Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1995 May 27;310(6991):1369–1373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6991.1369

Need and demand for primary health care: a comparative survey approach.

J L Hopton 1, M Dlugolecka 1
PMCID: PMC2549749  PMID: 7787542

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To develop general practice profiles of needs and demand for primary health care. DESIGN--Postal survey of a stratified random sample of 3478 people registered with five general practices. Data from a single practice were compared with data from the remaining four to identify areas of comparative need. SETTING--Five general practices in Lothian. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Differences between the single practice and the comparison practices in terms of social and economic circumstances, limiting long term illness, specific ongoing conditions, minor illness or symptoms, psychosocial problems, discussion of lifestyle, associated use of services. RESULTS--Respondents from the single practice reported higher rates than those in the four comparison practices of ongoing mental health and respiratory problems and use of antidepressants, tranquillisers, or sleeping tablets. Although rates of limiting long term illness and other specific ongoing conditions were comparable, the rates of minor illness or symptoms and psychosocial difficulties were higher in the single practice. Respondents from the single practice were more likely to consult frequently, to have contacted the practice out of normal working hours, and to have discussed psychosocial difficulties with a general practitioner. For any specific ongoing condition or "minor" illness, respondents from the single practice were no more likely to consult. CONCLUSIONS--A comparative survey approach is a useful method of developing an understanding of patterns of need and demand among general practice populations. It has the potential to inform planning within individual general practices and the process of commissioning among general practices within a given area.

Full text

PDF
1369

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abramson J. H. Community-oriented primary care--strategy, approaches, and practice: a review. Public Health Rev. 1988;16(1-2):35–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashton J. Public health and primary care: towards a common agenda. Public Health. 1990 Nov;104(6):387–398. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80082-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carr-Hill R. A., Sheldon T. Designing a deprivation payment for general practitioners: the UPA(8) wonderland. BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):393–396. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hannay D. R. Primary care and public health. BMJ. 1993 Aug 28;307(6903):516–517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6903.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hart J. T. Community general practitioners. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jun 2;288(6431):1670–1673. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6431.1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hopton J. L., Howie J. G., Porter A. M. Social indicators of health needs for general practice: a simpler approach. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jun;42(359):236–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Howie J. G. Diagnosis--the Achilles heel? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 May;22(118):310–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705–1709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kivell P. T., Turton B. J., Dawson B. R. Neighbourhoods for health service administration. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(6):701–711. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90255-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knox E. G. Principles of allocation of health care resources. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978 Mar;32(1):3–9. doi: 10.1136/jech.32.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Magi M., Allander E. Towards a theory of perceived and medically defined need. Sociol Health Illn. 1981 Mar;3(1):49–71. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mays N. Measuring morbidity for resource allocation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Sep 19;295(6600):703–706. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6600.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mays N. NHS resource allocation after the 1989 white paper: a critique of the research for the RAWP review. Community Med. 1989 Aug;11(3):173–186. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McDowell I., Martini C. J. Problems and new directions in the evaluation of primary care. Int J Epidemiol. 1976 Sep;5(3):247–250. doi: 10.1093/ije/5.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Morley V. Empowering GPs as purchasers. BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):112–114. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Redelmeier D. A., Tversky A. Discrepancy between medical decisions for individual patients and for groups. N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 19;322(16):1162–1164. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004193221620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sheldon T. A., Smith G. D., Bevan G. Weighting in the dark: resource allocation in the new NHS. BMJ. 1993 Mar 27;306(6881):835–839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6881.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sheldon T. A., Smith P., Borowitz M., Martin S., Hill R. C. Attempt at deriving a formula for setting general practitioner fundholding budgets. BMJ. 1994 Oct 22;309(6961):1059–1064. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6961.1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stone D. H. Primary care, community medicine and prevention: a convergence of needs. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 May;37(298):218–220. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES