uptake, inequalities between deprived and affluent areas persisted or became wider. Any reduction in inequality occurred only after uptake in affluent areas approached 95%. Interventions that improve overall uptake of preventive measures are unlikely to reduce social inequalities in uptake.

Full text

PDF
1142

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alwash R., McCarthy M. Measuring severity of injuries to children from home accidents. Arch Dis Child. 1988 Jun;63(6):635–638. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.6.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colver A. F. Health surveillance of preschool children: four years' experience. BMJ. 1990 May 12;300(6734):1246–1248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6734.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colver A. Immunisation and general practice. Lancet. 1989 Apr 22;1(8643):906–906. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92905-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jefferies S., McShane S., Oerton J., Victor C. R., Beardow R. Low immunization uptake rates in an inner-city health district: fact or fiction? J Public Health Med. 1991 Nov;13(4):312–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marsh G. N., Channing D. M. Narrowing the health gap between a deprived and an endowed community. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jan 16;296(6616):173–176. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6616.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nicoll A., Elliman D., Begg N. T. Immunisation: causes of failure and strategies and tactics for success. BMJ. 1989 Sep 30;299(6703):808–812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6703.808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reading R. Equity and community child health. Arch Dis Child. 1993 May;68(5):686–690. doi: 10.1136/adc.68.5.686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Reading R., Openshaw S. Do inaccuracies in small area deprivation analyses matter? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Jun;47(3):238–241. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.3.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scott E. A. Low immunisation rates: fact or fiction? Public Health. 1990 Jul;104(4):275–278. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80477-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wagstaff A., Paci P., van Doorslaer E. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):545–557. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Whitehead M., Dahlgren G. What can be done about inequalities in health? Lancet. 1991 Oct 26;338(8774):1059–1063. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91911-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES