Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1995 Oct 14;311(7011):981–985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7011.981

Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results.

K Lawrence 1, D McWhinnie 1, A Goodwin 1, H Doll 1, A Gordon 1, A Gray 1, J Britton 1, J Collin 1
PMCID: PMC2550988  PMID: 7580639

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To establish the safety, short term outcome, and theatre costs of transabdominal laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia performed as day surgery. DESIGN--Randomised controlled trial. The control operation was the two layer modified Maloney darn. SETTING--Teaching hospital and district general hospital. SUBJECTS--125 men randomised to laparoscopic or open repair of inguinal hernia. OUTCOME MEASURES--Morbidity, postoperative pain and use of analgesics, quality of life, and theatre costs. Outcome was assessed by questionnaires administered to patients daily for 10 days and at six weeks postoperatively and by outpatient review at six weeks. Return to normal activity was assessed by questionnaire at three months. RESULTS--One vascular complication (2%) occurred in the group that had open repair. Seven complications (12%) including vessel injury and early recurrence arose in the group that had laparoscopic repair (difference in complication rate 10% (95% confidence interval 4% to 18%; P = 0.02). Pain scores and quality of life assessed by the short form 36 showed a significant benefit to the group that had laparoscopic repair in the early postoperative period. Return to normal activity was not significantly different between the two groups. Total theatre costs were higher in the group that had laparoscopic repair (mean cost for laparoscopic repair 850 pounds (622 pounds to 1078 pounds); mean cost for open repair 268 pounds (245 pounds to 292 pounds)). CONCLUSIONS--Because of the greater complication rate and higher theatre costs for laparoscopic repair and the patient outcome preferences expressed, the results of larger trials of clinical and cost effectiveness using recurrence as the primary outcome measure should be known before laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is widely adopted.

Full text

PDF
981

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Capozzi J. A., Berkenfield J. A., Cherry J. K. Repair of inguinal hernia in the adult with Prolene mesh. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Aug;167(2):124–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Glassow F. Inguinal hernia repair using local anaesthesia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1984 Nov;66(6):382–387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kavic M. S. Laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):163–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00594099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lau J., Antman E. M., Jimenez-Silva J., Kupelnick B., Mosteller F., Chalmers T. C. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 23;327(4):248–254. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207233270406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McMahon A. J., Russell I. T., Baxter J. N., Ross S., Anderson J. R., Morran C. G., Sunderland G., Galloway D., Ramsay G., O'Dwyer P. J. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1994 Jan 15;343(8890):135–138. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90932-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morgan M., Reynolds A., Swan A. V., Beech R., Devlin H. B. Are current techniques of inguinal hernia repair optimal? A survey in the United Kingdom. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Nov;73(6):341–345. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwartz D., Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis. 1967 Aug;20(8):637–648. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shulman A. G., Amid P. K., Lichtenstein I. L. The safety of mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias: results of 3,019 operations from five diverse surgical sources. Am Surg. 1992 Apr;58(4):255–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stoker D. L., Spiegelhalter D. J., Singh R., Wellwood J. M. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. Lancet. 1994 May 21;343(8908):1243–1245. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92148-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vitale G. C., Collet D., Larson G. M., Cheadle W. G., Miller F. B., Perissat J. Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among French and American patients. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):396–398. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90606-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Winchester D. J., Dawes L. G., Modelski D. D., Nahrwold D. L., Pomerantz R. A., Prystowsky J. B., Rege R. V., Joehl R. J. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A preliminary experience. Arch Surg. 1993 Jul;128(7):781–786. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420190077010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES