Abstract
OBJECTIVES--To compare prescribing in general practices before and after they become fundholders to assess whether this affected prescribing patterns. DESIGN--Analysis of prescribing data (PACT) for one year before and one year after practices become first, second, or third wave fundholders and comparison with practices that were not fundholders during any part of the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Prescribing costs (net ingredient cost per prescribing unit), prescribing volume (items per 1000 prescribing units), net ingredient cost per item, and percentage of generic prescribing. SETTING--Former Mersey Regional Health Authority. SUBJECTS--100 fundholders (20 first wave, 31 second wave, 49 third wave) and 312 nonfundholders. RESULTS--Prescribing costs and volume rose throughout the study in all groups. In all three fundholding waves the rate of increase of prescribing costs was significantly lower than for nonfundholders. Both cost per item and prescribing volume tended to decrease, the former probably because of a significant increase in generic prescribing. Fundholding and non-fundholding practices differed in several respects. CONCLUSION--Fundholding has altered practice prescribing patterns compared with those of nonfundholders, increasing generic prescribing and reducing the rate of increase of prescribing costs.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bogle S. M., Harris C. M. Measuring prescribing: the shortcomings of the item. BMJ. 1994 Mar 5;308(6929):637–640. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6929.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradlow J., Coulter A. Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners' prescribing costs. BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Britten N., Bartley M., Blane D. Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation. BMJ. 1995 Apr 22;310(6986):1067–1068. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6986.1067c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dowell J. S., Snadden D., Dunbar J. A. Changing to generic formulary: how one fundholding practice reduced prescribing costs. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):505–508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keeley D. Prescribing costs. Fundholders had a head start. BMJ. 1994 Jan 15;308(6922):206–207. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6922.206c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd D. C., Harris C. M., Clucas D. W. Low income scheme index: a new deprivation scale based on prescribing in general practice. BMJ. 1995 Jan 21;310(6973):165–169. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell M., Heaney D., Howie J. G., Noble S. General practice fundholding: observations on prescribing patterns and costs using the defined daily dose method. BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1190–1194. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts S. J., Harris C. M. Age, sex, and temporary resident originated prescribing units (ASTRO-PUs): new weightings for analysing prescribing of general practices in England. BMJ. 1993 Aug 21;307(6902):485–488. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6902.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shine C., Dutt A. Appropriate prescribing in asthma. Good prescribing is encouraged. BMJ. 1995 Apr 22;310(6986):1070–1070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6986.1070a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walley T., Wilson R., Bligh J. Current prescribing in primary care in the UK. Effects of the indicative prescribing scheme and GP fundholding. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Apr;7(4):320–331. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507040-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]