Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1131–1135. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1131

Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study.

S P Harding 1, D M Broadbent 1, C Neoh 1, M C White 1, J Vora 1
PMCID: PMC2551056  PMID: 7580708

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate different methods for community based screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease. DESIGN--Prospective study. SETTING--Mobile screening unit visiting inner city community clinics; hospital assessment clinic (tertiary centre). SUBJECTS--395 diabetic patients registered with four general practices in an inner city location. INTERVENTIONS--Community based photography with mydriasis and direct ophthalmoscopy through dilated pupils by an experienced ophthalmologist, both compared with reference standard of slit lamp biomicroscopy by a consultant specialist in medical retinal disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Sensitivity and specificity of screening method and prevalence of sight threatening diabetic eye disease (moderate preproliferative retinopathy, circinate maculopathy, exudate within 1 disc diameter of fixation, other diabetes related eye disease). RESULTS--358 subjects underwent photography, 326 attended hospital clinic for ophthalmoscopy, and six were ungradable on photographs and biomicroscopy, leaving 320 for analysis. Of these 295 (91%) attended clinic within four months of photography. Sensitivity of detection of eye disease by photography was 89% (95% confidence interval 80% to 98%), significantly better than for direct ophthalmoscopy (65% (51% to 79%)). Analysis of patients with false negative results indicated possible improvement of photographic sensitivity to 93% by addition of stereoscopic macular pair photographs. Specificity of detection of sight threatening eye disease was 86% (82% to 90%) for photography and 97% (95% to 99%) for direct ophthalmoscopy. CONCLUSIONS--Since high sensitivity is essential for an effective screening programme, a photographic method should be considered as preferred option in national, community based screening programmes. Even in the hands of an experienced ophthalmologist, direct ophthalmoscopy is limited by weaknesses inherent to the instrument.

Full text

PDF
1131

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G., Bland J. M. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1552–1552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burns-Cox C. J., Hart J. C. Screening of diabetics for retinopathy by ophthalmic opticians. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Apr 6;290(6474):1052–1054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6474.1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buxton M. J., Sculpher M. J., Ferguson B. A., Humphreys J. E., Altman J. F., Spiegelhalter D. J., Kirby A. J., Jacob J. S., Bacon H., Dudbridge S. B. Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods. Diabet Med. 1991 May;8(4):371–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01612.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forrest R. D., Jackson C. A., Yudkin J. S. Screening for diabetic retinopathy--comparison of a nurse and a doctor with retinal photography. Diabetes Res. 1987 May;5(1):39–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foulds W. S., McCuish A., Barrie T., Green F., Scobie I. N., Ghafour I. M., McClure E., Barber J. H. Diabetic retinopathy in the West of Scotland: its detection and prevalence, and the cost-effectiveness of a proposed screening programme. Health Bull (Edinb) 1983 Nov;41(6):318–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacob J., Stead J., Sykes J., Taylor D., Tooke J. E. A report on the use of technician ophthalmoscopy combined with the use of the Canon non-mydriatic camera in screening for diabetic retinopathy in the community. Diabet Med. 1995 May;12(5):419–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Javitt J. C., Canner J. K., Sommer A. Cost effectiveness of current approaches to the control of retinopathy in type I diabetics. Ophthalmology. 1989 Feb;96(2):255–264. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32923-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones D., Dolben J., Owens D. R., Vora J. P., Young S., Creagh F. M. Non-mydriatic Polaroid photography in screening for diabetic retinopathy: evaluation in a clinical setting. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Apr 9;296(6628):1029–1030. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6628.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kinyoun J. L., Martin D. C., Fujimoto W. Y., Leonetti D. L. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 May;33(6):1888–1893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klein R., Klein B. E., Neider M. W., Hubbard L. D., Meuer S. M., Brothers R. J. Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology. 1985 Apr;92(4):485–491. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kleinstein R. N., Roseman J. M., Herman W. H., Holcombe J., Louv W. C. Detection of diabetic retinopathy by optometrists. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987 Nov;58(11):879–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kohner E. M., Barry P. J. Prevention of blindness in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia. 1984 Mar;26(3):173–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00252402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee C. M., Olk R. J. Modified grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Long-term visual results. Ophthalmology. 1991 Oct;98(10):1594–1602. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leese G. P., Ahmed S., Newton R. W., Jung R. T., Ellingford A., Baines P., Roxburgh S., Coleiro J. Use of mobile screening unit for diabetic retinopathy in rural and urban areas. BMJ. 1993 Jan 16;306(6871):187–189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6871.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mohan R., Kohner E. M., Aldington S. J., Nijhar I., Mohan V., Mather H. M. Evaluation of a non-mydriatic camera in Indian and European diabetic patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988 Nov;72(11):841–845. doi: 10.1136/bjo.72.11.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moss S. E., Klein R., Kessler S. D., Richie K. A. Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 1985 Jan;92(1):62–67. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34082-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rogers D., Bitner-Glindzicz M., Harris C., Yudkin J. S. Non-mydriatic retinal photography as a screening service for general practitioners. Diabet Med. 1990 Feb;7(2):165–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1990.tb01353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ryder B. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):207–208. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ryder R. E., Vora J. P., Atiea J. A., Owens D. R., Hayes T. M., Young S. Possible new method to improve detection of diabetic retinopathy: Polaroid non-mydriatic retinal photography. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Nov 2;291(6504):1256–1257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6504.1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Savolainen E. A., Lee Q. P. Diabetic retinopathy - need and demand for photocoagulation and its cost-effectiveness: evaluation based on services in the United Kingdom. Diabetologia. 1982 Aug;23(2):138–140. doi: 10.1007/BF01271176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schachat A. P., Hyman L., Leske M. C., Connell A. M., Hiner C., Javornik N., Alexander J. Comparison of diabetic retinopathy detection by clinical examinations and photograph gradings. Barbados (West Indies) Eye Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Aug;111(8):1064–1070. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090080060019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sparrow J. M., McLeod B. K., Smith T. D., Birch M. K., Rosenthal A. R. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy and their risk factors in the non-insulin-treated diabetic patients of an English town. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 1):158–163. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sussman E. J., Tsiaras W. G., Soper K. A. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA. 1982 Jun 18;247(23):3231–3234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taylor R., Lovelock L., Tunbridge W. M., Alberti K. G., Brackenridge R. G., Stephenson P., Young E. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ. 1990 Dec 1;301(6763):1243–1247. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6763.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wareham N., Greenwood R. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic fundus photography. Diabet Med. 1991 Aug-Sep;8(7):607–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Williams R., Nussey S., Humphry R., Thompson G. Assessment of non-mydriatic fundus photography in detection of diabetic retinopathy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Nov 1;293(6555):1140–1142. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6555.1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES