Skip to main content

letter

. 1995 Dec 9;311(7019):1572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7019.1572a

Local research ethics committees. Differences in application process cause problems.

M Black, B Leese, T Gosden

PMCID: PMC2548175 PMID: 8520422

1572

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Alberti K. G. Local research ethics committees. BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):639–640. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Garfield P. Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees. BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):660–661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Middle C., Johnson A., Petty T., Sims L., Macfarlane A. Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience. BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):659–660. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
While A. E. Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards? BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):661–661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ACTIONS

RESOURCES