Abstract
Congenital and acquired diseases of the biliary tree, or cholangiopathies, represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality in both children and adults. In late stages of the disease, cholangiocytes can no longer proliferate, resulting in loss of bile ducts, increased fibrosis, and ultimately cirrhosis and liver failure. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition has been proposed as a potential mechanism underlying both cholangiocyte proliferation and fibrogenesis in biliary diseases. In this issue of the JCI, using a myofibroblast-cholangiocyte coculture system and genetically modified mice, Omenetti and colleagues present evidence supporting the importance of paracrine hedgehog signaling between the two cell types and increased expression of mesenchymal markers in cholangiocytes (see the related article beginning on page 3331). These findings set the stage for future studies to further investigate the contribution of hedgehog signaling in both cholangiocyte repair and fibrogenesis in biliary diseases.
Cholangiopathies represent a spectrum of both congenital and acquired disorders characterized by chronic bile duct injury (reviewed in refs. 1, 2). Although cholangiocytes initially have the ability to proliferate in response to cellular injury, late-stage cholangiopathies are associated with loss of bile ducts and progressive fibrosis, resulting in cirrhosis and liver failure.
Ductular reactions, composed of small and apparently proliferating cholangiocytes in the periportal region, are detected in many forms of chronic liver injury, including those that primarily effect cholangiocytes. These cholangiocytes have been termed reactive cholangiocytes, and they acquire phenotypic behaviors not observed in the noninjured state, including secretion of inflammatory cytokines, chemoattractant proteins, and inhibitors of apoptosis. Reactive cholangiocytes are believed to arise from a progenitor cell compartment located along the terminal bile ductules and in the canal of Hering (2). However, the origin of these reactive cholangiocytes has not yet been established definitively. Evidence from experimental animal models has shown that crosstalk among reactive cholangiocytes, myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells contributes to cholangiocyte proliferation as well as the fibrotic response (1, 2). The identity and relative contribution of these paracrine mediators and the mechanisms that directly regulate cholangiocyte proliferation and fibrogenesis remain incompletely understood.
Potential role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cholestatic liver injury
In addition to secreting numerous regulatory molecules in response to cholangiocyte injury, reactive cholangiocytes lose some of their epithelial phenotypic characteristics and acquire a more mesenchymal phenotype characterized by the loss of E-cadherin and increased expression of some mesenchymal markers. During epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), epithelial cells lose polarity and cell-cell communication and acquire migratory and invasive phenotypic cellular behaviors. This process is important for tissue remodeling during normal development and more recently has been recognized as a component of repair processes in fibrotic diseases and malignancy (3, 4). EMT has been implicated in fibrotic diseases of the biliary tract as a potential mechanism for disappearance of bile ductules and concomitant increase in fibrosis (5–7). How EMT might be regulated in chronic biliary diseases is not known.
Previously, Omenetti and colleagues reported that the hedgehog signaling pathway is activated in both cholangiocytes and fibroblastic cells in experimental models of biliary injury and in livers of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) (8, 9). Because the hedgehog signaling pathway is known to be a positive effector of EMT in other tissues, the authors hypothesized that hedgehog signaling pathways could also be involved in EMT in response to cholestatic liver injury and fibrosis (10, 11).
The study by Omenetti and colleagues in the current issue of the JCI (12) tests this hypothesis, demonstrating that the mesenchymal marker S100A4 is expressed in a subset of ductular and fibroblastic cells in livers of patients with PBC, confirming previous findings (5, 6). Using a rat model of reversible chronic bile duct obstruction, they further show that expression of this mesenchymal marker is induced following bile duct obstruction. They confirm that this activation of a mesenchymal marker occurs within cholangiocytes by demonstrating both upregulation of mesenchymal markers and decreased expression of epithelial markers in cholangiocytes isolated from the livers of bile duct–ligated rats. Using the same approach, they demonstrate that cholangiocytes isolated from bile duct–ligated livers express hedgehog proteins and these hedgehog proteins are coexpressed with mesenchymal markers in ductular cells from the livers of patients with PBC.
These findings define a novel association between the expression of hedgehog proteins and mesenchymal markers in cholangiocytes after bile duct injury (12). To establish a functional relationship between hedgehog proteins and EMT, the authors used an in vitro system in which a cholangiocyte cell line is cocultured with a hepatic stellate cell line to test whether paracrine hedgehog signaling not only affects expression of mesenchymal markers but also increases the migratory behavior of cholangiocytes. They demonstrate that soluble factors expressed by hepatic stellate cells induce expression of mesenchymal markers in cholangiocytes. More importantly, using carefully performed cell migration assays, the authors show that soluble factors from hepatic stellate cells increase cholangiocyte motility and migration, two hallmarks of the mesenchymal phenotype. When conditioned medium from hepatic stellate cells was treated with hedgehog-neutralizing antibodies, the expression of mesenchymal markers and cholangiocyte migratory behavior were significantly reduced. This experiment provides what is believed to be the first functional evidence that hepatic stellate cells can influence cholangiocyte migratory behavior through a mechanism that is dependent upon hedgehog-mediated paracrine signaling (Figure 1).
To investigate whether alterations in hedgehog signaling are associated with increased EMT in vivo, Omenetti and colleagues performed bile duct ligation on mice haploinsufficient for the hedgehog inhibitor patched (Ptc) (12); these mice exhibit increased hedgehog signaling activity. As predicted, the livers of the mice showed enhanced fibrogenesis in response to bile duct ligation and elevated expression of the hedgehog transcription factor Gli2 and several mesenchymal markers. In the future, it will be important to establish that the change in cellular behavior of the cholangiocyte cell line, especially with respect to cell migration, seen in vitro can also be linked to hedgehog signaling in vivo.
Future directions
The current study provides compelling evidence of hepatic stellate cell secretion of hedgehog proteins that induce expression of mesenchymal marker genes and increase cholangiocyte migration in a coculture system (12). While Omenetti and colleagues demonstrate that increased hedgehog signaling in vivo is associated with increased fibrogenesis, the mechanism by which this occurs remains to be addressed. It is likely that hedgehog-mediated activation of cholangiocytes during bile duct injury results in the secretion of soluble factors that in turn enhance activation of hepatic stellate and other myofibroblastic cells, resulting in increased fibrogenesis. To explore this hypothesis, it might be possible to utilize the hepatic stellate cell/cholangiocyte system to identify factors secreted by cholangiocytes that result in hepatic stellate cell and portal fibroblast activation.
An important concept raised by the current study (12) stems from the observation that some of the cholangiocytes within the ductular reactions costained for Gli2 and either the mesenchymal marker S100A4 or vimentin. It is plausible that EMT occurs in a subset of reactive cholangiocytes within the ductular reaction. As proposed by the authors, ductular cells that respond to hedgehog signaling may represent a hepatic progenitor cell population capable of differentiating into fibrogenic cell types in response to liver injury. Support for this comes from cell culture studies indicating that cholangiocytes are capable of this type of transformation in vitro (6). In addition, Yovchev and colleagues have isolated a subset of hepatic progenitor cells that express both epithelial and mesenchymal markers, including several markers of EMT that are capable of repopulating injured rat liver (13). It would be useful to investigate whether the progenitor cells isolated in their study also respond to hedgehog signaling in a coculture system. Such evidence would provide support for the notion that hedgehog-responsive ductular cells represent a hepatic progenitor cell population. However, definitive proof that cholangiocytes are able to transdifferentiate into myofibroblasts will require in vivo lineage tracing with cholangiocyte-specific marker genes.
We can conclude from this study (12) that hedgehog signaling is likely to mediate both beneficial and deleterious effects of liver injury, depending upon the balance between its action as a survival factor for cholangiocytes and as a profibrogenic agent. Further characterization of the mechanisms of hepatic repair regulated by the hedgehog pathway and potential synergistic interaction with other signaling pathways involved in both cholangiocyte proliferation and fibrogenesis will be necessary prior to attempting to enhance or inhibit hedgehog signaling in chronic fibrotic liver diseases.
Acknowledgments
I thank Rebecca Wells, Klaus H. Kaestner, and Joshua R. Friedman for helpful suggestions on the manuscript.
Footnotes
Nonstandard abbreviations used: EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis.
Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Citation for this article: J. Clin. Invest. 118:3263–3265 (2008). doi:10.1172/JCI37189.
See the related article beginning on page 3331.
References
- 1.Xia X., et al. Cholangiocyte injury and ductopenic syndromes. Semin. Liver Dis. 2007;27:401–412. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-991516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lazaridis K.N., Strazzabosco M., Larusso N.F. The cholangiopathies: disorders of biliary epithelia. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1565–1577. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee J.M., Dedhar S., Kalluri R., Thompson E.W. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development, and disease. J. Cell Biol. 2006;172:973–981. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200601018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baum B., Settleman J., Quinlan M.P. Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states in development and disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008;19:294–308. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Robertson H., Kirby J.A., Yip W.W., Jones D.E., Burt A.D. Biliary epithelial-mesenchymal transition in posttransplantation recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45:977–981. doi: 10.1002/hep.21624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rygiel K.A., et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition contributes to portal tract fibrogenesis during human chronic liver disease. Lab. Invest. 2008;88:112–123. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Diaz R., et al. Evidence for the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in biliary atresia fibrosis. Hum. Pathol. 2008;39:102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Omenetti A., et al. Hedgehog-mediated mesenchymal-epithelial interactions modulate hepatic response to bile duct ligation. Lab. Invest. 2007;87:499–514. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Omenetti A., et al. The hedgehog pathway regulates remodeling responses to biliary obstruction in rats. Gut. 2008;57:1275–1282. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.148619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huber M.A., Kraut N., Beug H. Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005;17:548–558. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li X., Deng W., Lobo-Ruppert S.M., Ruppert J.M. Gli1 acts through Snail and E-cadherin to promote nuclear signaling by beta-catenin. Oncogene. 2007;26:4489–4498. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Omenetti A., et al. Hedgehog signaling regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition during biliary fibrosis in rodents and humans. J. Clin. Invest. . 2008;118:3331–3342. doi: 10.1172/JCI35875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yovchev M.I., et al. Identification of adult hepatic progenitor cells capable of repopulating injured rat liver. Hepatology. 2008;47:636–647. doi: 10.1002/hep.22047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]