Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1988 Feb 6;296(6619):386–391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6619.386

Young age as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: analysis of population based data from 10 022 cases

Clive A Meanwell, Krystyna A Kelly, Susan Wilson, Claudia Roginski, Ciaran Woodman, Rod Griffiths, George Blackledge
PMCID: PMC2544972  PMID: 3125911

Abstract

The effect of young age on survival in cervical cancer is not fully known, although evidence has suggested that it is a poor prognostic factor and that young patients should therefore be treated differently from older patients. All 10 022 cases of invasive cervical cancer in the west Midlands during 1957-81, which comprised 10% of the cases in England and Wales, were analysed to determine the prognostic effect of age. Univariate analysis showed a median survival time of 54 months for all cases, with survival rates at five years of 69% for patients aged under 40 and 45% for those aged 40 or older (χ12 (log rank)=331·4; p<0·0001). This difference remained significant after stratification for stage (χ12 (log rank)=7·1; p=0·008). Cox regression analysis with nine covariables, including age and year of registration, reaffirmed the importance of conventional prognostic factors such as stage of disease, size of tumour, state of lymph nodes, and differentiation of the tumour. After allowance was made for the effects of other prognostic factors young age was found to be a small but significant favourable factor that did not change during the period of the study. Estimated survival distributions obtained from the Cox model showed that for women presenting with the common characteristics associated with stage Ib disease who were treated with radical radiotherapy the survival rate at five years fell non-linearly from 71% in the group aged 25-29 to 65% in the group aged 65-69.

Young age alone is not a reason to alter existing policies for treatment for patients with invasive cervical cancer.

Full text

PDF
386

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adcock L. L., Julian T. M., Okagaki T., Jones T. K., Prem K. A., Twiggs L. B., Potish R. A., Phillips G. L. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix FIGO Stage I-B. Gynecol Oncol. 1982 Oct;14(2):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(82)90090-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baltzer J., Koepcke W., Lohe K. J., Ober K. G., Zander J. Age and 5-year survival rates in patients with operated carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1982 Oct;14(2):220–224. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(82)90093-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beecham J. B., Halvorsen T., Kolbenstvedt A. Histologic classification, lymph node metastases, and patient survival in stage IB cervical carcinoma: an analysis of 245 uniformly treated cases. Gynecol Oncol. 1978 Feb;6(1):95–105. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(78)90009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campion M. J., Singer A., Mitchell H. S. Complacency in diagnosis of cervical cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 May 23;294(6583):1337–1339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6583.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carmichael J. A., Clarke D. H., Moher D., Ohlke I. D., Karchmar E. J. Cervical carcinoma in women aged 34 and younger. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Feb;154(2):264–269. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90652-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chung C. K., Stryker J. A., Ward S. P., Nahhas W. A., Mortel R. Histologic grade and prognosis of carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 May;57(5):636–642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cook G. A., Draper G. J. Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain. Br J Cancer. 1984 Sep;50(3):367–375. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1984.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DECKER D. G., FRICKE R. E., PRATT J. H. Invasive carcinoma of the cervix in young women. J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Aug 20;158(16):1417–1420. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02960160011004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall S. W., Monaghan J. M. Invasive carcinoma of the cervix in younger women. Lancet. 1983 Sep 24;2(8352):731–731. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92262-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kyriakos M., Kempson R. L., Perez C. A. Carcinoma of the cervix in young women. I. Invasive carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Dec;38(6):930–944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LINDELL A. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix; incidence and influence of age; a statistical study. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1952;92:1–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LINDELL A. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix; incidence and influence of age; a statistical study. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1952;92:1–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mann W. J., Jr, Levy D., Hatch K. D., Shingleton H. M., Soong S. J. Prognostic significance of age in stage I carcinoma of the cervix. South Med J. 1980 Sep;73(9):1186–1188. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198009000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morgan L. S., Nelson J. H., Jr Surgical treatment of early cervical cancer. Semin Oncol. 1982 Sep;9(3):312–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peto R., Pike M. C., Armitage P., Breslow N. E., Cox D. R., Howard S. V., Mantel N., McPherson K., Peto J., Smith P. G. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. Br J Cancer. 1977 Jan;35(1):1–39. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1977.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Piver M. S., Chung W. S. Prognostic significance of cervical lesion size and pelvic node metastases in cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Nov;46(5):507–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Russell J. M., Blair V., Hunter R. D. Cervical carcinoma: prognosis in younger patients. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Aug 1;295(6593):300–303. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6593.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rutledge F. N., Galakatos A. E., Wharton J. T., Smith J. P. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 May;122(2):236–245. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33496-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shepherd J. H. Surgical management of early invasive cervical cancer. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Mar;12(1):183–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shingleton H. M., Gore H., Bradley D. H., Soong S. J. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix. I. Clinical evaluation and pathologic features. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Apr 1;139(7):799–814. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90547-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stanhope C. R., Smith J. P., Wharton J. T., Rutledge F. N., Fletcher G. H., Gallager H. S. Carcinoma of the cervix: the effect of age on survival. Gynecol Oncol. 1980 Oct;10(2):188–193. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(80)90080-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Nagel J. R., Jr, Donaldson E. S., Parker J. C., Van Dyke A. H., Wood E. G. The prognostic significance of cell type and lesion size in patients with cervical cancer treated by radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 1977 Jun;5(2):142–151. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(77)90018-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WENTZ W. B., REAGAN J. W. Survival in cervical cancer with respect to cell type. Cancer. 1959 Mar-Apr;12(2):384–388. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195903/04)12:2<384::aid-cncr2820120222>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ward B. G., Shepherd J. H., Monaghan J. M. Occult advanced cervical cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 May 4;290(6478):1301–1302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6478.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES