Abstract
The removal of the 5′ cap structure by the DCP1–DCP2 decapping complex irreversibly commits eukaryotic mRNAs to degradation. In human cells, the interaction between DCP1 and DCP2 is bridged by the Ge-1 protein. Ge-1 contains an N-terminal WD40-repeat domain connected by a low-complexity region to a conserved C-terminal domain. It was reported that the C-terminal domain interacts with DCP2 and mediates Ge-1 oligomerization and P-body localization. To understand the molecular basis for these functions, we determined the three-dimensional crystal structure of the most conserved region of the Drosophila melanogaster Ge-1 C-terminal domain. The region adopts an all α-helical fold related to ARM- and HEAT-repeat proteins. Using structure-based mutants we identified an invariant surface residue affecting P-body localization. The conservation of critical surface and structural residues suggests that the C-terminal region adopts a similar fold with conserved functions in all members of the Ge-1 protein family.
Keywords: decapping, EDC4, Hedls, mRNA decay, P-bodies
INTRODUCTION
mRNA degradation plays a central role in regulating gene expression. In eukaryotes this process is normally initiated by a gradual shortening of the poly(A) tail by deadenylation, followed by exonucleolytic digestion from the 3′ end by the exosome and its cofactors (Parker and Song 2004; Houseley et al. 2006). Alternatively, decay can also occur by the removal of the 5′ cap structure by the decapping enzyme DCP2 and subsequent 5′-to-3′ exonucleolytic degradation by XRN1 (Parker and Song 2004; Bail and Kiledjian 2006; Simon et al. 2006).
Decapping is an irreversible step in the decay pathway of bulk mRNA and is therefore tightly regulated. The decapping enzyme DCP2 requires additional proteins for full activity and/or stability. These proteins are generically termed decapping co-activators (or enhancers of decapping, EDCs), although they may activate decapping by different mechanisms (Parker and Song 2004; Bail and Kiledjian 2006; Simon et al. 2006). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, proteins that activate decapping include DCP1, the enhancer of decapping-1–3 (EDC1–3), the heptameric LSm1-7 complex, the DExH/D-box RNA helicase 1 (Dhh1, RCK/p54 in mammals or Me31B in Drosophila melanogaster), and Pat1 (Parker and Song 2004; Bail and Kiledjian 2006; Simon et al. 2006). S. cerevisiae DCP1 interacts directly with DCP2 and is required for decapping in vivo (She et al. 2004, 2006, 2008).
In human cells, the interaction between DCP1 and DCP2 appears to be mediated by the decapping activator Ge-1 (also known as EDC4 or Hedls, Human enhancer of decapping large subunit; Fenger-Grøn et al. 2005; Yu et al. 2005), which has no ortholog in S. cerevisiae. Ge-1, DCP1, and DCP2 are part of a multimeric protein complex, which also includes EDC3 and the RNA helicase RCK/p54 (Fenger-Grøn et al. 2005). All of these proteins colocalize in discrete cytoplasmic foci known as P-bodies (Eulalio et al. 2007a; Parker and Sheth 2007). Similarly, in Arabidopsis thaliana DCP1 and DCP2 interact with Varicose (the A. thaliana Ge-1 ortholog), suggesting that the role of Ge-1 as a physical bridge between DCP1 and DCP2 is conserved in multicellular organisms (Xu et al. 2006).
The Ge-1 protein family is characterized by an N-terminal seven-bladed β-propeller fold and a conserved C-terminal domain. The N-terminal and C-terminal globular domains are separated by a low-complexity region rich in serines (Ser-rich linker), which is thought to provide a flexible linker (Deyholos et al. 2003; Fenger-Grøn et al. 2005; Yu et al. 2005; Xu et al. 2006, Eulalio et al. 2007c). In Homo. sapiens, D. melanogaster, and A. thaliana, the Ge-1 proteins localize to P-bodies and are required for P-body integrity (Fenger-Grøn et al. 2005; Yu et al. 2005; Xu et al. 2006; Eulalio et al. 2007 b,c). Analysis of the subcellular localization of Ge-1 protein domains (N-terminal β-propeller domain, the Ser-rich linker, and the C-terminal domain) indicated that the C-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for P-body targeting (Yu et al. 2005; Xu et al. 2006; Eulalio et al. 2007c). In plants, this domain also mediates DCP1 and DCP2 interaction, as well as self-association (Xu et al. 2006). To shed light on the molecular basis for Ge-1 functions, we determined the three-dimensional structure of the highly conserved C-terminal region of D. melanogaster Ge-1 and identified an invariant surface residue that is crucial for P-body localization.
RESULTS
Crystal structure of the highly conserved C-terminal region of Ge-1
Human Ge-1 localizes to P-bodies via a C-terminal domain encompassed by residues 1020–1401, which correspond to residues 944–1354 in the D. melanogaster ortholog (Fig. 1A; Yu et al. 2005; Eulalio et al. 2007c). The very C-terminal end of this domain (residues 1220–1354, referred to as Ge-1C) is highly conserved across species (Fig. 1A, dark blue). Attempts to crystallize the entire C-terminal domain of D. melanogaster Ge-1 failed, despite the fact that this domain could be successfully expressed and purified. Well-diffracting crystals were, however, obtained with a shorter construct encompassing the C-terminal, highly conserved region of Ge-1 (Ge-1C; residues 1220–1354).
FIGURE 1.
Domain organization of Ge-1 and structure-based sequence alignment of the Ge-1 C-terminal region. (A) Schematic diagram of the domain organization of Ge-1. The N-terminal WD40-repeat domain is highlighted in light yellow. The C-terminal domain is highlighted in blue and the highly conserved C-terminal region (Ge-1C), is colored in dark blue. The numbering corresponds to the D. melanogaster Ge-1 ortholog (CG6181, SwissProt entry Q9VKK1). (B) A multiple sequence alignment of Ge-1 orthologs from D. melanogaster, H. sapiens, Mus musculus, Xenopus laevis, Danio rerio, C. elegans, and A. thaliana. Invariant residues are highlighted in green while significantly conserved residues (>65% conservation) are highlighted in yellow. Asterisks indicate residues mutagenized in this study; dots indicate residues involved in the dimerization interface.
The structure was solved using single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) data collected from a crystal of selenomethionine-substituted protein. There are two molecules in the crystal asymmetric unit (molecules A and B), related by a noncrystallographic dyad axis. The final model is refined at a resolution of 1.9 Å, with final free-R and working-R factors of 25.4% and 21.1%, respectively, and excellent stereochemistry (Table 1). In molecule A, essentially all residues in the electron density are well ordered, while the other molecule, B, contains a disordered region (residues 1256–1265). In both chains, the peptide sequence Gly-Ala-Met-Gly precedes the residue Asp1220 and is derived from the expression vector; this sequence is ordered and forms an additional turn at the start of the N-terminal α-helix.
TABLE 1.
Data collection and phasing statistics
The C-terminal region of Ge-1 is constructed of α-helical hairpin repeats
The crystal structure of Ge-1C (residues 1220–1354) consists of seven α-helices (α1–3 and α5–8) arranged in helix–turn–helix hairpins (Fig. 2A). The tandem stacking of the helical motifs gives rise to a superhelical architecture with an overall right-handed twist. The regular packing of the hairpins is interrupted by a short α-helical insert in the second hairpin repeat (α4), producing a marked kink in the molecule. The α4 insertion is disordered in one of the two molecules in the asymmetric unit (molecule B), suggesting conformational flexibility.
FIGURE 2.
The C-terminal region of Ge-1 adopts a helical-repeat fold similar to that of ARM/HEAT repeat proteins. (A) Ribbon diagram of Ge-1C in three orientations related by a 90° rotation around a vertical axis. Disordered portions of the polypeptide chains are indicated with dashed lines. Conserved residues discussed in the text are highlighted as sticks. All ribbon diagrams were generated using Pymol (http://www.pymol.org). (B) Structural superpositions of the Ge-1 C-terminal domain (colored blue) with the helical-repeat protein importin-α (colored pink, PDB entry 1ee5). The molecules are viewed as in the left panel of A. (C) Ge-1 crystallographic dimer viewed down the noncrystallographic twofold axis, with the two polypeptide chains in the asymmetric unit colored in blue and green respectively. The close-up shows the residues at the interface, with water molecules shown as red spheres. Hydrogen-bonding interactions are indicated with black dashed lines.
A search of the Protein Data Bank using the DALI server (Holm and Sander 1995) revealed that the superhelical architecture of Ge-1C is similar to proteins composed of right-handed α-helical repeats, such as armadillo (ARM) repeat and Huntington-elongation-A-subunit-TOR (HEAT) repeat proteins. The closest structural homologs include, among others, the ARM-repeat protein importin-α (Conti and Kuriyan 2000), the 14-3-3 protein (Rittinger et al. 1999), and the HEAT repeat protein eIF4GII (Fig. 2B; Marcotrigiano et al. 2001). These proteins superpose with root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 3.2 Å over 116 α-carbon atoms (Cα), of 3.3 Å over 94 Cα, and of 3.6 Å over 116 Cα, respectively. The similarity to 14-3-3 is only structural, as the positively charged phosphate-binding pocket in 14-3-3 is not conserved in Ge-1.
The C-terminal region of D. melanogaster Ge-1 remains monomeric in solution
In the crystal form we obtained, the two Ge-1C molecules in the asymmetric unit dimerize in a head-to-tail fashion (Fig. 2C). The dimerization interface is extensive, burying 13% of the surface of each monomer (932 Å2 of surface area buried out of 7416 Å2), as calculated using the PISA server (Krissinel and Henrick 2007). The helices α1 and α2 of one polypeptide chain contact helices α5 and α7 of the other polypeptide (Fig. 2C). The central portion of the dimer interface involves van der Waals contacts between Leu1240 of one monomer and a hydrophobic pocket lined with the side chains of Leu1239, Leu1240, and His1236 within the other monomer (Figs. 2C, 1B). Water molecules mediate interchain hydrogen-bonding interactions between the backbone of Leu1239 and Leu1240 and the side chains of Ser1274, Gln1277, Gln1278, and His1311. Several of these amino acid residues are evolutionarily conserved. In particular, Leu1239, Ser1274, and Gln1278 are invariant (Fig. 1B), and Gln1277 and His1311 are present in most Ge-1 orthologs (except in Caenorhabditis elegans).
The extents of both the dimerization interface observed in the crystals and the conservation of the residues mediating this self-association suggest a physiological dimer. Therefore we analyzed the behavior of Ge-1C in solution by coupling size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 column) to a static light scattering device (Viscotek). We found that Ge-1C elutes as a single peak of ∼18 kDa molecular weight and with monodispersity of less than 1.010 (Supplemental Figure 1), indicating that D. melanogaster Ge-1C remains monomeric in solution. Nevertheless, it is possible that Ge-1C contributes to self-association in the context of the entire C-terminal domain. Indeed, the entire C-terminal domain (residues 944–1354) oligomerizes in solution (data not shown). In agreement with this, self-association was also observed with the entire C-terminal domain of A. thaliana Ge-1 (Xu et al. 2006).
Functional analysis of conserved surface residues in Ge-1C
Mapping amino acid conservation onto the molecular surface of Ge-1C reveals several conserved surface residues in addition to Ser1274 and Gln1278 discussed above (Figs. 2A, 3). The invariant Asp1305 caps the N terminus of helix α7 and may therefore be conserved for structural reasons, to stabilize the helix dipole (Figs. 1B, 2A, 3). Similarly, Asp1243 caps the N terminus of helix α3 (Figs. 1B, 2A, 3). In contrast, Ser1274, Glu1277, Glu1278 (helix α5), and Arg1340 on the solvent-exposed surface of helix α8 are unlikely to be conserved for structural reasons (Figs. 1B, 2A, 3). We therefore tested whether the conservation of these residues might be important for functional reasons. To this end, Ser1274 and Glu1277, which form a conserved patch on the crystal packing interface of Ge-1C, were each substituted by a large positively charged residue (Arg). We also substituted Arg1340, located on the opposite side of the molecule, with glutamic acid (R1340E). We examined the effect of these mutations on DCP1 and DCP2 binding as well as on P-body localization in the context of the full-length protein.
FIGURE 3.
Identification of conserved molecular surfaces of Ge-1C. (A) Surface conservation within Ge-1C in the same orientations as in Figure 2A. The colors range from green for invariant residues to white for nonconserved residues. The representation was generated based on the sequence alignment shown in Figure 1B using the ConSurf server (Landau et al. 2005).
To test the interaction with DCP1 and DCP2, we coexpressed GFP fusions of these proteins with HA-tagged Ge-1 wild type or mutants and assayed whether they could be coimmunoprecipitated from cell lysates using anti-HA antibodies. An HA-tagged version of maltose binding protein (HA-MBP) served as a negative control. We found that both GFP-DCP1 and GFP-DCP2 coimmunoprecipitated with full-length HA-Ge-1, as well as with the proteins carrying the amino acid substitutions described above (Fig. 4A, lanes 10–12,14–16, respectively), indicating that the conserved residues are not critical for these interactions. This is consistent with the report that the corresponding Ge-1C fragment is dispensable for interactions with DCP1 and DCP2 in A. thaliana (Xu et al. 2006). Instead, the upstream less conserved part of the C-terminal domain interacted with both DCP2 and DCP1, although the interaction with DCP1 was less efficient than that with full-length Ge-1 (Xu et al. 2006).
FIGURE 4.
Functional analysis of conserved molecular surfaces of Ge-1. (A) HA-tagged maltose binding protein (MBP), Ge-1 wild type or the indicated Ge-1 mutants were cotransfected in S2 cells with GFP-DCP1 or GFP-DCP2, as indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using a monoclonal anti-HA antibody. HA-MBP served as a negative control. Inputs (1.25%) and immunoprecipitates (30%) were analyzed by Western blotting using polyclonal anti-HA and anti-GFP antibodies. Asterisks indicate cross-reactivity of the polyclonal anti-HA antibody with an endogenous protein (input panels) or cross-reactivity with the immunoglobulin heavy chain by the secondary antibody (IP panels). (B) HA-tagged MBP or Me31B were cotransfected in S2 cells with GFP-Ge-1 or GFP-EDC3. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using a monoclonal anti-HA antibody. Inputs (1.25%) and immunoprecipitates (30%) were analyzed by Western blotting using polyclonal anti-HA and anti-GFP antibodies. (C) Confocal fluorescent micrographs of fixed S2 cells expressing GFP-fusions of full length Ge-1 (wild-type, wt) or mutant proteins. Cells were stained with affinity-purified anti-Tral antibodies. The fraction of cells exhibiting a staining identical to that shown in the representative panel was determined by scoring at least 100 cells in two independent transfections performed per protein. The merged images show the GFP signal in green and the Tral signal in red. Scale bar: 5 μm.
Although we do not know whether the interaction of Ge-1 with DCP1 or DCP2 is direct or mediated by additional proteins, we can rule out the possibility that under our experimental conditions we are coimmunoprecipitating large protein aggregates (e.g., submicroscopic P-bodies), because under these conditions we could not detect an association between Ge-1 and additional P-body components including Me31B, EDC3, or HPat (Fig. 4B; data not shown). As a positive control, Me31B coimmunoprecipitated with HA-EDC3 as reported before (Fig. 4B; Tritschler et al. 2007).
We next tested the effect of the substitutions on P-body localization. As reported before, we found that GFP-tagged Ge-1 accumulated in cytoplasmic foci (Eulalio et al. 2007 b,c), which correspond to endogenous P-bodies as judged by the staining with antibodies to Tral (Trailer Hitch, a P-body marker in D. melanogaster; Fig. 4C; Eulalio et al. 2007 a,b). In contrast, a GFP-tagged protein carrying the R1340E substitution distributed diffusely throughout the cytoplasm and formed fewer GFP foci in a subset of cells (Fig. 4C). To quantify this effect the number of cells displaying GFP foci was counted. Whereas more than 90% of cells expressing wild-type GFP-Ge1 displayed GFP foci (Fig. 4C), only 62% of cells expressing the R1340E mutant displayed GFP foci, which were reduced in number. Note that the number and size of endogenous P-bodies was not affected in these cells (Fig. 4C). Moreover, ∼31% of cells expressing the mutant protein had no detectable GFP foci (Fig. 4C).
The expression of the R1340E mutant was comparable to that of the wild type (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the substitution has no significant effect on the general folding or stability of Ge-1. The effect of this mutation appears to be specific, as substitutions of the conserved residues Ser1274 or Gln1277 (S1274R, Q1277R) did not affect the accumulation of the protein into endogenous P-bodies (Fig. 4C). Moreover, because the R1340E substitution does not affect the interaction between Ge-1and DCP1 or DCP2, we conclude that these interactions are not sufficient to direct Ge-1 to P-bodies. Together our results argue that the highly conserved C-terminal region of Ge-1 has an essential role in promoting its accumulation in P-bodies.
Conclusions
The C-terminal highly conserved region of Ge-1 consists of tandem α-helical repeats. We crystallized a protein fragment in which the first four N-terminal residues were encoded by the expression vector. These N-terminal amino acids are well ordered and form part of the N-terminal α-helix of Ge-1C, suggesting that the truncated construct we crystallized interrupts an element of secondary structure that is likely completed by a few amino acid residues in the native sequence. It is possible that the whole C-terminal domain, including the less conserved region, consists of α-helical hairpins, which stack to form an elongated molecule, somewhat similar to other elongated α-helical repeat proteins (Jinek et al. 2004; Conti et al. 2006). Such proteins are typically scaffolds, whose surface mediates interactions with other macromolecules.
In the case of Ge-1, the surface centered at Arg1340 is critical for P-body localization, suggesting that interactions with other P-body component(s) drive Ge-1 into P-bodies. Given the evolutionary conservation of this residue, this localization mechanism is likely to be conserved across species. A spatially distinct and evolutionary conserved surface, centered at Ser1274, Gln1277, and Gln1278, is involved in crystal packing. This surface may contribute to Ge-1 self-association in vivo or may represent a site where other P-body components, distinct from DCP1 or DCP2, interact.
Ge-1 is an essential P-body component in D. melanogaster and human cells, as when it is depleted the remaining P-body components disperse throughout the cytoplasm (Yu et al. 2005; Eulalio et al. 2007 b,c). Like many P-body proteins, Ge-1 has a modular domain organization. Such modularity may enable Ge-1 to interact with multiple P-body components simultaneously, bringing them into close proximity and thereby facilitating P-body assembly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Protein expression, purification, and crystallization
The C-terminal region of D. melanogaster Ge-1 (Swissprot entry Q9VKK1, residues 1220–1354) was subcloned into a pET-derived expression vector, in frame with the NusA protein, a hexahistidine affinity tag, and a TEV protease cleavage sequence. The resulting fusion protein was expressed in the Escherichia coli strain BL21 Gold (Stratagene) at 20°C by inducing with 0.5 mM IPTG for 16 h. Cells were lysed by sonication in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol. The protein was purified by affinity chromatography using Ni2+-NTA agarose (Qiagen) and cleaved with TEV protease. The released affinity tag was removed by a subtractive Ni2+-affinity step. The protein was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography in 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, and concentrated to ∼4 mg mL−1. Needle-like crystals of Ge-1 were grown at 18°C using the sitting-drop vapor diffusion method by mixing 2 μL of protein solution with 1 μL of reservoir solution containing 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.2) and 20%–30% (w/v) PEG 3350. Selenomethionine-substituted Ge-1 was expressed in the E. coli strain DL41, purified as the native protein, and crystallized in 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.2) and 21% (w/v) PEG 3350.
Structure determination
For data collection at 100 K, native and selenomethionine-substituted crystals were soaked briefly in 100 mM Tris (pH 8.2), 20% (w/v) PEG 3350, 20% (v/v) PEG 400, and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. Both native and selenomethionine single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) data (measured at the Se K-absorption wavelength 0.97897 Å) were collected at beamline X06SA of the Swiss Light Source (Villigen, Switzerland) and processed with XDS (Kabsch 1993). Seven selenium sites were located using the Hybrid Structure Search (HySS) module of the PHENIX package (Grosse-Kunstleve and Adams 2003). Substructure refinement, phasing, and density modification were performed using AutoSHARP (Bricogne et al. 2003), yielding an initial electron density map revealing two polypeptide chains in the asymmetric unit. This was followed by noncrystallographic twofold symmetry averaging, phase extension, and initial automated chain tracing using RESOLVE (Terwilliger 2003). The atomic model was completed by automated model building in ARP/wARP and subsequent iterative cycles of manual model building in COOT (Emsley and Cowtan 2004) and TLS refinement in REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al. 1997) against the high-resolution native data set. The final atomic model has been refined to a free-R factor of 25.4% and a working-R factor of 21.1%, with good stereochemistry (Table 1), and contains two polypeptide chains in the asymmetric unit. Chain A comprises residues 1220–1350, with the exception of residues 1262–1265, for which no electron density is observed. Chain B consists of residues 1220–1255 and 1266–1353, with the residues 1256–1265 disordered.
Transfection of S2 cells and fluorescence microscopy
cDNAs encoding full-length EDC3, Me31B, DCP1, DCP2, and Ge-1 were described before (Eulalio et al. 2007 b,c). Mutants of D. melanogaster Ge-1 were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the Quick Change mutagenesis kit from Stratagene and the appropriate oligonucleotide sequences. All constructs were fully sequenced to confirm the presence of the mutations and the absence of additional mutations.
Transfections were performed in six-well dishes using Effectene transfection reagent (Qiagen). Three days after transfection, S2 cells were allowed 15 min to adhere to poly-D-Lysine-coated coverslips, washed once in serum-free medium, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min, followed by 5 min incubation in methanol at −20°C. After fixation, cells were washed in PBS, permeabilized for 5 min with PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100, and washed again with PBS. Cells were stained with affinity purified anti-Tral antibodies (Eulalio et al. 2007 b,c) diluted 1:250 in PBS containing 1% BSA. TRITC-coupled goat secondary antibody (Molecular Probes) was used in a dilution of 1:250. Cells were mounted using Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc.). Images were acquired using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope.
Coimmunoprecipitation assays and Western blotting
For coimmunoprecipitations, S2 cells were collected 3 d after transfection, washed with PBS, and resuspended in NET buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100) supplemented with protease inhibitors. Cells were lysed by three 30-sec sonication treatments, followed by 15 min incubation on ice. Cells were spun at 16,000g for 15 min at 4°C. Anti-HA antibodies (Covance Research Products) were added to the supernatants (2.5 μL / 2 × 106 cells). After 1 h at 4°C, 25 μL of Protein G-agarose (Roche) were added and the mixtures were rotated 1 h at 4°C. Beads were washed three times with NET buffer and once with NET buffer without Triton X-100. Bound proteins were eluted with sample buffer.
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked in PBS containing 5% fat-free milk powder and 0.3% Tween-20. Western blotting was performed with polyclonal anti-HA antibodies (1:1000; Sigma; catalog number H6908) and anti-GFP antibodies (1:2000), using the CDP-Star chemiluminescent immunoblot system (Western-Star kit from Tropix), as recommended by the manufacturer.
Data deposition
The atomic coordinates and structure factors for D. melanogaster Ge-1C have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under access code 2VXG.
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
Supplemental material can be found at http://www.rnajournal.org.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to J. Basquin, A. Cook, and A. Scholz for help with crystallization screens and to C. Basquin and J. Tittor for static light scattering experiments. We thank C. Schulze-Briese and the staff at the PX beamlines of the Swiss Light Source for assistance with data collection. This study was supported by the Max Planck Society and by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, FOR855).
Footnotes
Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.rnajournal.org/cgi/doi/10.1261/rna.1222908.
REFERENCES
- Bail, S., Kiledjian, M. More than 1 + 2 in mRNA decapping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006;13:7–9. doi: 10.1038/nsmb0106-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bricogne, G., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Schiltz, M., Paciorek, W. Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: Recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2003;59:2023–2030. doi: 10.1107/s0907444903017694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conti, E., Kuriyan, J. Crystallographic analysis of the specific yet versatile recognition of distinct nuclear localization signals by karyopherin α. Structure. 2000;8:329–338. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00107-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conti, E., Müller, C.W., Stewart, M. Karyopherin flexibility in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2006;16:237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deyholos, M.K., Cavaness, G.F., Hall, B., King, E., Punwani, J., Van Norman, J., Sieburth, L.E. VARICOSE, a WD-domain protein, is required for leaf blade development. Development. 2003;130:6577–6588. doi: 10.1242/dev.00909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emsley, P., Cowtan, K. Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eulalio, A., Behm-Ansmant, I., Izaurralde, E. P bodies: At the crossroads of post-transcriptional pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007a;8:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrm2080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eulalio, A., Behm-Ansmant, I., Schweizer, D., Izaurralde, E. P-body formation is a consequence, not the cause of RNA-mediated gene silencing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007b;27:3970–3981. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00128-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eulalio, A., Rehwinkel, J., Stricker, M., Huntzinger, E., Yang, S.-F., Doerks, T., Dorner, S., Bork, P., Boutros, M., Izaurralde, E. A target-specific requirement for enhancers of decapping in miRNA-mediated gene silencing. Genes & Dev. 2007c;21:2558–2570. doi: 10.1101/gad.443107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fenger-Grøn, M., Fillman, C., Norrild, B., Lykke-Andersen, J. Multiple processing body factors and the ARE binding protein TTP activate mRNA decapping. Mol. Cell. 2005;20:905–915. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Adams, P.D. Substructure search procedures for macromolecular structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2003;59:1966–1973. doi: 10.1107/s0907444903018043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holm, L., Sander, C. Dali: A network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1995;20:478–480. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89105-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houseley, J., LaCava, J., Tollervey, D. RNA-quality control by the exosome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7:529–539. doi: 10.1038/nrm1964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jinek, M., Rehwinkel, J., Lazarus, B.D., Izaurralde, E., Hanover, J.A., Conti, E. The superhelical TPR-repeat domain of O-linked GlcNAc transferase exhibits structural similarities to importin α. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:1001–1007. doi: 10.1038/nsmb833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabsch, W. Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993;26:795–800. [Google Scholar]
- Krissinel, E., Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;372:774–797. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landau, M., Mayrose, I., Rosenberg, Y., Glaser, F., Martz, E., Pupko, T., Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2005: The projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W299–W302. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marcotrigiano, J., Lomakin, I.B., Sonenberg, N., Pestova, T.V., Hellen, C.U., Burley, S.K. A conserved HEAT domain within eIF4G directs assembly of the translation initiation machinery. Mol. Cell. 2001;7:193–203. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00167-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murshudov, G.N., Vagin, A.A., Dodson, E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker, R., Sheth, U. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol. Cell. 2007;25:635–646. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker, R., Song, H. The enzymes and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:121–127. doi: 10.1038/nsmb724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rittinger, K., Budman, J., Xu, J., Volinia, S., Cantley, L.C., Smerdon, S.J., Gamblin, S.J., Yaffe, M.B. Structural analysis of 14-3-3 phosphopeptide complexes identifies a dual role for the nuclear export signal of 14-3-3 in ligand binding. Mol. Cell. 1999;4:153–166. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80363-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- She, M., Decker, C.J., Sundramurthy, K., Liu, Y., Chen, N., Parker, R., Song, H. Crystal structure of Dcp1p and its functional implications in mRNA decapping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:249–256. doi: 10.1038/nsmb730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- She, M., Decker, C.J., Chen, N., Tumati, S., Parker, R., Song, H. Crystal structure and functional analysis of Dcp2p from Schizosaccharomyces pombe . Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006;13:63–70. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- She, M., Decker, C.J., Svergun, D.I., Round, A., Chen, N., Muhlrad, D., Parker, R., Song, H. Structural basis of dcp2 recognition and activation by dcp1. Mol. Cell. 2008;29:337–349. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon, E., Camier, S., Séraphin, B. New insights into the control of mRNA decapping. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006;31:241–243. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terwilliger, T.C. SOLVE and RESOLVE: Automated structure solution and density modification. Methods Enzymol. 2003;374:22–37. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(03)74002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tritschler, F., Eulalio, A., Truffault, V., Hartmann, M.D., Helms, S., Schmidt, S., Coles, M., Izaurralde, E., Weichenrieder, O. A divergent Sm-fold in EDC3 proteins mediates DCP1-binding and P-body targeting. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007;27:8600–8611. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01506-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J., Yang, J.Y., Niu, Q.W., Chua, N.H. Arabidopsis DCP2, DCP1, and VARICOSE form a decapping complex required for postembryonic development. Plant Cell. 2006;18:3386–3398. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu, J.H., Yang, W.H., Gulick, T., Bloch, K.D., Bloch, D.B. Ge-1 is a central component of the mammalian cytoplasmic mRNA processing body. RNA. 2005;11:1795–1802. doi: 10.1261/rna.2142405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





