Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 1995 Mar 11;310(6980):668–669. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6980.668a

Rates of episiotomy. Conclusions and validity of data cannot be judged.

J F Stratton, H Gordon, M Logue
PMCID: PMC2549050  PMID: 7703782

Full text

PDF

Page 668

668

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Henriksen T. B., Bek K. M., Hedegaard M., Secher N. J. Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1255–1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sleep J., Grant A., Garcia J., Elbourne D., Spencer J., Chalmers I. West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 8;289(6445):587–590. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6445.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES