Skip to main content
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
letter
. 1982 Aug;74(8):785–788.

Pathogenesis of Tubal Pregnancy

John F J Clark, Gerard P Verly, Harold D Johnson
PMCID: PMC2552970  PMID: 7131577

Abstract

A review was made of 706 ectopic pregnancies treated at Howard University Hospital over a 20-year period. Comparison of two 10-year periods was made with special regard to the association of an inflammatory process in the involved tube. It is not the intention of this study to deny chronic pelvic inflammatory disease as a factor in the etiology of ectopic pregnancy, but it is not considered the main cause.

An inflammatory process was associated in 40.1 percent of cases during the first 10 years, and 16.7 percent of cases in the second 10 years. Further study is necessary to elucidate the cause of ectopic pregnancy, probably in the direction of functional disturbances rather than structural defects.

Full text

PDF
785

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASHERMAN J. G. Etiology of ectopic pregnancy: a new concept. Obstet Gynecol. 1955 Dec;6(6):619–624. doi: 10.1097/00006250-195512000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clarke G. A., Letchworth A. T., Anderson M. C. Ectopic pregnancy by transmigration of sperm after sterilisation with Hulka-Clemens clips. Br Med J. 1979 Mar 10;1(6164):659–660. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6164.659-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Franklin E. W., 3rd, Zeiderman A. M. Tubal ectopic pregnancy: etiology and obstetric and gynecologic sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Sep 15;117(2):220–225. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90635-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Honore L. H. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa in female infertility and ectopic tubal pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1978 Feb;29(2):164–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Honoré L. H. Tubal ectopic pregnancy with contralateral corpus luteum: a report of five cases. J Reprod Med. 1978 Oct;21(4):269–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iffy L., Gasser R. F. Letter: Tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Mar;47(3):380–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Metz K. G., Mastroianni L., Jr Tubal pregnancy subsequent to transperitoneal migration of spermatozoa. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1979 Jul;34(7):554–560. doi: 10.1097/00006254-197907010-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moore O. A., Waxman M., Udoffia C. Leiomyoma of the fallopian tube: a cause of tubal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 May 1;134(1):101–102. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90803-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Niles, Clark J. F. Pathogenesis of tubal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Dec 15;105(8):1230–1234. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(69)90295-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oronsaye A. U. Reproductive performance among patients with tubal ectopic pregnancy. Niger Med J. 1979 Feb;9(2):247–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES