Abstract
Since 1991 the NHS has attempted to identify and prioritise its needs for research and development in a systematic manner. This has not been done before and there is little evidence on which to draw. Multidisciplinary expert groups have identified priorities in different topics using explicit criteria and after widespread consultation within the NHS and research community to identify pressing problems and opportunities for research. This paper focuses on a review completed in 1993 to identify research and development priorities for the NHS in relation to the interface between primary and secondary care. The review covered several recent developments which require evaluation. The authors describe the process used to identify research and development priorities in this complex subject and examine the strengths and weaknesses of the approach. This case study should help to stimulate a wider debate on methods of identifying priorities, particularly those using participatory approaches, in research and non-research contexts.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Black D. A., Pole J. D. Priorities in biomedical research. Indices of burden. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1975 Dec;29(4):222–227. doi: 10.1136/jech.29.4.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulter A., Bradlow J. Effect of NHS reforms on general practitioners' referral patterns. BMJ. 1993 Feb 13;306(6875):433–437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6875.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drummond M. F., Davies L. M., Ferris F. L., 3rd Assessing the costs and benefits of medical research: the diabetic retinopathy study. Soc Sci Med. 1992 May;34(9):973–981. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90128-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haines A., Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488–1492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knottnerus J. A., Joosten J., Daams J. Comparing the quality of referrals of general practitioners with high and average referral rates: an independent panel review. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 May;40(334):178–181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. Why do research and which research to do? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Nov 14;295(6608):1248–1252. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6608.1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]