Skip to main content
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
letter
. 1982 Mar;74(3):267–272.

Value of X-Ray Pelvimetry in Primiparas. II: Influence on Management of Labor

Pedro A Poma
PMCID: PMC2552853  PMID: 7120463

Abstract

Despite its potential risks x-ray pelvimetry remains a common diagnostic procedure performed during labor. In order to determine whether x-ray pelvimetry measurements influence the outcome of labor (vaginal vs cesarean), 280 consecutive primiparous parturients were studied.

Most parturients were black at term with a vertex presentation. Most pelvimetries were ordered for suspected cephalopelvic disproportion. Of the total number of parturients studied, 31.8 percent had cesarean deliveries, 85.4 percent of them because of CPD. The clinical characteristics compared were similar among the groups studied. X-ray pelvimetry values obtained by two techniques were similar to those previously reported. Although correlations between measurements and delivery route were noted, these values, by themselves, did not have a necessary correlation to the route of delivery in the majority of parturients studied.

This finding, like others reported, emphasizes the need to abandon x-ray pelvimetry as a requirement for documenting contracted pelves before abdominal deliveries. CPD should be documented by evaluating the pelvis, quality of labor, and maternal-fetal well-being by other appropriate, less risky means readily available.

Full text

PDF
267

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Campbell J. A. X-ray pelvimetry: useful procedure or medical nonsense. J Natl Med Assoc. 1976 Nov;68(6):514–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fine E. A., Bracken M., Berkowitz R. L. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May 1;137(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90378-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. O'Driscoll K., Jackson R. J., Gallagher J. T. Active management of labour and cephalopelvic disproportion. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1970 May;77(5):385–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1970.tb03539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Poma P. A. Use of labor graphs in a community hospital. Int Surg. 1979 Nov-Dec;64(6):7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Poma P. A. X-ray pelvimetry in primiparas. I: Role of physiological maturity. J Natl Med Assoc. 1982 Feb;74(2):173–179. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Varner M. W., Cruikshank D. P., Laube D. W. X-ray pelvimetry in clinical obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Sep;56(3):296–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES