Abstract

We report direct electrochemistry of the iNOS heme domain in a DDAB film on the surface of a basal plane graphite electrode. Cyclic voltammetry reveals FeIII/II and FeII/I couples at −191 and −1049 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl). Added ligands imidazole and carbon monoxide shift the FeIII/II potential by +20 and +62 mV, while the addition of dioxygen results in large catalytic waves at the onset of FeIII reduction. Voltammetry at higher scan rates reveals that the FeIII/II cathodic peak can be resolved into two components, which are attributable to FeIII/II couples of 5- and 6-coordinate hemes. Digital simulation of our experimental data implicates water dissociation from the heme as a gating mechanism for ET in iNOS.
The critical role of nitric oxide (NO) in cellular signaling is firmly established.1 In higher animals, NO is synthesized by nitric oxide synthase (NOS), which converts L-arginine to citrulline and NO with NADPH and O2 as co-substrates.2 The enzyme consists of a reductase domain where electrons from NADPH are shuttled through bound flavins FAD and FMN, a calmodulin binding region that controls electron transfer (ET) to the heme, and a heme domain that contains a cysteine-ligated heme and tetrahydrobiopterin (H4B). Investigations herein utilize the heme domain of inducible NOS (iNOS), an immune system isoform implicated in several diseases in humans.3
The complexity of NOS and its impact on human health have thrust work on the NOS mechanism into the spotlight. It is well established that the catalytic cycle involves two turnovers of the enzyme. The first turnover converts L-arginine to N-hydroxyarginine: although envisioned as a P450-like hydroxylation, the reaction is dependent on one-electron oxidation of H4B.4 The second turnover is thought to involve a ferric peroxide nucleophile, but H4B is also required for this turnover in an as yet undetermined role. Although many details of the NOS mechanism remain to be elucidated, it is certain that ET reactions are key steps in the catalytic cycle.
Direct electrochemistry of iNOS can be achieved by confining the protein in didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) films on the surface of basal plane graphite electrodes (BPG).5–7 We report reduction potentials for FeIII/II and FeII/I couples, FeIII/II ET kinetics, catalytic reduction of dioxygen, and evidence for water-free and water-bound forms of the iNOS heme based on scan rate and pH dependence data.
DDAB films were formed on BPG (0.07 cm2) by depositing 5 μL of a 10 mM aqueous solution of DDAB on the electrode surface, followed by slow drying overnight. iNOS was incorporated into the film by soaking the coated electrode in a solution of enzyme (~ 20 μM in 50 mM KPi, 50 mM KCl, pH 7 buffer) for 30 minutes. A voltammogram of iNOS in DDAB on BPG is shown in Figure 1. We have assigned E1 (−191 mV) and E2 (−1049 mV) to heme FeIII/II and FeII/I couples, consistent with other studies of heme proteins in DDAB films.8,9 Notably, a couple similar to E2 was observed for neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), but was not assigned.7 Our assignments of E1 and E2 are supported by voltammetry in the presence of carbon monoxide: E1 shifts approximately +62 mV (consistent with other studies10,11), while E2 is not observed (presumably beyond the solvent window). For comparison, redox titrations of iNOS in its resting state (6-coordinate heme, low spin) conducted in solution yield a potential of −544 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl) for FeIII/II.12 Empirically, potential shifts are usually observed for heme proteins in surfactant films;13 the hydrophobic film likely leads to partial heme dehydration, causing the positive potential shift.14
Figure 1.

Cyclic voltammogram of iNOS in DDAB on BPG (0.07 cm2) at 200 mV/s in 50 mM KPi/50 mM KCl/pH7.
Besides CO, other molecules in solution also bind the heme. In the presence of 500 mM imidazole, E1 shifts +20 mV. When dioxygen is added, large catalytic reduction currents at the onset of E1 are observed (Supporting Information, Figure S1).
For E1, the peak current is linear with scan rate (surface bound) up to 16.7 V/s, after which it is linear with the square root of the scan rate (diffusive).15 This behavior is characteristic of thin film electrochemistry and indicates finite diffusion of the protein within the film.16 Thus, up to 16.7 V/s, we treated the redox system as surface-confined.
Closer inspection of Figure 1 reveals that the E1 cathodic wave is slightly broader than the other waves. Voltammetry at variable scan rates allowed us to resolve this peak into two distinct cathodic processes, Ep,c(1) and Ep,c(2). Figure 2a shows voltammograms recorded in pH 7 buffer at different scan rates. At high and low scan rates (8 vs. 0.05 V/s) only one cathodic peak (Ep,c(1) vs. Ep,c(2)) is present, while both cathodic processes are observed at intermediate (1 V/s) scan rates. In addition to being scan rate dependent, these cathodic processes are also pH dependent. At pH 5 and 1 V/s (Figure 2b), only one cathodic peak (Ep,c(1)) is present. Conversely, at pH 9 two distinct cathodic peaks are visible at 1 V/s (Figure 2c); in fact, at higher pH, Ep,c(2) is even more prominent. Notably, during the first cathodic sweep Ep,c(2) predominates, while in subsequent cathodic sweeps both Ep,c(1) and Ep,c(2) are resolved.
Figure 2.
Cyclic voltammograms of iNOS in DDAB on BPG in 50 mM KPi/50 mM KCl a) at 0.05 (black), 1 (gray), and 8 (dashed) V/s, pH 7; b) at 1 V/s, pH 5; c) at 1 V/s, pH 9. d) Variation of the average FeIII/II midpoint potential with pH at 200 mV/s.
This pH and scan rate dependence led us to believe that the iNOS heme axial water ligand is involved in an equilibrium that gives rise to Ep,c(1) and Ep,c(2) (Scheme 1). At pH 7 and 1 V/s, the first cathodic sweep results in Ep,c(2): this correlates with initial reduction of FeIII – OH2. The lability of the FeII – OH2 bond results in rapid conversion to a 5-coordinate heme.17,18 Oxidation of FeII to FeIII, followed by a second cathodic sweep at intermediate scan rates (1 V/s, Figure 2a) gives rise to two reduction peaks, corresponding to reduction of water-free (Ep,c(1)) and water-bound (Ep,c(2)) FeIII hemes.
Scheme 1.

Our interpretation is supported by the following observations. First, Ep,c(1) and Ep,c(2) differ by approximately 133 ± 9 mV, a value consistent with the potential difference between 5- and 6-coordinate iNOS hemes.12 Second, voltammetry at low pH results in a single cathodic peak attributable to Ep,c(1). Under acidic conditions, disruption of hydrogen bonding in the heme pocket likely leads to dissociation of the axial water, resulting in a 5-coordinate heme. Third, voltammetry at high pH (Figure 2c), where the axial water is partially deprotonated, shows that Ep,c(2) is more prominent. Hydroxide will have greater affinity for the cationic metal center, thereby shifting the cathodic peak distribution further to Ep,c(2). Fourth, voltammetry in the presence of imidazole yields a single cathodic process, consistent with constant heme ligation as it cycles between oxidation states (Figure S2).19
The dependence of the cathodic peak distribution on scan rate can be explained in terms of Scheme 1. At high scan rates, after oxidation of FeII, reduction of water-free FeIII occurs faster than water ligation to FeIII, yielding only Ep,c(1). Conversely, scanning slow allows water enough time to ligate FeIII before reduction, shifting the cathodic peak distribution to Ep,c(2). Thus, intermediate scan rates yield both Ep,c(1) and Ep,c(2).
Using Ep,c(1), k° (ΔG° = 0) for ET to the 5-coordinate heme evaluated at 16.7 V/s and pH 7 is 370 s−1.20 With this value, we used digital simulation to effectively model the experimental results in Figure 2a (see Supporting Information). From the simulation, we estimated values for k1, k2, and k3 in Scheme 1 to be 1 s−1, 0.5 s−1, and > 100 s−1. As expected,17,18 water dissociation from FeII is rapid (k3), while the kinetics of the FeIII equilibrium with water (k1, k2) appear slow. In the catalytic cycle of iNOS, the first ET event is proposed to be the rate-limiting step for substrate turnover, occurring at 1 s−1.21 k° for the 5-coordinate heme indicates that well-coupled pathways do exist between the protein surface and the heme; thus, electron tunneling is unlikely to be rate-limiting in catalysis. Rather, our simulation suggests that water dissociation from FeIII may function as a potential gating mechanism for the catalytic cycle.22
Proton-coupled ET was observed for nNOS in DDAB films as demonstrated by the variation of E1/2 with pH.7 For comparison, we performed voltammetry on iNOS at 200 mV/s and plotted the variation of E1/2 with pH for E1 (Figure 2d).23 The data reveal no variation of E1/2 for pH < 5, implying simple conversion of 5-coordinate FeIII to FeII. At pH > 7, E1/2 varies linearly with pH according to −53 mV/pH unit, as is often found for heme proteins.24,25 The observation of proton-coupled ET in a pH range where the heme is water-ligated further indicates that the heme axial water ligand gates ET in iNOS.
Supplementary Material
Details of electrode preparation, protein purification, digital simulations, voltammograms in the presence of dioxygen and imidazole, cytochrome c voltammetry, and an iNOS DDAB film spectrum. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs/acs/org.
Acknowledgments
We thank NSERC (Canada) (AKU), HHMI (AKU), NIH (DK19038 to HBG, GM070868 to DBG), the David and Lucille Packard Foundation (MGH) and the Parsons Foundation (WBB) for research support; S. Luzzi (U.C. Berkeley) for assistance with protein expression and purification.
References
- 1.Culotta E, Koshland DE. Science. 1992;258:1862–1865. doi: 10.1126/science.1361684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alderton WK, Cooper CE, Knowles RG. Biochemical J. 2001;357:593–615. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3570593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aktan F. Life Sciences. 2003;75:639–657. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hurshman AR, Krebs C, Edmondson DE, Marletta MA. Biochemistry. 2003;42:13287–13303. doi: 10.1021/bi035491p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rusling JF. Acc Chem Res. 1998;31:363–369. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Studies have shown that heme proteins retain their solution spectroscopic properties within surfactant films: see, for example, Ma H, Hu N. Anal Lett. 2001;34:339–361.Rusling JF, Nassar AF. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:11891–11897.
- 7.Direct electrochemistry of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase heme domain utilizing the surfactant film methodology has been reported (Bayachou M, Boutros JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:12722. doi: 10.1021/ja0482987.
- 8.Immoos CE, Chou J, Bayachou M, Blair E, Greaves J, Farmer PJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:4934–4942. doi: 10.1021/ja038925c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma H, Hu N. Anal Lett. 2001;34:339–361. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Z, Nassar AE, Lu Z, Schenkman JB, Rusling JF. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans. 1997;93:1769–1774. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fleming BD, Tian Y, Bell SG, Wong L, Urlacher V, Hill HAO. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:4082–4088. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03799.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Presta A, Weber-Main AM, Stankovich MT, Stuehr DJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:9460–9465. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lvov YM, Lu Z, Schenkman JB, Zu X, Rusling JF. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:4073–4080. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tezcan FA, Winkler JR, Gray HB. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:13383–13388. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bard AJ, Faulkner LR. Electrochemical Methods. 2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; New York: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lin R, Immoos CE, Farmer PJ. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2000;5:738–747. doi: 10.1007/s007750000163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wilker JJ, Dmochowski IJ, Dawson JH, Winkler JR, Gray HB. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:90–92. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Crutchley RJ, Ellis WR, Gray HB. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:5002–5004. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dawson JH, Andersson LA, Sono M. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:13637–13645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Laviron E. J Electroanal Chem. 1979;101:19–28. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Presta A, Siddhanta U, Wu C, Sennequier N, Huang L, Abu-Soud HM, Erzurum S, Stuehr DJ. Biochemistry. 1998;37:298–310. doi: 10.1021/bi971944c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.See Armstrong FA. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans. 2002:661–671. for a discussion of gated ET in proteins.
- 23.At 200 mV/s, the two cathodic peaks in E1 collapse into a single peak, yielding a potential representative of the population distribution between Ep,c(1) and Ep,c(2) and permitting us to estimate a midpoint potential (E1/2) for E1.
- 24.Munge B, Estavillo C, Schenkman JB, Rusling JF. ChemBioChem. 2003;4:82–89. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200390018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aguey-Zinsou K, Bernhardt PV, Voss JJD, Slessor KE. Chem Commun. 2003:418–419. doi: 10.1039/b211567k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Details of electrode preparation, protein purification, digital simulations, voltammograms in the presence of dioxygen and imidazole, cytochrome c voltammetry, and an iNOS DDAB film spectrum. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs/acs/org.

