Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2008 Jul 16;46(9):3177–3178. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00903-08

Molecular-Beacon-Based Real-Time PCR for Detection and Quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in Clinical Samples

Joseph Papaparaskevas 1,*, Dimitra P Houhoula 1, Argirios Siatelis 1, Athanassios Tsakris 1
PMCID: PMC2546739  PMID: 18632913

Although real-time PCR (RT-PCR) has been extensively evaluated for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections (5), data are limited on molecular-beacon (MB) applications. An MB-based RT-PCR protocol was designed and evaluated for direct M. tuberculosis detection and quantification in clinical specimens.

A total of 1,019 samples (417 pulmonary and 602 extrapulmonary) were consecutively and prospectively collected for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. They were processed using standard methodology (4) and divided into two parts. The first half of each sample was used for acid-fast staining and culture, while the second half was stored at −70°C. TB diagnosis of patients followed previous definitions (11). After diagnosis elucidation, the second part of each specimen obtained from TB-positive patients, as well as an equal number of specimens obtained from TB-negative patients, was thawed and DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

The RT-PCR targeted the IS6110 sequence, and the following primers, amplifying a 161-bp fragment, and MB were designed, using Beacon Designer 5.1 software (Premier Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA): TB2F (5′-GTCCACGCCGCCAACTACG-3′), TΒ2R (5′-GTTAGGTGCTGGTGGTCCGAAG-3′), and TB2B (6-carboxyfluorescein-5′-CGCGATCGCCACAGCCCGTCCCGCCGATGATCGCG-3′-benzoic acid succinimidyl ester). Conditions consisted of 2 min of denaturation at 95°C, 50 cycles of 45 s of denaturation at 93°C, 90 s of annealing at 60°C, and 2 min of extension at 72°C, and finally, 7 min of extension at 72°C. DNA extracted from the M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain (ATCC 25618) was used for the quantification standard curve. DNA from an M. avium and an M. chelonae clinical isolate, from an M. bovis BCG strain, and from Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, and Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 strains was used for specificity confirmation. The median and mean of the quantified DNA and cycle threshold values were calculated using Instat 3.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA 92130). A previously reported (8) single-step conventional PCR (C-PCR) was used for comparisons.

With the RT-PCR protocol, a positive signal was detected using DNA only from the M. tuberculosis and the M. bovis strains. RT-PCR analytical sensitivity was 7 fg of DNA, corresponding to approximately 1.4 mycobacterial genomes. Overall, 32 patients were TB positive, and 40 specimens were obtained from those patients (Tables 1 and 2). A total of 40 specimens (10 pulmonary and 30 extrapulmonary) were also obtained from 34 TB-negative patients. The two PCR assays showed equally high levels of sensitivity (Table 1), although C-PCR performed better among pulmonary specimens and RT-PCR performed better among extrapulmonary specimens. Combining the two assays yielded 100% sensitivity. After testing the samples diluted 10−1, we found three samples to be inhibitory (one with both protocols and two with PCR only). DNA quantification results from comparisons of the main specimen types are shown in Table 2. The mean (± standard deviation) cycle threshold value for the RT-PCR was 33.5 (± 5.3; range, 19.3 to 40.7).

TABLE 1.

Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of the two PCR assays

Clinical specimen category PCR assay % Sensitivity % Specificity % PPVa % NPVb
Pulmonary (n = 9) C-PCR 100 100 100 100
RT-PCR 88.9 100 100 90.9
C-PCR + RT-PCR 100 100 100 100
Extrapulmonary (n = 31) C-PCR 90.3 100 100 90.9
RT-PCR 93.5 100 100 93.8
C-PCR + RT-PCR 100 100 100 100
Total (n = 40) C-PCR 92.5 100 100 93.0
RT-PCR 92.5 100 100 93.0
C-PCR + RT-PCR 100 100 100 100
a

PPV, positive predictive value.

b

NPV, negative predictive value.

TABLE 2.

DNA quantification of the main specimen types by use of the RT-PCR protocol

Specimen category RT-PCR quantification (fg)
Mean (± SD) Median
Pulmonarya (n = 9) 20,287.51 (± 27,221.36) 5,900.00
Tissue biopsy (n = 8) 1,492.76 (± 3,052.54) 258.85
Pus (n = 7) 25,982.00 × 106 (± 72,337.00 × 106) 3,747.00
Lymph node biopsy (n = 6) 23,641.12 (± 52,748.28) 4.90
Miscellaneousb (n = 10) 1,334.38 (± 2,567.68) 74.30
a

Includes seven sputum and two lavage specimens.

b

Includes three urine specimens, two bone marrow aspiration samples, two gastric fluid samples, one cerebrospinal fluid sample, one pericardial aspiration sample, and one prostatic specimen.

In the literature, TaqMan and linear fluorescence probes have mostly been applied for direct diagnosis of TB (1, 3, 5). MB technology has been evaluated for direct detection of M. avium (2, 6) as well as for detection of mutation-specific resistance in M. tuberculosis isolates (9, 10) and, in only one report, for direct TB diagnosis using pulmonary specimens (7). In the present study, a newly designed MB RT-PCR was developed and proved to be a promising tool, showing high sensitivity and specificity for a collection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens, which in most cases (29 out of 40) were acid-fast staining and culture negative.

Our report has also shown that pulmonary and pus specimens had the highest median DNA loads, in contrast to the results seen with lymph nodes. Although lymph node biopsy is commonly used for extrapulmonary TB diagnosis, our results indicated that a specimen from the primal focal point of the disease, if retrievable, may yield higher mycobacterial loads.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by a grant from Pfizer Hellas.

There are no conflicts of interest to declare by any author.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 16 July 2008.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Broccolo, F., P. Scarpellini, G. Locatelli, A. Zingale, A. M. Brambilla, P. Cichero, L. A. Sechi, A. Lazzarin, P. Lusso, and M. S. Malnati. 2003. Rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial infections and quantitation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis load by two real-time calibrated PCR assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 414565-4572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet, E. S., J. A. Lindeboom, J. M. Prins, M. F. Peeters, E. C. J. Claas, and E. J. Kuijper. 2004. Real-time PCR assay using fine-needle aspirates and tissue biopsy specimens for rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial lymphadenitis in children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 422644-2650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cleary, T. J., G. Roudel, O. Casillas, and N. Miller. 2003. Rapid and specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by using the Smart Cycler instrument and a specific fluorogenic probe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 414783-4786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Delta-Latta, P. 2004. Mycobacteriology and antimycobacterial susceptibility testing, p. 7.1.1-7.3.1. In H. D. Isenberg (ed.), Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  • 5.Espy, M. J., J. R. Uhl, L. M. Sloan, S. P. Buckwalter, M. F. Jones, E. A. Vetter, J. D. C. Yao, N. L. Wengenack, J. E. Rosenblatt, F. R. Cockerill III, and T. F. Smith. 2006. Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19165-256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fang, Y., W. H. Wu, J. L. Pepper, J. L. Larsen, S. A. E. Marras, E. A. Nelson, W. B. Epperson, and J. Christopher-Hennings. 2002. Comparison of real-time, quantitative PCR with molecular beacons to nested PCR and culture methods for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine fecal samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40287-291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haldar, S., S. Chakravorty, M. Bhalla, S. De Majumdar, and J. S. Tyagi. 2007. Simplified detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum using smear microscopy and PCR with molecular beacons. J. Med. Microbiol. 561356-1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kox, L. F. F., D. Rhienthong, A. Medo-Miranda, N. Udomsantisuk, K. Ellis, J. Van Leeuwen, S. Van Heusden, S. Kuijper, and A. H. J. Kolk. 1994. A more reliable PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32672-678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Piatek, A. S., A. Telenti, M. R. Murray, H. El-Hajj, W. R. Jacobs, Jr., F. R. Kramer, and D. Alland. 2000. Genotypic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in two distinct populations using molecular beacons: implications for rapid susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44103-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Varma-Basil, M., H. El-Hajj, R. Colangeli, M. H. Hazbon, S. Kumar, M. Bose, M. Bobadilla-del-Valle, L. G. Garcia, A. Hernandez, F. R. Kramer, J. S. Osornio, A. Ponce-de-Leon, and D. Alland. 2004. Rapid detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from India and Mexico by a molecular beacon assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 425512-5516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization. 2003. Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines for national programmes, 3rd ed. WHO/CDS/TB/2003.313. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/cds_tb_2003_313/en/index.html. Accessed 7 May 2008.

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES