Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2008 Jul 7;74(17):5402–5407. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02689-07

Rapid Identification and Typing of Listeria Species by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

Sukhadeo B Barbuddhe 1, Thomas Maier 2, Gerold Schwarz 2, Markus Kostrzewa 2, Herbert Hof 3, Eugen Domann 1, Trinad Chakraborty 1, Torsten Hain 1,*
PMCID: PMC2546641  PMID: 18606788

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a food-borne pathogen that is the causative agent of human listeriosis, an opportunistic infection that primarily infects pregnant women and immunologically compromised individuals. Rapid, accurate discrimination between Listeria strains is essential for appropriate therapeutic management and timely intervention for infection control. A rapid method involving matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) that shows promise for identification of Listeria species and typing and even allows for differentiation at the level of clonal lineages among pathogenic strains of L. monocytogenes is presented. A total of 146 strains of different Listeria species and serotypes as well as clinical isolates were analyzed. The method was compared with the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of 48 Listeria strains comprising L. monocytogenes strains isolated from food-borne epidemics and sporadic cases, isolates representing different serotypes, and a number of Listeria strains whose genomes have been completely sequenced. Following a short inactivation/extraction procedure, cell material from a bacterial colony was deposited on a sample target, dried, overlaid with a matrix necessary for the MALDI process, and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. This technique examines the chemistry of major proteins, yielding profile spectra consisting of a series of peaks, a characteristic “fingerprint” mainly derived from ribosomal proteins. Specimens can be prepared in a few minutes from plate or liquid cultures, and a spectrum can be obtained within 1 minute. Mass spectra derived from Listeria isolates showed characteristic peaks, conserved at both the species and lineage levels. MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting may have potential for Listeria identification and subtyping and may improve infection control measures.


The genus Listeria consists of a group of gram-positive bacteria of low G+C content with six species, Listeria monocytogenes, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, L. innocua, L. welshimeri, and L. grayi. However, only L. monocytogenes and L. ivanovii exhibit pathogenic features, human cases of L. ivanovii infection being quite rare (8). L. monocytogenes is a food-borne pathogen that is the causative agent of human listeriosis, an opportunistic infection that primarily infects pregnant women and immunologically compromised individuals. Approximately 2,500 human listeriosis cases occur annually in the United States, resulting in 500 deaths (28). Meat, poultry, dairy, and vegetable products have all been implicated as vehicles of listeriosis (21). Since food-borne listeriosis was first reported in 1981 (34), food-borne outbreaks of L. monocytogenes have been documented worldwide (20).

Listeria monocytogenes has a strongly clonal population structure (5). L. monocytogenes strains are serotyped according to variation in the somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens (35). By using various genetic typing techniques, L. monocytogenes can be further classified into three lineages, of which lineage I encompasses serotypes 1/2b, 3b, 4b, 4d, and 4e; lineage II includes serotypes 1/2a, 1/2c, 3a, and 3c; and lineage III comprises serotypes 4a and 4c (29, 30, 42, 43). Although more than 12 serotypes of L. monocytogenes have been described (15), only 3 serotypes (1/2a, 1/2b, and 4b) cause the vast majority of clinical cases. Because of the importance of L. monocytogenes to human health, a number of discriminatory subtyping and identification methods for studying the epidemiology of this organism have been described (9, 14, 26, 42). Currently pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the most commonly employed subtyping technique, but new technologies are constantly introduced and tested in hopes of increasing the resolution, speed, and reproducibility of L. monocytogenes subtyping; these include multilocus sequence subtyping (33), ribotyping (43), and microarray genomic analysis (3). Most of the current techniques for the epidemiological identification of microorganisms are laborious and time-consuming. Although rapid methods to detect Listeria spp. based on PCR have been developed, some problems remain, such as the identification of atypical strains.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has become a valuable tool for the analysis of microorganisms (22, 32). The accuracy and speed of data acquisition by MALDI-TOF MS make this a potentially important tool for biological public health hazards, food processing, blood screening, and disease diagnoses. Other MS techniques have utilized pyrolysis gas chromatography/MS (13), fast atom bombardment MS (16, 17), and electrospray ionization MS (36) to obtain bacterial profiles. But all these techniques primarily focus on the low-molecular-weight components, e.g., lipids, of the cell. The MALDI technique couples high sensitivity with accuracy and is ideal for the detection of high- and low-molecular-weight proteins. MALDI-TOF MS has the potential for rapidly distinguishing between pathogenic and nonpathogenic species of bacteria (22, 23). In addition, mass spectra obtained from unknown bacterial samples can be used for comparison with reference libraries of known organisms for a correct identification (19). This concept of using a reference database with which unknown bacterial samples can be identified on the basis of comparisons with reference spectra currently is the most promising approach for microorganism identification based on MALDI-TOF MS. The goal is the elucidation of a reproducible genus-, species-, and strain-specific “fingerprint” for any given organism. Various attempts to apply MALDI-TOF MS to the identification and typing of bacteria have been described (2, 4). Early protocols involved solvent extraction and chemical modification before analysis, but some methods use simple sample preparation and direct analysis via appropriate ionization methods (37). Further work in this field was focused on investigations of the reproducibility of these spectra (41) and the possibility of coupling MALDI measurements with database analysis (1, 10).

In this study, the objective was to develop a robust method to analyze the extracts of Listeria species and strains by MALDI-TOF MS and to evaluate the reproducibility of this method. An additional objective was to establish a library of mass spectral fingerprints from reference strains of Listeria spp.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

Sources and other information on the Listeria strains examined are given in Table S1 in the supplemental material. All strains were either type, reference, or other well-characterized isolates that have been previously identified as belonging to a specific species.

The following reference strains were used in this study for MALDI-TOF MS analyses: Listeria monocytogenes DSM20600, L. ivanovii subsp. londoniensis DSM12491, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii DSM20750, L. innocua DSM20649, L. seeligeri DSM20751, L. welshimeri DSM20650, L. grayi DSM20601, and L. grayi DSM20596.

MALDI-TOF MS.

Listeria strains were grown overnight at 37°C on brain heart infusion agar. Cells of a whole colony were transferred from the plate to a 2.0-ml conical screw-cap extraction tube (Eppendorf, Germany) with a disposable inoculating loop and mixed thoroughly in 300 μl water to resuspend the bacterial cells. Later, 900 μl of absolute ethanol was added and mixed with the cell suspension, the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g (5415D; Eppendorf) for 2 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Subsequently, 10 μl of formic acid (70%) was added to the pellet and mixed thoroughly by pipetting before the addition of 10 μl acetonitrile to the mixture. The mixture was centrifuged again at maximum speed for 2 min. One microliter of the supernatant was placed onto a spot of a steel target plate and air dried at room temperature. Each sample was overlaid with 2 μl of matrix solution (saturated solution of α-cyno-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile-2.5% trifluoroacetic acid) and air dried at room temperature. MALDI-TOF MS was performed on a Microflex LT instrument (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). The spectra were recorded in the linear, positive mode at a laser frequency of 20 Hz within a mass range from 2,000 to 20,000 Da. The acceleration voltage was 20 kV, the IS2 voltage was maintained at 18.60 kV, and the extraction delay time was 200 ns.

For each spectrum, 500 laser shots were collected and analyzed (10 times 50 laser shots from different positions of the target spot). The spectra were externally calibrated using the standard calibrant mixture (Escherichia coli extract including the additional proteins RNase A and myoglobin). Calibration masses were as follows: RL36, 4,364.3 Da; RS22, 5,095.8 Da; RL34, 5,380.4 Da; RL33meth, 6,254.4 Da; RL32, 6,315.2 Da; RL29, 7,273.5 Da; RS19, 10,299.1 Da; RNase A, 13,682.2 Da; myoglobin, 16,952.5 Da).

Data analysis.

Manual/visual estimation of the mass spectra was performed using FlexAnalysis 2.4 software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Germany). For automated data analysis, raw spectra were processed using the MALDI BioTyper 1.1 software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Germany) with default settings. The software performs smoothing, normalization, baseline subtraction, and peak picking, thereby creating a list of the most significant peaks of a spectrum (m/z values with a given intensity, with the threshold set to a minimum of 1% of the highest peak and a maximum of 100 peaks). To identify unknown bacteria, the generated peak lists were used for matches against reference libraries directly using the integrated pattern matching algorithm of the software. After import of a spectrum into the BioTyper software, the whole process from processing to identification was performed automatically, without any user intervention.

For reference library construction, 20 independent spectra were recorded for each bacterial isolate (five independent measurements at four different spots each). To create peak lists of the spectra, the BioTyper software was used as described above. The 20 independent peak lists of a strain were used for automated “main spectrum” generation with default settings of the BioTyper software. Thereby, for each library entry a reference peak list (main spectrum) which contains information about averaged masses, averaged intensities, and relative abundances in the 20 measurements for all characteristic peaks of a given strain was created.

For “weighted” pattern matching analysis, the five closely related species (L. monocytogenes, L. ivanovii, L. innocua, L. seeligeri, and L. welshimeri) were used for recalculation of the peak ratings. Peaks which are present in all species were removed from the score calculation. Peaks occurring is one to four of the five different species were used for the weighted score calculations. The more specific such a peak is, the higher its weighted score contribution is set. For example, a peak occurring in only one species has the greatest impact in the weighted score calculation. Based on the remaining species-discriminating peaks, the “weighted pattern matching libraries” were created.

PFGE.

PFGE was performed according to the PulseNet standardized protocol (14). Briefly, genomic DNA was prepared by mixing 240 μl of a standardized cell suspension and 60 μl of a 10-mg/ml lysozyme solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), followed by incubation at 37°C for 10 min. An equal volume of molten 1.2% agarose, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 0.2 mg/ml proteinase K prepared in sterile distilled water and maintained at 53 to 56°C was added to the cell suspension, and the mixture was mixed by gently pipetting it up and down several times. The mixture (600 μl) was dispensed into forms of a sample reusable plug mold and allowed to cool for 5 min. The agarose plugs were transferred to tubes containing 4 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 [TE buffer], 1% sodium lauryl sarcosine, 0.15 mg/ml proteinase K), incubated for 2 h at 50 to 54°C in an orbital water bath shaker, and shaken at 200 rpm. After proteolysis, the lysis buffer solution was removed and the plugs were washed twice with 15 ml of preheated (50 to 54°C) sterile distilled water for 10 min, followed by four washes with 15 ml of preheated (50 to 54°C) TE buffer for 15 min in the orbital water bath shaker at 50 to 54°C and 200 rpm. After the final TE wash, the plugs were stored in 1.5 ml TE at 48°C until ready for restriction. Sample plugs were digested with 25 U of AscI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at 37°C for 3 h or 160 to 200 U of ApaI (New England Biolabs) at 30°C for 5 h. Plugs were then loaded on 1% agarose gel in 0.5× TBE (45 mM Tris, 45 mM borate, 1 mM EDTA) buffer and electrophoresed on a CHEF-DR II apparatus (Bio-Rad) using the following parameters: initial switch time, 4 s; final switch time, 40 s; run time, 22 h; angle, 120°; gradient, 6 V/cm; temperature, 14°C; and ramping factor, linear. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by a UV transilluminator. The generated PFGE patterns were analyzed using the Gel Compare II (Applied Maths) software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

MALDI-TOF MS spectra were obtained for 146 strains of different Listeria species. Initial MALDI-TOF MS studies were performed with well-characterized reference Listeria strains. MALDI-TOF MS was further used for identification of L. monocytogenes (86), L. innocua (9), L. ivanovii (20), L. seeligeri (15), L. welshimeri (4) and L. grayi (4) isolates. L. monocytogenes strains from outbreaks and clinical cases of human listeriosis were also included. All the Listeria strains were correctly identified at the species level. The identification result of MALDI-TOF MS was confirmed in each case. Secure identification of L. grayi was possible by direct pattern matching against all of the patterns present in our library, representing diverse microbial species. For exact identification of the nearly related Listeria species, the weighted pattern matching approach leads in all cases to a correct identification result (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

In a typical analysis of Listeria strains by MALDI-TOF MS, 20 to 50 prominent ion peaks were noted in the spectra in the region between 2,000 and 20,000 Da, with the highest-intensity peaks consistently in the range of 4,000 to 12,000 Da. Comparisons of spectra for multiple strains within a species revealed that multiple ions corresponded to a characteristic “fingerprint.” Samples analyzed at different times over the course of several hours after calibration yielded results that were reproducible, indicating that the precision of the method was sufficient for a rapid determination of Listeria species. Mass abundance was reflected by the height of a peak. Masses illustrated in Fig. 1 for L. monocytogenes, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, L. welshimeri, L. innocua, and L. grayi are the values determined from an individual experiment. The method described here is based on detection of mainly ribosomal protein fractions of bacteria, which are the most abundant and conserved (31, 38, 39). The molecular weights of putative “species-identifying” biomarker ions were determined by averaging the results for multiple strains tested in multiple experiments using the BioTyper 1.1 software (Fig. 2). Different mass spectrometric methods for analyzing whole bacterial cells for intact proteins, including the identification of protein biomarker ions, have been reported previously (6, 18, 23). Campylobacter and Helicobacter strains were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS, and biomarker ions in the 10- to 20-kDa range (presumably proteins) were reported to be the most discriminatory of those observed (44).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

MALDI-TOF MS spectra of whole-cell extracts of Listeria reference strains. Spectra representative of the MS profile were obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures. The absolute intensities of the ions are shown on the y axis, and the masses (in Da) of the ions are shown on the x axis. The m/z value stands for mass to charge ratio. For a single positive charge, this value corresponds to the molecular weight of the protein.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Discriminating peaks of Listeria strains analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. The absolute intensities of the ions are shown on the y axis, and the masses (in Da) of the ions are shown on the x axis. The m/z value stands for mass to charge ratio. For a single positive charge, this value corresponds to the molecular weight of the protein.

PFGE is currently the method of choice for investigating food-borne outbreaks of listeriosis and for tracing the outbreak-causing strain to the source of contamination. We therefore performed PFGE analysis of the Listeria species and L. monocytogenes serotypes in this study. PFGE is highly discriminatory (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) and permitted the grouping of the various serotypes in three lineages after ApaI digestion. Analysis of patterns generated by PFGE showed three lineages (29), lineage I (serotypes 1/2b, 3b, 4b, 4ab, 4d, 4e, 7), lineage II (serotypes 1/2a, 1/2c, 3a, 3c), and lineage III (serotypes 4a and 4c) (Fig. 3).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Dendrogram derived from a PFGE profile of ApaI macrorestriction showing restriction patterns among the L. monocytogenes serotypes. Isolate identification numbers and serotype are indicated to the right.

The MALDI-TOF MS method is robust and less laborious. The cost of instrumentation is comparable to that of a medium-throughput capillary-based DNA sequencing machine, but running costs and consumables are considerably lower than those for other identification methods. The sample processing is easier than that for PFGE. The method can separate the L. monocytogenes isolates up to the level of clonal lineages. Two different peak pairs (5,590/11,179 Da and 5,597/11,193 Da) lead to a separation of lineages. A stable variation at 7,970 Da can differentiate L. monocytogenes serotypes 4a and 4c from other serotypes. Several L. monocytogenes serotype 4a and 4c strains also showed a peak at 5,590/11,179 Da. The PFGE lineages were in complete agreement with the MALDI-based groupings (Table 1; see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

TABLE 1.

Comparative analysis of L. monocytogenes serotypes by MALDI-TOF MS and PFGE

Serotype Source Lineage by:
MALDI-TOF MS PFGE (ApaI digestion)
1/2a EGD-e II II
1/2b SLCC 2755 I I
1/2c SLCC 2372 II II
3a SLCC 7179 II II
3b SLCC 2540 I I
3c SLCC 2479 II II
4a SLCC 2374 III III
4a/b SLCC 7069 I I
4b L312 I I
4c SLCC 2376 III III
4d ATCC 19117 I I
4e SLCC 2378 I I
7 SLCC 2482 I I
4a L99 III III
4b F2365 I I
4b CLIP 80459 I I

Ten discrepancies between the MALDI-based data and the original assignments given in the strain collection were found. We reanalyzed all of these strains using 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species differentiation and phylogenetically based PCR analysis for clonal-lineage determination (data not shown). In every case, the MALDI-based assignments were accurate and correctly predicted concerning species and clonal lineage (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

A reference database employing the main spectra generated by analysis of Listeria strains by MALDI-TOF MS, which can easily be transferred among different laboratories using the identification system, has been generated. The database can serve as a ready source for identification of the Listeria strains in future analyses. A dendrogram generated using the m/z signatures of all the species tested indicated that the mass spectral data contained sufficient information to distinguish between species of Listeria.

Reproducibility, speed, and sensitivity of analysis are major advantages of the MALDI-TOF MS method. Extended periods of Listeria growth on agar plates, i.e., for several days, had only minor effects and did not affect the identification result. Even after 4 days of cultivation, the spectra revealed peaks sufficient for correct species identification. Reproducibility tests were also performed by cultivation of bacteria on brain heart infusion agars purchased from different manufacturers, but also with media not commonly used for the cultivation of Listeria. Identification to the species level was shown for L. monocytogenes for all kinds of media (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Also, the interlaboratory reproducibility with different instruments was investigated using three different Bruker MALDI-TOF MS systems (Microflex LT, Autoflex II, and Ultraflex III) in two different Bruker laboratories, located in Bremen and Leipzig, Germany. No significant influence among the different laboratories and different MALDI-TOF MS systems regarding spectrum quality and identification results was observed.

Spectrum quality, as judged from the width of the diagnostic mass range and from the number of diagnostic ions generated, is largely determined by the matrix-solvent system, i.e., by MALDI sample preparation, whereas the reproducibility of spectra depends largely on bacterial-sample handling techniques. Earlier methods for various pathogens used different protocols for sample preparations and were based on cell surface proteins or intact cells. More recently, whole-cell MALDI-TOF MS has been used to rapidly differentiate microorganisms (24). The MALDI-TOF MS approach generates unique m/z signatures for different microorganisms based on inherent differences in the cellular proteins expressed by the microbiological species. Earlier studies of the detection of Aeromonas spp. (12) and Campylobacter species (27) by MALDI-TOF MS used whole cells for generation of mass spectra. Species from the genera Escherichia (7), Helicobacter (11), Bacillus (23, 40), Salmonella (25), and Pseudomonas (40) have been characterized by MALDI-TOF MS. To our knowledge, this is the first study employing the MALDI-TOF fingerprinting technique for the in-depth analysis of Listeria. We applied a method which inactivates the bacteria and extracts the cell content, leading to excellent and reproducible mass spectra and accurate species identification. In addition, the inactivated bacteria can be stored in ethanol for months in advance of cell extraction. Even the bacterial extracts can be stored at −20°C for weeks without significant loss in spectrum quality (data not shown).

The major advantages of using MALDI-TOF MS-based protein mass spectral fingerprinting for the identification of microorganisms as well as for their differentiation at the subspecies level are ease and speed of analysis combined with relatively simple sample preparation techniques, the potential for the identification of mixed cultures, and rapid identification of candidate biomarkers, even when minimal genetic data are available. The accuracy and speed of data acquisition make MALDI-TOF MS a powerful tool especially suited for environmental monitoring and detection of biological hazards in food processing plants and in the hospital. Additionally, no initial assessment of samples like Gram staining, oxidase testing, or microscopy is necessary.

We have developed an expanded MALDI-TOF MS method for analyzing multiple Listeria species, applied this method to determine species and lineages, and validated the method using Listeria strains isolated from a variety of sources. MALDI-TOF MS is shown to be a rapid and powerful tool for the fast and simple discrimination of Listeria species, which could be useful for food processing establishments and for tracking epidemic outbreaks.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Claudia Zörb for excellent technical assistance.

S.B.B. is grateful to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for a Biotechnology Overseas Associateship. The work was supported by grants from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung and the ERA-NET Pathogenomics Network to T.C. and from the Säschsische Aufbaubank (SAB 10-634) to T.M. and M.K.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 7 July 2008.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Arnold, R. J., and J. P. Reilly. 1998. Fingerprint matching of E. coli strains with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of whole cells using a modified correlation approach. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 12:630-636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bernardo, K., N. Pakulat, M. Macht, O. Krut, H. Seifert, S. Fleer, F. Hunger, and M. Kronke. 2002. Identification and discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus strains using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2:747-753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Borucki, M. K., M. J. Krug, W. T. Muraoka, and D. R. Call. 2003. Discrimination among Listeria monocytogenes isolates using a mixed genome DNA microarray. Vet. Microbiol. 92:351-362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bright, J. J., M. A. Claydon, M. Soufian, and D. B. Gordon. 2002. Rapid typing of bacteria using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry and pattern recognition software. J. Microbiol. Methods 48:127-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Call, D. R., M. K. Borucki, and T. E. Besser. 2003. Mixed-genome microarrays reveal multiple serotype and lineage-specific differences among strains of Listeria monocytogenes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:632-639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Claydon, M. A., S. N. Davey, V. Edwards-Jones, and D. B. Gordon. 1996. The rapid identification of intact microorganisms using mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:1584-1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conway, G. C., S. C. Smole, D. A. Sarracino, R. D. Arbeit, and P. E. Leopold. 2001. Phyloproteomics: species identification of Enterobacteriaceae using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:103-112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cummins, A. J., A. K. Fielding, and J. McLauchlin. 1994. Listeria ivanovii infection in a patient with AIDS. J. Infect. 28:89-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Cesare, A., J. L. Bruce, T. R. Dambaugh, M. E. Guerzoni, and M. Wiedmann. 2001. Automated ribotyping using different enzymes to improve discrimination of Listeria monocytogenes isolates, with a particular focus on serotype 4b strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3002-3005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Demirev, P. A., Y. P. Ho, V. Ryzhov, and C. Fenselau. 1999. Microorganism identification by mass spectrometry and protein database searches. Anal. Chem. 71:2732-2738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Demirev, P. A., J. S. Lin, F. J. Pineda, and C. Fenselau. 2001. Bioinformatics and mass spectrometry for microorganism identification: proteome-wide post-translational modifications and database search algorithms for characterization of intact H. pylori. Anal. Chem. 73:4566-4573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Donohue, M. J., A. W. Smallwood, S. Pfaller, M. Rodgers, and J. A. Shoemaker. 2006. The development of a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry-based method for the protein fingerprinting and identification of Aeromonas species using whole cells. J. Microbiol. Methods 65:380-389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fenselau, C. 1994. Mass spectrometry for the characterization of microorganisms. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
  • 14.Graves, L. M., and B. Swaminathan. 2001. PulseNet standardized protocol for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes by macrorestriction and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 65:55-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Graves, L. M., B. Swaminathan, M. W. Reeves, S. B. Hunter, R. E. Weaver, B. D. Plikaytis, and A. Schuchat. 1994. Comparison of ribotyping and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2936-2943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heller, D. N., C. Fenselau, R. J. Cotter, P. Demirev, J. K. Olthoff, J. Honovich, M. Uy, T. Tanaka, and Y. Kishimoto. 1987. Mass spectral analysis of complex lipids desorbed directly from lyophilized membranes and cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142:194-199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heller, D. N., C. M. Murphy, R. J. Cotter, C. Fenselau, and O. M. Uy. 1988. Constant neutral loss scanning for the characterization of bacterial phospholipids desorbed by fast atom bombardment. Anal. Chem. 60:2787-2791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holland, R. D., C. R. Duffy, F. Rafii, J. B. Sutherland, T. M. Heinze, C. L. Holder, K. J. Voorhees, and J. O. Lay, Jr. 1999. Identification of bacterial proteins observed in MALDI TOF mass spectra from whole cells. Anal. Chem. 71:3226-3230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Holland, R. D., J. G. Wilkes, F. Rafii, J. B. Sutherland, C. C. Persons, K. J. Voorhees, and J. O. Lay, Jr. 1996. Rapid identification of intact whole bacteria based on spectral patterns using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 10:1227-1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jacquet, C., E. Gouin, D. Jeannel, P. Cossart, and J. Rocourt. 2002. Expression of ActA, Ami, InlB, and listeriolysin O in Listeria monocytogenes of human and food origin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:616-622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kathariou, S. 2002. Listeria monocytogenes virulence and pathogenicity, a food safety perspective. J. Food Prot. 65:1811-1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Krishnamurthy, T., and P. L. Ross. 1996. Rapid identification of bacteria by direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric analysis of whole cells. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 10:1992-1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Krishnamurthy, T., P. L. Ross, and U. Rajamani. 1996. Detection of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 10:883-888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lay, J. O., Jr. 2001. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry of bacteria. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 20:172-194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leuschner, R. G., N. Beresford-Jones, and C. Robinson. 2004. Difference and consensus of whole cell Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry spectra. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 38:24-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu, D. 2006. Identification, subtyping and virulence determination of Listeria monocytogenes, an important foodborne pathogen. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:645-659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mandrell, R. E., L. A. Harden, A. Bates, W. G. Miller, W. F. Haddon, and C. K. Fagerquist. 2005. Speciation of Campylobacter coli, C. jejuni, C. helveticus, C. lari, C. sputorum, and C. upsaliensis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:6292-6307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mead, P. S., L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L. F. McCaig, J. S. Bresee, C. Shapiro, P. M. Griffin, and R. V. Tauxe. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:607-625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nadon, C. A., D. L. Woodward, C. Young, F. G. Rodgers, and M. Wiedmann. 2001. Correlations between molecular subtyping and serotyping of Listeria monocytogenes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2704-2707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rasmussen, O. F., P. Skouboe, L. Dons, L. Rossen, and J. E. Olsen. 1995. Listeria monocytogenes exists in at least three evolutionary lines: evidence from flagellin, invasive associated protein and listeriolysin O genes. Microbiology 141(Pt. 9):2053-2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ryzhov, V., and C. Fenselau. 2001. Characterization of the protein subset desorbed by MALDI from whole bacterial cells. Anal. Chem. 73:746-750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Saenz, A. J., C. E. Petersen, N. B. Valentine, S. L. Gantt, K. H. Jarman, M. T. Kingsley, and K. L. Wahl. 1999. Reproducibility of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for replicate bacterial culture analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 13:1580-1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salcedo, C., L. Arreaza, B. Alcala, L. de la Fuente, and J. A. Vazquez. 2003. Development of a multilocus sequence typing method for analysis of Listeria monocytogenes clones. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:757-762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schlech, W. F., III, P. M. Lavigne, R. A. Bortolussi, A. C. Allen, E. V. Haldane, A. J. Wort, A. W. Hightower, S. E. Johnson, S. H. King, E. S. Nicholls, and C. V. Broome. 1983. Epidemic listeriosis—evidence for transmission by food. N. Engl. J. Med. 308:203-206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Seeliger, H. P. R., and K. Hohne. 1979. Serotyping of Listeria monocytogenes and related species. Methods Microbiol. 13:31-49. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smith, P. B., A. P. Snyder, and C. S. Harden. 1995. Characterization of bacterial phospholipids by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 67:1824-1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stoakes, L., M. A. John, R. Lannigan, B. C. Schieven, M. Ramos, D. Harley, and Z. Hussain. 1994. Gas-liquid chromatography of cellular fatty acids for identification of staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1908-1910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Suh, M. J., D. M. Hamburg, S. T. Gregory, A. E. Dahlberg, and P. A. Limbach. 2005. Extending ribosomal protein identifications to unsequenced bacterial strains using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Proteomics 5:4818-4831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Suh, M. J., and P. A. Limbach. 2004. Investigation of methods suitable for the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric analysis of proteins from ribonucleoprotein complexes. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 10:89-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wahl, K. L., S. C. Wunschel, K. H. Jarman, N. B. Valentine, C. E. Petersen, M. T. Kingsley, K. A. Zartolas, and A. J. Saenz. 2002. Analysis of microbial mixtures by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 74:6191-6199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang, Z., L. Russon, L. Li, D. C. Roser, and S. R. Long. 1998. Investigation of spectral reproducibility in direct analysis of bacteria proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 12:456-464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wiedmann, M. 2002. Molecular subtyping methods for Listeria monocytogenes. J. AOAC Int. 85:524-531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wiedmann, M., J. L. Bruce, C. Keating, A. E. Johnson, P. L. McDonough, and C. A. Batt. 1997. Ribotypes and virulence gene polymorphisms suggest three distinct Listeria monocytogenes lineages with differences in pathogenic potential. Infect. Immun. 65:2707-2716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Winkler, M. A., J. Uher, and S. Cepa. 1999. Direct analysis and identification of Helicobacter and Campylobacter species by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 71:3416-3419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES