Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1995 Sep 30;311(7009):848–852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7009.848

Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports.

F Sullivan 1, E Mitchell 1
PMCID: PMC2550856  PMID: 7580494

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To review findings from studies of the influence of desktop computers on primary care consultations. DESIGN--Systematic review of world reports from 1984 to 1994. SETTING--The computerised catalogues of Medline, BIDS, and GPlit were searched, as well as conference proceedings, books, bibliographies, and references in books and journal articles. SUBJECTS--30 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included for detailed review. INTERVENTIONS--A validated scheme for assessing methodological adequacy was used to score each paper. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Papers were rated on sample formation, baseline differences, unit of allocation, outcome measures, and follow up. Differences in outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS--Four of the six papers dealing with the consultation process showed that consultations took longer. Doctor initiated and "medical" content of consultations increased at the expense of a reduction in patient initiated and "social" content. Each of the 21 studies which looked at clinician performance showed an improvement when a computer was used (from 8% to 50%, with better results for single preventive measures). Only one of the three studies looking at patient outcomes showed an improvement (diastolic blood pressure control 5 mm Hg better after one year, with fewer doctor-patient consultations). CONCLUSIONS--Using a computer in the consultation may help improve clinician performance but may increase the length of the consultation. More studies are needed to assess the effects on patient outcomes of using a computer in consultations.

Full text

PDF
848

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnett G. O. The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 21;310(25):1643–1650. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198406213102506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bleich H. L., Beckley R. F., Horowitz G. L., Jackson J. D., Moody E. S., Franklin C., Goodman S. R., McKay M. W., Pope R. A., Walden T. Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. N Engl J Med. 1985 Mar 21;312(12):756–764. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198503213121205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brownbridge G., Evans A., Fitter M., Platts M. An interactive computerized protocol for the management of hypertension: effects on the general practitioner's clinical behaviour. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 May;36(286):198–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brownbridge G., Evans A., Wall T. Effect of computer use in the consultation on the delivery of care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Sep 7;291(6496):639–642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6496.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chambers C. V., Balaban D. J., Carlson B. L., Ungemack J. A., Grasberger D. M. Microcomputer-generated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines. J Fam Pract. 1989 Sep;29(3):273–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Donald J. B. On line prescribing by computer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Apr 5;292(6525):937–939. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6525.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donald J. B. Prescribing costs when computers are used to issue all prescriptions. BMJ. 1989 Jul 1;299(6690):28–30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6690.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FUNCTION of the hospital outpatient department. Lancet. 1953 Feb 7;1(6754):275–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feinstein A. R. The need for humanised science in evaluating medication. Lancet. 1972 Aug 26;2(7774):421–423. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91814-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garr D. R., Ornstein S. M., Jenkins R. G., Zemp L. D. The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice. Am J Prev Med. 1993 Jan-Feb;9(1):55–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gehlbach S. H., Wilkinson W. E., Hammond W. E., Clapp N. E., Finn A. L., Taylor W. J., Rodell M. S. Improving drug prescribing in a primary care practice. Med Care. 1984 Mar;22(3):193–201. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198403000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilliland A., Mills K. A., Steele K. General practitioner records on computer--handle with care. Fam Pract. 1992 Dec;9(4):441–450. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.4.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice. Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):45–52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harriss C., Pringle M. Do general practice computer systems assist in medical audit? Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;11(1):51–56. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hart J. T., Thomas C., Gibbons B., Edwards C., Hart M., Jones J., Jones M., Walton P. Twenty five years of case finding and audit in a socially deprived community. BMJ. 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1509–1513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6791.1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haynes R. B., Walker C. J. Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal. Arch Intern Med. 1987 Jul;147(7):1297–1301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Herzmark G., Brownbridge G., Fitter M., Evans A. Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Dec;34(269):649–654. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston M. E., Langton K. B., Haynes R. B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leaning M. S. The new information management and technology strategy of the NHS. BMJ. 1993 Jul 24;307(6898):217–217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6898.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McAlister N. H., Covvey H. D., Tong C., Lee A., Wigle E. D. Randomised controlled trial of computer assisted management of hypertension in primary care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 13;293(6548):670–674. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6548.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDonald C. J., Hui S. L., Smith D. M., Tierney W. M., Cohen S. J., Weinberger M., McCabe G. P. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jan;100(1):130–138. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McDowell I., Newell C., Rosser W. A randomized trial of computerized reminders for blood pressure screening in primary care. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3):297–305. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McDowell I., Newell C., Rosser W. Comparison of three methods of recalling patients for influenza vaccination. CMAJ. 1986 Nov 1;135(9):991–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McDowell I., Newell C., Rosser W. Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1989 Apr;28(4):420–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McPhee S. J., Bird J. A., Jenkins C. N., Fordham D. Promoting cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions. Arch Intern Med. 1989 Aug;149(8):1866–1872. doi: 10.1001/archinte.149.8.1866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mugford M., Banfield P., O'Hanlon M. Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. BMJ. 1991 Aug 17;303(6799):398–402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6799.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ornstein S. M., Garr D. R., Jenkins R. G., Rust P. F., Arnon A. Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1991 Jan;32(1):82–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pringle M., Robins S., Brown G. Computer assisted screening: effect on the patient and his consultation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 8;290(6483):1709–1712. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6483.1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pringle M., Robins S., Brown G. Timer: a new objective measure of consultation content and its application to computer assisted consultations. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jul 5;293(6538):20–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6538.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pringle M., Robins S., Brown G. Topic analysis: an objective measure of the consultation and its application to computer assisted consultations. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 15;290(6484):1789–1791. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6484.1789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pringle M. The new agenda for general practice computing. BMJ. 1990 Oct 13;301(6756):827–828. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6756.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rector A. L., Nowlan W. A., Kay S. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Methods Inf Med. 1991 Aug;30(3):179–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rethans J. J., Höppener P., Wolfs G., Diederiks J. Do personal computers make doctors less personal? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 May 21;296(6634):1446–1448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6634.1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rosser W. W., Hutchison B. G., McDowell I., Newell C. Use of reminders to increase compliance with tetanus booster vaccination. CMAJ. 1992 Mar 15;146(6):911–917. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tierney W. M., Hui S. L., McDonald C. J. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance. Med Care. 1986 Aug;24(8):659–666. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198608000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weingarten M. A., Bazel D., Shannon H. S. Computerized protocol for preventive medicine: a controlled self-audit in family practice. Fam Pract. 1989 Jun;6(2):120–124. doi: 10.1093/fampra/6.2.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wyatt J. C. Clinical data systems, Part 1: Data and medical records. Lancet. 1994 Dec 3;344(8936):1543–1547. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90353-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wyatt J. C. Clinical data systems, Part 3: Development and evaluation. Lancet. 1994 Dec 17;344(8938):1682–1688. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90463-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES