Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1511. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1511a

Glycated haemoglobin values. Methodological discrepancies are not important.

A S Wierzbicki, M Bickel, T M Reynolds
PMCID: PMC2541654  PMID: 7804063

Full text

PDF

Page 1511

1511

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baynes J. W., Bunn H. F., Goldstein D., Harris M., Martin D. B., Peterson C., Winterhalter K. National Diabetes Data Group: report of the expert committee on glucosylated hemoglobin. Diabetes Care. 1984 Nov-Dec;7(6):602–606. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.6.602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruns D. E. Standardization, calibration, and the care of diabetic patients. Clin Chem. 1992 Dec;38(12):2363–2364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pickup J. C., Crook M. A., Tutt P. Blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin measurement in hospital: which method? Diabet Med. 1993 Jun;10(5):402–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1993.tb00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES