Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Surgery logoLink to Canadian Journal of Surgery
. 2008 Aug;51(4):E92–E94.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive common bile duct exploration: a Canadian first

Shiva Jayaraman 1, Ward Davies 1, Christopher M Schlachta 1
PMCID: PMC2552933  PMID: 18815640

The first published report of a robot-assisted common bile duct exploration appeared in 2003.1 According to Intuitive Surgical, Inc., the manufacturer of the da Vinci system, a total of 3 robot-assisted common bile duct explorations have since been performed worldwide. As far as we can ascertain, this case constitutes the second published report and the first Canadian case.

Case report

An 84-year-old woman with significant medical comorbidities presented with obstructive jaundice and radiographic evidence of choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was attempted but was unsuccessful owing to a duodenal diverticulum. The patient was referred for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. After consultation by the Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery service, it was determined that, with a common duct stone measuring 2 cm in greatest dimension, a laparoscopic transcystic approach would not be feasible. A pilot experience of 18 robot-assisted cholecystectomies had been completed, so we obtained consent for a da Vinci–assisted common bile duct exploration.

The surgical procedure was performed successfully. Five operating ports were used: a 12-mm camera port, two 8-mm da Vinci ports, a 12-mm accessory and retracting port and a 5-mm port for cholangiography and choledochoscopy. After dissecting the Triangle of Calot, we carried out a transcystic cholangiography under fluoroscopy. This demonstrated several biliary calculi. The porta hepatis was exposed, and a 2-cm anterior choledochotomy was performed. Choledochoscopy and basket extraction of the multiple calculi and sludge were required (Fig. 1). We performed a full choledochoscopy from the ampulla of Vater to the secondary bile ducts. We inserted a T-tube and closed the choledochotomy around it with 5–0 polydioxanone sutures (Fig. 2). A postplacement T-tube cholangiogram demonstrated no residual stones and free flow of contrast into the duodenum. The patient was discharged on the first postoperative day. T-tube cholangiography and tube removal were scheduled for 4 weeks later.

graphic file with name E10FF1.jpg

FIG. 1. Choledochoscopy basket extraction of common-bile-duct stones. The insertion of the scope into the common bile duct was greatly facilitated by the dexterity provided by the robot.

graphic file with name E10FF2.jpg

FIG. 2. Suture closure of the choledochotomy and insertion of a T-tube.

Discussion

There are several published reports of successful abdominal operations using robotic devices.2 The robot eliminates surgeon tremor and allows 3-dimensional visualization of the operative environment.3 However, the main advantage of the da Vinci surgical system is the dexterity afforded by the Endowrist design, which allows precise control of technically challenging tasks such as fine suturing. These benefits were realized by the relative ease with which we could dissect around the bile duct, perform the choledochotomy and suture the bile duct. Similarly, choledochoscopy was greatly facilitated by robot-guided introduction and manipulation in the duct.

The role of robot assistance in general surgery continues to increase as computer assistance in the form of mechatronics and image guidance evolves. This case highlights the advantages of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. An elderly patient with multiple comorbidities was discharged home 1 day after a major operation and experienced no complications. The place of robot assistance will continue to be studied because it may pose a viable alternative treatment of choledocholithiasis for patients with contraindications to ERCP. Similarly, the technical advantages and control conferred by the da Vinci system make common bile duct exploration more facile than standard laparoscopic techniques.1 We are performing a series of cases to further study the efficacy and role of this novel approach.

Presented at the Canadian Surgery Forum, Toronto, Ont., Sept. 6–9, 2007.

Competing interests: None declared.

Accepted for publication Jan. 16, 2008

Correspondence to: Dr. C.M. Schlachta, CSTAR (Canadian Surgical Technologies & Advanced Robotics), 339 Windermere Rd., London ON N6A 5A5; fax 519 663-3481; Christopher.Schlachta@lhsc.on.ca

References

  • 1.Roeyen G, Chapelle T, Ysebaert D. Robot-assisted choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:165-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, et al. Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2004;91:1390-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH, et al. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg 2001;234:475-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES