Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To determine what proportion of health promotion activities reported by the patient is recorded in the general practice notes and to compare these methods of assessing health promotion with audio tape analysis. DESIGN--Secondary analysis of data obtained in a controlled trial of differing appointment lengths. After each consultation the medical record was examined and the patient invited to completed a questionnaire. A subsample of consultations was audio taped. SETTING--Nottinghamshire. SUBJECTS--16 general practitioners from 10 practices. This report includes 3324 consultations with patients aged > or = 17, with data on measurement of blood pressure and advice about smoking and alcohol. RESULTS--Data from questionnaire and medical notes were available for 2281 consultations. Advice on smoking was recorded in the notes in 30.9% of cases in which a patient reported it (for alcohol and measurement of blood pressure, 44.4% and 82.7% of cases respectively). In 516 cases analysis of audio tape and review of records was performed. Advice on smoking was recorded in the patient's notes in 28.6% of cases in which it was detected on audio tape (for alcohol, 31.1% of cases). In 335 consultations data from audio tape and questionnaire were available. Advice on smoking was reported by patients in 73.9% of cases in which it was detected on audio tape (for alcohol, 75.0% of cases). CONCLUSIONS--Review of the medical record is a reasonably accurate method of assessing measurement of blood pressure in the consultation but would lead to significant underestimation of advice about smoking and alcohol.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker R. Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):487–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klein R. On the Oregon trail: rationing health care. BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ley P., Bradshaw P. W., Eaves D., Walker C. M. A method for increasing patients' recall of information presented by doctors. Psychol Med. 1973 May;3(2):217–220. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700048558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maitland J. M., Reid J., Taylor R. J. Two stage audit of cerebrovascular and coronary heart disease risk factor recording: the effect of case finding and screening programmes. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Apr;41(345):144–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mant D., McKinlay C., Fuller A., Randall T., Fullard E. M., Muir J. Three year follow up of patients with raised blood pressure identified at health checks in general practice. BMJ. 1989 May 20;298(6684):1360–1362. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6684.1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pill R. M., Jones-Elwyn G., Stott N. C. Opportunistic health promotion: quantity or quality? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 May;39(322):196–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pringle M., Robins S., Brown G. Timer: a new objective measure of consultation content and its application to computer assisted consultations. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jul 5;293(6538):20–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6538.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rethans J. J., Martin E., Metsemakers J. To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Apr;44(381):153–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silagy C., Muir J., Coulter A., Thorogood M., Yudkin P., Roe L. Lifestyle advice in general practice: rates recalled by patients. BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):871–874. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson A., McDonald P., Hayes L., Cooney J. Health promotion in the general practice consultation: a minute makes a difference. BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):227–230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6821.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]