Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Oct 26;127(42):14542–14543. doi: 10.1021/ja053700i

Proton-Catalyzed Hydroamination and Hydroarylation Reactions of Anilines and Alkenes

A Dramatic Effect of Counteranions on Reaction Efficiency

Laura L Anderson 1, John Arnold 1, Robert G Bergman 1
PMCID: PMC2546609  NIHMSID: NIHMS65094  PMID: 16231885

Acid-catalyzed additions of amines to alkenes are generally unsuccessful due to the buffering effect of the amine substrate.1 Friedel—Crafts alkylations of arylamines are hindered by coordination of the amine to the Lewis acid catalyst.2 A recent communication by Hartwig et al. reports that several common Brønsted acids catalyze the intramolecular hydroamination of tosyl-protected amino olefins.3 Beller and co-workers have reported that alkylations of electron-rich anilines with styrene are promoted with HBF4·Et2O.2b,4 Herein we report the first homogeneous5 acid catalyst that promotes both hydroamination and hydroarylation reactions of anilines and alkenes, including simple cyclic alkenes and dienes. These transformations are air- and moisture-tolerant and can be controlled to favor either N—H or Ar—H addition products based on reaction conditions and aniline substitution pattern. The key to the activity of this system is that the acid counteranion has a dramatic effect on reaction efficiency.

In the course of our studies on metal-catalyzed hydroamination reactions,6 we found that Ph3CB(C6F5)4 (1) catalyzes the reaction of norbornene with aniline. Both hydroamination (2) and ortho-hydroarylation (3) products are formed using 5 mol % of 1 (eq 1).7

graphic file with name nihms-65094-ig0001.jpg (1)

To determine the role of the trityl cation, the above reaction was run in the presence of several trapping reagents. The addition of radical traps, such as 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol and 1,4-cyclohexadiene, did not affect the outcome of the reaction. In contrast, the addition of one catalytic equivalent of NEt3 completely inhibited both hydroamination and hydroarylation, suggesting that the reaction is acid-catalyzed.

We anticipated that the strongest acid in the reaction solution would be an anilinium salt.8 Accordingly, PhNH3B(C6F5)4·Et2O(4) was synthesized and shown to be as competent as 1, affording an identical product distribution (Table 1, entry 2). As shown in Table 1, several other anilinium salts and strong acids were screened as catalysts for the addition of aniline to norbornene. It was assumed that the acids in entries 3, 4, and 6 would rapidly react with aniline in the reaction mixture to form the corresponding anilinium salts. As expected, HOTf provided a yield similar to that observed with anilinium triflate. Analogous reactivity was anticipated for H(Et2O)2.5B(C6F5)4 (5) and 4; however, a significant decrease in reactivity was observed for 5. This discrepancy may be caused by the additional 1.5 equiv of ether associated with 5 and coincides with a lack of reactivity of these catalysts in donor solvents.9 The trend in reactivity is an increase in catalytic efficiency with decreasing anion coordination ability (BPh4- < OTf- < NTf2- < B(C6F5)4-).10 This suggests that the effective acidity of the anilinium salt in benzene increases with decreasing anion coordination ability and thereby facilitates protonation of the alkene.11 It has previously been shown that TFA does not catalyze the hydroamination of styrene with aniline. These results are consistent with our observations assuming that trifluoroacetate is a more strongly coordinating anion than OTf-.1b

Table 1.

Acid Catalysts for the Hydroamination and Hydroarylation of Norbornene graphic file with name nihms-65094-t0004.jpg

entry catalyst %yielda 2:3a
1 Ph3CB(C6F5)4 (1) 58 1:1
2 PhNH3B(C6F5)4·Et2O(4) 60 1:1
3 H(Et2O)2.5B(C6F5)4 (5) 33 1:1
4 HNTf2 35 1:1
5 PhNH3OTf 19 1:1
6 HOTf 13 1:1
7 PhNH3BPh4 0
a

Combined yield of 2 and 3. Yields and product ratios were determined by GC.

After determining that 4 was the optimal catalyst for the hydroamination/hydroarylation reaction, a variety of substituted anilines were evaluated to probe steric and electronic effects on product distribution. As shown in Table 2, the addition reaction tolerates substitution on the nitrogen as well as the aromatic ring of the aniline. The ortho-addition is favored for the hydroarylation products unless the ortho-positions of the aniline substrate are blocked. Electron-withdrawing substituents on the aniline increase the overall yield of the reaction and favor formation of the hydroamination product.7b Surprisingly, using aniline as a solvent does not affect the product ratio but decreases the overall yield of the transformation.

Table 2.

Effect of Aniline Substitution on Hydroamination and Hydroarylation Product Ratios graphic file with name nihms-65094-t0005.jpg

entry X % yielda 6:7
1 H 84 1:1
2 4-Cl 56 (55b) only 6
3 4-OMe 34 1:2
4 2,6-Me2 50c 2:3d,e
5 N-Me 55b 1:4d
6 3,5-CF3 80 only 6
a

Combined yield of 6 and 7.

b

With 5 mol % of 3, 72 h.

c

GC yield.

d

GC ratio of isomers.

e

7 is the p-hydroarylation product.

Compound 4 also catalyzes the hydroamination and hydroarylation reactions of substituted styrenes (Table 3).12 Notably, these transformations require lower temperatures and shorter reaction times than the norbornene reactions and are facilitated by electron-donating substituents on the styrene substrate (OMe vs Cl) and electron-withdrawing substituents on the aniline (OMe vs Cl or CF3). The para-substituted hydroarylation products are favored for these styrene substrates unless the para-position is blocked. These observations are consistent with the intermediacy of a stabilized carbocation and suggest that these transformations proceed along a reaction pathway similar to that of acid-catalyzed hydration, where either the heteroatom or the aromatic ring can act as the nucleophile (Scheme 1).13 The difference in the orthopara selectivity between norbornene and styrene hydroarylation products may be caused by differences in the stabilities of protonated intermediates.13

Table 3.

Hydroamination and Hydroarylation Reactions of Vinyl Arenes (Unless noted, yields are % yields determined by 1H NMR) graphic file with name nihms-65094-t0006.jpg

entry R X T (°C) t (h) yield 8:9:10
1a OMe H 45 1 34 87:3:10
2a OMe H 45 4 83 57:8:35
3 OMe H 45 8 72b 25:10:65
4 OMe H 75 4 93 4:22:74
5 OMe 4-OMe 45 51 82b 90:10:0
6 OMe 4-OMe 75 24 85b 20:80:0
7a Cl 4-Cl 105 1 89 50:50:0
8a Cl 4-Cl 105 4 99 25:75:0
9a Cl 3,5-CF3 45 3 52 100:0:0
10 Cl 3,5-CF3 45 24 63b 100:0:0
11 OMe 3-Cl 25 5 82b 40:60:0
12 OMe 3-Cl 45 12 71b 0:100:0
a

Time points from single NMR tube experiments.

b

Combined % yields of isolated products.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Proposed Mechanism

graphic file with name nihms-65094-ig0002.jpg (5)

The most notable trend in Table 3 is that N—H addition dominates at short reaction times, and Ar—H addition is the major product at longer reaction times and higher temperatures (Table 3, entries 1–4). Specifically, the yield of the hydroarylation product increases at the expense of the hydroamination product as the reaction proceeds. A control experiment demonstrated that isolated 11 undergoes a Hofmann—Martius rearrangement14 in the presence of 5 mol % of 4 to afford 12 (eq 5).4,12 This observed conversion of hydroamination to hydroarylation products allows for preferential generation of either the kinetic or the thermodynamic product based on reaction time and temperature.

Cyclic alkenes and dienes undergo analogous addition reactions (Table 4). These substrates give primarily hydroarylation products when treated with aniline; however, electron-poor anilines provide hydroamination products. Although these reactions are unoptimized, they illustrate the potential scope of this proton-catalyzed transformation.

Table 4.

Hydroamination and Hydroarylation Reactions of Other Unsaturated Substrates graphic file with name nihms-65094-t0007.jpg

entry alkene X T (°C) % yield 13:14
1a cyclopentene H 135 39 0:1
2a cis-cyclooctene H 135 45c 1:3
3b cyclohexadiene H 105 56 0:1
4b cyclohexadiene 3,5-CF3 75 20 1:0
a

Alkene:aniline (1:1), chlorobenzene, 7 days.

b

Alkene:aniline (1:2), benzene, 12 h.

c

NMR yield of 13 and 14.

In conclusion, PhNH3B(C6F5)4 has been identified as a new catalyst for the hydroamination and hydroarylation of several activated alkenes with anilines. We are currently investigating the details of the mechanism of this transformation and how to further control the selectivity for N—H and Ar—H additions. The control experiment used to identify this catalyst should also serve as a reminder that acid catalysis exists as a possibility in many metal-catalyzed systems and should always be investigated.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. GM-25459 to R.G.B.). We are grateful to Prof. G. Coates for drawing our attention to ref 4.

References

  • (1) (a).Muller TE, Beller M. Chem. Rev. 1998;98:675. doi: 10.1021/cr960433d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Katwatsura M, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:9546. [Google Scholar]
  • (2) (a).Kobayashi S, Komoto I, Matsuo J-I. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001;343:71. [Google Scholar]; (b) Beller M, Thiel OR, Trauthwein H. Synlett. 1999:243. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Schlummer B, Hartwig JF. Org. Lett. 2002;4:1471. doi: 10.1021/ol025659j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).This reaction has also been observed at high temperatures with HCl.Hart H, Kosak JR. J. Org. Chem. 1962;27:116.
  • (5) (a).For zeolite-catalyzed hydroamination, see: Penzien J, Su RQ, Mueller TE. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2002;182–183:489. For zeolitecatalyzed hydroarylation, see: Janssens B, Catry P, Claessens R, Baron G, Jacobs PA. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1997;105B:1211.
  • (6).Anderson LL, Arnold J, Bergman RG. Org. Lett. 2004;6:2591. doi: 10.1021/ol049084x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7) (a).This reaction has also been observed with Rh and Ti catalysts. Brunet JJ, Commenges G, Neibecker D, Philippot K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1994;469:221. Ackermann L, Kaspar LT, Gschrei CJ. Org. Lett. 2004;6:2515. doi: 10.1021/ol049282o.
  • (8).In the Ph3CB(C6F5)4-catalyzed reaction, the trityl cation could attack the aniline substrate to form an anilinium salt.
  • (9).The reaction can be performed in benzene, toluene, or chlorobenzene. No reaction is observed in CH2Cl2, DMF, acetonitrile, THF, or ethanol.
  • (10) (a).For similar anion effects with transition-metal catalysts, see: Burling S, Field LD, Messerle BA, Turner P. Organometallics. 2004;23:1714. Muller TE, Grosche M, Herdtweck E, Pleier AK, Walter E, Yan YK. Organometallics. 2000;19:170. (c)Ref 1b.
  • (11).Ion pair basicities can differ from corresponding ionic basicities. Streitwieser A, Kim Y-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:11783.
  • (12).For a recent example of acid-catalyzed aniline substitution, see: Cherian AE, Domski GJ, Rose JM, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. Org. Lett. doi: 10.1021/ol051916j. Submitted.
  • (13).See Supporting Information for details on the proposed mechanism.
  • (14).March J. Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure. 4th John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1992. p. 560. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES