Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To test the effects of feedback of information about patients' asthma to primary care teams. DESIGN--Patients' reports of morbidity, use of health services, and drug use on questionnaire was given to primary care teams. Randomised controlled trial with general practices as the subject of the intervention was used to test effectiveness of supplying information. SETTING--Primary care in district health authority, London. SUBJECTS--23 general practices, each of which notified at least 20 asthmatic patients aged 15-60 years for each principal. Practices were randomly allocated to an invention group (receiving feedback of information on control of asthma) or a control group (no feedback). INTERVENTION--Information on cards inserted in patients' medical records; booklet copies of information for team members; formal presentation to primary care teams; poster displays of data on patients in each practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Type and frequency of asthma symptoms, use of health services, use of asthma drugs. RESULTS--Reported morbidity at entry to the study was substantial: 45% (818) patients reported breathlessness at least once a week. Less than half these patients were using inhaled steroids regularly. Intervention and control groups did not differ in practice or patient characteristics on entry to the study. In spite of the potential for improvement no differences were observed between the two practice groups at the end of the study--for example, breathlessness at least once a week in last six months was experienced by 36% in intervention group v 35% in control group (t = -0.27, P < 0.79); surgery attendance in last six months by 48% v 48% (t = -0.05, P < 0.96); regular use of inhaled steroids by 60% v 58% (t = 0.51, P < 0.62). CONCLUSION--Feedback to general practitioners of information about patients' asthma does not on its own lead to change in the outcome of clinical care.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barritt P. W., Staples E. B. Measuring success in asthma care: a repeat audit. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Jun;41(347):232–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones K. Asthma care in general practice--time for revolution? Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Jun;41(347):224–226. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas J., Sisk J. E., Stocking B. From evidence to practice in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):405–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mugford M., Banfield P., O'Hanlon M. Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. BMJ. 1991 Aug 17;303(6799):398–402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6799.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiegal N., Murphy E., Kinmonth A. L., Ross F., Bain J., Coates R. Managing change in general practice: a step by step guide. BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):231–234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6821.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szczepura A., Wilmot J., Davies C., Fletcher J. Effectiveness and cost of different strategies for information feedback in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):19–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White P. T., Pharoah C. A., Anderson H. R., Freeling P. Randomized controlled trial of small group education on the outcome of chronic asthma in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 May;39(322):182–186. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winkens R. A., Pop P., Grol R. P., Kester A. D., Knottnerus J. A. Effect of feedback on test ordering behaviour of general practitioners. BMJ. 1992 Apr 25;304(6834):1093–1096. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6834.1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]