Abstract
The recent growth in the numbers of published systematic reviews reflects growing recognition of their importance for improving knowledge about the effects of health care. In Britain the NHS R&D Programme has established two centres to prepare systematic reviews of existing information, and the Cochrane Collaboration--an international network of individuals and institutions--evolved to produce systematic, periodically updated reviews of randomised controlled trials. The large amount of existing evidence that needs to be considered creates a problem for the reporting of systematic reviews: the need to ensure that methods and results of systematic reviews are adequately described has to be reconciled with the limited space available in printed journals. A possible solution is the use of electronic publications: reviews could be published simultaneously in a short, printed form and in a more detailed electronic form. Electronic publications also have the advantage of the ease with which reviews may be updated as new evidence becomes available or mistakes are identified.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c7e5/7c7e564702ed6fb9b666b124f3e6c3a5d78b24a5" alt="862"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffbcd/ffbcdbfbf81e97c74d91033b826995dc3c6407c4" alt="863"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11c52/11c52913ed83fdb34c0697b742d9183d7e4e9fa9" alt="864"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab0c7/ab0c75e70c6b45e1caeb4f36e1ac7786f7772216" alt="865"
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Antman E. M., Lau J., Kupelnick B., Mosteller F., Chalmers T. C. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992 Jul 8;268(2):240–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalmers I., Enkin M., Keirse M. J. Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care. Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):411–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickersin K., Higgins K., Meinert C. L. Identification of meta-analyses. The need for standard terminology. Control Clin Trials. 1990 Feb;11(1):52–66. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90032-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B. Loose connections between peer-reviewed clinical journals and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 1;113(9):724–728. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huth E. J. Needed: review articles with more scientific rigor. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):470–471. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-470_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston M. E., Langton K. B., Haynes R. B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas J., Sisk J. E., Stocking B. From evidence to practice in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):405–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mulrow C. D. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485–488. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ. 1988 Apr 15;138(8):697–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paterson-Brown S., Wyatt J. C., Fisk N. M. Are clinicians interested in up to date reviews of effective care? BMJ. 1993 Dec 4;307(6917):1464–1464. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6917.1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders M. C., Dick J. S., Brown I. M., McPherson K., Chalmers I. The effects of hospital admission for bed rest on the duration of twin pregnancy: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1985 Oct 12;2(8459):793–795. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90792-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang P. H., Lau J., Chalmers T. C. Meta-analysis of effects of intensive blood-glucose control on late complications of type I diabetes. Lancet. 1993 May 22;341(8856):1306–1309. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90816-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yusuf S., Collins R., Peto R., Furberg C., Stampfer M. J., Goldhaber S. Z., Hennekens C. H. Intravenous and intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: overview of results on mortality, reinfarction and side-effects from 33 randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 1985 Jul;6(7):556–585. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yusuf S., Sleight P. Limitation of myocardial infarct size. Present status. Drugs. 1983 May;25(5):441–450. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198325050-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]