Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2007 Nov 7;111(47):13353–13356. doi: 10.1021/jp077036z

Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy Reveals That Water is Nonessential to the Core Structure of Alpha-Synuclein Fibrils

Kathryn D Kloepper 1, Kevin L Hartman 1, Daniel T Ladror 1, Chad M Rienstra 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC2551327  NIHMSID: NIHMS62889  PMID: 17985869

Abstract

Protein aggregation is implicated in the etiology of numerous neurodegenerative diseases. An understanding of aggregation mechanisms is enhanced by atomic-resolution structural information, of which relatively little is currently available. Lewy bodies, the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease, contain large quantities of fibrillar alpha-synuclein (AS). Here we present solid-state NMR spectroscopy studies of dried AS fibrils. The spectra have high resolution and sensitivity, and the site-resolved chemical shifts agree very well with those previously observed for hydrated fibrils. The conserved chemical shifts indicate that bulk water is nonessential to the fibril core structure. Moreover, the sample preparation procedure yields major improvements in spectral sensitivity, without compromising spectral resolution. This advance will greatly assist atomic-resolution structural analysis of AS fibrils.

Keywords: amyloid, chemical shifts, magic-angle spinning, Parkinson’s disease, protein

Introduction

The protein α-synuclein (AS) is intrinsically unstructured yet upon prolonged incubation forms β-sheet rich amyloid fibrils, as found in the Lewy bodies of Parkinson’s disease patients.1,2 Mutations of AS (A53T,3 A30P,4 and E46K5) are implicated in familial PD, although the mechanism of pathology is not yet well understood. Structural information in this context is highly desirable. However, because amyloid fibrils are insoluble and non-crystalline, solution NMR and x-ray crystallography studies of fibrils are limited. Structural models have been developed based upon EPR spin labeling experiments.6,7 Higher resolution information can be provided by solid-state NMR (SSNMR), as demonstrated in recent studies of β-amyloid,8-11 HET-s prion,12-14 and AS15,16 fibrils. Obtaining spectra of high resolution and sensitivity is the first step towards total structure determination.

In the case of AS, as we recently demonstrated,16 relatively weak cross polarization (CP) signals are observed near room temperature, due to local molecular dynamics. Low temperature significantly enhances signal intensities while retaining high resolution. Nevertheless, the majority of the NMR rotor volume is occupied by water, placing an upper limit on the detection sensitivity. Further enhancements in sensitivity could be derived from drying fibrils, as previously demonstrated for β-amyloid,17 but to do so raises the concern that the dehydration process might alter the fibril structure. For example, Perutz et al. have modeled amyloid fibrils (including AS) as water-filled nanotubes.18 Experimental data that give insight into atomic-resolution structural properties would help to resolve this controversy.

In this work, we present such insights based on SSNMR spectra of dried AS fibrils. We show that dried samples yield spectra with nearly identical chemical shifts to those of hydrated fibrils, consistent with an atomic-resolution structure that is unaltered upon dehydration. In addition, spectral sensitivity is substantially enhanced due to the larger quantity of dried protein packed into the SSNMR rotor. This protocol is applicable to high-resolution structural studies of AS fibrils.

Experimental Section

Expression, purification, and fibril formation of AS were performed as described previously.16,19 Fibrils were separated from solution by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 g for 1 h, and the supernatant removed. The centrifuged fibrils appeared as translucent, white gelatinous pellets. The mass of a fully hydrated fibril pellet (starting protein amount = 7.5 mg) was typically 50-60 mg. The pellet was dried under a gentle stream of N2 (g) until hard and white. The sample was weighed throughout the 2-4 h drying period in order to monitor water loss. The dried pellet was then crushed with a wooden dowel (to increase surface area) and again dried under a stream of N2 (g) until no further changes in mass were observed.

SSNMR studies were performed on four-channel Varian InfinityPlus spectrometers. Spectra of hydrated fibrils were acquired at 600 MHz with a Varian BalunTM 1H-13C-15N 4.0 mm probe and MAS rate of 10,000±3 Hz.16 Experiments on dried fibril samples were acquired at 500 MHz with a Varian BalunTM 1H-13C-15N 3.2 mm MAS probe at 11,111±3 Hz. The variable temperature gas was maintained at 90±10 scfh flow, and the reported sample temperatures take into account thermocouple calibration and frictional heating due to MAS. Data were processed with nmrPipe20 with back linear prediction and polynomial baseline (frequency domain) correction applied to the direct dimension, and zero filling and Lorentzian-to-Gaussian apodization were applied to each dimension before Fourier transformation; processing parameters are located in the figure captions. Chemical shifts are referenced to adamantane.21 Linewidths are reported for 25 representative 15N and 13C sites.

Results and Discussion

FIGURE 1

Figure 1.

Figure 1

13C 1D spectra of dried AS fibrils, 384 scans. A) 0 °C, B) -20 °C, C) -40 °C. All spectra are processed identically, with 0.16 ppm line broadening.

As demonstrated previously, fully hydrated AS fibrils yield relatively weak CP signals near room temperature, due to molecular motions that dynamically average dipolar couplings.16 The 1D 13C CP-MAS spectra of hydrated AS fibrils are enhanced substantially by reduction in temperature from 0 to -40 °C. Here we show that spectra of dried AS fibrils are essentially independent of temperature in this regime (Figure 1). The integrated spectral intensity varies by less than 5% over this range. We attribute this to the rigidity of the dried protein. CP enhancement values of ∼2.5 for the 1H-13C versus 13C Bloch decay (direct polarization) spectra further support this interpretation; such enhancements are observed on our instruments only for microscopically rigid proteins or model organic compounds.22,23 In contrast, spectra of hydrated fibrils16 have poor CP enhancement (∼1.0) at 0 °C, which increases somewhat to 2.2 at -40 °C. Therefore sample drying improves CP enhancement.

A second benefit of drying is that a larger quantity of protein can be packed in the rotor. We examined hydrated samples primarily in 4 mm limited speed rotors, in which at most ∼14 mg of protein could be packed (approximately 16% by mass), with the remainder water. Limited speed 3.2 mm rotors allow for only ∼7 mg of hydrated protein; however, upon drying, more than 24 mg of protein was packed in the same 3.2 mm rotor model. The large quantity of material in the smaller coil volume, combined with the enhanced CP, resulted in a greater than four-fold sensitivity gain per unit time.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of 2D CC (10 ms DARR mixing) spectra of AS fibrils. A) Dried AS fibrils acquired on a 500 MHz spectrometer, ∼30 μl sample volume, 1.7 h at 0 °C; B) Hydrated AS fibrils acquired on a 600 MHz spectrometer, ∼100 μl sample volume, 2.2 h at -40 °C. Both spectra were processed identically, with 0.26 ppm line broadening in both dimensions, and drawn with contours 5 times the noise level.

2D 13C-13C spectra (Figure 2) have similar spectral fingerprints. For example, the patterns of Thr, Ser, Gly, Ala and Ile cross peaks (as indicated on the figure) are qualitatively similar in both spectra. The overall appearance does differ, due to the fact that the dried AS spectra have much greater overall intensity. This is especially significant among side-chain resonances, such as Glu CB/CG-CD and Asp CB-CG (F1 = 180-185, F2 = 30-40 ppm). Many peaks appear in this dried fibril spectrum that could only be observed with more than a day of signal averaging with the hydrated fibrils. Such 2D spectra were also used to confirm that of the drying procedure was readily reproduced and the samples have indefinite stability.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Strip plot of 3D NCC/CNC type experiments demonstrating the backbone walk from V74 to A76. Spectra from left to right are NCOCX, CAN(CO)CX, CON(CA)CX, and NCACX 3Ds. Experiment time for each was 20 h.

We acquired 3D spectra to identify backbone correlations for the unambiguous assignment of N, C’, CA and side-chain 13C chemical shifts; NCOCX, CAN(CO)CX, NCACX, and CON(CA)CX spectra were acquired in 20 h each (Figure 3) using methods described elsewhere.23 Signal positions were consistent with those previously reported, and the line widths (0.58±0.15 ppm in the 13C dimensions and 0.96±0.26 ppm for 15N) were within error the same as those of hydrated fibrils. This indicates that the drying procedure caused no significant deterioration in microscopic order of the fibril core.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Correlation of chemical shifts between hydrated and dried AS fibrils.

We proceeded to assign the majority of resonances in the fibril core from V66 to F94 (Supporting Information), enabling a site-specific comparison of hydrated and dried AS fibrils. The chemical shift values are highly correlated between the two states (Figure 4). For example, the correlation coefficient (R2) for 15N chemical shifts is 0.984, and the root-mean-squared deviation (RMSD) of the 15N chemical shifts is 0.88 ppm, slightly less than the average 15N linewidth. The aliphatic 13C sites (CA and CB) agree with an even higher R2 value of 0.996 and RMSD of 0.89 ppm, and for the carbonyl 13C values R2 is 0.965 and the RMSD 0.45 ppm, less than the average 13C linewidth. The aliphatic 13C chemical shifts depend most strongly upon backbone conformation, and therefore the high similarity indicates a conserved secondary structure. The most prominent outliers are S87 and I88, which (based on our previous TALOS analysis16) are likely in a turn. Excluding those sites, the overall RMSD for the other 68 assigned 15N and 13C chemical shifts is 0.46 ppm. The agreement is remarkable when considering that the signals for the dried fibrils were assigned de novo.

Conclusions

SSNMR spectra of dried AS fibrils demonstrate that loss of water does not significantly alter the structure of the fibril core. The chemical shifts of the core region are identical within experimental error to hydrated AS fibrils. Therefore the secondary structure is not significantly changed by the dehydration process. Moreover, the common sidechain 13C chemical shifts indicate that no major rearrangements of rotameric states occur. One significant difference observed is that dynamics are attenuated, as judged by a reduced temperature-dependent of the signal intensities. This is consistent with the periphery of the fibril becoming more tightly packed upon dehydration.

In addition to the insights into AS secondary structure, the dried fibrils provide a benefit to sensitivity, as previously recognized for β-amyloid by Tycko and co-workers.17 Enhanced spectral sensitivity is particularly valuable for multidimensional experiments in which multiple polarization transfer steps are involved. Here we obtained optimal pulse sequence performance for several 3D experiments, enabling independent assignment of the fibril core with only a few days of experimental data. We anticipate that these same characteristics will enable experiments for measurements of long-range distances, which require high power decoupling.24

Together these capabilities will contribute to the determination of AS fibril structures at atomic resolution, in order to relate the structure to functional properties of AS fibrils. This information will, in turn, enable elucidation of the role(s) that this protein plays in the etiology and/or progression of Parkinson’s disease.

Supplementary Material

1File002

Acknowledgement

We thank the National Institutes of Health (R01GM073770) for funding, Dr. Donghua H. Zhou, W. Trent Franks, and Prof. Julia M. George for insightful discussions, and Prof. Beat H. Meier (ETH-Hönggerberg) for advice regarding fibril sample drying. K.D.K. was a James R. Beck Fellow.

References

  • (1).Conway KA, Harper JD, Lansbury PT. Biochemistry. 2000;39:2552. doi: 10.1021/bi991447r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R, Goedert M. Nature. 1997;388:839. doi: 10.1038/42166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Polymeropoulos MH, Lavedan C, Leroy E, Ide SE, Dehejia A, Dutra A, Pike B, Root H, Rubenstein J, Boyer R, Stenroos ES, Chandrasekharappa S, Athanassiadou A, Papapetropoulos T, Johnson WG, Lazzarini AM, Duvoisin RC, DiIorio G, Golbe LI, Nussbaum RL. Science. 1997;276:2045. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Kruger R, Kuhn W, Muller T, Woitalla D, Graeber M, Kosel S, Przuntek H, Epplen JT, Schols L, Riess O. Nat. Genet. 1998;18:106. doi: 10.1038/ng0298-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Zarranz JJ, Alegre J, Gomez-Esteban JC, Lezcano E, Ros R, Ampuero I, Vidal L, Hoenicka J, Rodriguez O, Atares B, Llorens V, Tortosa EG, del Ser T, Munoz DG, de Yebenes JG. Ann. Neurol. 2004;55:164. doi: 10.1002/ana.10795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Der-Sarkissian A, Jao CC, Chen J, Langen R. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:37530. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305266200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Chen M, Margittai M, Chen J, Langen R. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;2007:24970. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700368200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Balbach JJ, Petkova AT, Oyler NA, Antzutkin ON, Gordon DJ, Meredith SC, Tycko R. Biophys. J. 2002;83:1205. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75244-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Petkova AT, Ishii Y, Balbach JJ, Antzutkin ON, Leapman RD, Delaglio F, Tycko R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:16742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262663499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Petkova AT, Yau WM, Tycko R. Biochemistry. 2006;45:498. doi: 10.1021/bi051952q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Petkova AT, Leapman RD, Guo ZH, Yau WM, Mattson MP, Tycko R. Science. 2005;307:262. doi: 10.1126/science.1105850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Ritter C, Maddelein ML, Siemer AB, Luhrs T, Ernst M, Meier BH, Saupe SJ, Riek R. Nature. 2005;435:844. doi: 10.1038/nature03793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Siemer AB, Ritter C, Steinmetz MO, Ernst M, Riek R, Meier BH. J. Biomol. NMR. 2006;34:75. doi: 10.1007/s10858-005-5582-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Siemer AB, Arnold AA, Ritter C, Westfeld T, Ernst M, Riek R, Meier BH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:13224. doi: 10.1021/ja063639x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Heise H, Hoyer W, Becker S, Andronesi OC, Riedel D, Baldus M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:15871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506109102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Kloepper KD, Zhou DH, Li Y, Winter KA, George JM, Rienstra CM. J. Biomol. NMR. 2007 doi: 10.1007/s10858-007-9189-z. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Bu Z, Shi Y, Callaway DJE, Tycko R. Biophys. J. 2007;92:594. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.091017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Perutz MF, Finch JT, Berriman J, Lesk A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:5591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.042681399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Kloepper KD, Woods WS, Winter KA, George JM, Rienstra CM. Protein Express. Purif. 2006;48:112. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. J. Biomol. NMR. 1995;6:277. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Morcombe CR, Zilm KW. J. Magn. Reson. 2003;162:479. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(03)00082-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Franks WT, Zhou DH, Wylie BJ, Money BG, Graesser DT, Frericks HL, Sahota G, Rienstra CM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:12291. doi: 10.1021/ja044497e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Franks WT, Kloepper KD, Wylie BJ, Rienstra CM. J. Biomol. NMR. 2007 doi: 10.1007/s10858-007-9179-1. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Jaroniec CP, Filip C, Griffin RG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:10728. doi: 10.1021/ja026385y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1File002

RESOURCES