Skip to main content
Cytotechnology logoLink to Cytotechnology
. 2008 Mar 29;56(3):151–160. doi: 10.1007/s10616-008-9144-1

Expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation: trends and perspectives

Hera Andrade-Zaldívar 1, Leticia Santos 1, Antonio De León Rodríguez 1,
PMCID: PMC2553633  PMID: 19002853

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood transplantation is clinically limited by its low progenitor cell content. Ex vivo expansion has become an alternative to increase the cell dose available for transplants. Expansion has been evaluated in several ways such as static cultures combining growth factors or mimicking the natural microenvironment using co-culture systems. However, static cultures have a small volume capacity and therefore large-scale expansion has been addressed using bioreactors. These and other biotechnological approaches for the expansion of hematopoietic progenitors and their utility to study several aspects of hematopoietic stem cell biology are discussed here.

Keywords: 2D-culture, 3D-culture, Human cells, Leukemia, Rotating wall vessel, Stirred tank, Transplant

Introduction

Blood tissue transplantation is not limited to traditional blood transfusions containing mature blood cells. It is also possible to renovate the entire blood system transplanting hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) to allow a full recovery of the hematopoietic system in patients with different hematological disorders such as aplastic anemia and leukemia. This approach opened a wide range of clinical applications for progenitor blood cells transplantation including gene therapy (Zubler 2006) and the generation of specific mature cell types (Matsunaga et al. 2006; Introna et al. 2006).

HSC are self-renewing multipotent cells able to produce all blood cell lineages. They are found in the bone marrow and they can migrate to the circulating blood only with the proper stimulation (Tong et al. 1994). Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is other major source of HSC, which has been successfully used for transplantation since 1989 (Gluckman et al. 1989). The possibility of creating UCB banks is a reality (Bornstein et al. 2005); therefore UCB is increasingly gaining attention as a reliable source of HSC for transplantation, and it is currently an accepted therapy for several diseases. Bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells autologous transplantation reduces the risk of immunological rejection and are preferred as therapeutic approaches. But, various reports showed that UCB has several advantages over the other sources of HSC when allogenic transplantation is needed, e.g. accessibility and non-invasive collection procedure, a lower chance of host versus graft disease and more flexibility for multi-lineage differentiation (Saulnier et al. 2005). The main drawback in UCB transplantation is the low quantity of HSC, since the content per UCB unit ranges between 0.4 and 1.0 × 109 total mononuclear cells (MNC), whereas the dose currently recommended ranges from 2.0 × 107 to 2.5 × 107 MNC/kg. A dose lower than 1.5 × 107 MNC/kg showed poor results (Bornstein et al. 2005), thus restricting UCB transplantation to pediatric patients in most of the cases. Since the biology of HSC and their microenvironment are not totally understood (Hofmeister et al. 2007), it has not been easy to overcome this issue. Ex vivo expansion of HSC from UCB and other sources became an alternative to increase the cell-dose available for transplants and to further research on HSC. There is evidence that even if short-term expansion may modify HSC properties, it is strongly probable that the engraftment characteristics remain unaltered (Zhai et al. 2004).

HSC culture requirements

HSC require an adequate microenvironment to keep their stem properties. In bone marrow the microenvironment is very complex, HSC are surrounded by bone matrix and different cells including fibroblast, adipocyte, macrophage and endothelial cells, which produce various cytokines and growth factors; these signaling molecules induce HSC to differentiate or to remain in the stem state maintaining a balance in hematopoiesis.

In vitro HSC culture requires a suitable microenvironment, for that reason, different culture media, growth factors and supplements have been tested (Table 1). Most investigators have used Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM) plus animal or human serum and combinations of cytokines. Alternatively, serum-free and animal product-free media have been developed to avoid immunological issues affecting transplantation. Different cytokine cocktails aim the proliferation of undifferentiated HSC and the maintenance of their engraftment capacity. The optimal combination and concentration of growth factors to preserve the stem state has not been yet established (Mohamed et al. 2006; Piacibello et al. 1998), but a mixture of stem cell factor (SCF), thrombopoietin (TPO), and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt-3L) is enough to support the expansion of HSC. However, no correlation has been found between the concentration of cytokines and the expansion of CD34+ cells (Mohamed et al. 2006). Another option to mimic the stromal niche is co-culture HSC with accessory cells (Zhang et al. 2006).

Table 1.

Comparison of different expansion protocols for human UCB hematopoietic stem cells using various cytokine combinations

Cytokine cocktail Serum Expansion of CD34+ cells at day 7 (fold) Reference
SCF, GM-CSF, IL-3, TPO, Flt-3L 20% FBS 11.21 ± 9.27 Mohamed et al. (2006)
SCF, GM-CSF, IL-3, TPO 20% FBS 10.18 ± 8.64 Mohamed et al. (2006)
SCF, GM-CSF, IL-3, TPO, IL-6 20% FBS 9.87 ± 8.57 Mohamed et al. (2006)
SCF, Flt-3L, TPO, IL-3, IL-6 20% FBS 3.2 Yang et al. (2008)
SCF, IL-6, IL-3 20% FBS 2.44 Qunliang et al. (2006)
SCF, TPO, Flt-3L, IL-3, G-CSF, IL-6 0% 27 Yao et al. (2006)
SCF, GM-CSF, IL-3, TPO, Flt-3L 0% 25.11 ± 13.50 Mohamed et al. (2006)
SCF, GM-CSF, IL-3, TPO 0% 24.98 ± 13.66 Mohamed et al. (2006)
SCF, GM-CSF, IL-3, TPO, IL-6 0% 24.56 ± 13.37 Mohamed et al. (2006)
G-CSF, IL-6, EPO 0% 6.36 ± 0.33 Chivu et al. (2004)

FBS: Fetal bovine serum

In vitro HSC culture should be a closed bioprocess to avoid the contamination, keep HSC undifferentiated and achieve a fold expansion enough to transplant adult patients. Different methods to expand HSC attempt the highest expansion with the lowest manipulation. Expansion in traditional static cultures e.g. T-flasks, culture bags and multi-well plates are not suitable for HSC, since these cells are likely to clump at the bottom and there is not proper nutrient and oxygen distribution. Moreover, it has been reported that primitive cells cultured under static conditions lose their unique stem features (Unsworth and Lelkes 1998). Suspension cultures and other platforms appeared as alternatives, e.g. perfusion chambers (Koller et al. 1998; Van Zant et al. 1994), and stirred tanks (De Leon et al. 1998; Collins et al. 1998; De León et al. 2001), showing advantages over static cultures. Reviews on approaches to expand HSC (Robinson et al. 2005; Cabrita et al. 2003) and clinical trials (Schoemans et al. 2006; Devine et al. 2003) have been published elsewhere. Therefore, we have focused this review on more recent biotechnological approaches aiming to increase the HSC content for transplantation.

Three-dimensional static cultures

The first cultures of UCB-HSC were performed in classic static culture dishes. However, static cultures do not provide the proper three-dimensional (3D) environment. Therefore, new strategies have been designed. The microenvironment of HSC has been mimicked with 3D-scaffolds. In one study UCB-HSC in a serum-free/cytokine-free medium were expanded on a commercial 3D carbon matrix (Cytomatrix) covered with fibronectin (Ehring et al. 2003). The culture system consisted of multi-well plates with or without the matrix. Since culture medium was serum and cytokine free, cells cultured without the matrix did not show expansion at all. Expanded cells showed engraftment capacity in the sub lethally irradiated severe combined immuno-deficient and non-obese diabetic (NOD/SCID) murine model. Similarly, the utility of 3D-scaffolds over 2D-cultures was demonstrated in a study using a fibronectin-immobilized 3D polyethylene terephthalate (PET) synthetic matrix, where UCB-CD34+ cells were cultured for 10 days in serum-free media yielding a 100-fold time expansion. Long term culture initiating cells (LTC-IC) which are responsible for long term engraftment presented a 47-fold expansion, in addition, the expanded cells allowed reconstitution of hematopoiesis in the NOD/SCID murine model (Feng et al. 2006).

Ceramic foams of Al2O3 and apatite have been used to provide a 3D-structure similar to bone (Schubert et al. 2004). Total nucleated cells from bone marrow and mobilized peripheral blood (1 × 106 cells/mL) were seeded on the foams in 6 well-plates. The static culture was carried out in IMDM supplemented with human AB serum and cytokines. After 12–27 days of culture, three morphologies and cell clusters covered the ceramic surface, supporting the multipotent capacity of the cells, although confirmation on the phenotype or the quantity of cells produced was not provided. Static systems with 3D-scaffolds have demonstrated the expansion of HSC keeping the repopulating ability. However, the recuperation of the cells requires mechanical or enzymatic detachment, which may damage the cells. These cultures ranged from 0.1 to 2 mL and the scale-up has not been performed, thus it is uncertain whether they will be useful for clinical applications.

Some groups have established co-cultures to provide a proper 3D microenvironment for HSC. Current work is focused on the creation of murine cell lines able to support UCB-HSC expansion (Qiu et al. 2003). The main drawback of xenogenic feeder cells is the risk of pathogens leading to infection and immunological reactions. Several studies tried to overcome this issue. For example, Fujimoto et al. attained a 194-fold expansion of UCB-MNC in 2 mL cultures using microencapsulated mouse or human feeder cells (Fujimoto et al. 2007). Feeder cells obtained from human bone marrow have been used to expand UCB-HSC in 5 mL cultures with SCF, TPO, Flt-3L plus human serum (Yamaguchi et al. 2002). Adherent cells obtained from UCB cultures have been used as feeder layers to support the expansion of HSC (Yoo et al. 2003; Jang et al. 2006). However, the engraftment capacity and the immunological reactions after transplantation need to be further studied. Xie et al. established an indirect co-culture system using retroviral transduced human mesenchymal stem cells expressing Flt-3L and TPO, and adding complementary cytokines to culture UCB-CD34+ cells. In a serum free co-culture of 7 days the MNC expansion was almost twice the expansion achieved using only cytokines. The colony forming unit of granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte and megakaryocyte (CFU-GEMM) showed a 13.55 ± 4.15 fold expansion while using only cytokines it was 3.23 ± 1.28. However, CD34+ and total CFU did not show a significant difference. Expanded cells also showed a bigger increase in the LTC-IC and similar engraftment to uncultured cells in the NOD/SCID murine model (Xie et al. 2006). The feeder layer systems have achieved expansion, but these approaches require preparing mono-layers previous to the culture, making the process slower. Besides, extra manipulation is needed to harvest the expanded HSC. The use of monolayers in large-scale cultures has not been evaluated neither. Due to this fact, together with immunological issues makes unknown whether these methods may be clinically relevant.

Static 3D approaches seem to expand HSC more efficiently than traditional 2D static cultures. But the use of inert supports or stromal cells involves additional steps to recuperate the cells—e.g. trypsin treatment—that may damage or reduce the number of cells.

Leaving aside the 3D support, Madlambayan et al. designed a static bioprocess consisting of two gas permeable culture bags separated by a magnetic system to eliminate undesired cells from the culture (Madlambayan et al. 2006). The multi-step process included seeding of cells, a first incubation of 4 days, separation of the fraction of interest, centrifugation for growth media renewal, and additional sub-cultivation for 4 days. With this device the total cell, CD34+, CFU, and LTC-IC fold expansion achieved 24.6 ± 3.6, 30.8 ± 7.2, 31.3 ± 5.8 and 32.6 ± 7.5 folds, respectively. Positive engraftment was demonstrated in the NOD/SCID murine model. This process was used for volumes up to 24 mL with little manipulation of the cells and it may be used for the amplification of cells for a clinical application.

Dynamic cultures

Despite static cultures have shown expansion of HSC, the scaling-up represents a major problem because more volume means less oxygen flow and less nutrient availability in the system. Several dynamic models that incorporate gas flow have been used to overcome this problem. Diverse bioreactors with specific characteristics (Table 2) have been designed for HSC expansion since the 1990s. In addition, the latest designs have served as well to study the HSC biology.

Table 2.

Recent approaches for human HSC expansion

System Cells Volume (mL) Media and growth factors Fold expansion Engraftment Reference
RWV0–6 rpm8 days 2 × 105 UCB-MNC/mL 33 IMDM, 10% FBS, 10% horse serum, 5.33 ng/mL IL-3, 16 ng/mL SCF, 3.33 ng/mL G-CSF, 2.13 ng/mL GM-CSF, 7.47 ng/mL Flt-3L and 7.47 ng/mL TPO MNC: 435 ± 87.6CD34+: 32.7 ± 15.6CFU-GM: 21.7 ± 4.9 Not tested Liu et al. (2006)
Spinner flask30 rpm7 days 1 × 106 Mbm CD34+/mL 30 IMDM, 20% FBS, 50 ng/mL SCF, 5 ng/mL IL-3 and 10 ng/mL IL-6 MNC: 1.27CD34+: 5.43CFU: 10.60 Not tested Qunliang et al. (2006)
DIDECO Pluricell30 rpm12 days 2 × 104 fresh UCB-CD34+/mL 38 Unknown with Flt-3L, TPO, IL-3, SCF and human plasma MNC: 230.4 ± 91.5CD34+: 21.0 ± 11.9CFU: ND Yes Astori et al. (2005)
Static 3D matrixFibronectin covered14 days 2.5 × 105 UCB-CD34+/mL 1 StemSpan (serum free)Cytokine free MNC: NDCD34+: 3CFU-GM: 2.6 Yes Ehring et al. (2003)
Static 3D matrixFibronectin-immobilized PET10 days 1.0 × 103 UCB-CD34+/mL 0.1 StemSpan (serum free)100 ng/mL SCF, 100 ng/mL Filt-3L, 50 ng/mLTPO, 20 ng/mL IL-3 MNC: NDCD34+: 100LTC-IC: 47 Yes Feng et al. (2006)
Static disposable bags8 days 1.0 × 103 UCB-CD34+/mL 2.3–24.5 StemSpan (serum free)100 ng/mL SCF, 100 ng/mL Flt-3L, 50 ng/mL TPO, 1 μg/mL low-density lipoproteins MNC: 24.6 ± 3.6CD34+: 30.8 ± 7.2CFU: 31.3 ± 5.8 Yes Madlambayan et al. (2006)
Stirred tank bioreactor75 rpm7 days 5 × 105 UCB-MNC/mL 120 IMDM, 10% FBS, 1 ng/mL IL-3, 5 ng/mL SCF, 1 ng/mL GM-CSF and 3 U/mL EPO MNC: 1.27CD34+: NDCFU: 7 Not tested De Leon et al. (1998)

ND: Not determined

Stirred and perfusion systems

Bioreactors have been useful to expand HSC as well as to study their in vitro biology (Van Zant et al. 1994; Robinson et al. 2005; Kwon et al. 2003). For instance, Qunliag et al. developed a comparative gene expression analysis of UCB-HSC grown in static and spinner flasks cultures (Qunliang et al. 2006). The differences in gene expression between the two systems were evaluated using cDNA micro-arrays and semi-quantitative PCR. They found 11 of 103 genes over-expressed in static culture which are involved in oxidative stress response and DNA repair. Genes over-expressed included Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD-1), glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT-1), excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation groups 1 and 3 (ERCC-1 and ERCC-3), tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1 (BTNFRSF1B), BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa interacting protein 3 (BNIP-3), glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI), and transcription factor forkhead box O1A (FOXO). These elements probably constitute the HSC response to the low-oxygen and the deprived-nutrient environment provided by the static culture, which cause gradient concentration of nutrients, growth factors, metabolites and poor gas flow. Another interesting finding was the over-expression of delta-like homolog 1 (DLK-1) in static culture. It is thought that DLK-1 blocks the differentiation of hematopoietic primitive cells. Differential expression of genes and proteins in diverse growth conditions leads to elucidate the active pathways in HSC, which could help to improve HSC expansion. However, this experiment only reported 1.27, 5.43 and 10.60-fold expansions of MNC, CD34+ cells, and CFU, respectively, showing low potential for clinical applications.

The DIDECO Pluricell system (Patent pending) is a commercially available bioreactor consisting of a 175 cm2 polystyrene expansion chamber, equipped with a series of filters and bags to permit the injection of media, gas, cells and outlets for sampling and collection of the expanded cells. Culture media and components are certified as serum-free. This culture system has been used to expand fresh and cryopreserved human CD34+-UCB cells for 12 days with an injection of fresh media on day 7 of culture. FACS analysis determined that most of the progenitors expanded were of myeloid and megakaryocytic lineage (Astori et al. 2005). In a 38 mL culture of fresh CD34+-UCB samples, 249.1 ± 49.5 and 33.0 ± 14.3-fold expansions of MNC and CD34+ cells were achieved, respectively. This system generated an average 1.75 × 108 MNC, just enough to transplant a 6 kg patient with 2.9 × 107 MNC/kg. The expanded cells showed significant engraftment in the NOD/SCID murine model, however human trials must be performed. This system showed a high MNC expansion, and the use of certified reagents for the culture may settle it for clinical trials.

Rotating wall vessels

Stirred tanks and perfusion chambers produce shear stress, which may cause mechanical damage to HSC. One approach to maintain homogeneous environment with low stress, is the use of rotating wall vessels (RWV). Liu et al. (2006) designed a RWV bioreactor to culture total MNC from UCB (Fig. 1). Cells were cultured at an increasing rotating speed from 0 to 6 rpm. The RWV achieved large expansion of MNC, however the engraftment capacity of the expanded cells was not evaluated. It will be necessary to study whether the cells are affected at the molecular level under these culture conditions. The authors suggested that the multi-step RWV bioreactor could expand a single cord blood to reach 1.2 × 109 MNC, enough to transplant an 80 kg patient (with the minimal amount of 1.5 × 107 CMN/kg). However, the cell dose is below the standards defined in the current guidelines for transplantation (Bornstein et al. 2005).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. Adapted from Liu et al. (2006)

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) developed two RWV bioreactors for tissue mass culture (Martin and Vermette 2005). The slow turn lateral vessel (STLV) bioreactor has been used to culture several kinds of cells both on Earth and in space. The STLV (Fig. 2a) was operated at 15–30 rpm on Earth and slower in space allowing a free-fall state, reducing the shear stress. The high aspect ratio vessel (HARV) bioreactor (Fig. 2b) has a similar design, but the rotating speed can be slower than STLV. Both systems were used to culture human embryonic stem cells (hESC), showing that STLV reduced the aggregation of hESC and they attained a 4-fold increase in productivity respect to the Petri dish cultures (Gerecht-Nir et al. 2004). The NASA-RWV systems have been used to study the effects of microgravity on murine HSC and evaluating the hematopoietic homeostasis during long space expeditions (Ohi et al. 2004). These RWV bioreactors could be tested for human HSC expansion for transplantation.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

NASA-RWV bioreactors. (a) Slow turn lateral vessel. (b) High aspect ratio vessel, adapted from Gerecht-Nir et al. (2004)

Novel systems

There are other strategies to design bioreactors minimizing shear stress. For example, Zellwerk GmbH-HiPer-Gruppe has developed a novel rotating bed perfusion (RBP) system equipped with ceramic carrier discs arranged horizontally (Fig. 3a). Discs rotate slowly allowing the cells to alternate between medium and air (Kasper et al. 2007). The RBP system has been used to culture osteoblasts and other kind of adherent cells, including stem cells, thus it may be a promising approach to expand HSC. Cesco Bioengineering Co., Ltd developed a novel disposable packed bed contractile (DPBC) bioreactor that provides low shear stress because it is not agitated and it does not need sparging air, resembling an artificial lung. The DPBC (Fig. 3b) has been successfully used to produce various proteins and viruses and it is suitable for adherent and non-adherent cell cultures including embryonic stem cells (Ho et al. 2004). The DPBC bioreactor could be used to expand HSC, but the recuperation of the cells from the bioreactor could be problematic.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) Rotating bed perfusion system, Zellwerk GmbH-HiPer-Gruppe. (b) Disposable packed bed contractile bioreactor, Cesco Bioengineering Co., adapted from Kasper et al. (2007) and Ho et al. (2004)

Concluding remarks

There is a growing range of clinical applications for UCB-HSC and a lack of efficient tools to expand them. The characterization of the optimal conditions for in vitro culture of HSC is still a challenge (Lim et al. 2007). The optimal combination and quantity of cytokines, use of serum, time of culture, initial cell density, enrichment of CD34+ cells, use of stroma, and other factors are not fully determined. The TPO, Flt-3L and SCF mix is used in most static and dynamic cultures for HSC expansion. In most cases, the time of culture is from 1 to 2 weeks, but no higher expansion is shown in the longer cultures and the optimum time of culture is uncertain. The maximum MNC expansion has been achieved in the low-rate agitated RWV system (435-fold). The largest volume used in bioreactors was 120 mL (De Leon et al. 1998) and larger scale-up has not been evaluated yet. Despite the few reports on the use of bioreactors for HSC expansion, it has been demonstrated that they are generally better platforms than static 2D cultures to expand MNC from UCB.

Considering the problems derived from long-term culture of stem cells such as phenotypic changes and chromosomal alterations (Josephson et al. 2006), it is necessary to establish characterization methods for expanded HSC to assure that cells maintain the same features and they are safe for transplantation. The characterization of cells must include the alterations by epigenetic factors, since they lead to aging and differentiation (Dykstra and de Hann 2008; Muller-Sieburg and Sieburg 2006; Attema et al. 2007). Transcriptomic and proteomic studies could be helpful for this purpose. The elucidation of mechanisms governing self-renewal and differentiation of HSC is needed to control the in vitro expansion.

Results from pilot clinical trials of transplants using expanded UCB-HSC have shown no adverse effects in the patients. However, more clinical trials must be conducted using expanded UCB-HSC for guarantying the safety.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by CONACYT-Fondos Sectoriales Salud Grant 13993 and Grant I0010-2007-01, the sabbatical fellowship 79973 and PhD scholarship 103403.

References

  1. Astori G, Adami V, Mambrini G, Bigi L, Cilli M, Facchini A, Falsaca E, Malangone W (2005) Evaluation of ex vivo expansion and engraftment in NOD/SCID mice of umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells using the DIDECO “Pluricell System”. Bone Marrow Transplant 35:1101–1106 [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Attema JL, Papathanasiou P, Forsberg EC, Xu J, Smale ST, Weissman IL (2007) Epigenetic characterization of hematopoietic stem cell differentiation using miniChIP and bisulfite sequencing analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:12371–12376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bornstein R, Flores AI, Montalban MA, del Rey MJ, de la Serna J, Gilsanz F (2005) A modified cord blood collection method achieves sufficient levels for transplantation in most adult patients. Stem cells 23:324–334 [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Cabrita GJ, Fereira BS, da Silva CL, Gonçalves R, Almeida-Porada G, Cabral JM (2003) Hematopoietic stem cells: from the bone to the bioreactor. Trends Biotechnol 21:233–240 [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Chivu M, Diaconu CC, Bleotu C, Alexiu I, Brasoveanu L, Cernescu C (2004) The comparison of different protocols for expansion of umbilical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cells. J Cell Mol Med 8:223–231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Collins PC, Nielsen LK, Patel SD, Papoutsakis ET, Miller WM (1998) Characterization of hematopoietic cell expansion, oxygen uptake and glycolysis in a controlled, stirred-tank bioreactor system. Biotechnol Prog 14:466–472 [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. De Leon A, Mayani H, Ramirez O (1998) Design, characterization and application of a minibioreactor for the culture of human hematopoietic cells under controlled conditions. Cytotechnology 28(1–3):127–138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. De León A, Barba-de la Rosa AP, Mayani H, Galindo E, Ramírez OT (2001) Two useful dimensionless parameters that combine physiological, operational and bioreactor design parameters for improved control of dissolved oxygen. Biotechnol Lett 23:1051–1056 [DOI]
  9. Devine SM, Lazarus HM, Emerson SG (2003) Clinical application of hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion: current status and future prospects. Bone Marrow Transplant 31:241–252 [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Dykstra B, de Hann G (2008) Hematopoietic stem cell aging and self-renewal. Cell Tissue Res 331:91–101 [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Ehring B, Biber TM, Upton TM, Plosky D, Pykett M, Rosenzweig M (2003) Expansion of HPCs from cord blood in a novel 3D matrix. Cytotherapy 5:490–499 [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Feng Q, Chai C, Jiang XS, Leong KW, Mao HQ (2006) Expansion of engrafting human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in three-dimensional scaffolds with surface-immobilized fibronectin. J Biomed Mater Res 78:781–791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Fujimoto N, Fujita S, Takashi T, Toguchida J, Kenji I, Hiroshi S, Hiroo I (2007) Microencapsulated an feeder cells as a source of soluble factors for expansion of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. Biomaterials 28:4795–4805 [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Gerecht-Nir S, Cohen S, Itskovitz-Eldor J (2004) Bioreactor cultivation enhances the efficiency of human embryoid body (hEB) formation and differentiation. Biotechnol Bioeng 86:493–502 [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HE, Auerbach AD (1989) Hematopoietic reconstitution of a patient with Fanconi anemia by means of umbilical cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling. N Engl J Med 321:1174–1178 [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Ho L, Greene CL, Schmidt AW, Huang LH (2004) Cultivation of HEK 293 cell line and production of a member of the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors for drug discovery applications using a highly efficient novel bioreactor. Cytotechnology 45:117–123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Hofmeister CC, Zhang J, Knight KL, Le P, Stiff PJ (2007) Ex vivo expansion of umbilical cord blood stem cells for transplantation: growing knowledge from the hematopoietic niche. Bone Marrow Transplant 39:11–23 [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Introna M, Franceschetti M, Ciocca A, Borleri G, Conti E, Golay J, Rambaldi A (2006) Rapid and massive expansion of cord blood-derived cytokine-induced killer cells: an innovative proposal for the treatment of leukemia relapse after cord blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 38:621–627 [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Jang YK, Jung DH, Jung MH, Kim DH, Yoo KH, Sung KW, Koo HH, Oh W, Yang YS, Yang SE (2006) Mesenchymal stem cells feeder layer from human umbilical cord blood for ex vivo expanded growth and proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Ann Hematol 85:212–225 [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Josephson R, Sykes G, Liu Y, Ording C, Xu W, Zeng X, Shin S, Loring J, Maitra A, Rao M, Auerbach J (2006) A molecular scheme for improved characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines. BMC Biol 4:28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Kasper C, Suck K, Anton F, Scheper T, Kall S, van Griensven M (2007) A newly developed rotating bed bioreactor for bone tissue engineering. In: Ashammakhi N, Reis R, Chiellini E (eds) Topics in tissue engineering. Oulu, Finland, pp 1–15
  22. Koller MR, Palsson MA, Manchel I,Maher RJ, Palsson BO (1998) Tissue culture surface characteristics influence the expansion of human bone marrow cells. Biomaterials 19:1963–1972 [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Kwon J, Kim BS, Kim MJ, Park HW (2003) Suspension culture of hematopoietic stem cells in stirred bioreactors. Biotechnol Lett 25:179–182 [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Lim M, Ye H, Panoskaltsis N, Drakakis EM, Yue X, Cass AE, Radomska A, Mantalaris A (2007) Intelligent bioprocessing for haemotopoietic cell cultures using monitoring and design of experiments. Biotechnol Adv 25:353–368 [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Liu Y, Liu T, Fan X, Ma X, Cui Z (2006) Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood in rotating wall vessel. J Biotechnol 124:592–601 [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Madlambayan GJ, Rogers I, Purpura KA, Ito C, Yu M, Kirouac D, Casper RF, Zandstra PW (2006) Clinically relevant expansion of hematopoietic stem cells with conserved function in a single-use, closed-system bioprocess. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 12:1020–1030 [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Martin Y, Vermette P (2005) Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: design, characterization, and recent advances. Biomaterials 26:7481–7503 [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Matsunaga T, Tanaka I, Kobune M, Kawano Y, Tanaka M, Kuribayashi K, Iyama S, Sato T, Sato Y, Takimoto R, Takayama T, Kato J, Ninomiya T, Hamada H, Niitsu Y (2006) Ex vivo large-scale generation of human platelets from cord blood CD34+ cells. Stem Cells 24:2877–2887 [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. Mohamed AA, Ibrahim AM, El-Masry MW, Manssur IM, Khroshied MA, Gouda HM, Riad RM (2006) Ex vivo expansion of stem cells: defining optimum conditions using various cytokines. Lab Hematol 12:86–93 [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. Muller-Sieburg CE, Sieburg HB (2006) The GOD of hematopoietic stem cells, a clonal diversity model of the stem cell compartment. Cell Cycle 5:394–398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  31. Ohi S, Roach AN, Ramsahai S, Kim BC, Fitzgerald W, Riley DA, Gonda SR (2004) The hematopoietic stem cell therapy for exploration of deep space. New Frontiers & Future Concepts. AIP Conf Proc 699:938–950 [DOI]
  32. Piacibello W, Sanavio F, Garetto L, Severino A, Dane A, Gammaitoni L, Aglietta M (1998) Differential growth factor requirement of primitive cord blood hematopoietic stem cell for self-renewal and amplification vs proliferation and differentiation. Leukemia 12:718–727 [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Qiu H, Fujimori Y, Kai S, Fujibayashi Y, Nishioka K, Hara H (2003) Establishment of mouse embryonic fibroblast cell lines that promote ex vivo expansion of human cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 12:39–46 [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Qunliang L, Qiwei L, Haibo C, Wen-Song T (2006) A comparative gene-expression analysis of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells grown in static and stirred culture systems. Cell Mol Biol Lett 11:475–487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  35. Robinson S, Niu T, de Lima M, Ng J, Yang H, McManis J, Karandish S, Sadeghi T, Fu P, del Angel M, O’Connor S, Dhamplin R, Shpall E (2005) Ex vivo expansion of umbilical cord blood. Cytotherapy 7:243–250 [DOI] [PubMed]
  36. Saulnier N, Di Campli C, Zocco MA, Di Gioacchino G, Novi M, Gasbarrini A (2005) From stem cell to solid organ. Bone marrow, peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood as favorable source? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 9:315–324 [PubMed]
  37. Schoemans H, Theunissen K, Maertens J, Boogaerts M, Verfaillie C, Wagner J (2006) Adult umbilical cord blood transplantation: a comprehensive review. Bone Marrow Transplant 38:83–93 [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Schubert H, Garrn I, Berthold A, Knauff WU, Reufi B, Fietz T, Gross UM (2004) Culture of haematopoietic cells in a 3D bioreactor made of Al2O3 or apatite foam. J Mater Sci Mater Med 4:331–334 [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Tong J, Gianni AM, Siena S, Srour EF, Bregni M, Hoffman R (1994) Primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells are present in peripheral blood autografts. Blood Cells 20:351–362, discussion 362–363 [PubMed]
  40. Unsworth BR, Lelkes PI (1998) Growing tissues in microgravity. Nat Med 4:901–907 [DOI] [PubMed]
  41. Van Zant G, Rummel SA, Koller MR, Larson DB, Drubachevsky I, Palsson M, Emerson SG (1994) Expansion in bioreactors of human progenitor populations from cord blood and mobilized peripheral blood. Blood Cells 20:482–491 [PubMed]
  42. Xie C, Jia B, Xiang Y, Wang L, Wang G, Huang G, McNiece IK, Wang J. (2006) Support of hMSCs transduced with TPO/FL genes to expansion of umbilical cord CD34+ cells in indirect co-culture. Cell Tissue Res 326:101–110 [DOI] [PubMed]
  43. Yamaguchi M, Hirayama F, Murahashi H, Azuma H, Sato N, Miyakazu H, Fukazawa K, Sawada K, Koike T, Kuwabara M, Ikeda H, Ikebuchi K (2002) Ex vivo expansion of UC blood primitive hematopoietic progenitors and transplantable stem cells using human primary BM stromal cells and human AB serum. Cytotherapy 4:109–118 [DOI] [PubMed]
  44. Yang S, Cai H, Jin H, Tan WS (2008) Hematopoietic reconstitution of CD34+ cells grown in static and stirred culture systems in NOD/SCID mice. Biotechnol Lett 30:61–65 [DOI] [PubMed]
  45. Yao CL, Fena SH, Lin XZ, Chu IM, Hsieh TB, Hwang SM (2006) Characterization of serum-free ex vivo-expanded hematopoietic cells derived from human umbilical cord blood CD133+ cells. Stem Cells Dev 15:70–78 [DOI] [PubMed]
  46. Yoo ES, Lee KE, Seo JW, Yoo EH, Lee MA, Im SA, Mun YC, Lee SN, Huh JW, Kim MJ, Jo DY, Ahn JY, Lee SM, Chung WS, Kim JH, Seong CM (2003) Adherent cells generated during long-term culture of human cord blood CD34+ cells have characteristics of endothelial cells and beneficial effect on cord blood ex vivo expansion. Stem Cells 21:228–235 [DOI] [PubMed]
  47. Zhai QL, Qiu LG, Li Q, Meng HX, Han JL, Herzig RH, Han ZC (2004) Short-term ex vivo expansion sustains the homing-related properties of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Haematologica 89:265–272 [PubMed]
  48. Zhang Y, Chai C, Jiang XS, Teoh SH, Leong KW (2006) Co-culture of umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells with human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng 12:2161–2170 [DOI] [PubMed]
  49. Zubler RH (2006) Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells and gene therapy development. Swiss Med Wkly 136:795–799 [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES