Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1987 Mar;61(3):748–754. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.3.748-754.1987

Simian virus 40 associates with nuclear superstructures at early times of infection.

J B Watson, J D Gralla
PMCID: PMC254016  PMID: 3027402

Abstract

The association of infecting simian virus 40 with insoluble nuclear structures was assayed by disrupting infected nuclei and assaying insoluble fractions for virus. Three methods were used which lyse nuclei but maintain the insolubility of residual nuclear structures: sonication, high-salt-Triton-EDTA extraction, and low-salt-lithium diiodosalicylate extraction. After each type of nuclear extraction, infecting simian virus 40 remained associated with the residual nuclear structures. This association depended strictly on natural viral infections and on the use of buffers containing moderate amounts of salt and Mg2+ for the isolation of infected nuclei. These viral interactions exhibited behavior similar to host cell DNA interactions studied by analogous assays. Both viral DNA and coat proteins were found associated with the host cell nuclear superstructure. We concluding that at early times after infection the viral templates mimic the state of the host cell chromatin by attaching to the cellular nuclear matrix.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson R. P., Woo E. Organization in the cell nucleus: divalent cations modulate the distribution of condensed and diffuse chromatin. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;90(1):181–186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold E. A., Young K. E. Heterogeneity of chromatin: fractionation of sonicated rat liver chromatin by partial precipitation with Mg2+. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1974 Sep;164(1):73–89. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(74)90009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avila J., Saral R., Martin R. G., Khoury G. The temperature-sensitive defect in SV40 group D mutants. Virology. 1976 Aug;73(1):89–95. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(76)90063-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbanti-Brodano G., Swetly P., Koprowski H. Early events in the infection of permissive cells with simian virus 40: adsorption, penetration, and uncoating. J Virol. 1970 Jul;6(1):78–86. doi: 10.1128/jvi.6.1.78-86.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barry J. M., Merriam R. W. Swelling of hen erythrocyte nuclei in cytoplasm from Xenopus eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Mar;71(1):90–96. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90267-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benyajati C., Worcel A. Isolation, characterization, and structure of the folded interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):393–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berezney R., Buchholtz L. A. Isolation and characterization of rat liver nuclear matrices containing high molecular weight deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1981 Aug 18;20(17):4995–5002. doi: 10.1021/bi00520a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Identification of a nuclear protein matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Oct 23;60(4):1410–1417. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90355-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berrios M., Osheroff N., Fisher P. A. In situ localization of DNA topoisomerase II, a major polypeptide component of the Drosophila nuclear matrix fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(12):4142–4146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bodnar J. W., Jones C. J., Coombs D. H., Pearson G. D., Ward D. C. Proteins tightly bound to HeLa cell DNA at nuclear matrix attachment sites. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;3(9):1567–1579. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.9.1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Butel J. S., Rapp F. The effect of arabinofuranosylcytosine on the growth cycle of simian virus 40. Virology. 1965 Dec;27(4):490–495. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90174-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chou J. Y., Martin R. G. Complementation analysis of simian virus 40 mutants. J Virol. 1974 May;13(5):1101–1109. doi: 10.1128/jvi.13.5.1101-1109.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90761-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook P. R., Brazell I. A., Jost E. Characterization of nuclear structures containing superhelical DNA. J Cell Sci. 1976 Nov;22(2):303–324. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.2.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook P. R., Lang J., Hayday A., Lania L., Fried M., Chiswell D. J., Wyke J. A. Active viral genes in transformed cells lie close to the nuclear cage. EMBO J. 1982;1(4):447–452. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01189.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cremisi C. The appearance of DNase I hypersensitive sites at the 5' end of the late SV40 genes is correlated with the transcriptional switch. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Nov 25;9(22):5949–5964. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.22.5949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Davis A. H., Reudelhuber T. L., Garrard W. T. Varigated chromatin structures of mouse ribosomal RNA genes. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jun 15;167(1):133–155. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80038-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Earnshaw W. C., Halligan B., Cooke C. A., Heck M. M., Liu L. F. Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1706–1715. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Earnshaw W. C., Heck M. M. Localization of topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1716–1725. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. The organisation of chromatin loops: characterization of a scaffold attachment site. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):511–518. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. JENSEN F. C., GIRARDI A. J., GILDEN R. V., KOPROWSKI H. INFECTION OF HUMAN AND SIMIAN TISSUE CULTURES WITH ROUS SARCOMA VIRUS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Jul;52:53–59. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jackson D. A., Cook P. R. Replication occurs at a nucleoskeleton. EMBO J. 1986 Jun;5(6):1403–1410. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04374.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawson G. M., Knoll B. J., March C. J., Woo S. L., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Definition of 5' and 3' structural boundaries of the chromatin domain containing the ovalbumin multigene family. J Biol Chem. 1982 Feb 10;257(3):1501–1507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leake R. E., Trench M. E., Barry J. M. Effect of cations on the consideration of hen erythrocyte nuclei and its relation to gene activation. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Mar;71(1):17–26. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90257-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lebkowski J. S., Laemmli U. K. Non-histone proteins and long-range organization of HeLa interphase DNA. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):325–344. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90332-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ozer H. L. Synthesis and assembly of simian virus 40. I. Differential synthesis of intact virions and empty shells. J Virol. 1972 Jan;9(1):41–51. doi: 10.1128/jvi.9.1.41-51.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):817–828. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Razin S. V., Chernokhvostov V. V., Roodyn A. V., Zbarsky I. B., Georgiev G. P. Proteins tightly bound to DNA in the regions of DNA attachment to the skeletal structures of interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):65–73. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90361-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Razin S. V., Mantieva V. L., Georgiev G. P. The similarity of DNA sequences remaining bound to scaffold upon nuclease treatment of interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Nov 24;7(6):1713–1735. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Robb J. A., Martin R. G. Genetic analysis of simian virus 40. 3. Characterization of a temperature-sensitive mutant blocked at an early stage of productive infection in monkey cells. J Virol. 1972 Jun;9(6):956–968. doi: 10.1128/jvi.9.6.956-968.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Robinson S. I., Nelkin B. D., Vogelstein B. The ovalbumin gene is associated with the nuclear matrix of chicken oviduct cells. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):99–106. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90379-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rose S. M., Garrard W. T. Differentiation-dependent chromatin alterations precede and accompany transcription of immunoglobulin light chain genes. J Biol Chem. 1984 Jul 10;259(13):8534–8544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Small D., Nelkin B., Vogelstein B. The association of transcribed genes with the nuclear matrix of Drosophila cells during heat shock. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Apr 11;13(7):2413–2431. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.7.2413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith H. C., Berezney R., Brewster J. M., Rekosh D. Properties of adenoviral DNA bound to the nuclear matrix. Biochemistry. 1985 Feb 26;24(5):1197–1202. doi: 10.1021/bi00326a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Udvardy A., Schedl P., Sander M., Hsieh T. S. Novel partitioning of DNA cleavage sites for Drosophila topoisomerase II. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):933–941. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90353-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vogelstein B., Pardoll D. M., Coffey D. S. Supercoiled loops and eucaryotic DNA replicaton. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(1 Pt 1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weintraub H., Groudine M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science. 1976 Sep 3;193(4256):848–856. doi: 10.1126/science.948749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Williamson D. H., Fennell D. J. The use of fluorescent DNA-binding agent for detecting and separating yeast mitochondrial DNA. Methods Cell Biol. 1975;12:335–351. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60963-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang L., Rowe T. C., Nelson E. M., Liu L. F. In vivo mapping of DNA topoisomerase II-specific cleavage sites on SV40 chromatin. Cell. 1985 May;41(1):127–132. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES