Abstract
OBJECTIVES--To determine the feasibility of enrolling non-attenders of a population based cardiovascular risk reduction programme (the British family heart study) into a further, similar programme and to assess the effect of non-attendance on the effectiveness of the programme. DESIGN--Follow up of non-attenders by practice nurses, including home visits if necessary, to administer questionnaires and obtain physiological measurements. SETTING--Eight general practices across England, Scotland, and Wales. SUBJECTS--Non-attenders in a cardiovascular risk factor screening and intervention programme compared with attenders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Number of non-attenders enrolled; sociodemographic characteristics; personal and family history of coronary heart disease; cardiovascular risk factors; and total coronary risk score. RESULTS--Data were collected from 106 (17%) of the 608 non-attending families (99 men and 42 women). Of the 543 non-attending families from five practices that attempted complete follow up, 256 had moved away or died. Only 76 were eventually enrolled into the study. The prevalence of coronary heart disease and a family history of coronary heart disease were similar among non-attenders and attenders as were the individual coronary risk factors studied except smoking. Women non-attenders were more likely to be current cigarette smokers than attenders (15/42 v 202/948, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS--The intensive follow up of non-attenders resulted in real intervention opportunities in only a small number. Since the effect of any intervention in a population is reduced by non-attendance audit of preventive medical programmes aimed at the population should allow for the effect of non-attenders on the overall results.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Criqui M. H., Barrett-Connor E., Austin M. Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Nov;108(5):367–372. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Difford F., Telling J. P., Davies K. R., Fornear J. E., Reading C. A. Continuous opportunistic and systematic screening for hypertension with computer help: analysis of non-responders. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 May 2;294(6580):1130–1132. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6580.1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinmonth A. L., Davies G. Action plan for preventing coronary heart disease. BMJ. 1991 Oct 26;303(6809):1060–1060. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1060-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pill R., French J., Harding K., Stott N. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Feb;38(307):53–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tunstall-Pedoe H. The Dundee coronary risk-disk for management of change in risk factors. BMJ. 1991 Sep 28;303(6805):744–747. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6805.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wrench J. G., Irvine R. Coronary heart disease: account of a preventive clinic in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Sep;34(266):477–481. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]